{"id":223921,"date":"2009-08-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-03-08T18:58:58","modified_gmt":"2015-03-08T13:28:58","slug":"chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja &#8230; vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja &#8230; vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And H.Billappa<\/div>\n<pre>iii' THE HIGH COURT OF KARE-\u20ac:'\u00a5fAliA AT BA;'~EG.Ai,OR\u00a7\u00a7}__\n\nDATED THIS THE 3*\" am' OF AUGUST, 2999 2 'f w f  \n\nPR\u00a3S}3ZN\u00b0'I'\n\nTHE HoN*BLi~: MR. .I*LES'i'IC}'~3 m*%:5::; \"    V\n\nAND\n\n'I'\u00a3-iii; HQNBLE MR.  H. i\u00a7:L.Lz2_i?A?;r\u00a7,   \n\nM.F.A_,. \ufb01e. 2:~;%2;2\u00a7ri\u00a7_s~3M '\u00bb\n\nBETWEEN :      *\n\nu.........m4--s\u00bb-.-...u-\u00bb...\u00bb..\u00bb.n. ..\n\nCHg%.N1)RA m\u00a7\u20ac:r\u00a5;Vi.\u00a3l\u00a3V{)I:(\u00a7V\u00a7L\u00a7{':'_V'     &amp;\n3:0. WLNJA D1:W:L&gt;\u00bb:GA' A  \nM,A.3c&gt;R  %%%%   \"\nREG. KLELLIE\u00bb\/\u00a3Ai\\\u00a7E'V_--~V  \nEANKESHWARAROAD \" '  \nBYEEDOGR, KEENDAPUR T;;LUK  A _ \n5130?; 13131'.  ~  ';...,~;}\"i.;is:.;-:%%\u00bb?s;v&lt;_zg&#039;s;I1f?_, S;&#039;3&amp;IEB\n-- -- _  \u00a7T\u00ab:s%';'~\u00e9Gi_,:%I';L1 VILLAGE\nV  '\u00a7{{.;\u00a7E'D;3\u00a73URA TALUK.\n\n\n\n2. RAYI ALI\n\nS20. HASSANABBA ALLIABB\nMAJOR, R30. H. No. 4:22:25\n\nNEAR AIRPORT PLAZA\nVASCODAGAIVIA, GOA.   .\n\n3. THE NEW ENDIA ASSURANCE CO.. 1.T1\"i  ' \n\nBRANCH OFFICE, SANTHA PAI.,_IGA ENLDXNG     E  .\n13\" FLOOR, VASCOQAGAMA, GOA, A   \nREE. BY XTS BRANCH MANAGER.  \n\n4. MQHAMMED ISMAIL A \u00abE\n\n3:0.ME.K.Ez;zA1EmE1nNrN..E'E'.E  E ..\nALI MANZIL, MUSLIM sT1\u00a7EEf.':\" .  \nSHIRURU. '  5  .. \n\n5. UNITEE iN}3)L5i 1N%AEE%E.a.NcENE:c;E.% 1\u00a7N&gt;.... A\n\nBRANCH OFFICE;KA1'ICHN\u00a7_{'~E.TOWERS\nNH. 17,-I{L?2$E_I),APU'.'i?;.;*&amp;    A\nREP. Bag' rrs EEANCN MgEsgxGEE.\n\n6. L\u00a7\u00a7A'r'H \" _   \nsic. BHA.Sf;AR;.ACHA;?:'.Y\u00ab...\n'fEI)THARE VILLAS '\n Emgmk  ..... \n - KU?=~IDA.P'*URA TALUK. A ... EESPONDEEWE\n\n(B:;r'S:i.'V}\u00e9- NANEEESNEEEPA. ADV, FOR R-3\n\n -  Sri. ?.B'.'Rz1;3'{}, Am;.;E0R R-5)\n\nmum\n\n:    ..jE=T1:iI;'}..MFA IS F\u00a3LE:D UNDER SECTIQN may OF THE\n\n \"'M\"'\u20ac_AC'?\u00bb.AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED\n\n'- 'NV-2%3.E';--*.2:;z.:;r5 PASSE9 EN MVC Ne. 2040:2601 ON THE FILE OF\n\n 'ENE _CI'VIL JUDGE (sE..\u00a7N.) AND MEEEEER. AIBDL. MACT,\n\n E N ..Kt;NDAPURA, PAR'I'L'r' ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION'\n\n \"*--\u00ab_F'C~'f: COMPENSATION EEN3 SEEKING ENHANCEMENT GF\n V(':OMPENSA'I'ION.\n\n\n\nT\u00a7\"iIS AFPEAL COMING {EN FOR HEARING THIS DAY'\n PATEL 3', DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING;\n\nJLFD GZMENT\n\nThis appeal is directed against the judgnem and   V'\n\n23.022905 passe\u00e9 in MVC No. 204ez20G1+--on t.~'\"1e;  :,,;,~;\u00a7:~;;e:3. \n\nCivil Judge (Samar Division) and Aa:1dii;g;i;:.;T \":;ao\u00e9\u00a2;\u00bbi %'g;\u00a7c;c1e\u00a7\u00a7ig%\n\nCziairris Tribunal (for shaft 'Claig\u00e9zs-.n\"\u00a3*::ibun\u00a3i}')\u00a7  \nClaims Tribunai by its judgmgmt gn\u00a3'i\" L.awari\u00a71e'\u00a2i'-Aa~-Sjlxrzz of\nRs.1,'}'8,600f'- with interest at 4{3'%'c;_'fr&lt;$1:1 pgiiiion till the\n\niiate cf reaiisatian. &#039;&quot;.