{"id":226387,"date":"2009-06-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009"},"modified":"2015-10-09T00:37:48","modified_gmt":"2015-10-08T19:07:48","slug":"state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HEGH com'? 012* KARNATAKA \n\nAT BANGALORE}\n\nBATED 'I'HiS THE 1%' DAY 09' JUNE  ' F.\n\nPRESENTMW\n\nTHE HON'BLE3 MRS..JUS'I'iC.;E} MaN;;m.;\u00a7a CHE:L_{:;Lr\u00a7\u00a7\n\n3?'.3'333.._  2  \nTHE H0N=BLB MRJUSTIC-E A;AL4.= G\"0_w::>A\nCRL. APPEAL :39. _453of\u00bb2002 -- I\n\nBETWEEN: V  ~ \" * \nSTATE BY   'V\nCHANNAGIRIPQLIfL;'3_  '   \nDAvANAGE22EDis5i1f;\u00bb-_% _    \"\"\"\"...APPELLANT\n(By Sri. P. M  ;=;a:;;,, \u00e9\u00a7iP?}\"\"\"\"  \nAND:  M %  ' \n1);vz0i\u00a7A1%\u00a3s'M'E:9 VS1'&A's::j;3_   \n3\/ 0 ABDUL; :s;AMME_m::AB__\"_.'%V\n\nAGED 28 YEARS;  \nNU G<3;HA1,L: WLLAGE\n\n - Ac;~iA;$;'r\u20acA{.:;;R:__TALU\u00a7<' H ---------- ~ "\n\nX2} MGH'aMNIED: JARIF\n\nSf OJSRE ~2s.13;){5\u00a7.;g' EEAMEEDSAB\nAGEU31 YE;A$?$',\nNUG{'.,~;\u00a3HA,LLI_ VILLAGE?\n\n cHAz~:\u00a7es;\u00a7;;R1'TALuK\n\n - ":33 M.::;BAMMEa SHAKER\n'  ":3;_'C:_A:~3~9UL HAM'EEz::sAB\n. A(3.e3:3 33 YEARS,\n  '\u20ac:1v:\u00a7L ENGINEER,\n_ 'vv3:w;fr:VE PLACE: NUGG}\u00a5\u00a7ALLi,\n\n\n\nPRESENTLY RES\u00a7DING AT\nD.NO.52; 1, 3RD CRQSS,\nANJANAPPA GARDENS,\nNEW LAYOUT,\nMYSOR3 ROAD\nBANGALORE" 18.\n4} SMT.NO{3RJAN\nW\/O SR1 ABDUL HAMMEDSAB\nAGED 51 YEARS,  _\nNUGGIHALLI VILLAGE ' __  '- V V _   "\nCHANNAGIRI TALUK    \n(By Sn'. A. N. Radhakrisf1i:a,Adx?o<:\u00e9'\u00a3e\u00a7 V \n\nCri\ufb01ppsal is \ufb02ied undar SeCii03;:.._3'?'${1}_'_. 8:. (3) Cr.P.C.\nby the State P.P.;.for V*St$.fc 'praying \u00abthat this Horfhie\nCourt may be pltmscd. to \u00a7gra.nVt:.isav\u00e9"vt<\u00a7~.fi1c  agapcal against\nthe juc1gement r1at\u00bbj:\u00e9(i' _3O."3..1.12{)\u20ac)T{__p\u00e9assetimby the Addi. S.J.,\n(Fast Track;-' fQcau'1"i;3'..__ r;ayarxag.arei",.,  s,c:.No.352\/ 2900,\nacquitting this  ;:i;:sp0I1d.e\ufb01t':~.wa<5\u00a2usi:d for the o\ufb01bnce\npuz1ishab1c:'m1_c\u00a7ttr S\u00e9\u00a7:i~;o:1--36.3, 35!3'E(i1d 3'?'6 IPC3.\n\nThis 53.9631   for hearing this day, MANJULA\nCHELI_V.me.}AJ a'\u00a2\u00e911--.:\u00a2zsed"t1:u%~; following:\n\nJUl}GMENT\n\n.'  iiis \ufb01led cI1a11\u00a2::ngin.g the ozticr sf acquittal \u00a311\n\n _  ($11 the \ufb01k: <)fF'ast '3"rac1\u00ab: Cami, Eavanagere,\n\n'  '\ufb01g. I\ufb01 brief, tha \u20ac38.85 of th\u00e9 prosecutien is as un\u00e9cr:\n\n -.3J_  Deceased Bharathi, when she was a miner, was mken\n\n " -. \u00ab by accused no, 1 t0 Ba\ufb01gaiom to his brothc\ufb01s house with the\n\n\n\nassurance of marrying her and committct\u00e9 rape oI11 _ii1s;r.\n\nSubsequently', a Paxlcitaayat was heid in the v\ufb02lage  'E1:_%" \n\nmarriad her accarding to Mushlm customs. \n\naccused persons subjected her to:v.J\ufb01?