{"id":226398,"date":"2008-07-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008"},"modified":"2016-08-11T22:07:03","modified_gmt":"2016-08-11T16:37:03","slug":"miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
.uum us nnmvuuanma I-nun QUUKIAIAUR: IXAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1<\/p>\n
E’? ‘TTE EEGH SOUR’? OF KARNATAKA, BANGAIKJRE
\nDATED TIE-{IS ‘TI-E 31*’? DAY \u00a32)? JIILY <\/p>\n
BEFORE<\/p>\n
13% H\u00ab3H*Ez.E .’M1F.’.\u00bb.JUS’l’ICE: v.JAGA\u00a7\u00a7A?:i3i\u00e9;\u00e9’  <\/p>\n
REGU smaxm Q” <\/p>\n
BEWIEM :\n<\/p>\n
mpms,
\nmm LATE m1~rB.s\u00a7=.a;s <\/p>\n
&RamLm P-ms  M
\nAGE:55″\u00a3’\u00a7ARS     <\/p>\n
ESQ f’r$LSAl.1IE\u00abS   <\/p>\n
K.a.Rma?:>:m%%      <\/p>\n
 gtgzsmrcr, Ii)._B’.’ij  A   APPELLANT<\/p>\n
cs’:   FOR
\nsR1\u00a3AmUEmR1’Rg:3Hz:m?:KnRA RAG, AEVOEZATEJ<\/p>\n
E3<\/p>\n
mR,I%.\u00a7.S.Ei\u20acI%\u00a3ATH’   ‘
\n$59 PWWRMG  :3
\nms: amaas <\/p>\n
   msvormgm<\/p>\n
 gay sm:\u00bb=:% \u00a7\u00a7*;mna1T1sHwm BEAT, ADWDCATE ma
\n% _sE1,3.L..Ar:HaRYA, ADVDCATE}<\/p>\n
    samad aweal is \ufb01led un\u00e9m Sactaion
\n \u00a3?PC. ag\ufb01mt tine j  and di dated<\/p>\n
1-\u00e9#;3;-$1161 passed in RA 110.140] 199% an the \ufb01le oftha I<\/p>\n
 \ufb01giicli, i”:a:=.-:1 Judge [Sr.Dn.}, Mangm diamiaaing the
\n 7.333%? and wn\ufb01ming the judit and decree dated<\/p>\n
— u. u must: 3 xawgaug<\/p>\n
I\\r’3.1IV” nu-um-ununnn ruun MVIUKI Ur Iv-\\i(IVuv\\lAI\\A I’1ll3l”I LUUKI Ur KAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
24.5. EQQ5 maa\ufb01 in O.S.Nc.6C.\u00a51f1991 on the file of the<\/p>\n
E1 Aa\u00e9\ufb01l Ci\u00bb-ii Judga {J1-‘.Bn.), Mazagalom.<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01 appeal minim on far haaring this  the
\nwart mack: the fallaw\ufb01m : <\/p>\n
\nthe tr\u00e9al mart ax\ufb01 thra  <\/p>\n
 ef the judgment    ‘ <\/p>\n
suit 212$ \ufb01x  \u00abif   mandat13ry<\/p>\n
mmamn Eng %’sai&%,-mment being<\/p>\n
 V   <\/p>\n
‘E3: 5.   \ufb01at a king
\ntime -\ufb01izzm   side of the suit mad
\nsismxLw.mg;fg  ;sr,;2mr\u00a2u%dm and in its plaoe: a
\n  by the deremam and this<\/p>\n
 ifuah to the aisrii ccurt eemplai
\n   the  vasf pu\ufb02ing up a new wall the<\/p>\n
  ‘   :\u00a7aL\u00a2i:z~edu-sea ms width azzfthe mad and as rm.
