{"id":225372,"date":"2008-09-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-08-30T00:10:07","modified_gmt":"2017-08-29T18:40:07","slug":"the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K L G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre>k'\u20ac5EA$t'*'%.\u20ac'\u00a7.i\"\"\"s-iW$\u00a23\"*?: \u00a77,\"'\u00a7i?'\u00bb*m.'$5\u00a7'\"\"\u00a7'-         \n\nIN THE HIGH COLERT OF     4%\nCIR(\"T3U'I'I' BENCH   \nTHE :~mmaLB: MR;  \n A .' \nTHE HONBLE  &lt;3. RAMESH\nDAT11[\u00a7VTi}fI_$ &quot;\u00e9\u00e9WEMBER, 2003\n    1~a\u00bb1?\u00a7:~RA1;5:3r{\u00a7;V%1558\/2002\n 5, -  ~ %\n\n*me&#039;:s;::s;t;e &#039;  %\nBabaittgixkar P(3_li&lt;::e - S &quot;  .. Appellant\n\n(:33; Sm{.Ar1umha R.[}esai, Add}. SP?)\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p> :&#8221;w \/1&#8242;  Uppar,<br \/>\n5 1&#8242; years, O::.j(;:&#8221;Ho11seh01cI work,<\/p>\n<p> L R\/0\u00a3\u20ac\u00a7eI;g&#8217;a1ag\u00a7utti.\n<\/p>\n<p>H M &#8221;   Saba Uppar,<br \/>\n ._ years, Occ: Agxicuiture,<\/p>\n<p> T.1&#8217;\u00a5;&#8217;_o&#8221;Ka\u00e9I1ga1aguiti.\n<\/p>\n<p> _ VT &#8220;Iviuf.tappa Harxamaxtxth Uppar,<\/p>\n<p>,  years, Occ: Agriculture,<br \/>\n&#8216; R\/0 Kengaiagutii.\n<\/p>\n<p>ma\ufb02ht\ufb02ww<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;. vsvvnl us nvwnatnlnlu\ufb02 nsun \\.vq;u_ ur AHKNAII-Klt\ufb02 HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C011<\/p>\n<p>4. Suresh Ham;-unanth Upper,<br \/>\n2-4 years, 003: Student,<br \/>\nR\/0 Kengaiagntti.\n<\/p>\n<p>Renuka Hazxalnamth Uppar, &#8216; 1<\/p>\n<p>31 yaars, Oars: Househcld work, 7<\/p>\n<p>R\/0 Kengaiagutti. &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;U1<\/p>\n<p>6. S.-aravva w\/0 Smmappa  &#8216;<br \/>\n33 years, Occr I~i0:1$i1.gid work; .__ _<br \/>\nR\/C: Kengalagutti. &#8221; &#8216; _  &#8216; &#8216; &#8216; %  _ Respo12c1&lt;-znts<\/p>\n<p>(By Advocaa; s:~i.s;v;&#039;-&quot;rag.  &quot;  <\/p>\n<p>my&#8230; \u00bb&#8230;V_v<\/p>\n<p>This ;;Appi\u00a7a1__isA&#039;1&#039;i%@(1_ tinder Sec.3&#039;78(}) and (3) of<br \/>\nCr.P.C. \ufb01t; g1*\u00e9mt\u00bb.\u00a3sat*ic \u00a30313 an appeal against the judgment<br \/>\ndated :4.,%5.&lt;2002&quot;;;asse:g=:;y*%&#8212;:he I: Add}. S.J., Bijapur in SC<br \/>\nNo.64\/97 &#039;acquitting ..;the&quot;::e&quot;sptjnde13ts\/ accused 2 1:0 7 for the<br \/>\noifences p1\u00a7i11\u00a7s\u00a3*;ab1\u20ac: tmtigt&#039; Sec. 143, 147, 498-5., 307, 504<br \/>\nR\/w S:-3,149 9:1&#039; IP&lt;:::;  &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>*&#8217;L1*i::s,%%vAAp;:;ea1 i\u00e9$Wi\u00a7ho1nii1g on far final hearing this day,<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217;*F;i{I};;L&#8217;\u00a7{&#8216;;\u00a71i}1&#8242;(_&#8221;\u00a7;._RAMESH J. dtzlivared the following:&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>JUI)GhmNT<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; V&#8217; ~  &#8216;T&#8217;1&#8217;~!:;.is&#8221;appea.E is by the State against the order of acquitta}<br \/>\n _&#8221;&#8221;;j\u00a7a\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;:;ed&#8217;A by H Acid}. Sessions Judge, Bijapur in S\u20acSSi{}I}.S