{"id":225672,"date":"2010-02-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010"},"modified":"2014-05-10T12:42:34","modified_gmt":"2014-05-10T07:12:34","slug":"syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Aravind Kumar<\/div>\n
; (9\n\nIN THE HIGH coum' or KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 16% DAY or FEBRUARY. 20-2-9\nBEFORE v_v .V\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND    \u00ab \"\nCIVIL REVISION perxrrormo. 1-cg'   1* V'\nBETWEEN: I I V ' A  V'  J\n\n1. Syed Dastagir.\n\nS\/0. Late S. Gaffar.\n\nMajor. Door I\\Eo.446_._\nShaiivahana Road. I \nNazarbad,  VA -   _\nMysore \u00bb-- 570 010.  V  '\n\n2. M. A.Sha\u00a7:h'\u20ac1'Eaj'; _ g   \nS\/o. Late   Anaihalrajiah. f .\nM \/s. Agianm-aj'a'i';\u00a2h  .Son$A,. \nPaint and I9*iait;:j1.wa;'e'*1\\\/IVe'rc'h2_1_nt. \n\nAdj;1ce_11t. to  eNe'1z1ifa_jaiah,\nPalm Shop No'.'.E\"E\": \/2  \nNew No.34'?\/2. Ashok\"a,Road.\nLashkaf\"Moha11a.  V' \"\nE';fIy\"so're M 570 001.\n\n\"    _____ .. v  Petitioners\n\n'   Joseph. Adv.)\n\nAND \n\n  '   Riekabchand Challani.\n\nAge-:3, about 78 years.\n \" ' {?.~\u20aco.15. New No.347,\n* .,_z'--_XShoka Road.\nLashkar Mohaila.\nMysore - 570 001.\n\n\n\n[J\n\n2. Nooijaliziii.\nW\/o. Basheer Ahmed.\nMajorj)\/0. Late S. Gallar.\nD. No. 1494. Muslim Block.\nBehind Cl'1L1F'('.l\"l.\nHtmsur.   ' :_. \u00ab\n -'.Respoiide11t_s'e H\n\n(By Smt. Mrudula Adv. for Sri. '17.:    \nAdv. for R.l]    \"  \n\nThis Civil Revision Petition pi*a13l\/'i--ngv--t'o set'v--lV-asivde thjellordesf\ndated 1 1*\" December 2008 i'eje(:t'jin*g_{1l1e \u00e91;1piiea.tio11'S._i'ovr..addL1cii'1g\nadditional evidence passed in R.A'.s, 179\/2O0?'2i1'id3 RA. 213\/2007\n\non the file ofl Addl. Civil Judge (s1:.i3n_) 'M._ysore;*  \n\nThis petition coming  day the Court. made\nthe following: 5   -  \"\n\nR.A.No.i1l3\/t2'0Q7\"la'r'e the correctness and the legality\n\nof the  appeals dated .1 l--l2~2008 by the\n\nl Add4i;ii(\"inial (3liVii.___{Jttdgge Sr.I)n. & CJM, lvlysore. whereunder\n\n app1&i(n\u00a7a1;ion? i'oi\"'a_ddit.i()I1al evidence had been dismissed.\n\n   in nutshell are as follows:\n\nl\"\"l'he-__lp'a:\"1.'ies are referred to as per the ranlcs in the Court\n\nW  The plaintiff\" (W respondent herein} who is the landlord<\/pre>\n
” ,a11d’*owner of the non–residen1:ial premises bearing No. 347\/2,<\/p>\n
 Road. Ixashkzxi’ Mohalia. i\\\/Iysoi’e~57000i instituted<\/p>\n
Wt<\/p>\n
‘..-J<\/p>\n
ejectmeni suit agaitist. the defendanis [petitioners l and  herein)<\/p>\n
in O.S.No.39\/2005 on the file of the IV Additional ‘eixjii..4’_J~iidge.<\/p>\n
{Jr.Dn) Mysore. The defendants on service of n_e:f;ice”<\/p>\n
and filed their written statement denying Ihe”pl’ai:r}f Vave’r.mc.nt’s..j <\/p>\n
The trial Court framed initially fouij issseu-es. A’Z.StI1;5’SF:C1lo\u00a5;\u20ac–}j1ti3kf’_’an .<\/p>\n
additional issue was also frain__ed aaidl’ o11n.’t\u00a7opfisi_deri.ng ihe~<\/p>\n
pleadings. evidenoe on record andxkthe d.oCurn’enls ‘produced by its<\/p>\n
