{"id":226623,"date":"2010-07-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010"},"modified":"2017-11-08T08:05:15","modified_gmt":"2017-11-08T02:35:15","slug":"dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                           CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                               Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                             Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                    Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                                     Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001625\/8700\n                                                                            Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001625\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging from the Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<pre>Appellant                                :      Dr. Pradeep Dutta,\n                                                s\/o Dr P.K. Dutta,\n                                                r\/o A-2, Kailash Colony,\n                                                New Delhi 110048\n\nRespondent                               :       Mr. A. K. Mittal\n                                                 Public Information Officer &amp; SE Central Zone\n                                                 Municipal Corporation of Delhi\n                                                 Building Department\n                                                 Central Zone:, Lajpat Nagar\n                                                 New Delhi\n\nRTI application filed on                 :       02\/03\/2010\nPIO replied                              :       23\/03\/2010\nFirst appeal filed on                    :       12\/04\/2010\nFirst Appellate Authority order          :       29\/04\/2010\nSecond Appeal received on                :       16\/06\/2010\n\nSl.                 Information Sought                             Reply of the Public Information Officer (PIO)\n1. On what date was compounding charges of Rs                      As per record, difference of compounding fee\n    14,25,720\/- paid by the owners of premises no A-I,             (2,21,595\/-) and levy for additional FAR (Rs.\n    Kailash Colony, New Delhi 110048 to M.C.D.?                    14,16,184\/-)      (total  amount      deposited    Rs.\n                                                                   16,37,779\/-),\n<\/pre>\n<p>                                                                     already deposited vide G-8 Receipt No.765062<br \/>\n                                                                   dated 16-9-1999 and G-8 receipt No.760022 dated<br \/>\n                                                                   30-3-1999,<br \/>\n                                                                      a in regularization file with the Building<br \/>\n                                                                   Department, South Zone, Green Park, New Delhi,<br \/>\n                                                                   was adjusted against the demand of Rs.14,25,720,<br \/>\n                                                                   issued vide demand letter No.269\/AE(B)-I\/Central<br \/>\n                                                                   Zone\/2009        dated    19-5-2009      (file    No.1<br \/>\n                                                                   17\/B\/UCRJCZ\/08)\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   The said breakup of compounding charges of Ps                 As per record, regularization file in which difference<br \/>\n     14,25,720\/- is not present in the regularization file no I    of compounding fee (2,21,595\/-) and levy for<br \/>\n     17\/BIUCRICVO8 dtd. 8.12.2008.                                 additional<br \/>\n      It is present in which file? Is there a separate file made       FAR (Rs.14,16,1841-) (total amount deposited<br \/>\n     for deposit of compounding charges of the premise A-I,        Rs.16,37,779\/-), already deposited in regularization<br \/>\n     Kailash Colony.                                               file with the Building Department, South Zone,<br \/>\n                                                                   Green Park, New Delhi. Same has not been received<br \/>\n                                                                   in this office from South Zone, so far.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.   Compounding charges of Rs 1416184\/- for additional            -do-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     FAR file dtd. 18.3.99 and Rs.221595\/- as difference of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                         Page 1 of 3<\/span><br \/>\n      compounding fees paid on date 16.9.99.The breakup of<br \/>\n     charges are present in which file.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>4.   Regularization plan for building made in 1999              -do-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     ( Regularization file no 151\/RZN dtd.18.3.99) is not<br \/>\n     present in file 1l7\/B\/UCR\/CZ\/08 dat. 8.12.08. Is this<br \/>\n     plan present in HQ, Town Hall? After taking order dtd.<br \/>\n     15.9.99 from the EE\/BIdg\/HQ, the regularization plan<br \/>\n     was released on 20th Sept, 1999.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>5.   Is it correct to assume that compounding fees has been     As per record of this office, compounding fee and<br \/>\n     paid thrice, viz Rs 1416184\/- in 18.3.99, P.s 221595k      additional<br \/>\n     on 16.9.99 and Ks 14,25,720k alter 8.12.08? Kindly          FAR is deposited as stated at point No.1 above.<br \/>\n     give the breakdown for the payment made for the<br \/>\n     compounding charges<br \/>\n     as a\/m\n<\/p>\n<p>6.   What are the annual mixed use charges for opening a        rates of annual mixed use charges for opening a<br \/>\n     guest house in type B colony under clause 15.7 (other      guest house in type B colony are mentioned in press<br \/>\n     activity) of the Master Plan of Delhi MP of 2021 i.e. at   release dated 5-8-2007, 25-1-2010 and its<br \/>\n     what rate (Rs per sq m) is misuse charges levied by        modification dated 4-2-2010 (copies of which are<br \/>\n     MCD.                                                       enclosed)<\/p>\n<p>7.   