{"id":224357,"date":"2010-09-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-01-25T12:30:09","modified_gmt":"2016-01-25T07:00:09","slug":"north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"North West Karnataka Road … vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
North West Karnataka Road … vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: V Jagannathan<\/div>\n
IN1}\ufb02EHKHiCOURT(X?KARNATAKA.\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA\n\nDATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF sE1>TEMBER;'%2.\u00a7'1G,k1 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE; \n\nM.F.A. N0.121 13 OF 2.00-5 (MV):  - *\nM.F.A. CROB. N0.\"1.0'09 OF'-2008; \nIN MFA N0.121_2G\u00bb\/G6\" AND\u00bb  \nM.F.A. N0.\"1~2120 0FA---2966' (MV)  \nM.F.A. NO.12118\/06   _    \n\nBETWEEN      \n\nNORTHWE'S'{!3V5.KAI\u00a7NATA1K1A R6A1j\n\nTRANSPORT CQR\u00a3?Q~RA<\u00a3f1@.N". ~\n\nCENTRAL OFFICE', jjj\u00a7:;0K_U'L ROAD.\nHUBLI, BY*1fI'1sVVMANAG1N_;:r DIRECTOR. ...APPELLAN'l'\n\n _ [BY CHAITANYA KUMAR, ADV.)\n\n Arm}\n\n1;. \nW\/Q SR1 MJALLAPPA @\nBABASAB I4-'ULLARI.\n\n  *A_GED ABOUT 44 YEARS.\n\n'   PA;;\\I1)1*r,\n'~ _  sgo BABASAB @ MAIAAPPA FUL-LARI,\n"  ..A.C}ED AI3C)U'I' 26 YEARS.\n\n\n\nI'-J\n\nOCC. COOLIE.\n\n3. ZULEKHAN.\n"W\/O SR1 BABASAB FULLARI.\nAGED ABOUT 4} YEARS.\n\n4. KHAWAJASAB BABASAB @   \nMALLAPPA FULLARL I\nAGED ABOUT 18 YEARS.\n\n5. NANIMA,\n\nD\/O BABASAB @\n\nMALLAPPA FULLARI, \n\nAGED ABOUT 14 YEARS-,._   _\n\nM\/G BY RESPONDENTANO3'  ;<\/pre>\n
ALLARE R\/O S4ALGARj.A 3 _  ~
\nAKKALKO’I’TQ_,     =
\nSOLAPUR  ‘   ”   \u00bb<\/p>\n
6. SMT; SAi\\}’1TO_SH1:'{SHI’V’\u00a7}’ CPLAVAN<\/p>\n
@ LAMANAI-, ACiE”\u00bbMA.jOR’,’~~–., A A<\/p>\n
OCC. DRIVER AND:fOWNE\u00bbR..-OF<\/p>\n
THE MoT\u00a9ER’ACYCE,E;. = <\/p>\n
R\/O MADURA,_?NAc;AR., “PANDA INDI. …RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
  V” “‘fBY’M:\/S”CI%IE2TANA”‘ASsoc1ATEs FOR R1, R2:
\n \u00bbS_RI _SA..Ci\u00ab}I’NV 5: MAGADUM, ADV., FOR R6;
\n*–Esm. SE \u00a3ANI<Ai-I: RANGAREJI, Am\/., FOR R3:<\/p>\n
 s SAJJAN SI~:'\u00a3E'I'I'Y, ADV, FOR R6)
\nMFA' CR,0B;':'..-N0. 1 009 \/O8<\/p>\n
 ~ .-  E  'BETWEEN<\/p>\n
  T"'A.\u00a7jAN'1}'0sH, s\/0 SI-HVU CHAVAN,<\/p>\n
AGEI) ABOUT 27 YEARS.\n<\/p>\n
OCC. DRIVER.\n<\/p>\n
S \/ O MADU RANAGAR TANDA.\n<\/p>\n
