{"id":225064,"date":"2011-05-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2"},"modified":"2015-07-19T23:39:19","modified_gmt":"2015-07-19T18:09:19","slug":"bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2","title":{"rendered":"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Rajesh H.Shukla,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/5845\/2011\t 5\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 5845 of 2011\n \n\n=========================================================\n\n \n\nBHOOMI\nENTERPRISE THROUGH POA RANJIT SINGH BATH - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT THROUGH SPECIAL SECRETARY &amp; 3 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nSP MAJMUDAR for\nPetitioner(s) : 1,MRVIMALAPUROHIT for Petitioner(s) : 1, \nMR PATEL\nAGP for Respondent(s) : 1, \nNone for Respondent(s) : 2 -\n4. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE RAJESH H.SHUKLA\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 05\/05\/2011 \n\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>1.<br \/>\nPresent petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 14,<br \/>\n19 as well as 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and also under<br \/>\nthe provisions of Bombay Land Revenue Code challenging the impugned<br \/>\norder passed by the respondent No.1,- Special Secretary (Appeals),<br \/>\nRevenue Department, State of Gujarat, dated 8th April,<br \/>\n2011 in revision application No.MVV\/JMN\/ Kutchh\/ 23 of 2011 and also<br \/>\nchallenging the  stay of the operation of the order dated 11th<br \/>\nMarch, 2011 passed by the District Collector, Kutch on the grounds<br \/>\nset in the memo of petition inter alia, that<br \/>\nthe District Collector has exceeded the jurisdiction and travelled<br \/>\nbeyond the Notice issued under section 79(A) of the Bombay Land<br \/>\nRevenue Code. It is also contended that the respondent No.1 has also<br \/>\nerred in holding that there was a breach of the condition.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate Mr.Majmudar submitted that the impugned order is passed<br \/>\nbeyond the show cause notice. He referred to the show cause notice<br \/>\nand submitted that the show cause notice has been issued for breach<br \/>\nof condition no.6 which is regarding the construction within the<br \/>\nstipulated period. However, he submitted that the same has also been<br \/>\ncondoned and, therefore, impugned order could not have been passed.<br \/>\nHe submitted that as the impugned order has been passed going beyond<br \/>\nthe show cause notice it amounts to violation of principles of<br \/>\nnatural justice. In support of his submissions he has referred to and<br \/>\nrelied upon the order passed by this Hon&#8217;ble Court in a judgment<br \/>\nreported in 2008 (2) GLH<br \/>\n520 in<br \/>\nthe case of <a href=\"\/doc\/1797320\/\">Hill<br \/>\nMemorial High School and Anr. vs. District Education Officer and Anr.<br \/>\nand<\/a><br \/>\nhas also referred to judgment and order reported in 2009<br \/>\n(0) GLHEL- HC 222728 in<br \/>\nthe case of Taruva<br \/>\nJuth Telibiya Sahakari Mandli vs State of Gujarat. Learned<br \/>\nadvocate Mr.Majmudar has also submitted that the order of Collector<br \/>\ndated 11th<br \/>\nMarch, 2011 is sought to be implemented by making entry on 12th<br \/>\nMarch, 2011 which suggests about highhandedness. He has submitted<br \/>\nthat in a similar matter in Special Civil Application No.5604 of 2011<br \/>\nthe High Court (Coram: M.R.Shah, J.) vide order dated 29th<br \/>\nApril, 2011 has remanded the matter back and, therefore, in this case<br \/>\nalso the matter be remanded and the impugned order may be quashed and<br \/>\nset aside as the revision application is pending and non-granting of<br \/>\nthe order of status<br \/>\nquo would<br \/>\nmake it infructuous. He further submitted that for grant of interim<br \/>\nrelief in<br \/>\nrespect of any proceedings before the competent authority the same<br \/>\nconsideration has applied to the Civil Court like prima<br \/>\nfacie, balance<br \/>\nof convenience etc. which has not been considered. He has also<br \/>\nsubmitted that in fact, the proceedings under section 79(A) were<br \/>\ninitiated earlier which were subsequently, when the construction was<br \/>\nmade, were regularized, and, therefore, again the said proceedings<br \/>\ncould not have been initiated. He has also referred to and relied<br \/>\nupon the judgment and order of the High Court reported in 2005<br \/>\n(0) GLHELC- HC 206854 in<br \/>\nthe case of <a href=\"\/doc\/1227877\/\">Legal<br \/>\nHeirs and Rep. Of Decd. Sidibhai Badhabhai vs State of Gujarat and<\/a><br \/>\nin the case of Hill<br \/>\nMemorial High School and Anr. (supra) to<br \/>\nemphasize that the order could<br \/>\nnot have been passed without affording opportunity of hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tLearned<br \/>\nAssistant Government Pleader Mr.Patel has submitted that the show<br \/>\ncause notice clearly referred to the breach of the conditions which<br \/>\nis at page:42 and pointedly referred to those conditions and<br \/>\nsubmitted that one of the conditions was that land to be used for the<br \/>\npurpose of salt which, in turn, would create the employment for the<br \/>\nlocal  people. However, it has been leased out after making<br \/>\nunauthorized construction of the godown letting out to the shipping<br \/>\ncompany and others. Not only that but the land has not been used for<br \/>\nthe purpose for which it was given and in fact, unauthorized<br \/>\nconstruction has been made, and, therefore, impugned order has been<br \/>\npassed. Referring to Annexure-E, which is a show cause notice<br \/>\ndtd.29.6.2010, he submitted that earlier also suo<br \/>\nmotu proceedings<br \/>\nfor breach of condition was initiated and time was extended for<br \/>\nmaking use of the land for the purpose of which it has been given and<br \/>\nas there is no compliance with the same, again notice has been issued<br \/>\npointing out the breach or violation. The show cause notice clearly<br \/>\nrefers to these details about the breach of conditions subject to<br \/>\nwhich the land was given which again has a reference to purpose for<br \/>\nwhich it is to be used. It is also made clear that any construction<br \/>\nwas to be made subject to the approval of the Collector or the<br \/>\nGovernment. Admittedly there is no such previous permission obtained.