\u00a5"\u00a3i'e'it\u00a7; 7anci:i --1;flti1Vfe\u00a71;\u00e9V1y \n\nkilled her on 30.9.1999 at abgaut   'V\n\npillow on her face and th\u20ac:rea,ftr:i':?.:\u00a7ct he}  to\n\nscreen away the crime cmnmitttd'"b3' _:t.*3\u20ac\u00a7i;2_.._\n\nb) '}['h-:: charges leyeiied   were ibr the\n\no\ufb01eaces punisL;s:t\u00a7:\u00a2.w?':;:;cis;r  "37*6\u00a7498-A, 302 read\n\nwith Seciiola .3?-a.n\ufb01i:1f:,;2{)1';.I&L'E'.C.\u00ab'1'i:<: {::ase was committed to\nSessionS'v--._{3G1\u00a7.ri'  eifsnibtt\ufb01 \u00a3vex'e exciusivtiy triable by\n\nthat ccurt.  _W\u00e9i53.  as accuse\ufb01 persons pieadtit\u00e9\n\n not  to the V'<\u00a71:r;2::'_g_\u00a7:_:\u00a7\u00a23..*:v ';.P18 anci 3} material asbjects. Portions of the\n\n   Qf PW}, PW2, P313, PW6, PW11 and PW2?' came\n\n  E: marked as Exs.D3. to D6.\n\n\n\nd) The learned trial judge theugh was convinced of the:\n\nhomicidal death of the deceased, proceeded to ac(_1u4i::t-..'_:t'1:c\n\naccused based on the fact that the pmsacution  _\nto estabijsh which of the accusezi was 1\\3s;3a*\u00bb:;;is--i\u00a7\u00a7lt::  \u00ab\u00a721c_: u \n\nincident in quezstion. The main: Iea\u00e9son :.forfjvCu:\ufb01in'g'~.tbvV Vs.\u00bb:n__1<:}9;V T .\u00ab\n\nconclusion was the sfate111\u20ac:nt_[a3f_ PWI'   if\nthe decaased and aiso her  that  \npeople after much 'the co\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01fs of the\ncomplaint and they were   the members\n\nof the family ofth\u00e9fg\u00e9cus\u00e9\ufb01d to .. h \u00abV\n\n8} Agg:i\u00e9iz\u00a2d"    of acquittal, pmsccution\n\nhas Come:  this \n\n"   2,.;?~;om w\u00e9i\u00e9 \ufb01iade out\nby the: groaecution, the sam\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9is simiiarly\n\nthe a\ufb01ences pugai\u00e9t\ufb01able \u00a5\u00a51nc1_e\u00a7f..':Sec{i<\u00a7'::sV Vane} 1375, 1.13.63.\n\nailcgcd  ' Q\ufb01\u00e9rzces punishable under\nSections  C3Q2'*and  fead with Section 34 against\n\nother _\u00bb:=2(j:c11s<\u00a7\u00a7 V pers.i311$'-  not established, ther\u00e9for\ufb01,\n\n ,ta~--  \u00abgiij\u00e9\u00e9cution failed to establiah all the\n\n         \n\n'\u00ab::_harg_\u00e9':3. l'7\u20ac:*\u00a7\u00a7iiI\u00e9\u20aci..T_\u00a3ag.;::insi the accused.\n\n 'E'fh\u00e9 ';:;+'$i:::zi that wcsuld 3..'{'iS\u20ac fcrr G121" consideratioza is:\n\n Whather \u20ac136 mafxriai avaiiabia on recorci wanants\n'~if;?\u00a7I\u00b0\ufb012:\u00a3";&n{:$ with the j1;&gms11t and order of acquittal?\n\n 6. PW} azgci PW? are parents of damaged Bharathi @\n\nV.V;'$\u00a7}&sha. Accmrding ':9 them, A\u00bb- lpersuaded \ufb01er 1:0 accompany\n\n\n\nhim to Bangalom and because of commitial of rape on her,\n\nthey had to agree for the marriage; even a\ufb01er mami\u00e9igc,\n\naccused $ubj\u20ac:<:ted her to \u00a31}-treatment and \u00a5.1i\u00a7'im:.?its'~:1"}_,;'.:f__.'k::t"L'.7f,VVA' \n\nput an and to her life by murdering her. pW3~1\u00a7a\ufb01c\u00a7axs:;'u:;"\u00a2gs' \n\nfor EXP} 1, S\ufb01izlif\ufb01 of mclimina\ufb01ng li1113.d1;<V:t't:z4:;1:.V'V":2:1  'rlg\u00e9adw E3? {lie\ndeceased. PW5--Raveesh3;~ .