\n ma 33.8-itlg am. road as mm and Wm;
\n p1-mpmrtjr, ma plainb\ufb01’ naught far the<\/p>\n
mg’ p   restraixaim the defendant<\/p>\n
\u00abgz<\/p>\n
0.<\/p>\n
.. ……. …….. wvunl ur AMKNHIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUIHI’<\/p>\n
4.,
\nan\u00e9a\ufb01ssrappzwlawgthcevidarwe\ufb01wdmlay\ufb02m<\/p>\n
par\ufb01w az\ufb01 aka  mire af the  the
\ncammuamm, thc ma’: mutt. mid that <\/p>\n
an the wastm1 side of the suit props.-rty  <\/p>\n
had; 31% gznmmd that tha <\/p>\n
w\ufb01th gr the mad by
\namwaza\u00e9 th: quasgian
\npermrsent    Izqatived<\/p>\n
mnnmm   ft. mgztm level than the<\/p>\n
  put a cast to be shared by
\nbath :3?   slower appellate aourt, an
\n  me appeal. flhe dafendant,<\/p>\n
TV  :2     the amend afl.\n<\/p>\n
  tha rmrda as well as the papa’ beak.<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
.1′<\/p>\n
6<\/span>
\n%\u00a7 E\ufb01ia Ceurt, at the tima sf adnf\ufb01aion, had<\/p>\n
\ufb01ms\ufb01 \ufb01g &I%wing aumtamial question cfjgw \ufb01or<\/p>\n
mmis\ufb02azratmm:\n<\/p>\n
“Whse& Em 51.151: cf the    <\/p>\n
rmpaz\ufb01mt was   En.\n<\/p>\n
}f\ufb01&:\u00a7’*’m’ fax” dwlaratizzn of   .V T
\nla\ufb01 af tha appe11s,:.:t.’_
\nby 95%-m’iPtion?’    % A k   k
\n:3, 1:. :5    qmmtism that is
\n\ufb01mma, gm: mm:   us; whether the
\nsuit eraf   caou\ufb02 have
\nhaw held an   prayer \ufb01at
\nci\ufb01amtimm.  Q11″ um land of the
\n\u00a7 thy   _  <\/p>\n
  fa’ thaa appellant, at the: out<\/p>\n
 su”%:m    ‘ court was inawrur it; partly<\/p>\n
Mam;\n<\/p>\n
gym?   tiag  ‘far  mm the mm’ ‘ “n<\/p>\n
  \u00e9 ‘tl\ufb01cla\u00e9ia\ufb01on ass ‘as Ea \ufb01ght of easammt over<\/p>\n
 ? V *   It is the case gr title plaimmthat he<\/p>\n
 mad? but @113 g\u00e9aixmhas mt aougm for any<\/p>\n
3\/<\/p>\n
(<\/p>\n
.~—nr–\\\u00bb 1’:\n<\/p>\n
“”‘”‘”‘””” HIV” ‘-*’-“-3″”A”U””,_:l\\al*\\l’ll\\l.l-\\I;!-\\l’U-\\. rub!-I LUUR?” OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-EGH COURT<\/p>\n
G;\n<\/p>\n
daciara\ufb01a\ufb01 mf h\ufb01 \ufb01ght and therefore, in the absem of<\/p>\n
pxaym”\u00a7ez”suehare1iudbeingthereir1thepl\u00a7\u00e9;:t,thse<\/p>\n
qixezatirsza gr gantziilg injzmotion Wm not rm<\/p>\n
it wag argued that from    AV<\/p>\n
upan the ;::iaia.W’a mar  ro& ci
\ngot rmiazmzi :J;c1T   of the
\nd\u00a2f\u00a2:’1&a.n\u20ac:..,  this.   wumel for tha
\naylknt    Caimiaaziraw as
\nwell as   murts belew in the
\n is pcizmed nut that the<\/p>\n
Ecm\ufb01\u00e9igg\u00e9gzwrf\u00e9’  given a clean chit tn the<\/p>\n
.n’ …–m-‘n.nmu nxvn uuultl Ur NAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HiGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1<\/p>\n
aypveliznj:   .tb\u00e9 qumt5.c:r1 of granting any
\n V.  ‘  d\ufb01 mt Mme’ in such<\/p>\n
 1  mf tha afwa1d’ suI::rm1s.a’ ion,<\/p>\n
  fw%.:t3::s;e!;’:”V’S1’\u00a3.P.R.B:!::han Rae an the appe\ufb02ant<\/p>\n
  ‘     sef the dead:-isian gr this Court reported in.