judgment and decree dated”2–4-.\u00a7,OQ?jud’e\u00a7:reedthe suit.<\/p>\n
3. Aggriei\/ed__  1del’endan1s filed two
\nappeals i.e..:_. the second revision
\npeiit.ioner)._ by the first revision
\n also came io be dismissed by<\/p>\n
judgment anddecreehdaljie\u00bbdT1..\u00bbs.ls l2–2008 and the judgment passed<\/p>\n
by ll”1\u20acj4′-:(‘)vL1u}*.’i’ below _eame to be confirmed.<\/p>\n
V    pendency of these two appeals before the<\/p>\n
is-si.jAddi:io\u00a7i:;1.7′ em; Judge {Sr.Dn). <31 CJM. Mysore, an<\/p>\n
 ':–ippliea1"\u00a3ioi"'1'\u00ab:_under Order 41 Rule 27 had been filed by the<\/p>\n
 I appelia–nt.s therein seeking to adduce additional evidence. The<\/p>\n
 -T.\u00e9:a:\u00a2;\u00a7 applieration was resisted by the respondent by filing detailed<\/p>\n
“pobjeciions. The said applieaiion was also considered by the<\/p>\n
@,<\/p>\n
appellate Court while considering the appeal on main and by its
\njudgment and decree dt.i 1-12-2008 as referred to supiaiioi only
\ndismissed the appeal but also dismissed the “by<\/p>\n
the appellants seeking production of additional evid_e11e’e..  0<\/p>\n
5. Being aggrieved by this j=Vudlgn1ei1t”.anci\u00abd.e’C.1:eVel’pasVsed id.<\/p>\n
in R.A.Nos.l79\/2007 and 213\/2oo’7lldei:ee1 i1l;”,i:.:.z.’2oos
\nfirst appellate Court the appella11’ts:therein’i..e_.;’-petitidnlersl in this
\nrevision petition filed two,separate’e.seeoi1d& aplpeVa’is'”namely RSA
\n394\/2009 {filed by the lirstll:l_’peti_tio11er] and RSA<\/p>\n
367\/2009 (filed -the   petitio1’1e’r). The said<\/p>\n
appeals we1’e..eo;1sid”e.;*ed’on.n1eri’i;sw–ahd the findings of the first
\nAppellate”–,Court’  aVsll’trilal__lCourt came to be con\ufb01rmed and<\/p>\n
when the appeals ‘were “taeliiiig dismissed. the learned counsel<\/p>\n
…u.appeari11gl’i”or both”-Vtheappellants sought for time to vacate the<\/p>\n
IV’g’pl’\u20ac:IR~lS\u20acS,\\Eil1d’\u00ab.I3’1’1alZ)l\u20ac the appellants therein to file an affidavit<\/p>\n
of ~undertal{i’hg,’gthe matter came to be adjourned and on the<\/p>\n
_adjour3*1ed—Vidaiel namely on 94-2009 an affidavit sworn to by the<\/p>\n
0″respeetivel”appellants tl’1erein, the revision petitioners herein was<\/p>\n
l_”Ae.:i1e.el’i’11*”RsA 394\/2009 and RSA 367\/2009 respectively. The said<\/p>\n
..l_4l”af?i’davits was taken on record and undertaking given by the<\/p>\n
‘VVportion};oi’ the first “app’ella.te Courtis order to contend that there is<\/p>\n
‘A’~._noA fi’n,di11gCA the operative portion of the judgment of the<\/p>\n
V the apif;lica.tioii”i’iled for additional evidence and hence rejection of
\n“luv.a’aopliCEitioit'” for additional evidence is to be considered as an
\n *foi’d\u00e9x”‘*iand if so construed. the petitioners would be justified in<\/p>\n
 invoiiiiig the revisional jurisdiction. He would also contend that<\/p>\n
de\ufb01ned under Section 2(14} of the Code of Civil Procedure. To
\nbuttress his argtiment, he would cite two decisions oi’.theDl~ion’ble
\nSupreme Court in the case Diwan Brothers Vs.