\u00a7peaks"'  ' 'p'\u00e9i1';(:.'hay\u00a3;it "i3eit;g heid\nprior to the marriage of  and so far\nas harassment V' the case of\n\n'aha px~<3S:ec11_tic$iAV1LT'L'v.i?V\\1\u00a7{:6 is't,Ei::..._;"1r:igh\u00a53our of the accused; he\nSpfi\u00e9i-{RS  pieads ignoralscc regarding ill-\n\ntreatm;::::d:._  "Dr."G.jE3.\u00a7%t;i1 issued Ex.P8~post mermm\n\n ';%epg\u00a7\u00abt."'Pi\u00a72'3~irai\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9h, hrsa\u00e9 master issued EX.P\u20ac\u00ab), birth\n\n \"t h\"s?. _\u00e9;i\u20ac<:*\u20ac:ase.d. PW9 is the assistant engincar\n\nWh\u00e9 \u00bbr:ijie1&*V.tif}\u00e9:'..--si;:etch as per Ex.?1(}. PW10 is the G116 whe\n\n '<::QnductCci_ i=;rzquest as per EJXP4 and rscoztied statemanis of\n\n and kin, PW}: talks at" handing aver two shits to\n\n  but the same are net produced. F'w}2--~AI11am,1}}a speaks\n\n  .0f the 10% affair between. A--~1 and the deceased, panchayat\n\n\n\nand brings back unsekd items in the evening. Acoordiz:_;_g to\n\nhim, A-1 used ts assist his father in the \u00a73usi;1;:;2=.s ;-\u00ab\u00ab_\u00a2_\u00e9)z:;v\n\n1.<\/pre>\n
10.1999, a Friday, he took the articles of A\u00bb\u00ab  V.<\/p>\n
viliagcrs; A~1 and_A~–4 did not attenci Q13 she1i<':iy "' 2<\/p>\n
were there. PW19 speaks about <\/p>\n
dated 11.2.1999 between the d.eCe_g\u00a7se(i a:j1\u20ac:I AV–~1.:
\nChidazlandayya who speaks of  gf$i1;;,'J_VV:::51i;s':ra3\u00aby f;v:2*ith A~
\n1, information in this  by 'PWi2v%AA12$lding cf
\npanchayat wherein A–I _V_x\u00a73'aQ:;3_  deceased<\/p>\n
Bharathi anci ;~'iii%3; f3na1;Iiage;V ai\u00e9c:(:) zfiiI1g_…iio him, in the<\/p>\n
marziagtf   "property was agreed to<\/p>\n
be given  1&5:  ::1ocumex1t was given to her<\/p>\n
and a gtgpy E4:;{\u00a2a$_x\u00e9:ii\u00a7iv_%:}i\u00e9.bLVfather Gf A– 1; abeuf: 7*'-8 monihs
\n 2i1_f1e:r~:r?e\u00a7i3i'?:,e1fA..iAV:si3;f:A.  ""\u00a7"W21 is the photographer who took
\n   dead body at the time of inquest. i3'Wi22'~
\nh\ufb02zicih'   watch ovsr the dead body and took it far
\nPgst  he prodmce\ufb02 p\ufb01rsonai baiengixxgs {if the
\n   .\u00a7%\u00a7{~:$.S.4\u00a7:&ci, "i,e, Fv'E.Os.i29 {\u00a33 31 beibre the poiictat PW23 is<\/p>\n
 cozxstabie who was posted. on \u00e9uty after<\/p>\n
 '  \u00a7; VVa. ;3frf:1"eh::t11di11g A~1 1163.1' Bhadravati bus stazid and produced<\/p>\n
him before C.\u00a73.I. PW24 talks of apprehending othcir accpsed<\/p>\n
on 1.12.1999 and the report is at Ex.P1:'\u00a7. PW25 is <\/p>\n
who mgistcrad Crime No.234\/99 based on the  .<\/p>\n
PW1 and sent FIR to the court. PW26 is the 1  u " 'V <\/p>\n