Case<\/p>\n<p>H  V    &#8216;Ne.:;.64\/97 dated 14.6.2002 far the :t:&gt;ffene::es punishabie uncier<\/p>\n<p>860.143, 147, 498%., 387, 304 R\/W 860.149 of IPC. On<br \/>\nwgg\u00e9,<\/p>\n<p>thigh anti her Saree caught \ufb01re. Having seen.  of<\/p>\n<p>them went away. She fell on the gjeund :g1&#8217;:*1(i&#8221; &#8216;get &#8216;e)\u00bb:ti:1g:3,is\u00a7i1eti&#8217;A. _<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01re herseif. For 4-5 days she   4&#8211;.S* &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>days after the incident her riietlger earee<br \/>\nincident and thereafter her    her parents<br \/>\nhouse at Beliubbi.   treatmerlt was<br \/>\ngiven to her irythe    thereafter elderly<br \/>\npereens of   the accused, but<br \/>\nthey  3:9&#8217;  As such, later she filed a<br \/>\nc0mpleint.&#8211;. &#8216;  got examined the injured<\/p>\n<p>and e)b1&#8243;zai:f&#8217;:ed &#8221; eei\ufb01\ufb01eate and iater statements of 7<\/p>\n<p> _  were :&#8217;ec.Q:f_(1\u20actd and ehargewsheet was med. After the<\/p>\n<p> e&lt;\u00a7\ufb011\u00bbruiit;;}.of\ufb01*;e_c,ase under Seit; marked 9 documents. {)1} the diI&#8217;f3CtiOI&#8217;i, EZXJD-I was gm;<\/p>\n<p>an uvvtu ur rwmnlnu-\\nA H361&#8243;! COURT OF KARNATAXA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HiG!&#8221;! COU<\/p>\n<p>Ixiarketi. Thereafter recorded the Statemems urider 368.313<br \/>\nJ;*e\u00bb~<\/p>\n<p>an uuuxl ur MKNAJAKA HIGH COURIAOF KARNATAKA H;<br \/>\n_  &#8216; GH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH (2.00<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">12<\/span><\/p>\n<p>izolding her hands and made her imnaobiiesz aild gm.&#8217; mid<\/p>\n<p>the COI1\u20ac11,1\u20ac3{. of the accused as narrated _3:\u00e9\u00a7\u00bb .&#8211;   &#8216;s{)i{&#8216;:&#8217;V&#8211;_<\/p>\n<p>t.est.i;m0ny of the victim herseli  E6 &#8216;tfia\u00bbft&#8217;;&#8221;s:.Iii::&#8217;:&#8217;*es2ja&#8217;S;VOik1 a&#8217; I<\/p>\n<p>precarinus c:o3&#8217;1&lt;iiti0r1 at that71in;.e l)O&#039;1;-tiihg  tiiat.<br \/>\nSubsequent cmzduct of the   \u00e9\u00e9dpgkaachmg the<br \/>\npoiice 1301* going to the   gm&#039;: went a.1:{1g with<br \/>\nher In0t}1e;: to he;~V.{;at.iv\u00a2&#8221;&#8216;p\u00a3a\u00a7:\u00a2,V iii:  shows that all<br \/>\nthat is not &#8216;\u00a7r\ufb01J};%;   rightly noted by the<br \/>\nSession$..Ji#\u00a7\u00e9&#8217;g\u00a7;&#8217; V;:r2 gione, I11{}I&#8217;\u20ac: S\ufb01} Icxdgng of the comg\ufb02aizat aftrzr<\/p>\n<p>I1&amp;:z3i*&#8217;13:*~&#8217;  &#8216;A\ufb01i;1\u00a79Ai\u00a7VV;\u00a7%*hiCh itself Sh\u20ac}WS to be Lmnatural. AS is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;.:1of.iC\u20ac\u00a7d B33&#8242; {$16 Sessions Judg\ufb01 that the compkaim is \ufb01l\ufb01d<br \/>\n;*:2f\ufb01ei*4$3f10t1g11t when \u20ac116}? ccmld not come to Bi&#8217;-I&#8217;II1S. Except the<br \/>\n&#8220;&#8221;&#8216;.&#8221;S{}V:EfS E\u00a33Sf,iH1{}Ifty cf the Victim, Gthar wi&#8217;mess\u20ac:s are all h\ufb01arsay<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;.WiiI3.\u20acSs\u00a3:s as is m:&gt;ti{:6:d. The ether Wi&#8221;Ei1\u20acSS\u20acS Wh\u00e9k have also<\/p>\n<p>depesed that they are the viiiagerg fram her parents hcsuse<\/p>\n<p>L2,:e-~<\/p>\n<p>. .._.. ..