{"id":224127,"date":"2008-12-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008"},"modified":"2016-01-02T05:25:17","modified_gmt":"2016-01-01T23:55:17","slug":"col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                     Complaint Nos. CIC\/WB\/C\/2008\/00735 dated 19.6.2008\n                         Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 18\n\nComplainant          - Col. A. D. Nargolkar\nRespondent      -      Ministry of Defence\n\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>        There were two complaints on a similar subject, which were clubbed and<br \/>\nheard together. Our decision in File No. CIC\/WM\/C\/2008\/00040 was announced<br \/>\nin the hearing on 4.12.2008.          The decision in the present complaint was<br \/>\nreserved.\n<\/p>\n<p>     By an application of 14.2.08 Col. A.D. Nargolkar of HQ 41 Arty Div PIN<br \/>\n908441 applied to Maj. Gen. O.P. Soni, GOC 41 Arty Div, Southern Command<br \/>\nseeking the following information:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>        &#8220;Complete proceedings of C of 1 ordered vide your letter no.<br \/>\n        400501\/63\/a dated 17th September, 2007 to include: &#8211;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        (a)  All Recordings Before And By the Court.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        (b)  Opinion &amp; Findings by Presiding Officer.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        (c)  Recommendation of GOC 41 Arty Div.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        (d)  Recommendations of GOC 21 Corps.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        (e)  Directions of Final Competent Authority GOC- In-C-Southern<br \/>\n             Command, on the Proceedings of the Court of Inquiry.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        Postal Order for Rs. 200\/- No. Xxxxx is at along with for MG\/C Adm<br \/>\n        HQ Southern Command only, since Proceedings are currently with<br \/>\n        HQ Southern Command.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>        To this he received no response with the result that he moved a first<br \/>\nappeal on 26.5.08 before both Maj. Gen. Soni and Maj. Gen. D. Rajan, the latter<br \/>\nIn-charge Admn. HQ Southern Command, Pune. Upon this he received an order<br \/>\nof 10.6.08 informing him that &#8220;all recordings before and by the Court were<br \/>\nhanded over to you vide HQ 41 Arty Div letter 400501\/CF\/And\/27\/1 dated 23 Feb<br \/>\n08 when 5CN was served on you. There is no provision under Army Rule 184,<br \/>\nunder which Opinion and Findings by Presiding Officer, Recommendations of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                              1<\/span><br \/>\n GOC 41 Arty Divn and Recommendations of GOC 21 Corps can be provided.<br \/>\nFurther, the information is denied under Sec. 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act 2005, as it<br \/>\nrelates to personal information, the disclosure of which has no relationship to any<br \/>\npublic activity or interest.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Upon this Col. Nargolkar moved his 2nd appeal before us praying as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;I feel that reply by HQ Southern Command dated 26th August 2005<br \/>\n       and by RTI Cell at Army HQ dated 29th August 2008 is only a<br \/>\n       delaying measure with the sole aim of prolonging gross trauma to<br \/>\n       me and denying information to me in my quest for Justice. They<br \/>\n       have misused their Powers of a Discreet Inquiry by Military<br \/>\n       Intelligence transgressing lines of authority to look into my case.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       Kindly review my case for information asked for from HQ Southern<br \/>\n       Command as well as Army HQ in light of the above said facts and<br \/>\n       situation. I have also cautioned army authorities that specific<br \/>\n       persons are responsible under the RTI Act 2005 for such<br \/>\n       unreasonably withheld information.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      Although this appeal attaches with it both applications, one of which has<br \/>\nbeen dealt with in our disposal of complaint No. CIC\/SM\/C\/2008\/00040, it will be<br \/>\nnoted that the prayer in this case refers to responses from HQ Southern<br \/>\nCommand dated 26.8.08 and 29.8.08, both of which refer to the application of<br \/>\n23.7.08 disposed of in file No. CIC\/SM\/C\/2008\/00040.         In the present case,<br \/>\ntherefore, there has been no first appeal against the information provided by<br \/>\norder of the Court dated 23.2.08 referred to by Brig. M. Pattar in disposing of his<br \/>\nfirst appeal in the present case for information being examined in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The appeal was heard on 4.12.2008 through videoconference.                  The<br \/>\nfollowing are present:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       Appellant at CIC Studio, New Delhi.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             Col. A.D. Nargolkar<br \/>\n       Respondents at CIC Studio, New Delhi.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>             Brig. P. Chakraborty, CPIO<br \/>\n             Col. A. K. Vyas, Dir. RTI<br \/>\n             Col. B. S. Raju, Col. &#8211; MS Legal<br \/>\n             Maj. M. Gahlot, GSO -1 (Legal)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         2<\/span><br \/>\n        Respondent at NIC Studio, Pune<br \/>\n            Col. Bishnoi, Representing Southern Command<\/p>\n<p>     Appellant Col. Nargolkar submitted copy of an order of the High Court of<br \/>\nBombay in WP No. 5674\/2008 &#8211; <a href=\"\/doc\/1227782\/\">Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs. Union of India &amp; Ors.<\/a><br \/>\nwhich reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;Counsel appearing for the respondent states that they have<br \/>\n       already provided copy and also states that they will provide another<br \/>\n       copy of the documents within two weeks from today, of the findings<br \/>\n       of the court of inquiry proceedings, so far as the court of enquiry<br \/>\n       proceedings finds the petitioner guilty of any charge. In view of the<br \/>\n       statement made nothing survives in this petition. The same is<br \/>\n       disposed of accordingly.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     Whereas respondents submitted that the complete set of all documents<br \/>\nhave been provided, appellant Col. Nargolkar submitted that while the findings of<br \/>\nthe Court of Enquiry have been provided, the proceedings have not.\n<\/p>\n<p>                            DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n<p>     What this appeal amounts to is a request that we sit in judgment upon<br \/>\nwhether the decision of the High Court of Judicature of Bombay have been fully<br \/>\ncomplied with or not. This is clearly a task for that Court which has in fact passed<br \/>\nthe ruling. Although the quest for information is indeed within the jurisdiction of<br \/>\nthis Commission, when this quest has been met by an order of a judicial Court,<br \/>\neven though this were independent of the case before us, it will be moot whether<br \/>\nthere is any case for interference by this quasi-judicial authority. In our view,<br \/>\nthere is no such ground. Should appellant Col. Nargolkar feel that the orders of<br \/>\nthe High Court of Judicature of Bombay stand transgressed, he will have to seek<br \/>\nrelief from that Court. This complaint is therefore dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Reserved in the hearing this decision is announced on 10th day of<br \/>\nDecember 2008 in the open Court.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         3<\/span><\/p>\n<p> Notice of this decision be given free of cost to all the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Wajahat Habibullah)<br \/>\nChief Information Commissioner<br \/>\n10.12.2008<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against<br \/>\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO<br \/>\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Pankaj Shreyaskar)<br \/>\nJoint Registrar<br \/>\n10.12.2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Complaint Nos. CIC\/WB\/C\/2008\/00735 dated 19.6.2008 Right to Information Act 2005 &#8211; Section 18 Complainant &#8211; Col. A. D. Nargolkar Respondent &#8211; Ministry of Defence Facts There were two complaints on a similar subject, which were clubbed and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-224127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-01T23:55:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-01T23:55:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":936,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-01T23:55:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-01T23:55:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-01T23:55:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008"},"wordCount":936,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008","name":"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-01T23:55:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/col-a-d-nargolkar-vs-ministry-of-defence-on-10-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Col. A. D. Nargolkar vs Ministry Of Defence on 10 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224127"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224127\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}