TQ. INDI, DISTBIJAPUR.\n<\/p>\n
{BY SR1 S S SAJJANSHE’I”1″‘Y, ADV. ,)<\/p>\n
AND<\/p>\n
NORTH WEST KARNATAKA RQADKA <\/p>\n
TRANSPORT CORPORATION .. _ 4″‘ V
\nCENTRAL OFFICE, GOKUL ROAD,<\/p>\n
HUBLI, BY ITS MANAGING DIREQCIIIQR, ”
\n . I . .RESPONI)EN’i.’<\/p>\n
[THE MID KSRTC, BANg3AI.0_RE;1,  R. <\/p>\n
…CROSS A’ V.\n<\/p>\n
(BY SR1 CHAITANYA   A ;V <\/p>\n
M.F.A. No;~1’2″j;26i\u00a76
\nBETWEER ” — I} I, I :3′;  I
\nN0R’mI’*N”E–sT KARN.ArARA..–~RoAI)<\/p>\n
TRANSPORTIICVORPO.RAT1-ON,
\nCENTRAL OFFICE; GOKUL ROAD.\n<\/p>\n
 ._ 1~\u00ab1UB.1,I,v BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.<\/p>\n
 {BY SRI,A_VCH\u00abAOITANYA KUMAR, ADV.)<\/p>\n
A1\\.ID5  A<\/p>\n
 SRI4uSAI$\\IAf1″C.)\u00a7’aH.\n<\/p>\n
~ .  TS\/’Q SR1 SHIVU CHAVAN,
\n“AVGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,<\/p>\n
OC~Ci DRIVER.\n<\/p>\n
   R3\/O MADURANAGAR TANDA.\n<\/p>\n
 ~\u00bb-{N131 TALUK,<\/p>\n
. . .API3’ELLAN’I’<\/p>\n
BIJAPUR IDISTRICI’. . . JQESPOND ENT<\/p>\n
[BY SR1 S S SAJJANSHETTY, A.DV.,)<\/p>\n
>3′-=\u00a3=*=f\u00a2<\/p>\n
M.F.A. NO12118\/O6 IS FILED UNf3E’R–.:SE”C7FI-QIxI_
\n173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST ‘I’*HE”‘JIIDOMEN’:IfAND
\nAWARD DATED 15.7.2006 PASSED IN MV*C_ NO”.
\nON THE FILE OF FRL. IDISTRICT.JUI)C}E.,i1;MEMB’ERI
\nMACT–1, EIJAFUR, AWARDINGA COMRENSATIONOF –. ‘<\/p>\n
RS. 45,16,000\/– WITH FUTURE_”‘IITNTERESTA.@ E% RA.
\nFROM THE DATE OF FIL_ING._ OF PETITION TILL
\nREALIZATION.    _ I <\/p>\n
MFA CROB. NO.I0D9}’0\u00e9:’AIN~\u00ab..M}:iA_[:12I20\/05 IS
\nFILED UNDER_ORDER”‘Zi’1;.”:RUI\u00a7E 2.;2._C.F.C. AGAINST
\nTHE JUDGMAENTI I AND  A’w’ARD(* ~ DATED 15.7.2008<\/p>\n
FASSED IN MFC “N’C>.,4452}-\/200;) ‘(IN THE FILE OF THE
\nMOTOR 1111 AC.CID.}\u00a7;_N1’S”‘ _”CLA_IMS TRIBUNAL NO.I
\nBIJAPUR, ATABIJAPUR,”\u00bb33AR’I’LY”ALLOWING THE CLAIM
\nPE3’I’I’1’ION~. A FO’F2″~-._COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
\nENHANCEMENT OF} COM’PENSA’l’ION.<\/p>\n
VM.F.AI=N_O.122120\/O6 IS FILED UNDER SECTION
\n173(1) OF MV’A.AC’l’ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND<\/p>\n
f “vAWARI}..j-Ij)A\u00a7’.ED 157.2006 PASSED IN MVC NO442\/O0
\n ON-.T\ufb02’_E’\u00abFI.I_;E. OF FRL. DISTRICT JUDGE, MEMBER.
\n” 1_’;\u00bb,EIJA_F[UR, AWARDING A COMPENSATION OF<\/p>\n
RS.’EE,00O.j—. ‘gWITH FUTURE INTEREST @ 6% RA.
