{"id":224418,"date":"2008-10-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-03-28T19:00:16","modified_gmt":"2018-03-28T13:30:16","slug":"d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"D S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
D S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n
 \n\n\"'9\n9'\n\n\u00bb ' S E)'\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNAT_==\u00a7.KA AT    \n\nDATED Tms ml: 16\"'-' DAY OF 0cT03ER%_:;303%'A--T.ILj .   : \" u. \n\nBEFORE \n\nTHE HUMBLE .411aJUsr;ctgfs. AEp:rL  :3\n\nmmTPET1rgQA*.N0.15\u00a7gggg_a g1,{_zi4;'a'.2i4g. \n\nas. Ramamani, V      \n\nWfolate Dr.K.R. Sz;:'yaa1araj\u00a7?a11a Iy\u00a7:r,.'4 ' \"\nAged about\u00e9l ye;-'_irs,f;1;~~' V     ' V\nma No.4}6,R}v1'V\"'2'fd:$iageg   V   L  \nBangaiore. '  5__  ' '   ..    Petitioner.\n\n(BySri Re\ufb01ben   . '\nAnd: A A  H \"V\n\nI T'.\u00a7:eState of \n_i}\u00a3>pa1fm1\u20ac:g1t of Urban-\u00ab\ufb01evelopznaexmt,\n\n% %   _ M.S.\"Buil_din.gs,\n\n'  'D1: '  Veedhi,\n. '\u00abBang2l\ufb01r\u00a2_ _  991,\n' A  its \n\n_\u00bb The~~Bai;aga!ore Develepmem Au\ufb021erity,\n_ ' .. Sax\ufb02c\u00e9y Road, Kunlaza Paxk West,\nJ \" _ B\u00e9irgalere M 560 @203\n ._ Rapid. By its Connnissioxier.\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n3 The Special Land Acquisition Officer,\nBangaiore Development Authority,\nSankey Road, Kumara Park West,\n\nBangalore -569 020.      it\n\n(By Sri M. Keshav Reddy, AGA for R1 i \nSri Ravi G. Sabhahit, Adv. for R2 atid R3)   \n\nomn-\n\nThis Writ Petition is  22'7\"ot' the\nConstitution, praying to quash the 'ordere.de;te'd 3gL4.,;ZQO\"?..passed by\n\nR3, etc. V   _\n\nThis Writ Petitien C\u00a7)i2ti23g:'3n_\u20acfdt Prelimixj\u00e9rg\ufb01earixag in 'B'\nGroup this day\", tllef\u00e9ieiuft jizeeie tt1eVfeiiewi;:;g:..V  '\n\n iiii    it \nThe peti-tie\ufb01er  purchased 8500 sq. ft.\nef land in Sy.No. .VofvI,ette\ufb01ge3,tei1einli village from the iegai heirs\nOficne t:31derV.ia'i\"r'eg\u00a3ete:\"ed sale deed dated 6.2.1998. It is\n\nthe.\"t:aseV\"uf 1the\"f:eti.tixmer that since there was a threat of\n\n {ijgpossessi\u00e9\ufb01 officials of the second respondent, she \ufb01led<\/pre>\n
   C3.v\u00a7.’Nes.648\/1997 and 715531998 against the second<\/p>\n
 has ebtained an order of temporary injutiction<\/p>\n
V’  the second respondent firom dispessessing her from the<\/p>\n
{:3<\/p>\n
“K<\/p>\n
property in question. It is further contended that     <\/p>\n
pendeney of the said suits, at the behest of the petitioriei; :Stzite– _  it  it<\/p>\n
Government has sent 3 letter to the  7;’<\/p>\n
7. \u00a301999 suggesting the second respondent to~oomide1{eli~otxnent.w3<\/p>\n
of the said site in favour of the   sei\u00e9ond
\nrespondent did not   of the State
\nGovernment, she \ufb01led  Court in
\nW.P.Nos.46I9 and    to the second
\nrespondent to     by the State
\nGovernment  question in her favour. This
\nCourt by its   the second respondent
\nto  the  \ufb01led by her. In terms of the
\n .C’iio4i;1r.t,_’the second respondent has gassed an order<\/p>\n
at AnfieXiire\u00abi’A’:’irejeeiinn her application for allotment of the said<\/p>\n
wsiiVte_. Petitioner”—iras’ ealled in question the said order in this writ<\/p>\n
  S’:-n  W<\/p>\n
Rules made theretznder. Therefore, second respondent is right <\/p>\n
rejecting the request: efthe petitioner. .  \u00bb<\/p>\n
5. I have eare\ufb01xiiy cens\u00e9dered {he arguments made    ‘ ‘M<\/p>\n
learned Counsel at the Bar and perused the  <\/p>\n
recerd,<\/p>\n
6. It is the ease of the petifiener ‘purchaeed the
\nproperty’ in question by a deed ofsa\ufb01e   the legai<\/p>\n
heirs of one Patalappei  ft\u00ab!i9eiz1_the.’materia\u00a7 en record that
\nthe leads \u00a311 questienee have V2i.*fea._eiy. acquired by the State
\nGm*emrnen’t<;a1i<Ie.hax?e  iraneferred to the second respondent<\/p>\n
e23;rlierv':te\u00ab  \ufb01zgehase by the pe\ufb01tioner for development in<\/p>\n
 a\u00a3eerd:i13ee'T'.__3ei{h  'f\u00a7r'ai%?isiens of the Act and Rules made<\/p>\n
V ;gi\u00a7:ei'eunder. "The~.fi\ufb01otifieaiien under Sectien 16(2) of the Land<\/p>\n
 already been issued on 3957,1987. Petitiener<\/p>\n
 .\u00a7_:et gfxrjedsieed any material to Show that the iands have not been<\/p>\n
  ' .._f\u00e9eete\u00a7i''\u00a3x?\u00a7th the Bangalore velepment Aetherity ear\ufb01er to the<\/p>\n
K1<\/p>\n
date of her purchase. The third respondent after examination of the  __<\/p>\n
acquisition records has rightly come to a conclusion that the lands-~ <\/p>\n
are vested with the second respondent eariier to the ~\u00a3i1:\u00e9t"\u00a3\u20acV " <\/p>\n