\u00a3&quot;ta\u00e9::&quot;ag3peiE\u00a7gi;rVV1&#039;tV&#039;_\u00a7ia$::  appeal on\n\nthe gmun\ufb01 that  giriwgiviint a\ufb01varded by the Tribunai is\n\ninadequate ans:i=1\u00a7:e  erit--itl\u00e9c\u00a3 &#039;Ibr \u20ac:1hancement.\n\n , A   ciaigtns is he a kkader by professinn. Tizai: on\n\n S3-:\u00a73.3\u20ac3 ;::-.111 near Naerga\u00e9cie cf&#039; ?adz:va:&quot;i viilage\n\n fhe appellant&quot;x$*a\u00e9\u00abTpf0ceeding \ufb01em Smith 13:} north an a Bajaj Scaeter\n\nr&amp;gi&#039;s\u00a7\u00a7at\u00a30n Na KA-29-H-3203 as a pi\ufb02iozz ri\ufb01er, Fourth\n\n &#039;1ta:S;&#039;so\u00a7I:\u00a7a2i\u00a3 was riding the said smote? beionging ti: sixfia respo\ufb01cieni\n\nVT  they were pmceeding ne Neergadde, a mini lorry bearing\n\n fagistratien N0. GA-{)2 &quot;$38 . e \ufb01om the appes\u00e9te direction in\n\n\n\na rash and negligent nzanner and \ufb01ashe\u00e9 against the scooter.  a\n\nreszzit of the said accident, the appeiiani fail dawn and stsstanged\n\ngievnus injuries. The sai\u00e9 accident occurred 0:: &amp;s&#039;.3\u00a3&#039;3(}Ui\u00a7&quot;\u00a3 of the  x\n\nand negligent driving of the mini 30:13; by its driver.   *\n\n\ufb02ied a ciaizn petition claiming a compensat\u00e9nn  \n\nunder different heads. The said ciairn p\u20acii:TiiOIi::._\u00a7:21Ii;1e tap Tf\n\nTribunal for consideration on 23.Q&#039;?.&#039;2Vf\ufb01}&#039;;S.?V&quot;}7hnA{&#039;23.n\u00a7tns\nhearing ban: the sides? after \u00a7;n;3\u00a3ide2:in%\u00a3;t}:1.e&#039;&lt;3{\u00a7a1 nnd&#039;\ufb01r%\u00a2t;n\u00a7entar};\nevicience and other i&#039;f31\u20aci5\\\u00ab&#039;8.n1;VIi1&#039;Z.&#039;;3;\u20ac7:1\u00a3&#039;&quot;\u00a78.&quot;i--:\u00a7%\u00a7\u00a7\u20ac*Wed the ciann\npetitien in part; and anxargied nrith interest at\n\n6% \ufb01om nae ._dain V&#039;:-f*~..neti1;\u00a3&lt;;n &#039;iii}* the date of reaiisation. &#039;nae\n\naompensafinn *e1n&lt;;untV&#039;;:)afg?;::b\u00a7\u00a7:.&#039;is*;ia;\u00a7\u00a7 apportinned between the \ufb01\ufb01h\n\n_ and  fesgpondnnts.   and 80% respectively. The appellant\n\nV.  pra_sn1}t:.}}\u00a3 instanit appeal on ihe geund that the cempensaiion\n\n &#039;{&#039;rib1;nai \u00e9s inadequate and he is enii\ufb02ed for\n\nV et\ufb01zanc\u00e9ineiziEfei\u00e9mpensation.\n\n   &#039;3.-n&#039;The subn\ufb01ssien of the ieame\u00e9 counsel appeaxnig ii)? the\n\n.: *p\u00a7}\ufb01\u00a7i;az}{ is that, tlite Cianns Tribunai has commitied 3 gave error in\n\nA&quot;&quot;&#039;2i\u00a7v.arding 2:, gain of Rs.1,34, 5- tewards 2-ass sf \ufb01ltnre eaznings.\n\n\n\nThe Claims Tribunal withaut taking ink} consideraiian the age ofthe\n\nappeilarzt has not appiied the appropriate multiplier and has not \n\ninto consideratitm the reasonabie income cf the appellant.  &quot; \n\nit needs m be modified. He \ufb01mher submitted t23_a1l_ &quot;%ii2.s% &lt;:%1a:;?1;\u00bbg\u00a7 T   \n\nTribuna} has not awarded any amount tow.-;9ards I0ss iwi&#039; 2i:rnef;1ii\u00bb;:s;VV_ \u00e9fifi _ \n\n1if% and the game needs it) be g1&#039;a;1fe_d b\u00a7$4&quot;\u00a3his* &#039;V\n\nsubmitted \u00a3113&#039;: the amount awar\u00e9ed  \ufb02aizn\u00e9&quot; Tribizfial fgwards\npair; sufferings, conveyance; &#039;z&#039;;r)uri:;\ufb01n1_\u00e9ht 1.  ~- .aHen\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01t Hv\u00e9harges\nneeds to be enhanced by this CQ;;_1&quot;&#039;i;.   VV &#039;D\n\n4. L\u00a2ame\u00e9A\u00e9b::.\ufb01s\u00a7i3&#039;for&#039;thifd__and_&#039;\ufb01\ufb01h respondents M Insurance<\/pre>\n<p>Csmpanies \u00a2\u20ac;r;i\u00e9;1de\u00e9i&#8221;&#8216;:lia&#8217;\u00e9, i.&#8217;1;\u00e9 &#8216;g\u00e9gneni anti award passe\u00e9 by the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;i&#8217;ribuna&#8217;\u00a3;is&#8221;\u00a7u.st a\ufb01d&#8221;:e;_\u00e9$\ufb01habia and \u00e9nierference by this Court is not<\/p>\n<p>5; Ha\u00e9r\ufb01 aounsei appearing ii}: the appeliani and the<\/p>\n<p>H H &#8221; :&#8217;  &#8216; &#8216;ia\u00e9fgzed _.c+.:}u:f3;s\u00e91 appearirig for the Insurance Cempaniesw<\/p>\n<p> 6. A\ufb01er pemsai (xi? the judgment and award passe\ufb01 by the<\/p>\n<p>  C:Eain1s_ Tribunal it einerges that the Clai\ufb01iw Tribunal has comrixittad<\/p>\n<p>2: gave error if} taking the disability at 333% and not a\ufb01agting<br \/>\nappropriate multiplier. The appellant was working as Evade: and was<\/p>\n<p>getiing an inceme 0f&#8217; RS.2,{}{}0:&#8217;- per rnanth. The same has <\/p>\n<p>rightiy taken as the income of the appellant and ii is <\/p>\n<p>reasonable. The age ef the appelkaszt is 28 years an\u00e9 the   .<\/p>\n<p>rnuitipiier of &#8216; 1&#8242;?&#8217; ought to have been take:1._I&#8217;h\u00a7_ Docidf&#8217;   \u00e9 <\/p>\n<p>in his esrisdence that the agpeilani has susta:iA11.ed:1&#8217;dis$\u00a3b\u00a7iit\u00a7}* ?;:: 1:_&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>the whole body and the injuries sugi\ufb01itiad ar\u00e9&#8217;0f&#8217;v&#8217;penn2if\u00a7\u00e9i:i&#8217;;za:;1r\u00e9,<br \/>\nThe appellant is net abie to do my w0{i&lt;_; inv_fu\u00a3.\u00a7;re. If&quot;&#039;i}2e Vsaiqfiaspect<br \/>\nof\ufb02rxe matter is taken into cansids\u00e9ratien t\u00a7f1&#039;e;  &#039;irihunai ought to<\/p>\n<p>have iakerijize _\u00a33f3;} {\u00a7i.52l;;iiiiy&#039; ihstead cf 35%. Tllerefore we<\/p>\n<p>detezmine th\u00e9&#039; pefrzaa\ufb01eht d&quot;ir\u00a7;;=;E,1i&#039;1iit\u00a7gntE1e appeiiam; ai 275% in respect<\/p>\n<p>vofthe @3013 Lbodyg, &quot;i&#039;11\u00a7zV&quot;&#039;ei\u00a7breV&#039;\u00a3f&#039;th:e income ofthe appeiiant is taker;<\/p>\n<p> ingnth 3.326 the appsropriate muitiplier appiicabie ig<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01the appellant is taiiezz at 75% in respect of<\/p>\n<p>V VV the whisie bsfidy, &#039;ffhe cosmpensatiorzz payahie towag\u00e9s loss of \ufb01mire<\/p>\n<p>_&#039;::efz\u00a7es:. :3 Rs. 3,06,0~0&lt;3;_ _i.e, zrm X :2 X 2&#039;; X 73 5 mi).<\/p>\n<p>:&#039;E._\u00a2c&#039;&lt;\u00a7f\u00a3ii:1gl\u00a7z, we award 3, sum efRs.3,\ufb016,\ufb01@\u00a3}\u00a7~ scrwardg I053  T. <\/p>\n<p>mecii\ufb01ed as under: 3 V\n<\/p>\n<p>21. Towards pain and sufferings  _V &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>Ex Towayds Mediated ex;\u00a7;\u00a7;;ses    :$j:s(\u00a7.xr30<br \/>\nc. Tswards csnveyance,   f &#8216;  . &#8216; V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>a:1dmedic:aiat\u20ac.