{"id":226494,"date":"2010-06-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010"},"modified":"2015-11-04T14:06:04","modified_gmt":"2015-11-04T08:36:04","slug":"mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                                                1\n\n\n                            CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\nRoom No.296, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066\n                  Telefax:011-26180532 &amp; 011-26107254 website: cic.gov.in\n                             Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/001118\u00adDS\n\nAppellant               :       Shri Dharam Pal Rana,\nPublic Authority        :       National Insurance Co. Ltd, Kolkata\nDate of Hearing         :       10\/06\/2010\nDate of Decision        :       10\/06\/2010\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>:-\n<\/p>\n<p>       The Appellant Shri D.P. Rana vide his RTI request dated 20\/02\/2009 sought<br \/>\ninformation from CPIO, National Insurance Company Limited, Kolkata in which he sought<br \/>\ncopies of his ACRs for 06 years from 1999 to 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     He also sought the details of the officers who have been given benefit of technical<br \/>\ninsurance qualifications for promotion more than once with effect from promotion exercise<br \/>\n2003 till date and also qualifications of 02 other employees Enclosed herewith as Annexure<br \/>\nA.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      CPIO vide his order dated 23\/03\/2009 denied disclosure of information as sought under<br \/>\npoints 3 i) &amp; ii) under sub section (e) of section 8(1) of the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      Other information sought by the appellant was denied citing sub section (a) of section<br \/>\n8(1) of the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.     Aggrieved by the above decision, the appellant preferred first appeal dated 30\/03\/2009<br \/>\nbefore FAA which was not adjudicated upon by the FAA.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.     The appellant has come before the Commission challenging CPIO&#8217;s order vide his<br \/>\nappeal dated 08\/06\/2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.      The matter was heard today. Respondents were heard through video conferencing.<br \/>\nAppellant appeared in person. Appellant stated that he had been overlooked for promotion<br \/>\nexercise of 2003 and had reason to believe that he was not assessed fairly by his reporting and<br \/>\nreviewing officers who he claimed were involved in unlawful activities for which they were<br \/>\nlater charge-sheeted and suspended.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.      As per his averments, the said officers were biased against him for not being part of<br \/>\ntheir unlawful activities.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.        Accordingly, he sought copies of CRs for 06 years from 1999 to 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.     Respondents stated that, as per the rules, ACR for 04 years were taking cognizance of<br \/>\nduring the promotion exercise. Also, there was 03 tier system of assessment in the ACRs, i.e.,<br \/>\nby reporting officer, first reviewing officer + overall grading by second reviewing officer and,<br \/>\ntherefore, the appellant could not claim to have been hurt by biased reporting by the reporting<br \/>\nand first reviewing officer.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>11.     The appellant, however, stated that while the reporting and the first reviewing officer<br \/>\nwere functioning in his immediate work environment, the final reviewing officer was located at<br \/>\nan office located in another city and did not have personal knowledge of the work being done<br \/>\nby him and most often agreed in a routine manner with the assessment of the first two<br \/>\nauthorities.\n<\/p>\n<p>12.    Respondents stated that during the promotion exercise the competent authority assessed<br \/>\nthe officer due for promotion on several parameters including qualification, seniority and<br \/>\nACRs.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                              DECISION<\/p>\n<p>13.     In respect of point 3. iii) 1) &amp; 2) of the RTI application, respondent may provide a copy<br \/>\nof the relevant rules as applicable during the period 2003-February, 2009 to the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>Point 3. iii) 2) Respondents are directed to provide the number of persons given advantage<br \/>\nbeyond the number of times as prescribed under the rules.\n<\/p>\n<p>14.     Specific information in respect of third party as sought by the appellant is denied under<br \/>\nsection 8(1)(j) and need not be provided.\n<\/p>\n<p>15.     Respondents stated that currently promotion exercise is being conducted and requested<br \/>\nfor extra time for providing information.\n<\/p>\n<p>16.    Accordingly, it is ordered that the above information may be provided to the appellant<br \/>\nwithin 06 weeks of receipt of this order.\n<\/p>\n<p>17.    The Commission noted the submissions made by both sides bearing in mind the OM<br \/>\ndated 21\/09\/2007 issued by DoPT and the decision of the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in Dev Dutt<br \/>\nVs. Union of India &amp; Ors. and other cases.\n<\/p>\n<p>18.   