\n 3% az\ufb01 cf the Apm Clcmrt neparmd in
\n am 594 :9 mama that wizhou: sezeking for
\n 0%’ \ufb01\ufb02e mm the mix mad, the pmiw cauki<\/p>\n
X<\/p>\n
” ” ‘”” ‘ ‘ “””‘ ‘ “””‘”” A’?-.\u00b0”‘T,A””””””””\\”‘\\ *'”V” ‘JJUKT 01’ KARNQTAKA HK-PH COURT OF KNINATAKA I-IGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COLRT<\/p>\n
‘1
\nnot have wught for thc miietf of mjummn and much<\/p>\n
1&5 the 3%} aaurt ccmlui mt have detzrev\ufb01 the sfgit evan<\/p>\n
8″ DH the ctha  H
\nSr~i.Pum1’ka\u00a7Iahwax’ Bhat ror%me;%ra;ago@aiaf1:,&%%   <\/p>\n
in tha p\u00e9mx\ufb01nga af
\np%am@’11.:a,s pmdea  ezgixs\u00e9o\u00e9cx used by
\nthe mm far  else may to the
\nexsidwwtm an  by the eaurw
\nbelsw and  trial court carnzst<\/p>\n
he \ufb01i  @arc1 to ma facts<\/p>\n
a\ufb01igimtams’ *..as.e”‘ and the trial” mart
\nam\ufb01’    emzmaclmwnt though he a
\nneg\ufb01giahie  having regard as the fact that both<\/p>\n
  \u00bb  mt  am\u00bb. Thmrefcrgizhe \ufb01miing of fact<\/p>\n
In; a<\/p>\n
  %  T s::%$n apprvac1a’ rim czf esriamoegs. called {gm
\n    awaal.\n<\/p>\n
 9, Saints I proceed ta caomi\ufb01er the substantial<\/p>\n
 ” quem7ana\u00a73.aw, it is nmmzy to re\ufb02ex’ ta m’ta1n’ facm<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
-.-. y<\/p>\n
j: …n… 1runrn\\rl u-nun uuunl ur IKAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURY OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR’<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\n(“\\D”‘;v\\:\n<\/p>\n
w\ufb01sch are –\u00a7a- d\ufb01pum wtwacn the parties. Bath the
\nA<\/p>\n
piajrzz\ufb01 may ma defendant has taken any the<\/p>\n
WW2; mag othen 1: is also wt in  <\/p>\n
wars 8: pathway was the  cf   <\/p>\n
mm. m m-mama  A
\n\ufb01allen \u00a33 aim an adm\ufb01tsci     mt\ufb01’
\nW311 E13 ?m aka
\n1%. as San tbs repczrt   that than
\nis rm   made by the
\n\u00e9afma\ufb01aii\u00e9  it ‘ma reported by
\n   \ufb01g; dim-e is :31::su’uctio:t:1 tn
\ntine  pmpen”ty’. The plain\ufb01\ufb01’
\n$3  aim admim-ad in his evidsnoea<\/p>\n
  of a oo\ufb01und wail by the
\n     his prcvperty dams not cause any<\/p>\n
 m the puma? ma the plamjzz\ufb01” ‘ has not<\/p>\n
 A.  m amt trouble it} rape-at of thv: 10 ft. widv:
\n “rm trial man. has also mcnrsrded a \ufb01nding that<\/p>\n
in  was canned ta the mad dune to the<\/p>\n
\u00b0wmm”””\u00b0'”‘w1$\u00a2’ . T’,l’1ua,,f1’Dm the aforesaid adnzxitted mm
\n&<'<\/p>\n
9<\/span>
\np\u00a7aeed\u00a2ntf1\u00a2evidmeeafthsparlimasweHaswitI1thc<\/p>\n
raw:-t afthe Csrwzzimhainner, tk trial \u00abmart has <\/p>\n
a%: a cwwiusian that thm-3 has harm rm  -.4 V<\/p>\n
the apwllani wear the plam’ ti\ufb01s pmpaty   <\/p>\n
;-‘L afthe width af the mac\u00a7.”\u00a7a’s\u00ab n;a\u00e91; azvzu  <\/p>\n
af the aype\ufb01ant but due to   :3? <\/p>\n
mu\u00e9 wa\ufb01 mllawing cm im own.’  o\ufb01
\nma au1ciez’m’ O , the mm   of
\nmn\u00e9azaazgzr ixgzumtiun ta   the
\nsaid \ufb01r1di% af    preferred
\n2%.   af law, the suit 3 \ufb01led<\/p>\n
fag” rm mag 35  ‘Ihe trial wart:
\n  age  an\u00e9 mmm the present
\n  \ufb01t {ha same tam, it has 1:0 be<\/p>\n
   aha-g’ tmmval of the wall<\/p>\n
‘ . ‘   air’ ‘<\/p>\n
..A 3.1%’ m-uuununzu-\\ rllun LUUKT OF KARNATAKA FIFO!-I COURT OF KARNATAKA HFGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1<\/p>\n
‘2: in the patfxwajgahcnruld wtabliah that<\/p>\n
V’    sf mgw” and eg:m’ and in has been<\/p>\n
   {if the raa\ufb01 m E9 to his property’. Tlrwte ‘3<\/p>\n
– 1-Iurinvn<\/p>\n
 E\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01t wmsci by the trial cumntaa @rds tfwnamre<\/p>\n
9\/<\/p>\n
l
\n1<\/span>
\nu<\/p>\n
\\o
\ncf’ right $2′ the plajrzt\ufb01’ am” the disprutnsd road. The<\/p>\n
prwctriptixae \ufb01ght 1%  t ow: \ufb01rm r:;..aa:V1V;”‘:.f”L:’f.fi:d\u00abe::’<\/p>\n
these atirmxmatannes where-the suit of   <\/p>\n
g\ufb01nr by the t:a’1a1′ mart, is   ~. 2 n K<\/p>\n
3:1. in the  e\u00a3..~-‘\ufb01;V\u00a7g\u00a5E’I*ILI1a\u00a7\u00ab’$\ufb027DIi\u00a7AKAR vs.