tht': spot after receiving yhone meisasagea th\u20ac3.. 1,iI1i1.*2iiu;"a:3;;VTA\u00ab<\/p>\n
de:a\ufb021 of a woman and he is tl15-,_.one i?:f1 1C- senf\u00a2"'}V:i*\u00a7\u00a3 1A_v
\npolice station far registering  h\u00e9i  spot
\nmahazar as per Ex.P5  1 tov SA. HVIVDWQ7 is
\nanother 1.0. whe aisca    mcorded<\/p>\n
vcluntary State;11\u20ac.tr\u00ab2\u00a7 _' of  lg   he conducted<\/p>\n
recove1'y: V.;\u00a7er 35 under which M.G.2\ufb01 was
\nrecovsrrsdb PW2'?  \ufb01led charge sheet after<\/p>\n
complcting i::{{fcs:figat}i0::.\u00a7'- PW28 is the constable whey caz\ufb01czd<\/p>\n
' V' 'E.x.P';'.,.. {0 'Lbs pg-iice staitibn.<\/p>\n
 Patii says the fa\ufb02awing irxjuxies wait<\/p>\n
V VV _ fo1;1:\u20aci"*anv=t:f1\u00e9's:i;\u00e9a\u00a3i h\ufb02dyz<\/p>\n
 ..   wounds 01: the chest, abdczmcn, both
\nV'  'hthighs and bath fags, bet}: mms, were<\/p>\n
pmsent;\n<\/p>\n
Ali the bmn wounds were white in coisur,<\/p>\n
:30 red \ufb01ne demalztation S8511, skin on the<\/p>\n
If}<\/p>\n
xvotinds was burnt. Skin and face and back
\nbiackened. .\n<\/p>\n
Mi the burn Wounds were pos\u00a3–mort:c:m in  <\/p>\n
nature. ‘<\/p>\n
Accczrding to him, \u00e9eath was due  as 3 ‘\ufb01:=\u00a71;lt of <\/p>\n
su\ufb01bcation and it must have happe\ufb01\u00e9d  \u00abte::r  ‘V<\/p>\n
the past mortcm; he has opi11ed’tI:>1.\u00e91t.if”a  on
\nthe mouth and both nos\u00e9gz\ufb02s, .a'”p\u00e9\u00a7t’s\u00a7$i:__Wa\ufb01\u00a3d”di\u00a2\u00a7g;1ue to
\nsuffocation, and that a piilcw’   cause such<\/p>\n
suffocation; accorglwmg te:’hiIi1,’~\u00a73:1,r1’1$’–x57e1*ezgzdst mortem and<\/p>\n
there m?g.$”1;<H)  {If   and wounds were white
\nin colaui\ufb01. Es  \u00aba parse}; digs due to $1:1<::ac::k<\/p>\n
suddsnlfg eve\ufb01i hefo\ufb01iz   or immechiatelgg after catching<\/p>\n
 * \ufb01xe, v1i:i}.i:'i:r\u00a7f;..x\u00a7;r<.;1,1l\u00bb:i ;1\u00e93}t'b'c*'i\u20acd line 33}; the  0fb’:.1:\u00a3’::s being white in coirzmr. Accoxding<\/p>\n
 ‘ Ito the: si\ufb01ejt Vmahazar, the dead hardy was found cm the<\/p>\n
‘1..1:;i{}\u00e9f3i_3fS ifing on its back,<\/p>\n
   The fm\u00e9ings dtiring iaqusst proceedings go :9 Show<\/p>\n
 t.11a*\u00a3. the sntim aie\ufb02zea were burnt 311$ back portion {3f the<\/p>\n
ELI<\/p>\n
dead body was not burnt; tongua was protruding bet.r.r\u00ab=.–*_c<:':I'1<\/p>\n
the teeth. Though the opinion ofthe doctor is that ,<\/p>\n
due to asphyxia as a result of sui:I'o=:*ation,–A"""i13  V'<\/p>\n
t:xamiz1atio11 he says if someone diesd-ue_t0 s.\u00a71oc }\u00a7 'b%:f<):i::. <\/p>\n
SpIEa(iS over the "body, there Wiii not lbs  <\/p>\n
iherefom, the evidence of this   gt}
\nhe is not defmite whet.her'_bu1"ns'i1;;dic\u00a7\u00a7te\u00ab':.\ufb01\u00a2yH%i1'e post
\nmertem in nature. He i1va1:3: \u00e9';}sQ".V_1;:(12.;;;"on What basis