-&#8230;..V_..V.-.-. uwnnzvnlnn\ufb02 ruurl LUUKI Ur IEARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HiGI&#8217;\u00a7 COURT OF KA\ufb02NATAKA I&#8217;\u00a7lGH&#8217;COUl<\/p>\n<p>I?\n<\/p>\n<p>versioza is a hczarsay. PW&#8211;8 has s:1ppo1&#8217;f;ed__ti*a{: $?(32f$\u00a5i0fr&#8212;-&lt;jI*.tI1\u20ac:<\/p>\n<p>pi&#039;ose&lt;:utTi0r1 regarding the advise; ..t.c;~__the &#039;&#8211;&#039;ai\u20aciC&#039;t1*S\u20ac:<i>\u00a3ice regarding<br \/>\nthe haI&#8217;ass1neI1f.f 1;1et.\u20acid&#8217;   by the accused.<br \/>\nAlthough    about the ov&lt;=:1&#039;f:A&#8211;act<br \/>\nof the a;t(i11$\u00e9d:vE3\u00a7;&#039;&#8211;::\u00a7;:  w\u00e9iizrzz\u00e9ss in the CI&#039;OSS-\u20acX\u00a3iII1iI1a1Zi0Z]<br \/>\n1&#039;16: }13s:V1adi1;&#039;:it&amp;\u00a5i&quot;\u00e9iigf\ufb01 got 80 stated befare the pelice in<\/p>\n<p>this raga15&lt;&#039;;i%&#8230;__  &#039;Sa\ufb02ci\u00e9shiv (&#039;:ha:r1&lt;\u00a7ran1 Uppar who is the<\/p>\n<p>.. _ fJaf.t&#039;i?i&quot;33&#039;i18l &#039;LI.If1C}\u20ac &quot;of &#8230;:Ef_:\u20ac&#8211;: &lt;:o;npIair1am&#039;: I1\u20ac3C8SS\u00ab&#039;31&#039;\ufb01f\u20ac his wersion<\/p>\n<p> }{I;\u20ac)%&#039;\u00a3I1 \u00ab\u00a5I_{) ~bi3 \u00a7i1E1\u20ac?F6S1Tf3(&#039;\u00a7 and he is also a Witf}.\u20aciSS to spcak<\/p>\n<p>ab;.:;1,1\u00e9: f.}1eA E\u00e9fair\u00e9gssxxzeilt ili\u00e9ilti\u00e9i out to the (:oz11piair1an*it 31151 3136<\/p>\n<p>&#039; r\u20acgar&lt;u:i:l1:1:g iz1cidez1&#039;t. ami he is tarziy a heamay wi.&#039;\u00a5:a\u20ac:ss. He<br \/>\nV. Lad\ufb01xittsti thai; he has not givsn any stat\u00e9merzt regarding<br \/>\n ___&quot;&quot; &#039;haV3:ass111a:1t, ta bring cash and gold to the victim by the<\/p>\n<p>&#039;4  xaCC&#039;\u00a31S\u20ac(T}.. This fact. depicts that; this evidence caxmot. be<\/p>\n<p>wort.\u00a715: of C()I&quot;I&#039;(}b\u00a3)i&quot;8.&#039;EjV\u20ac evidence {if {he victim. ?W-1O is<\/p>\n<p>&#039; E:&#039;4_g&#039;;.\/<\/p>\n<p>or&#039;?\n<\/p>\n<p>.\u00ab-5 1 us&#8221; 1 \u00bb&#8230;u&#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;<br \/>\nW7<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>5%.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">19<\/span><\/p>\n<p>with a11ot:her lady or due 1:0 $01116 ()&#8217;\u00a3h\u20acI&#8217; I&#8217;\u20acE1E3{);{:T\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;.W&#8217;I&#8221;\u00a7[if;%.._:gi\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7}V&#8221;?}f1\u20ac<\/p>\n<p>ratia cf the judgment. of the H\u00ab:3n&#8217;ble Sup:*\u00e923.&#8221;3a..  t;:vc\u00a7&#8221;~<\/p>\n<p>views are possible f9Aseaiy   -[ -&#8216;  as ViS__I1&#8217;i;?*\u00a3\u00a3C6d. -&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>If .\n<\/p>\n<p>by the tria} curt uecessaxiig\u00e9    tfise<br \/>\naccused has to be taken note&#8217;  &#8216;b\u00a73{\u00a71\u00a7&#8217;;gl\u00a7;_1:1ci and in<br \/>\nthe facts and ci1*cun.1si.;;f;:es  as  prosecution<br \/>\nfailed 1:0 prave thgi&#8217; case  amused be<br \/>\ngiver: bene\ufb01t  been acquitted<br \/>\nrightly; by   &#8220;E&#8217;Rf1&#8217;\u00e91Vi:\u00a7.