\nammm REDBY :33  AN13 o’1*LmRs*<\/p>\n
re.-wrtm\ufb01   Ccnurt has held<\/p>\n
mt; “””    5w suit for desclaraticn<\/p>\n
 01’ ‘wr\ufb01 3.11: mmequen\ufb01al
\nirgjuna’\u20aci\u00a3:n.AV._vBuf.\u00b0”how.V_:V    11% title is mm: in<\/p>\n
  if 11%  ‘\u00a3i&’ is nut cf<\/p>\n
 pwa\u00e9zsaafi\ufb01zig’ is suit far’ posswsion with<\/p>\n
  %jmm\u00a7m;m%iu;\u00a2mm- En the imam was, the<\/p>\n
‘   says in 11% plcadirm that ha is tzsirmg<\/p>\n
1nm%’ 5 and \ufb01rms has his pmpmtjr, thm ‘m<\/p>\n
…….. .. ..n….n.n….–. . nu. . -…uu..-nu \ufb01.grV Iu-1n:1.HlN|I\\F| nluvn \\…uuKI Ur’ IKAKNAIAISA HIHH (.00!!! 0!’ KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT’<\/p>\n
  af msammm af  ‘ :1 cIa:sxa’ \u00a2-\u00e9y the piainti\ufb01
\nH<\/p>\n
3:?\n<\/p>\n
:  mfnnc\ufb01nn ;m   <\/p>\n
I \\
\nam aaamagumty rm aueh $1′ a prayar 73 tr: has found in<\/p>\n
the suit\ufb02e\u00e9bythe 331%.\n<\/p>\n
3:2. “rim Caurt, in the case
\nQupm W. S.R.AZ\ufb01ACK’   <\/p>\n
has Iml\u00e9 t\u00e9xat it ‘we nnmaaary   ‘ii   2<\/p>\n
bag can a
\nmum see}: 5:\u00bb: a :1\u00a2:::11a:a’gzT5*nV:1\ufb01__=:>\u00e9\ufb01\u00bb Om  he has<\/p>\n
irzstant ma   *.’:V'”A.V:’,i’_.;.arzfV   ‘ptiteIz has: mm<\/p>\n
  the cam at’ *I<.sEE'rHa.RAM<\/p>\n
. nu. a -..uum vr_ AHKNHIAIXA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA H16?! COURT<\/p>\n
us. mwaym\ufb01rgg   2901 so 2152 \ufb01ound
\n had chimed ta be the<\/p>\n
 am mug& <\/p>\n
    the angoymeat. of suit
\n OObyO paw mi $'& the aesenaam
\nV V  \ufb01md any mrmwtcmeni, on the port\u00e9crrz of
\n  Eand) T115 qnes\ufb01cm arms an :39 wwtlnr
\n '(iefaa\u00e9mt had awachsd upon. the ptartian cf auit
\n  and the mepart of the Euzmissiane-r 511% that<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
u~.4-.eJn.q ""1;\u00e9"d'<\/p>\n
— —— V’. .–n-‘-uu-unu-1;g\\.\u00a2-1<\/p>\n
\\&
\nthe ctlefmmant haxi mt encroashsed any portion of land of
\n\ufb02wp e&\ufb01n\ufb01mtEew\ufb01mmonrwIp1\ufb01aho
\nx-emiaa aha: the piairxti\ufb01 had failed to <\/p>\n
\u00aefen% bani esnarnacizeci an the 31.1″:  <\/p>\n
thma mkmmm\ufb01, the:   <\/p>\n
\npm’ was mt. entithd m  % =  <\/p>\n
\u00a341 In that maafagn   dam mt
\n_ .      kw W   .\n<\/p>\n
timpum rim: hm   to do math the
\nprewar    Camm\ufb01sianer
\nin mg  the mn’ectm’ n in an
\nv:r&1f}*i%:%.\u00a7\u00a7”   :au:>eoA  sf the amaisn af the soil<\/p>\n
mtngei  aacepm this finding cf the<\/p>\n
. anal”! uvunl vr AMKNHEAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
Cszuri. 1-‘.”;a13’2%V[ _ ‘   the p1a”mti\ufb01’ has stated in
\n M  \ufb01wi”heA,’n ix\ufb01s and em-ass ta his
\n .    Vig\ufb01nfa\u00e9. the d\ufb01dant has clmrly denied<\/p>\n
A I  quwticm Umlaa: thnse ckmzmmnms,
\n hav\ufb01g\u00e9la\u00e9 \ufb01or dmlaratinn, the trial
\n ‘=.ra&f&$k\u00a2\ufb01 & been gisam by \u00a31: am}. thus lowcr agpe\ufb01ate<\/p>\n
}\/<\/p>\n
‘I<\/p>\n
. law: a yuan! A \\4!rV l\\.HIIlYI-ill-\\i’U-1 niul-I LUURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT<\/p>\n