\nhe opmes that death \\&7\u00a3{S:_\u20acii1\u00a7.':_'f;:(Z3  does not say
\nwhether   of used on the
\nmouth  gzressing her face.\n<\/p>\n
But the  ‘hot accidental burns and it<\/p>\n
h\u00e91Pii>\u20ac1T’~*3d in 4f’:’4l’1@.. f”2I*s’\u00a3.’;”\u00a31o\u00bb 0r  the house, There is no defmite<\/p>\n
‘V V’ cvid\u00e9\ufb01z\u00e9e i..A’t;\u00a51at {he’V  was tZ)fht”LI’WiS\u20ac2 than homicidal.<\/p>\n
‘9.__’ 1V’Ahe p.\u00a25x\u00a7\u00a7..V;q:i1estion is, whethar the accused persons ha\u00e9.<\/p>\n
  ;<:_QHl1110I:': \ufb01gientian to kill {ieceaseci Bharathi, in omier to<\/p>\n
  ';\u00a7:.{{"iAf;a;C;';{"' 7316* provisian of Sac\ufb01on .302 read with Sectican 34,<\/p>\n
 in order to ascertain this, it has 13:) be seen if the<\/p>\n
 'V.;\u00a7'1v;<'3's\u20accz,z'\u00a3:io11 has established that Awl murdered the dmeased<\/p>\n
by smothezing with a pillow and other accused assisted;<\/p>\n
in making the cvidance disappear.\n<\/p>\n
:0. Apparentiy, death has occurred in  u <\/p>\n
heme: of\ufb02ae deceaged and it was Within   .’<\/p>\n
accuse\ufb01 as to how it 0CC1EII’6d5.–!}1}\u00a7;E\u20ac c14c&\u00a7a\u20aci” \u00a3:ody
\nthe 1st \ufb02oor lying on the  cvid\u00e9rgcag\u00e9f;  d;)ct0r
\ndefmitely does not rule    part of
\nthe deceased becauae accQ:1f;<ii'IA1'Vg'i\u20acjs' not be any
\nred line d<:marc;3ti:;:n;;1 1'\u00a711  dies suddenly<\/p>\n
due to shack'   fat. in tha present<\/p>\n
case, ap a1'"i: -item" t':\u00a7c t\u00a7s3\u00a2E:s;SE;\u00a2:1,' severai other persons were<\/p>\n
also living  the zftiatii\ufb01zeziial home. Merely because it was<\/p>\n
V 331 img\u00e9r\u00e9caste iixarriagc, it does not mean accused were<\/p>\n
  \ufb01lmq\ufb01iztg  to (19 away with hat \ufb01fe. As a matter of<\/p>\n
fag.-,3;-['\u00a7:.[Aisv4\u00a7\u00a3h\u00a7  of prosecu\ufb01on. that \ufb01r} {wk her away<\/p>\n
 _ pzior\ufb01o the  and they were iiving in his bmthefa<\/p>\n
 "–..V\ufb01o}.:$\u00a2. '}E'}2i\u00e9 would 03113.2' go is Show that apart: from Ari, his<\/p>\n
  was also supporting their marriage. It is \ufb01ti\ufb01li franc:<\/p>\n
  ~.Vf_:\u00a31(\u00a7'\u00a7\u20acVi{i\u20ac\ufb02C\u20ac that name of the fam\ufb01y members of deceased<\/p>\n
:~ Bharat11i ware: mftrested in the said maniagag thczir<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
a\ufb02egaiiexz is that there was persistent demand for dowryand<\/p>\n
they were troubling the deceased on one pmmxi or
\nAccording to them, she was con\ufb01nmi in a  V.\n<\/p>\n
allowing her to talk to anyone. ‘\u00a5’hereVf\u00bbg1t,
\nChjts through the Winciow in the <\/p>\n
according to the {)F0S6C1}t1’OI1,V.’W{3’rfi handed 0’:\u20ac’1 ‘faI:i\ufb01:\ufb02y <\/p>\n
members cf the deceased and  the   to;\n<\/p>\n
know about it, they c1ose{:1 ‘\u00a71:_1e u?i’11d\u00a7>xx~:.;3\ufb01i\u00a711A,3panelsAAai1d nails.