\u00e9:i&#8217;1cZant:;iiarge2;; _  &#8211;  5,G\u00a7{}.i}G<\/p>\n<p>:1. mg of;nc\u00a2\ufb01.;\u00a7; ~;i\u00a7:r:gga\u00e9argxenz &#8211; Rs. 4,0913%<\/p>\n<p>6&#8242; T0wa}e;i$_&#8217;Aiz&gt;ss  ccf life: ~ Rs. 25,003.63<\/p>\n<p>_f&#8217;; ~;&#8217;\u00a7E&#8217;0\u00a7\u00a7}3;&#8221;d;$ tags &#8220;::;f.\ufb02_1_\u00a3m*e earning -. Rs. 3,o5,e0e.c3@<br \/>\n&#8216;A  1{q.3,33,?o\u00a7.:&gt;&lt;;\n<\/p>\n<p>..4.._.a=a&#8230;\u00a2..x..-a-m-; mmmmmmmm .=..\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; ~  ; &#8216;\u00a3&#8221;.?&#8230;'{, A\ufb02szim Qf Rs.3,83,&#8217;?\u20ac}Gf&#8217;- with inierest at 6% from the \u00e9aie<\/p>\n<p>  getition iii} the \u00e9ate sf&#8217; reaiisatisn is awar\u00e9ed instead sf<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;    &#8216;R\u00e9;&#8217;1 ,&#8217;?3,6\u20aciQ;&#8217;- awarded by the exams Tribzznai. Wit}: this<\/p>\n<p>znedifiaa\ufb01icrx, the ju\u00e9gnent an\u00e9 award passed bf; the Claims Triburzai<\/p>\n<p>E;\n<\/p>\n<p>L;\n<\/p>\n<p>{E<\/p>\n<p>L7<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja &#8230; vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil And H.Billappa iii&#8217; THE HIGH COURT OF KARE-\u20ac:&#8217;\u00a5fAliA AT BA;&#8217;~EG.Ai,OR\u00a7\u00a7}__ DATED THIS THE 3*&#8221; am&#8217; OF AUGUST, 2999 2 &#8216;f w f PR\u00a3S}3ZN\u00b0&#8217;I&#8217; THE HoN*BLi~: MR. .I*LES&#8217;i&#8217;IC}&#8217;~3 m*%:5::; &#8221; V AND &#8216;I&#8217;\u00a3-iii; HQNBLE MR. H. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-223921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja ... vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja ... vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-08T13:28:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chandra Devadiga S\\\/O Manja &#8230; vs M Fathulla S\\\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-08T13:28:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":460,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Chandra Devadiga S\\\/O Manja ... vs M Fathulla S\\\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-08T13:28:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chandra Devadiga S\\\/O Manja &#8230; vs M Fathulla S\\\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja ... vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja ... vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-08T13:28:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja &#8230; vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-08T13:28:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009"},"wordCount":460,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009","name":"Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja ... vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-08T13:28:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandra-devadiga-so-manja-vs-m-fathulla-so-anwar-saheb-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chandra Devadiga S\/O Manja &#8230; vs M Fathulla S\/O Anwar Saheb on 3 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223921"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223921\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}