\\3
\nmutt mum mt ham gangs tn the extzmt cf’ declaring the<\/p>\n
rigldt nithe yiainti\ufb01winn m such prayer  at
\naa in  mam mam:-e, bath ma <\/p>\n
aezinug ermr caf kw in wt  flag  <\/p>\n
a  is law. {he-uglq \u00abSf  <\/p>\n
daciarat\u00e9mn in respect (sf
\nthe plafmti\ufb01 could mt  gm: \ufb01g-<\/p>\n
mm aid mg.  to the plamtm
\naka    no anmvachment
\n  :1\u00bb pIsu’.nti\ufb01’ pmpeny.\n<\/p>\n
as    MO”; in the mad which has
\n  is  , the report of<\/p>\n
~  given a clan chit tn the<\/p>\n
% .  repart is mzzcepmd in mm by both<\/p>\n
.’  1% far as the arguwt ofthe lmnml ca-umel<\/p>\n
 rmmdent that the appellant \u00a35 not the owner of
\n mad Em qmaa\ufb01n’11 and therefore, quwthn of the<\/p>\n
plam\ufb01\ufb01 seeldm msmmtazy right ever the aaicl read<\/p>\n
29%<\/p>\n
‘I<\/p>\n
.n. …\\.–.-n uuunl ur Iv-IKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COUR1<\/p>\n
M-\n<\/p>\n
daaww amt a\ufb01sse and so aka the rmed far dseclaration dam<\/p>\n
pmm gr gm pla:’Ln1:i\ufb01’ far mmazoz-;.r g\u00e9hgoh<\/p>\n
W\ufb01a  W the defemda\u00a3\u00a7t;”‘e?.1e’x1A  -ief  j
\npatliway 33:5 mncerned     ‘<\/p>\n
ths swam’ at’ th-.-: mad  sjon
\npart msgh: w have got e\u00e9semmary
\nright \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 the mad    ought
\nto have;  right in his
\n\u00a3:am:.r    gcuxid. thc View
\n  suit being a% in<\/p>\n
”    surf the \ufb02aming diszzuasimz, 1 hold<\/p>\n
    was in czrror 1% even decreeing the suit<\/p>\n
  in part. and the lawa appellate cxmrt
\n %%@m:ima furthm: arm: in eieslaring the \ufb01ght of the<\/p>\n
V ‘  w&&re 21:: such prayer was thus in the said
\n   .f%p%a.i11L Cammz\ufb01hrg the quumtian raised. T3 armwaread<\/p>\n
by hcxldirxg that. Wham than ian\ufb01apwayar for declaration cf<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008 Author: V.Jagannathan .uum us nnmvuuanma I-nun QUUKIAIAUR: IXAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1 E’? ‘TTE EEGH SOUR’? OF KARNATAKA, BANGAIKJRE DATED TIE-{IS ‘TI-E 31*’? DAY \u00a32)? JIILY BEFORE 13% H\u00ab3H*Ez.E .’M1F.’.\u00bb.JUS’l’ICE: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMiss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-11T16:37:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-11T16:37:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2004,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-11T16:37:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-11T16:37:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-11T16:37:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008"},"wordCount":2004,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008","name":"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-11T16:37:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/miss-ida-pais-vs-dr-m-d-kamath-on-31-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Miss Ida Pais vs Dr M D Kamath on 31 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}