purchase by the petitioner. Therefore, the purehase 'oiadeii.   <\/p>\n
petitioner subsequent to the vesting' is    .ti:.ei  it<\/p>\n
respondents. The State Government, thetefore, eaen.ot–..di1feoit*;it}ie" <\/p>\n
second and third respondents Vttnxallot;iteoz1traty"'to"'the
\nprovisioras of the Bangalore Dexzeiopmieiitii and the<\/p>\n
Rules made thereunder.'  gu3:iiuittedi'iii33? ,i',I_i1\u00a7:fieii\u00a3!1116d AGA,<\/p>\n
a careful peruaal oi'  State Government
\nshows that it   eoiziiiiuiiieatioe sent by the Under
\nSeeretary\u00bb\u00bbtoitiie.Staite and not a direction referable to
\n  of ffhe  being a statutory authority having<\/p>\n
forzniiiated  sc\u00a7:ieuteViii\u00a7iv'aecerdanee with the provisions of the Act<\/p>\n
  and  obtaiioezii\ufb02ie approval of the State eannot deviate from<\/p>\n
seheme exeept in the manner provided under the Act. The iand<\/p>\n
   by the State Governrnent and made over to the BDA<\/p>\n
 ' V .__V T t1:~ua"speci\ufb01e purpose ofexeeuting the approved scheme and such a<\/p>\n
\\a<\/p>\n
t<\/p>\n
land has to be utilised by the BDA strictly in accordance  ' vi'  -1~ ii <\/p>\n
provisions of the Asst and the Rules made thereiinder. It "is V'  ii<\/p>\n
settled that a pubiie body invested with statutnryipowiere. te  i  i:"p_  * 'i<\/p>\n
care not to exceed or abuse its pewers.'iIt"'m;1st Reef)    <\/p>\n
limits ofthe authority committed tq it.<\/p>\n
7. Learned Counsel _1’fi)r._ti1e \u00e9liow any
\nstatutory provision   is i Jeiifi;ii0w’ered to
\nregularisefallet   except pointing
\nout the letter  i\ufb01nder Secretary to the
\nState Govermrient.   the Act, the Government is
\nenebiegi to   ii)’ th.e__BDA as are necessary or expedient<\/p>\n
for  vQLii.4Q\u20act\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7”t}3:\u00a5i}i1″\u00a7}GS\u20acS (}f the Act. If the power of the<\/p>\n
 ‘-{3:\u20ac}vem;ziienti”iis exr\u00e9tiieliie to direct the BDA to carry out the<\/p>\n
..i\u00a7i1r;;eses ef the  certainly a –direetien in disregard cf the<\/p>\n
 pfesgrision cannot be issueri. Such a direction is not<\/p>\n
H  in law. Therefere, it eamiet be argued that the ietter at<\/p>\n
 ij3\u00a7’:;\u00a7}$i:’:\u00a7&’\u00a73r\u20ac ‘D’ is in the nature of a directicm ender Section 65 efthe<\/p>\n
\\x.\n<\/p>\n
as<\/p>\n
Act. Since the property is vested with the secend respondegxt;   A4 <\/p>\n
cannot be aiiertted to the petitioner contrary t9 the pravisioazstif ._<\/p>\n
Bangaiere Development Authority Act  <\/p>\n
thereunder.\n<\/p>\n
8. Having considered the   dr:*.3i1;~–.I’\u00bbr.;15’~nQt \ufb01nd any<\/p>\n
merit in this writ petitien. It is accer\u00e9i\ufb01gig! disrnis\u00e9\u00e9d. “chats.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court D S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer “‘9 9’ \u00bb ‘ S E)’ IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNAT_==\u00a7.KA AT DATED Tms ml: 16″‘-‘ DAY OF 0cT03ER%_:;303%’A–T.ILj . : ” u. BEFORE THE HUMBLE .411aJUsr;ctgfs. AEp:rL :3 mmTPET1rgQA*.N0.15\u00a7gggg_a g1,{_zi4;’a’.2i4g. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-224418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nD S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"D S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-28T13:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"D S Ramamani W\\\/O Late Dr. K.R. … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-28T13:30:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":780,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008\",\"name\":\"D S Ramamani W\\\/O Late Dr. K.R. ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-28T13:30:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"D S Ramamani W\\\/O Late Dr. K.R. … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"D S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"D S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-28T13:30:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"D S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-28T13:30:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008"},"wordCount":780,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008","name":"D S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-28T13:30:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-s-ramamani-wo-late-dr-k-r-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"D S Ramamani W\/O Late Dr. K.R. … vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224418\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}