{"id":22704,"date":"1951-08-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1951-08-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951"},"modified":"2017-11-09T23:37:51","modified_gmt":"2017-11-09T18:07:51","slug":"jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951","title":{"rendered":"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1953 All 509<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Malik<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Malik, M Ahmad<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>Malik, C.J.<\/p>\n<p> 1. There was a reference to arbitration out of Court. The arbitrators gave an award &amp; filed an application in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration Act in the Court of the learned Civil Judge, Shahjahanpur, that the award be made a rule of the Court. This was opposed on various grounds. We are not concerned with the other grounds, but one ground that came up to this Court was the question whether it was open to the arbitrators to hold that Madho Ram had no share in the partnership assets as he was not a partner. The trial Court had decided the contention against the objectors and had made the award a rule of the Court. In appeal this Court came to the conclusion that Madho Ram was a party to the partnership deed, that the reference was made by Hazari Lal, Jagannath Prasad and Madho Ram as partners, that the reference itself showed that it was admitted that Madho Ram was a partner and that it was, therefore, not open to the arbitrators to go into the question whether Madho Ram was a partner and to hold that he was not a partner. This Court, therefore, allowed the appeal, set aside the order of the lower Court and dismissed the application for making the award a rule of the Court. Against the order this application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court has been filed.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has urged that he is entitled to appeal as a matter of right. The application is, however, opposed on behalf of the opposite party for whom it has been contended that the appellant has no such right.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. The property which was the subject-matter of the award was valued at over Rs. 22,000\/-, in which Hazari Lal had admitted an eight-anna share. The question was whether Jagannath Prasad had the remaining eight-anna share of Madho Ram also had a three anna share in the partnership assets, Mr, Harnandan Prasad has urged that it was only the value of Madho Ram&#8217;s three-anna share that was in dispute in the suit and that was the proper valuation of the suit, as of the application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. This, to our minds, is not correct. The application was for making the award a rule of the Court and that application was granted by the trial Court. The result of the decree passed by this Court was that the award was set aside in its entirety. At the time when the appeal was decided by this Court on 10-11-1949, the Code of Civil Procedure, Act 5 of 1908 was in force. Section 110 of the Code provided that the value of the suit must be Rs. 10000 or upwards, or the decree or final order mint involve, direct or indirectly, some claim or question to or respecting property of like amount or value. The question for decision by the trial Court as well as by this Court was whether the award should or should not be made a rule of the Court. It cannot, therefore, be said that the value of Madho Ram&#8217;s share and not tne value of the entire property dealt with by the award was the true criterion for judging the valuation of the suit and the proposed appeal to the Supreme Court.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party has<br \/>\nraised one more point : he has urged that this<br \/>\napplication for leave to appeal having been filed<br \/>\non 14-2-1950, the proposed appeal must now be<br \/>\nvalued at Rs. 20,000\/- or above. On behalf of<br \/>\nthe applicant, on the other hand, it has been<br \/>\nurged that the appeal having been decided by this<br \/>\nCourt on 16-11-1949, the appellant had a vested<br \/>\nright to file an application for leave in accord<br \/>\nance with the provisions of the Civil Procedure<br \/>\nCode which was then in force and the mere fact<br \/>\nthat the application for leave was filed on 14-2-\n<\/p>\n<p>1950, after the Constitution had come into force<br \/>\nwould not take away that right. A Full Bench<br \/>\nof the Calcutta High Court in &#8212; &#8216;Sadar Ali v.\n<\/p>\n<p>Dalimuddin&#8217;, AIR 1928 Cal 640 (P.B.) (A), dealing<br \/>\nwith the amendment of Clauses 15 and 39, Letters<br \/>\nPatent of that High Court which required that<br \/>\nthere was no right of appeal from the decision<br \/>\nof a single Judge sitting in second appeal in the<br \/>\nabsence of a certificate from him that the case<br \/>\nwas a fit one for appeal, held that in the absence<br \/>\nof any provision making the amendment retrospective the proper rule of construction was that<br \/>\nthe new Letters Patent should operate upon appeals arising out of suits instituted after 14-1-1928,<br \/>\nthe date from which the amendment came into<br \/>\neffect. Their Lordships observed:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This new clause in the Letters Patent cannot<br \/>\nbe given retrospective effect. The provision<br \/>\nwhich takes away jurisdiction is itself subject<br \/>\nto the implied saving of the litigant&#8217;s right.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>The same view was taken in this Court in &#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Baij Nath v. Doolarey Hajjam&#8217;, AIR 1928 All 708<br \/>\n(B). In &#8212; &#8216;Na,ndlal Ganpatsao v. Hiralalsao Ganpatsao&#8217;, AIR 1950 Nag 222 (C), the same view was<br \/>\naccepted by the Nagpur High Court in the manner<br \/>\nof an application for leave to appeal to the<br \/>\nSupreme Court under Article 133 of the Constitution.\n<\/p>\n<p>A Bench of the Madras High Court in &#8212; &#8216;Ramaswami Chettier v. Ramanathan Chettier&#8217;, AIR<br \/>\n1951 Mad 251 (D), has also taken the same view.\n<\/p>\n<p>The appellant, in our view, has a right of appeal,<br \/>\nand we grant him the necessary certificate under<br \/>\nArticle 133 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951 Equivalent citations: AIR 1953 All 509 Author: Malik Bench: Malik, M Ahmad JUDGMENT Malik, C.J. 1. There was a reference to arbitration out of Court. The arbitrators gave an award &amp; filed an application in accordance with the provisions of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1951-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-09T18:07:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951\",\"datePublished\":\"1951-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-09T18:07:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951\"},\"wordCount\":961,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951\",\"name\":\"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1951-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-09T18:07:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1951-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-09T18:07:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951","datePublished":"1951-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-09T18:07:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951"},"wordCount":961,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951","name":"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1951-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-09T18:07:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jagannath-prasad-vs-hazari-lal-and-ors-on-31-august-1951#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jagannath Prasad vs Hazari Lal And Ors. on 31 August, 1951"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22704"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22704\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}