\nIndia, Bombay and others reported in (1
\nand Hero Vinoth Vs.\n<\/p>\n
545. He would elaborate hisdis_ubm’i&ssio’ns
\nwhen an application for addit.ional*evidence”   it\ufb02woluld go to
\nthe root; of the matter naiiiely,   Court and
\nhence the petitioners are   t.he revisional
\njurisdiction of Court  challenged the<\/p>\n
judgement  “pi:is\u00e9ed,”:_.i”ri{_ -RA. No.i79\/2007 and
\nR.A.No.2:Viv3\/$t)l0′?;’VbyV  :S\u20acCQ1}d Appeals.<\/p>\n
9. Fire’ hlwoulld 4Vdra’w.:_”..'”ihe attention of this Court to the<\/p>\n
first as well as in its decree about the rejection of<\/p>\n
  TheVfoi”i’ovv”ing points arise for my consideration.<\/p>\n
appeals the judgment and decree of the first
\nappellate Court. has merged and henoei\u00bb-tiae
\nrevision petitioner cannot resagitate;’t’h’e–\u00ab’.fs–a;n’ie.V__’_<\/p>\n
issue under guise of Revision.\n<\/p>\n
(iii) in View of the order passed
\nChallenged in RSA\u00bbth’ev..VpresenVt_ itevilsiorgpetiifion<\/p>\n
is not maintiainable.   ‘<\/p>\n
(iv) There are no grci-uVnd’s’ln*iacE’eV .()’Ll1;tv to condone the<\/p>\n
delay.’ ‘  pp  *<\/p>\n
iv) “””   revision petitioners
\n all their avenues have now
\n petition to Wriggle out of the<\/p>\n
 nnderijalliiingpi given before this Court and
\nAt.\/act\u00e9iordingly seeks for dismissal of the revision<\/p>\n
” ‘ p+?:_i’:itjon with costs.\n<\/p>\n
li”._ Having heard the learned counsel for the parties.<\/p>\n
{i} Whether the order passed by the \ufb01I’S1. Appellate Court<\/p>\n
dated I L12-2008 suffers from any legal infirrnity’?<\/p>\n
..  Procliictivoiiof additional evidence in<\/p>\n
  pari’ies to an appeal shall not be entitled to<\/p>\n
prod.1,1’c,i’e_.additional evidence, Whether oral or<\/p>\n
 la} The Court from whose decree the appeal is<\/p>\n
Explarlarion : A decree is preliminary when
\nproceedings have to be taken before the
\nbe completely disposed of. It is final when  is
\nadjudication Compleieiy disposes of _ u<\/p>\n
may be partly preliminaiy a’i1<:'=;lparily \u00ab\u00a3i'i'1al:1'A '  "
\n[3] to (13) XXX<\/p>\n
(14) "order" means the  'exprehssiori oflany
\ndecision of a Civil' C_o~;.trt  is nvo'E\u00ab.a decree;
\nORDER XL}. RULp;.27".  '<\/p>\n
1 . Forrrzii of – \u20acWIJ1at,llt:o V aeebiilpany
\nmef\ufb02\u00b0.\u00a5aridi1lI_n   "  A<\/p>\n
 llll  " ill   ………… ..\n<\/p>\n
2 Appellate Court :\n<\/p>\n
doe’u..meni’ary. in the Appellate Court. But if\u00bb<\/p>\n
preferred has refused to admit evidence which<\/p>\n
ought. to have been admitted. or<\/p>\n
and 213\/200? {which admittedly has already reached finality in<\/p>\n
R.S.A.i\\ios. 3941\/2009 and 367\/2009 dated O1\u00ab04-2009}. in this<\/p>\n
revision petition and rattempting, to obtain orders b\u00ab\u00a7i’..t1s.iri-gtrick<\/p>\n
and stratagem which cannot be countenaneed ‘t.his:;Cotirtol’ <\/p>\n
is required to be dealt firmly. This condtict-1t}\u00a7’V:”‘th_c.VVVrevision T<\/p>\n
petitioner clearly depicts that their or1l.y’i–nter1tion is to dragon<\/p>\n
the proceedings and squat.   the
\npresent type of litigation uth.eir slol”c.’aii’e\u00a7<:l ingenuity
\nwhich not only requires to  to be deprecated.
\nHence in the fiU:l'CS:\u00a7V3:V   cloiivsidered opinion that
\neach of the   'mulcted with exemplary
\ncosts  them to the respondent
\nwithin one  'failing which the respondents are<\/p>\n
entitled to ex–e(iti.t.e t1iiise._o'1'dTeir by initiating appropriate execution<\/p>\n
 \u00a2_pi'c)t:veedii1.lge.V T he"–rey_i_:3&iyon petition as wet! as LA. fiied for delay<\/p>\n
"._V are "cl ismissed.\n<\/p>\n
Sd.\/-*
\nJUDGE.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010 Author: Aravind Kumar ; (9 IN THE HIGH coum’ or KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16% DAY or FEBRUARY. 20-2-9 BEFORE v_v .V THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND \u00ab ” CIVIL REVISION perxrrormo. 1-cg’ 1* V’ BETWEEN: I I V ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-225672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSyed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-10T07:12:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-10T07:12:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1142,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-10T07:12:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-10T07:12:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-10T07:12:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010"},"wordCount":1142,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010","name":"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-10T07:12:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-dastagir-vs-s-m-rickabchand-challani-on-16-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Syed Dastagir vs S M Rickabchand Challani on 16 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225672"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225672\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}