\nFROM  ‘DATE OF FILING OF FETITION TILL<\/p>\n
– V V REALIEATION.\n<\/p>\n
  ” ‘S~..THESE M.F.AS. A\/W CROSS OBJECTIONS
\n” _ COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY THE COURT
\n‘ D’ELIV’ERED THE FOLLOWING;\n<\/p>\n
COMMON JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
The two appeals are filed by the <\/p>\n
quest\ufb01oning the que1.nt um of compensation :1\\\u00e9ly21lft}:%j’c’l–.,:to._. .<\/p>\n
the claimam: and Cross objec.tio11 for e1fl1l1\u00e9i’11(5crri’ooi,oi <\/p>\n
comper1sat.ion.\n<\/p>\n
2. The facts of the Case co-rnl1′.<aoI1 toi. .lj_.):ot:'l1  V<\/p>\n
appeals and cross objecti011slVlV*c'1t_\u00e9' thatll'o11l'l6;V4.2l:Q00 the
\nclaimant in MVC No.\u00e9\u00a7\u00ab;\u00a72;.\/ :;jdllt1g; the ltnotorcyole
\nand near Nagathan pm. KSRTC<\/p>\n
bus be.\u20acC1ring%1 came from opposite side
\nand clasllzgztfitytlo Following the said<\/p>\n
aC:Cidjc:'1'1t_t.ho V-pyillioa" 'rider of the n1otor<:ycle namely<\/p>\n
 a11dthe rider of the motorcycle namely<\/p>\n
lE32_11'ith.osl*1z""got.V.l'11ji.:red. Claim petitions were filed by the<\/p>\n
le\u00a7;e1'l'– rep'i'\u00e9s;ei1t.21t.ives of a.fo1"esaici. l\\\/Iallappa and also by<\/p>\n
 .:t:l1r~:JltnjLiV1'od Santosh. MACT allowed the claim petitions<\/p>\n
  zi;\u00a7Cl'2iWa1r(le(l 2; sum of 34,16,000\/– in MVC .No.629\/00<\/p>\n
 "Vt-*l91ictl1 we-1&3 filed. by the L.R.s of clectrased Malla1.3pa1. it<\/p>\n
ls.\n<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
aiso awarded co1npe:t1sai:ior1 of 368.000\/W in MVC
\nNo.442\/2000 which was filed by the ingiireci <\/p>\n
Liability was put on the Corporatiozn. 1<\/p>\n
3. The iiability was qiiestioned by the C’orporatio11v.”‘_”i H<\/p>\n
b\u20acf()~f\u20ac this Court in MFA No.121’1’9’\/Us Q_ a.nd.;\u00abtfiis_CVoa’rtKT.,<\/p>\n
dismissed the Corporations: ap1:>:eaI”.3V_3zy <\/p>\n
dated 28.5.2009. Therefore iiaio\ufb01gity is riot in\n<\/p>\n
4. As far as the qu_a_Iit:;,1In._\u00bb_ of ‘e.r)r;_1pe1%1sation<\/p>\n
a_wardediri   is cuoricverned, grievance of the
\nappeilarit.  has taken the income at<\/p>\n
Q’.-4,000,\/W   it is on the higher side, more<\/p>\n
.0 0. ”’over*~-the.’accident. iovicetirred in the year 2000. Therefore<\/p>\n
\u00e9helredueed to $3,000\/W and in the other<\/p>\n
  ease-..__of j.:1j1:i;%yA0MACT has awarded 368.000\/\u00bb and it is<\/p>\n
 also on ‘\u00a3..h”e higher side.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5. Oil: the other haiid, leairimd (?()L\u00a5I’1S(:’.1 f01’___t,he<\/p>\n
claimants argued that iiht’. Compensation a\\ve1rded’iif\u00a7f”i.h’i,\u00e9<\/p>\n
two (raises are just and reasorlable 1’e\u00a3;iiirii1:g”i.”‘ ‘<\/p>\n
redu(tti0.11 and  far as liability if-1*’CO’i1C\u20acI’i_)(3d,”i1’i”‘!ibW:V.0f”\u00bb..<\/p>\n
this Court’s decision in the A:’\u00e9.vf()y’3″‘(.3fI1\u20ac11\ufb01QiTJ.’Cd2 <\/p>\n
N0. 121 19\/ 2006 it is not .,i:o  .  to
\ncontend that it is not   h i i i<\/p>\n
6. In lights of submissions
\nputforward   “1’iabi’1’ity. bf, ifiii\u00e9v-:\u00bbC0rp0rati0n has been
\nsei’,t1edi’bbj?viv_MFAV”Nb.12119\/06, only the<\/p>\n
quantiirii. ‘of  awarded by the tribunal<\/p>\n
requires to  ii
\n_~5–7.v_ii’11.Vthe” ‘\u00ab:t21.s\u00a7:__.0i’ death of Mallappa the ciaim<\/p>\n
 by his wife and children and MAC’?<\/p>\n
i,<i0i.{"ihev 'iI."i'Cx()41.'i}vV\u20ac at: $4,000\/\u00ab per inonizh. Though the<\/p>\n
i\u00bbVappeiiarit4301111391 argL1cd that the said iiicome is on the<\/p>\n
fE'1igi1E:~r side, yei ii is noticed from the evi(1e11(:e placed by<\/p>\n
the claimants that the deceased was 21 priest. and he__wa_s<\/p>\n
also 21 mantravacii and was also a eoutmtziy <\/p>\n
pin:-1et'itio1'1e;" and it was when the deceased 131:1 g.o'ne: "<\/p>\n
the village for the purpose ofi"w'ii.(:hc\u00a7_t'aft"  it<\/p>\n
accident. occurred on the way. 'Fa?;ing_f1ot.e'of.t*he<\/p>\n
the deceased which was 45_"~yea1*5\u00a7 q8.I"i\u20ac'1A "nLiniVber'V of V<\/p>\n
Qccupatjons hf; "I33  '1"lv'IS W1fC.