\nShe was aiiewed to go is aempk:  \\>\\?31:\u00e9: 1’3;– :’g}:1’r.=;~ met her kith<\/p>\n
an km, she }1a1j1ci:L?\u00a7i\ufb02%3veI:=__c1:;\u00a7iL’a\u00a7~’:to”.ti:i\u20ac,*:\u00a311V.._f{f\ufb01ot1gi1 such chits<\/p>\n
were gits\u00e9n tt\ufb01 ” E33? 2f:f;\u00a7.’t 11{3\u00a3v, ‘~$CCQII:3.iI1g to him, none of these
\nchits are ‘attained   not part of the prosecution<\/p>\n
reccsrcis _V<\/p>\n
‘A ‘ V.  3,  other hand, the evidence Wouid go to show<\/p>\n
 wlzamver share: A-1 would have got,<\/p>\n
_W3.S  tea the name 9f the decaassed pfiar ‘\u00a30 f:]:1&
\n\u00a7.a”:.t1?i age.V’V–“i5’11is Woui\u00e9 013.13? gas to Show that war: some<\/p>\n
 _;.:\u00a717r;Vp\u00e9r:\ufb01jg was kept in her name.\n<\/p>\n
iii<\/p>\n
12, Then coming to the lodging of comp1ai11t,g i}1c<\/p>\n
incident Gccuned duz\u00e9ng the intervenizlg night of  ‘ <\/p>\n
and 1.10.1999, am} the compiaint was 10dga\u20aciHq19\u00a3-iii\ufb01.  <\/p>\n
at 11.15 a.1:1:1. Thus, theme: is a de1ay”6f35\u00ab   k_::iV5gVi:ArV1g <\/p>\n
the complaint from the time of dsgciirfrcznce;  PW} Vi:13;$  ”<\/p>\n
categorically admitted that by vpum. “on
\ncame to know about thev iqcide:Li”a\ufb01\u00a7i~  visitiixg t\ufb01c spot,
\nthe: complaint was lodged:  from<\/p>\n
her community vjfJ:3;.’}:\u00a3\ufb02\u00a73  V__t11e’ \/\ufb01\ufb01mpiaint. Even
\nthen, it is    is not pmperly
\n2  other hand, defence
\nbrought 511:1 ‘r>5=:cf tZ1\u00e9”a,c%:,:s.%i to jail Elven PWf;~Su\u20aciha, elder sister of the<\/p>\n
V’ iie\u00e9\u00e9asg\u00e9 Eas stated 30 in 116:’ statement before the Tahg\ufb01dar<\/p>\n
 Ex.D6. Acmniing is 133;”, she wanted the famiiy 91″<\/p>\n
“AB\u00a7iu1 I-Iamecisab to 136 completely wiped o\ufb01l Aicmg with<\/p>\n
…..\n<\/p>\n
‘J:\n<\/p>\n
her parsnts she also W311: and lodgttd the compiaint that the<\/p>\n
entire: fam\ufb01y of the accused should be behind hars_ …
\nfamily members of the cieceased had ve\ufb01geance of _
\nnature, no Wonder that aven innacent ;3e0p1e_–am  u <\/p>\n
in the comxxxission of the crime. All this:m\u00e9af\u00a3ur\u00a7a1.’x=\u00a7%\u20ac>t11:}Vr::;\u00a2f3,l\u00a7: <\/p>\n
establish the contention Qf tl1eV.defenct\u00a7”t.I1’a?. the,<\/p>\n
and others were an aiong  \\;\u00e9;:2g:\u00e9:af1ce:’:against
\nthe accused anci have leiiged a  R x\n<\/p>\n
13. There is (mm more fa\u00e9\ufb01   the court to<\/p>\n
accept the sai\u00e9; ‘t’:Qf_1″:enf:i0ng  t’;.’1&(%i””\u00abi;i{:f;e;:;:\u00a7.\u00e9e. Acocxrding to<\/p>\n
PW22–h\u00e9tad  in Watch the dead. body at
\n12.00 mici\ufb01igilt 011′-1′.1.G.  V .P’\\.V1~mother a\u00e9mits that she<\/p>\n
went :5; i;H\u00a2: h\u00a3).\u00a31se 0f”tIi1c:V’ accused cm that night and by that<\/p>\n
  Vvfgagt off, $55 remained in the house ti\ufb02 cvenjgmg<\/p>\n
 in the village prepared EXP} and she
\n321% pig: hm’?  Acetror\u00e9ing to PW29, Gus 9f the wimasses is
\n‘~ _ th\u00a2 spat” and alga ts ihe marriage, PW? Went is the
\n jli\ufb01atieun on the very same night 3322 came back aftar
\n the cornpiaint. From this admission, it confirms<\/p>\n
ifthc-rs was one mom sempiaint othaz’ than EXP: which is not<\/p>\n
before us. If the police haci came to kuow of the ” 3<\/p>\n
admitted by W22 during the early hours of 1. 151999″ M<\/p>\n
