{"id":225830,"date":"1982-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1982-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982"},"modified":"2017-07-04T19:57:20","modified_gmt":"2017-07-04T14:27:20","slug":"tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982","title":{"rendered":"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji &#8230; on 4 August, 1982"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Bombay High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji &#8230; on 4 August, 1982<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1983 Bom 116<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Kania<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Chandurkar, Kania<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p> Kania, J. <\/p>\n<p> 1. This  is a petition  under Art. 226 of the Constitution praying in the main for  quashing and setting aside an order  passed by the Tahaildar, Chiplun, dated 15th April, 1977 on an application by respondent 1 to 3 under the provision of the Maharashtra Debt Relief Act. 1975.\n<\/p>\n<p>  2.  Respondent 1 to 3 and their brothers formed  a joint Hindu family and the said joint family owned land  bearing Khata No. 453 admeasuring 5 acra 26 gunthas at village Kherdi in Chiplun taluka  of Rantagiri district   On 7th Dec., 1967 the petitioner purchased from  respondent 1 to 3 as representing  the said join family  a house bearing house  No. 1603, viz.,  &#8220;Krishna Bhuvan&#8221;.  of village Panchayat, Kherdi, along  with certain surrounding land admeasuring  13 gunthas for a sum  of Rs. 5,500\/-.  On the same by another  documents was  entered into whereby the petitioner agree to return the property sold under the aforesaid sale deed on the  payment of the whole amount by  respondent 1 to 3  provided  the repayment was made within whole amount to respondent  1 to 3 provided  the repayment was made within the next ten years. On the coming into the force the Maharashtra Debt. Relief Act, respondent 1 to 3  made  an application that they be declared as marginal farmers as defined  in the said Act and that the transaction which  took place on 7th Dec.,  1967 was only  a mortgage and not the sale and that  they should be  granted  relief under the said Act and the house, viz. &#8220;Krishna Bhuvan&#8221;, returned to them free from all encumbrances.  The Tahsildar by his impugned judgment held that on the appointed day under the   said Act, there was a debt and  that respondent 1 to 3 were &#8220;debtors&#8221; as defined under the said Act, was he passed an order for the return of the whole property mentioned in the sale deed dated 7th Dec. 1967 to respondent 1 to 3 free  from all debts and encumbrances on the footing  that the transaction which took place on 7th Dec. 1967 was a mortgage and  not a sale.  It  is this  decision of the Tahsildar which is sought to be impugned in the present application.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.  We may  point out  that, under S. 2, Maharshtra Debt Relief Act, 22nd August, 1975 was the appointed day and S. 4  provided  for the liquidation of  certain debts  outstanding on that date.  The submission of Mr. Walwalkar, the learned counsel  for  the petitioner, is that, in the present case, there was no relationship of debtor and creditor   on the appointed day between the petitioner and respondent 1 to 3  at all, as the transaction which  took place between them was one of sale with a separate  agreement to repurchase. In view of this, the provisions of the aforesaid Act documents not come into  play at the respect of this transaction.  It seem that there  is substance in the contention  of <a href=\"\/doc\/1449101\/\">Mr. Walwalkar.  In K. Simarathmull v. Nanjalingiah Gowder,<\/a> ,  the facts were that the plaintiff borrowed a certain amount  from the defendants and in lieu thereof executed a decree of conveyance of certain land with a house thereon  in favour  of the defendants.  On the same day another deed of reconveyance was   executed by the defendants.  By this deed the defendants  agreed  to reconvey the house but the exercise of the right of demanding reconveyance by the plaintiff was subject to two conditions.  The plaintiff broke one of the conditions and the plaintiff refused to reconvey.  It  was held   by the Supreme Court that the sale deed, the deed  of conveyance and the rent note executed by the plaintiff were part of the same transaction. It was, however, held that the plea of the plaintiff that the sale  deed constituted a transaction of mortgage by conditional sale was inadmissible, because the sale deed an the convenant for reconveyance were contained in separate documents,  In Abdul Latif v. Abdul Gani Serang , it has  been held by the Calcutta High Court that  a mortgage by conditional sale is a transaction essentially different from a sale   with a  condition of  repurchases. In  a sale with a conditions of  repurchase the ownership  vests in the transferee form the date of the documents and there is  no question  of any debt being  in existence after the transaction.  In a case of mortgage y conditional  sale, the debt subsists and  right to redeem remains with debtor,.   In our view, it is clear that the transaction in the petitioner before us was one of a sale with  a condition of repurchase with the result that there was  no relationship of debtor  and creditor  arising  out of  that transaction and the provisions of the Maharashtra Debt  Relief Act did not come into play  at all.\n<\/p>\n<p>  4.  The only  submission of Mr. Joglekar, the learned counsel for respondent 1 to 3, was that it appear from the judgment of the Tahsildar that respondent 1 to 3 at some  stage  promised to pay the petitioner the entire amount of what they regarded as their debt&#8221; and requested the petitioner to return the property pledged with him..  the petitioner by his  reply demanded a larger amount for the return  of the property. This according to Mr. Joglekar shows that it was admitted that there  was a debt.  Even if this is so, this, in our  view, cannot  alter the legal  position.  Nor is  it possible  to act on admission which is not specifically  before us.  There is merely a reference to the larger demand of Rs.  7,650\/- by the petitioner in the order of the Tahsildar and it is not possible to act upon  that.  In view of the aforesaid, the order of the Tahsildar is clearly bad in  law and liable  to be  struck down.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.  In the  result, the  petition is allowed, the rule made  absolute and the impugned order of the Tahsildar set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>        6.  Looking  to all the facts and circumstance of the case;  there will be no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. Petition allowed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji &#8230; on 4 August, 1982 Equivalent citations: AIR 1983 Bom 116 Author: Kania Bench: Chandurkar, Kania JUDGMENT Kania, J. 1. This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution praying in the main for quashing and setting aside an order passed by the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-225830","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji ... on 4 August, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji ... on 4 August, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1982-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-04T14:27:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji &#8230; on 4 August, 1982\",\"datePublished\":\"1982-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-04T14:27:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982\"},\"wordCount\":997,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982\",\"name\":\"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji ... on 4 August, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1982-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-04T14:27:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji &#8230; on 4 August, 1982\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji ... on 4 August, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji ... on 4 August, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1982-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-04T14:27:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji &#8230; on 4 August, 1982","datePublished":"1982-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-04T14:27:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982"},"wordCount":997,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982","name":"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji ... on 4 August, 1982 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1982-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-04T14:27:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tukaram-ramchandra-mirgal-vs-shankar-alias-sakharam-kirshnaji-on-4-august-1982#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tukaram Ramchandra Mirgal vs Shankar Alias Sakharam Kirshnaji &#8230; on 4 August, 1982"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225830","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225830"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225830\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225830"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225830"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225830"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}