\nMAC'? therefore took the ti'~Va_t.'"'{.4,000\/- per<\/p>\n
month. Even,.CoiiirtgiAfr1i1eVA'd'i_e:posi:1g of the appeal<\/p>\n
preferred by   in  MFA No. 121 19 \/O6<\/p>\n
observeti'  1 the said appeai that the
\nincome taken at ?.,jV4\u00bb,0O'a0"\/'\u00ab+w~"per rrionth is also on the<\/p>\n
higher side." A .\n<\/p>\n
  1Ai’ght=___Qfv the aforesaid factors quantum of<\/p>\n
(\u00e9of\ufb01peI’:vs’2itlt’;hi”afwarded in MVC No.82?)\/00 which has<\/p>\n
gitzeii”mrziisevftoi'”MFA 12118\/O6. does not require any<\/p>\n
 _ 4 t V t_redt1<.:t.i(_ir';.3 <\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
9. Cciming to MFA No.12120\/06. wherein_..__the<\/p>\n
(tompensation awarcied in MVC No.442\/00 is <.%ai"}eCi~\u00ab.Vii'i.'<\/p>\n
question- That was the ease of injury and the" (t1aih1s'n,t"' : V'<\/p>\n
Santosh has suffered two fra(:f:,i1r(\u00bb::s. A and 0 si'mp,1ez<\/p>\n
injuries. MACT i,he3*efo1'e awzirded -'~<\/p>\n
the grievous injuries and * Aheach
\ninjuries. Thus   at
\n368,000\/\u00bb. Though  Vifadpdpears that the
\ncompensation.   each. of the
\ngrievous   yet taking note of
\nthe fa__\u00a2i{"  did not award the
\ncompensation'  heads like pain and<\/p>\n
suffeifing, Iossd ofafnenities of life, loss of earning<\/p>\n
"'eapaeity.;"'\u00bb eiie,, theviiieompenseition over ail awarded at<\/p>\n
  \u00a3tjVS0LC:21nI1Ot be said to be on the higher side.<\/p>\n
1~(V)v'.*E'c)i' the above reasons, the appeals filed by the<\/p>\n
 are dismissed. So also the cross<\/p>\n
  oliijections No. I 009\/2008.\n<\/p>\n
E”\n<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
EU<\/p>\n
11. The Corp0ra1″ion is directed to dep0s1’t:___ the
\n21m0u1’1t before i,ribu1’1a1 within four weeks and 3_’fx1.(_\u00a7’a1’i*i’\u20ac,<\/p>\n
in cEe130si\u20ac: before this Court: be transferrssd to    ”<\/p>\n
  3UDGE’T\u00bb<\/p>\n
YKL\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court North West Karnataka Road … vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010 Author: V Jagannathan IN1}\ufb02EHKHiCOURT(X?KARNATAKA. CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF sE1>TEMBER;’%2.\u00a7’1G,k1 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE; M.F.A. N0.121 13 OF 2.00-5 (MV): – * M.F.A. CROB. N0.”1.0’09 OF’-2008; IN MFA N0.121_2G\u00bb\/G6″ AND\u00bb M.F.A. N0.”1~2120 0FA—2966′ (MV) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-224357","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNorth West Karnataka Road ... vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-25T07:00:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"North West Karnataka Road … vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-25T07:00:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1356,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010\",\"name\":\"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-25T07:00:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"North West Karnataka Road … vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-25T07:00:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"North West Karnataka Road … vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-25T07:00:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010"},"wordCount":1356,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010","name":"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-25T07:00:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-smt-sundrabai-on-30-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"North West Karnataka Road … vs Smt Sundrabai on 30 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224357"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224357\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224357"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}