the Tahsilciar was also at the spatio\ufb01  <\/p>\n
complaint ought to have been \ufb011ecb\u00a7j1’m:’–m_T  ‘aftrzrn <\/p>\n
incident. Thcrefcarcz, the V” was   in
\nconcluding that E\u00a7x.P1 is. not  the
\ninvestiga\ufb01ng agency }1::i\\,_ lodgaci
\nprier to Ex.P1 ~therei’df\u00a3:’,   Sis not able to<\/p>\n
exylam the d\u00a2}..a:;,:.’   ~ ”\n<\/p>\n
  “14 ‘b\u00a7ve  that when they came
\nout craf  Cal} an {E6 irztervcning<\/p>\n
night of 30.\u00a7;~3 $399  b’Z(;}..”~*’}{999 heard cxzies from \u00a31116 heuse<\/p>\n
 \u00a7:sf aqcs\ufb01sed; both \u00e9\u00a7f’\u00abt}:1sf::1:: did not pay attention, thinking it<\/p>\n
 K_w3.\u00a7;”::xpi$r;j_  cinema on ‘RV. The ieamled trial judge<\/p>\n
f\u00e9ul\u00e9\ufb01-.VV\ufb01i\u00e9t ‘ii}’1\u00e91\u00a7:  is impmvgmeni in the versian sf tlm<\/p>\n
.witnesLEse$’–  A011′ “c0m\u00a7ar:i’ng their evidence with Sscticn. 161<\/p>\n
 ‘A4 “s.\u00a7.at<3[3;;\u20ac;ni\u00a7. if the wands did \ufb02at attract their attentian<\/p>\n
 -s\u00a5e:1iVQ’u:;iy, \u00e9eflniteiy We cannot placa much reliance cm a<\/p>\n
. _ ‘ ‘s,-ingie CiI’C”i.”\u00a3I}3.St8\ufb02C\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n
IS. In the Eight cf the above sexieus de\ufb01ciencies in _r;1::c<\/p>\n
cast: of the prosecution, the so-calletii recoveries wiii ::1\u00a7}u’;= }fiavE: A’<\/p>\n
much xeievance. There is diifercilce of apizxion’: ‘<\/p>\n
recovery of M.O.26~\u00bbpi11ow used for s_1_11.o.t};1_eI’i11_g”iIi&*:i1ve::\u00a7\u00e9a$\u00a2d.’_ <\/p>\n
Prosecution mainly reliiss on circuinstatztial1evidgi1c\u00e9,. [E::7s.ii.\/_:<\/p>\n
none of the cixtumstances :_e.3.1;\u00a71b]iV\u00e9\u00a7i:u?\u00a31. VHo1?\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9i*:;;s.\/
\nS1lSpiC.’i\u00a33I1 based on such  evi\u00e9iezgc\ufb01lg it\ufb01w\ufb02l not
\ntake tht: place of proof:    ma} _”\u00a7z.1dge: was
\njustified in not accept1ngAV:}:_1\u00a7*:’ <::aL.\ufb01”e:1ccs_” }fji%;1:;1 -i’s}1\u00e9\u00a7<)1eiLuiid\u00e9ii'  302 read with<\/p>\n
Sztctien A. 3 E   . R V
\n16:'-Tiianv<':o\u00a7:\u00a7i\ufb01g. f1:x.. ..'0:ff'ence under Section 498A,<\/p>\n
I.P.C., fzxcep\u00e9t-. t}1e_'}:;if'i;  kin of the deceased, 13.0<\/p>\n
 mdegi\u00e9iadgni ..witne\u00e9s"*–has supporteci 131$ prosecution case.<\/p>\n
 ..E'vr:i:'1"  chrits indicating ill-\u00a3:*ea'\u00a3:111ent to the<\/p>\n
de\u00e9ea\u00e9\u00e9d ait' :1:E3\u00a3: '%1an\ufb01s of the accuse\u00e9 am \ufb01at befare us.<\/p>\n
'.?W6~\u00e9\u00a7:1..\u00e9z:g;\ufb01iz-fainiamce, sxpresse\ufb01 his igxzoranczit abcuit the<\/p>\n
 '\ufb01ie\u00e9saagzd icseing i}i~tmated1 by me accused. Similar is the<\/p>\n
~.""\u00a7i"\u00a77"}::\u00a7."'i:\u20ac.3%E'fi\u00a2At{f cf PW 1.4. Thaugh PWs– 14 and 13 am neighbours,<\/p>\n
* evidczzce dees not indicate that accused had Silbj\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01d<\/p>\n
E8'<\/p>\n
the cieceaseci tn crutrlty, either physical er ment_aL.'4'
\nwhole, though at some point of time some ha:?\u00a21s\u00a7sni::1{i f'<:5r
\ndowry was tried to be made out by' f}:\u00e9'E, V’<\/p>\n
abseuce 0:’ prosecution estai\u00a7\u00bbii5;;L;’fii’*1g t\u00a31eV..\u00a2Zna1}g_\u20ac ‘”<iIo"\u00a7v1-y
\ndemand', we are unable, 3:0 u;1ci'cL'#\u00a7\u00a7VLf2z;\ufb01i(lL,_.as ' id "i}1e' type 0f