Annual mixed use charges for running retail shops on       Rates of annual mixed use charges for running retail<br \/>\n     mixed use roads in GF and Basement are Rs 767\/sq m.        shops are also mentioned in press release dated 5-8-<br \/>\n     Undersigned wants to know the reason for the               2007, 25-1-2010 at stated at point No.6 above<br \/>\n     discrepancy<br \/>\n     in charges\n<\/p>\n<p>8.   Guidelines for allowing mixed land use namely nursing      Requisite documents can be furnished to the<br \/>\n     homes, Guest houses and banks in residential areas vide    applicant on deposition of Rs.261- with the Citizen<br \/>\n     circular nos:                                              Service Bureau at House Tax Building, Ring Road,\n<\/p>\n<p>      a) D\/11 55\/AddI Com (E)\/99 dtd. 10.6.99                   Lajpat Nagar-Ill,New Delhi for 13 documents @\n<\/p>\n<p>      b) D\/639\/EE (B)\/HQ\/03 dtd. 16.10.03                       Rs.21- per document, and submission of cash receipt<br \/>\n                                                                in this office, as per provisions of RTI Act-2005.<br \/>\nGrounds for the First Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>The PIO transferred point no (1), (2), (3) and (4) of the RTI application to the P10\/SE (C)-1\/South Zone\/<br \/>\nBldg\/Green Park, u\/s 6(3) of the RTI Act and no answer has been received by the appellant from that PlO.\n<\/p>\n<p>Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\n<\/p>\n<p>The RTI application has already been transferred to the Office of SE(C)-l, South Zone vide letter dated<br \/>\n25.03.2010.The appeal was disposed off.\n<\/p>\n<p>Grounds for the Second Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>The PIO transferred point no (1), (2), (3) and (4) of the RTI application to the PIO\/SE (C)-1\/South Zone\/<br \/>\nBldg\/Green Park, u\/s 6(3) of the RTI Act and no answer has been received by the appellant from that PlO.<br \/>\n, unsatisfactory answer was provided to points no (1)<br \/>\n to (5).\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Dr. Pradeep Dutta;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. B. S. Meena, AE(B) on behalf of Mr. A. K. Mittal, Public Information Officer &amp; SE;\n<\/p>\n<p>         The PIO has given most of the information but is now directed to give the following additional<br \/>\nclarification:\n<\/p>\n<p>     1-     Query-5: The dates and amounts on which any charges were paid in central zone against<br \/>\n            property A-1, Kailash Colony.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                    Page 2 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p> In this matter the PIO has provided information which appears to create very genuine doubt in the mind of<br \/>\nthe appellant on two counts:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>    1-      The PIO has claimed that a compounding fee which was assessed till 2009 was paid for the<br \/>\n            said property in 1999. This would really stretch the imagination of any rational person. This<br \/>\n            becomes open to doubt since the PIO South Zone is claiming that the regularization file (Self<br \/>\n            assessment under voluntary scheme) relating to this of 1999 has been lost by South Zone. The<br \/>\n            appellant informs the commission that PIO South Zone has filed a police complaint for the loss<br \/>\n            of this file.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    2-       More mysterious is the PIO&#8217;s claim that there is no breakup cost available as to how a<br \/>\n            compounding charge demand of Rs.14, 25,720\/- was made in 2009. It is amazing and<br \/>\n            unbelievable that a government office raises a demand of Rs.14,25,720\/- without any<br \/>\n            calculation being done. This means the actual demand could be 1.4lacs or 1.4crores. Complete<br \/>\n            absence of any logic or calculations seems to becoming a characteristic of the working of<br \/>\n            MCD. Hence citizens have great doubts as to whether the corporation is doing its work with<br \/>\n            any rationality.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The PIO is directed to give the information about the dates and amounts on which<br \/>\nany charges were paid in Central Zone (Building Dept.) against property A-1, Kailash<br \/>\nColony to the appellant before 15 August 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.<br \/>\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                        Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                              Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                           26 July 2010<br \/>\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(SM)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                              Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001625\/8700 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/001625 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Dr. Pradeep Dutta, s\/o Dr P.K. Dutta, r\/o A-2, Kailash Colony, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-226623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-08T02:35:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-08T02:35:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1020,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-08T02:35:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-08T02:35:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-08T02:35:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010"},"wordCount":1020,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010","name":"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-08T02:35:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-pradeep-dutta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-26-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr.Pradeep Dutta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226623"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226623\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}