<br \/>\nSubmission has been made by learned counsel Mr. Majmudar that the<br \/>\npermission for construction of the godown has been obtained from the<br \/>\npanchayat which itself would reflect the conduct that when the land<br \/>\nhas been given subject to the conditions as mentioned therein which<br \/>\nincludes getting necessary permission from the Government for making<br \/>\nconstruction and instead of getting such permission it is contended<br \/>\nthat permission has been taken from the panchayat the land was to be<br \/>\nused for particular purpose and the underlined<br \/>\npolicy for giving such land is to encourage the industrial use like<br \/>\nmaking a salt which in turn will help generating the local<br \/>\nemployment. It is in this context instead of using the land for the<br \/>\npurpose of salt and making the construction without any permission of<br \/>\nthe godown which are to be let out and on earlier occasion inspite of<br \/>\nnotice issued and granting of extension of time when the condition or<br \/>\nproceedings have not been changed, again show cause notice has been<br \/>\nissued pursuant to which the impugned order has been passed.<br \/>\nTherefore the submission made by learned counsel Mr.Majmudar that it<br \/>\nis in violation of principles of natural justice and the impugned<br \/>\norder has travelled beyond the show cause notice without any merits<br \/>\nis unaccepted. In fact the impugned order itself is self-explanatory<br \/>\nnot only with regard to violation or breach of condition but totally<br \/>\nfrustrate the very purpose of giving such land as it was given<br \/>\nsubject to the conditions with same purpose of encouraging the<br \/>\nparticular area by some kind of industrial activity or for generating<br \/>\nthe local employment. If that very purpose is frustrated, and when<br \/>\nthe order is passed after issuing show cause notice and again the<br \/>\nrespondent No.1 Secretary (Appeal) having considered this aspects has<br \/>\npassed the impugned order, it cannot be said that it is arbitrary.<br \/>\nMoreover, there is no question of granting any status<br \/>\nquo as<br \/>\nsought to be canvassed as in such matter if such order is passed it<br \/>\nwould be wrong doing for some further period pending the proceedings<br \/>\nbefore the authority. The submission made by learned counsel that the<br \/>\nsame criteria for grant of injunction would apply as in the civil<br \/>\ncourt though procedure is required to be accepted but there has to be<br \/>\nsome prima facie<br \/>\ncase,<br \/>\nbalance of convenience and therefore impugned order cannot be said to<br \/>\nbe erroneous which would call for any exercise of discretion under<br \/>\nArticle 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The submissions<br \/>\nmade by learned counsel Mr.Majmudar that the order impugned has<br \/>\ntravelled beyond the show cause notice is misconceived. Reliance<br \/>\nplaced upon judgments of this Court referring to the judgment<br \/>\nparticularly reported in 2008 (2) GLH 520 is not applicable to the<br \/>\nfacts of the present case as in that case it was a show cause notice<br \/>\nto the institution for rejection of a grant and this case is with<br \/>\nregard to a breach of the condition subject to which under a policy<br \/>\nthe land is given. Therefore this judgment will not have any<br \/>\napplication. The judgment reported in 2005 (0) GLHEL-HC 206854 was<br \/>\nagain referring to the proceedings initiated on the ground that land<br \/>\nwas not cultivated for the whole period and that another person was<br \/>\nallowed to cultivate, and, therefore, the grant of land was<br \/>\ncancelled. Again this was considered in background  of the facts of<br \/>\nthe case with regard to the record whereas in the facts of the<br \/>\npresent there is admittedly a breach of the condition for which show<br \/>\ncause notice has been issued and earlier also opportunity was given,<br \/>\ntherefore, the present petition deserves to be rejected in limine and<br \/>\naccordingly stands dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>(RAJESH<br \/>\nH. SHUKLA, J.)<\/p>\n<p>Amit<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011 Author: Rajesh H.Shukla,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/5845\/2011 5\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5845 of 2011 ========================================================= BHOOMI ENTERPRISE THROUGH POA RANJIT SINGH BATH &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH SPECIAL [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-225064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-19T18:09:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-19T18:09:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2\"},\"wordCount\":1404,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2\",\"name\":\"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-19T18:09:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-19T18:09:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-19T18:09:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2"},"wordCount":1404,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2","name":"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-19T18:09:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhoomi-vs-state-on-5-may-2011-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bhoomi vs State on 5 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225064\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}