{"id":225673,"date":"2009-04-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-18T02:39:32","modified_gmt":"2016-04-17T21:09:32","slug":"ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>             Central Information Commission\n                                                            CIC\/AD\/A\/09\/00313\n\n                                                             Dated April 27, 2009\n\nName of the Applicant                  :   Ms.Mamta Johari\n\nName of the Public Authority           :   Doordarshan, Indore\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.    The Applicant filed an RTI application dt.29.7.08 with the CPIO, DDK, Indore.\n<\/p>\n<p>      She requested for information in respect of attendance record from November<br \/>\n      2002 to July 2008 and payable salary of Mr.Sunil Johari . She also wanted to<br \/>\n      know the amount being deducted from his salary and information about how<br \/>\n      much deduction of GPF is permissible and whether the GPF amount is being<br \/>\n      deducted more than permissible limit and whether such consent was given by<br \/>\n      Mr.Sunil Johari in writing or not.   The CPIO replied on 2.9.08 stating that<br \/>\n      information is about third party and denied the information under section<br \/>\n      8(i)(j) of the RTI Act. He also stated that he had written to the third party<br \/>\n      seeking his permission and Mr. Sunil Johari stated that he had been divorced<br \/>\n      from Mrs. Mamta Johari and denied information since its disclosure would<br \/>\n      harm him and his family. The Appellant was accordingly denied the<br \/>\n      information.    Not satisfied with this reply, the Applicant filed an appeal<br \/>\n      dt.13.9.08 stating that Mr.Sunil Johari who was her husband and that he had<br \/>\n      deserted her and her child and is not providing any maintenance amount. She<br \/>\n      stated that an application u\/s 125 Cr.P.C has been presented by her before<br \/>\n      the family court, Gwalior in which the inquiry is being conducted about<br \/>\n      income of the husband. She added that Mr. Johari has also played a fraud<br \/>\n      before the Department by deducting the GPF amount more than the<br \/>\n      permissible limit with a malafide intention. The Appellate Authority replied on<br \/>\n      11.11.08 directing the CPIO to provide all the information requested by the<br \/>\n      Applicant in her RTI application. The CPIO then referred the case to the<br \/>\n      Appellate Authority with the representation of Mr. Sunil Johari stating that<br \/>\n      there are number of cases against him regarding the          divorce and that<br \/>\n      disclosure would harm him and his family.       After the Appellate Authority<br \/>\n      received the representation he considered the same and provided all the<br \/>\n      information except the leave account stating that there is no public interest<br \/>\n       involved in disclosing the same.   Aggrieved with the reply, the Applicant filed<br \/>\n      a second appeal dt.23.1.09 before CIC.          In her appeal she stated that<br \/>\n      information which was initially allowed to be collected by her vide letter<br \/>\n      dt.31.12.08 was withdrawn by the Appellate Authority and therefore the<br \/>\n      attendance record was not supplied to her. She prayed for restoring of order<br \/>\n      dt.11.11.08.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, scheduled the<br \/>\n      hearing for April 27, 2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    Smt. Geeta Markam, Station Director, Doordarshan, Indore &amp; CPIO, Mr. R.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Venkateshwarlu, DDG, DDK, Delhi and Mr. V. Pandit, ASE, DDK, Indore &amp;<br \/>\n      ACPIO represented the Public Authority.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    The Applicant&#8217;s brother and Advocate Mr. Deepak Saxena came late at the<br \/>\n      hearing and only after the Respondent left.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.    The Respondent submitted that the Appellate Authority has provided all the<br \/>\n      information (except the leave record). The information was provided i) since<br \/>\n      the information is already in the public domain and ii) on humanitarian<br \/>\n      grounds. The Commission observed that in the second appeal, the Appellant<br \/>\n      has requested for the attendance and leave records of Mr. Johari.           The<br \/>\n      Appellant also stated in the appeal that the attendance record is required in<br \/>\n      connection with criminal cases filed under section 498A of IPC for demand of<br \/>\n      dowry,   with the police, informing them that Mr. Johari and his family<br \/>\n      members have been harassing her for dowry and not permitting her to reside<br \/>\n      in the accommodation which was allotted to Mr. Johari by the Office. The<br \/>\n      Appellant also stated that she suspects that her husband has attended the<br \/>\n      court cases without taking leave from office.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    On perusal of the information provided and after hearing the submissions of<br \/>\n      the Respondents, the Commission is of the opinion that the Appellant (and<br \/>\n      her small child), having been harassed by her husband and then deserted by<br \/>\n      him and not being provided any maintenance allowance,           has a right to<br \/>\n      information which would help her to seek justice and, accordingly, although<br \/>\n       the information has been denied by the third party, allows disclosure of<br \/>\n      information regarding attendance and leave records of Mr. Johari to the<br \/>\n      Appellant in public interest. The Commission directs the CPIO to provide all<br \/>\n      the available information to the Appellant within 20 days of date of issue of<br \/>\n      this Order.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.    The appeal is disposed off<\/p>\n<p>                                                                (Annapurna Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                        Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nAsst. Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.    Mrs.Mamta Johari<br \/>\n      W\/o Mr.Sunil Johari<br \/>\n      C\/o Mr.Vipin Kumar Saxena<br \/>\n      Near Water Tank<br \/>\n      Behind Gorkhi<br \/>\n      Gwalior<\/p>\n<p>2.    Mr.R.K.Bohare<br \/>\n      The ACPIO &amp;<br \/>\n      Centre Director<br \/>\n      Doordarshan Kendra<br \/>\n      A.B.Road<br \/>\n      Indore 452 001<\/p>\n<p>3.    Mr.R.Venkateswarlu<br \/>\n      The Appellate Authority &amp;<br \/>\n      Dy. Director General<br \/>\n      DG : Doordarshan<br \/>\n      Doordarshan Bhawan<br \/>\n      Copernicus Marg<br \/>\n      New Delhi<\/p>\n<p>4.    Officer in charge, NIC<\/p>\n<p>5.    Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009 Central Information Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/09\/00313 Dated April 27, 2009 Name of the Applicant : Ms.Mamta Johari Name of the Public Authority : Doordarshan, Indore Background 1. The Applicant filed an RTI application dt.29.7.08 with the CPIO, DDK, Indore. She requested for information in respect [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-225673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-17T21:09:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-17T21:09:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":800,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-17T21:09:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-17T21:09:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-17T21:09:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009"},"wordCount":800,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009","name":"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-17T21:09:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-mamta-johari-vs-doordarshan-indore-on-27-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ms.Mamta Johari vs Doordarshan, Indore on 27 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225673"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225673\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}