Para 09 of CIC&#8217;s landmark decision dated 19\/02\/2009(in Appeal No.CIC\/WB\/A\/<br \/>\n2007\/00422 dated 20\/04\/2007):-\n<\/p>\n<p>       &#8220;Perusal of the Memorandum indicates that discretion has been left with the public<br \/>\nauthority to disclose or not to disclose ACRs to an employee depending upon as to whether<br \/>\nthe public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interest.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>19.    In the present case, the Commission sees merit in the submissions of the appellant and<br \/>\nkeeping in view the above mentioned decision directs the respondent to provide photocopy of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the remarks made by reporting and first reviewing officer in respect of the appellant&#8217;s ACRs<br \/>\nfor the years 1999-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 since it is these four ACRs that were<br \/>\ntaken into consideration for the promotion exercise of 2003 by the competent authority. The<br \/>\nCommission also directs the respondents to provide the overall grading of the appellant to the<br \/>\nappellant in respect of the above 04 ACRs and also the ACRs for the years 2003-04 and 2004-<br \/>\n05 which is in keeping with the decision of the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in Dev Dutt Vs. Union<br \/>\nof India and Ors (2008 8 SCC 725). The Commission wishes to place on record that this<br \/>\ndecision had been taken after giving due weightage to the arguments of the respondent<br \/>\nparticularly as per their written submission in which they have observed that:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      \u2022   &#8220;disclosure of ACRs would seriously harm interpersonal relationship in an<br \/>\n          organization.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      \u2022   ACR notings represent an inter action based on trust and confidence between the officer<br \/>\n          involve in initiating, reviewing or accepting the ACRs.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      \u2022   These officers could be seriously embarrassed and even compromised if their notings<br \/>\n          are made public.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      \u2022   No public purpose is going to be served by disclosing this information.     On the<br \/>\n          contrary it may lead to harm public interest in terms of compromising objectivity of<br \/>\n          ACR.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      \u2022   System of ACR is established for the sake of good governance in the organization and<br \/>\n          breach of its confidentiality may adversely affect the system.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      \u2022   The information sought for is of personal nature as being provided by the individuals as<br \/>\n          per their assessment in respect of appraisee.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>20.     After considering the averments of the respondents and the appellant, the Commission<br \/>\nhas arrived at the above decision.\n<\/p>\n<p>21.       Information as at para 19 above to be provided within 03 weeks of receipt of this order.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                          (Smt. Deepak Sandhu)<br \/>\n                                                                 Information Commissioner (DS)<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                     4<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     (Tarun Kumar)<br \/>\n     Joint Secretary &amp; Addl. Registrar<\/p>\n<p>     Copy to:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           1. Shri Dharam Pal Rana,<br \/>\n              Assistant Manager, Direct Agents Branch-II,<br \/>\n              National Insurance Co. Ltd, 21 Daryaganj,<br \/>\n              Delhi-110002.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<pre>     2.\u00a0      The Central Public Information Officer,\n              Under RTI Act, 2005,\n              National Insurance Co. Ltd,\n              Head Office: 3, Middleton Street,\n              Kolkata-700071.\n\n3.   The Appellate Authority,\n           Under RTI Act, 2005,\n           National Insurance Co. Ltd,\n           Head Office: 3, Middleton Street,\n           Kolkata-700071.\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010 1 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No.296, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Telefax:011-26180532 &amp; 011-26107254 website: cic.gov.in Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/001118\u00adDS Appellant : Shri Dharam Pal Rana, Public Authority : National Insurance Co. Ltd, Kolkata Date of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-04T08:36:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-04T08:36:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":970,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-04T08:36:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-04T08:36:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-04T08:36:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010"},"wordCount":970,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010","name":"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-04T08:36:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dharam-pal-rana-vs-insurance-division-on-10-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Dharam Pal Rana vs Insurance Division on 10 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226494"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226494\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}