\u20ac:V&#8217;ansWeIi11g all the pr()iI1tS<br \/>\nraised   Hegrder of acquittai passed by<br \/>\nth\ufb01 Isa1*r;\u20ac;{i_  Bijapzgr in S.C.64\/199?&#8217; is<br \/>\ne::c:&gt;nfi1&#8217;n}&lt;::d }&amp;*\u00a31;1ae  . 1&quot;.1&#039;&quot;i\u20ac appeal.<br \/>\n  {ha appaal is {iiSI&quot;\u00a31i&#039;.3S\u20ac\u00a7d. Juafgment in<\/p>\n<p> V S.CL5\u00e94}&#039; &#039;i919&quot;V?.v~&quot;i;e E?;V\u00e9re1)_3: &lt;:or1\ufb01m1t:d.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-1<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">0<\/span><br \/>\nu<br \/>\nI<br \/>\nQ<br \/>\n3::\n<\/p>\n<p>E<br \/>\nE<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><br \/>\n\u00a7<br \/>\nEL<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">0<\/span><br \/>\nE<br \/>\n:1<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><br \/>\nx<br \/>\nQ<br \/>\n::\n<\/p>\n<p>E<br \/>\ng<br \/>\n3&amp;-\n<\/p>\n<p>O<br \/>\nE<br \/>\n:2<br \/>\nO<br \/>\nu<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">:1:<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">0<\/span><br \/>\nI<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><br \/>\n5-\n<\/p>\n<p>-at<br \/>\nE<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><br \/>\n&#8220;an<br \/>\nO<br \/>\nE<br \/>\n:1<br \/>\nO<br \/>\nU<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">35<\/span><br \/>\n:2<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\n\u00a7<br \/>\n3 .\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>}~?ij:Z{)f}9i)8<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008 Author: K L G.Ramesh k&#8217;\u20ac5EA$t&#8217;*&#8217;%.\u20ac&#8217;\u00a7.i&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;s-iW$\u00a23&#8243;*?: \u00a77,&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7i?&#8217;\u00bb*m.&#8217;$5\u00a7'&#8221;&#8221;\u00a7&#8217;- IN THE HIGH COLERT OF 4% CIR(&#8220;T3U&#8217;I&#8217;I&#8217; BENCH THE :~mmaLB: MR; A .&#8217; THE HONBLE &lt;3. RAMESH DAT11[\u00a7VTi}fI_$ &quot;\u00e9\u00e9WEMBER, 2003 1~a\u00bb1?\u00a7:~RA1;5:3r{\u00a7;V%1558\/2002 5, &#8211; ~ % *me&#039;:s;::s;t;e &#039; % Babaittgixkar P(3_li&lt;::e &#8211; S &quot; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-225372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-29T18:40:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-29T18:40:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1123,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008\",\"name\":\"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-29T18:40:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-29T18:40:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-29T18:40:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008"},"wordCount":1123,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008","name":"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-29T18:40:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-vs-gouravva-wo-hanamanth-uppar-on-18-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The State Of Karnataka vs Gouravva W\/O Hanamanth Uppar on 18 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}