\ncrucify alleged against th\u00e9'  ma} court;<\/p>\n
\nwas justi\ufb01cd in  pumlshablcsz\nunder   nr\ufb01z \n\n1?'.    punishable under\n<\/pre>\n
Section\u00e9rg\u00e9\u00e9 .tt;\u00bb\u20ac*  evidence on xtxzord goes is
\nshow th\u00e9f;   had raachad the age cf<\/p>\n
ciisc1’efgicu::,_ velu11fi;\u00e9iri1y’ezccen1pa:1i6d the accused to<\/p>\n
  \ufb01\ufb01yed in \ufb01lti’ house of A-3. There: is<\/p>\n
 Show ciectaased ever protested thif act Gf<\/p>\n
A4  sjp*e:\ufb01i\u00e9VI%\u00e9r retaining is: their viiiage from Bangaiare,<\/p>\n
._ she :vas.’p;f?Essu:izing her garents far her marriage with A—1.
\n.  iiheugh they apposzz\ufb01 the marriage, \u00a3116}? get her
\nV\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01xa\ufb01ied to 5&1 in accordance with Musiim customs ami her<\/p>\n
\ufb02ame was aiso changed. As on the date of Pr: taking her<\/p>\n
away to Bangaiere, she was just some months 1953 theija 18<\/p>\n
years. Therefore, the trial court was justified i11_’v\u00bbs{a”_;:?’;i\u00bbn-g<\/p>\n
neither tht: offence of kidnap nor rape on the dece\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9d  V.<\/p>\n
1 was established.\n<\/p>\n
18. Coming to wrtmgful COI1f1;[::1f3II1\u00a2I1,fA,::vV:1\u00a3:’7’\u20ac5’1’1{:1.\\7V'{E  A’<\/p>\n
discussed above that the pmsaea\ufb01on i\u00a7ia4_.$’L*1iserz:tb9}\u00a7g*  to <\/p>\n
estabiish that she was confmf-\u00a7iv..:._xf:0 gs.  her
\ncommunication was only wa3} \u00a7’f Vfiirgugh the
\nwindow Of the Lrzatzimoniafl\ufb02 :v;}i\u00a7*sr to her kith
\nand kin through  A L  V<\/p>\n
19.    we are of \ufb01m
\nopinion that tl%;\ufb01’r\u00a7;a\u00a7{iI1iIig triai judg does not
\nCail for a1A;t}\u00ab’_v m\u00e9iihftma\u00e9’; A :%.c{\u00a7t;1″dingl}g the appeal is<\/p>\n
 ‘
\nSd\/’*
\nREESE<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00a7,;’\u00a7
\nEig\ufb01\ufb01g<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009 Author: Manjula Chellur Gowda IN THE HEGH com’? 012* KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE} BATED ‘I’HiS THE 1%’ DAY 09′ JUNE ‘ F. PRESENTMW THE HON’BLE3 MRS..JUS’I’iC.;E} MaN;;m.;\u00a7a CHE:L_{:;Lr\u00a7\u00a7 3?’.3’333.._ 2 THE H0N=BLB MRJUSTIC-E A;AL4.= G”0_w::>A CRL. APPEAL :39. _453of\u00bb2002 — I BETWEEN: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-08T19:07:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-08T19:07:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2301,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009\",\"name\":\"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-08T19:07:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-08T19:07:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-08T19:07:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009"},"wordCount":2301,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009","name":"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-08T19:07:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-channagiri-police-vs-mohammed-shakib-on-1-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State By Channagiri Police vs Mohammed Shakib on 1 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226387\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}