{"id":227072,"date":"2008-08-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008"},"modified":"2014-02-06T21:29:02","modified_gmt":"2014-02-06T15:59:02","slug":"sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
4%?-i CQURY QF KARNATAKA I-il\ufb01ei-E C;{}i;3.:RT OF KARNATAKA. H563 cmm (BF E(AR\u00a7\\\u00a5i4Wf%\u00a7(\ufb01 HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CQURT OF KARNATAKA E-NGH C\n\nas  1~\u00a7i.\"%H 3:32:21' GI?' KARHATAM AT Baneamgeg\n\nI3.\ufb01'\u00a7*E\u00a7 ms mm am my 01?' AUGU$'rg\u20ac*;\u20aciI$'::   %  _\n\nBEFCTSRE\n\n I:iC>H'BLE     'A  \n\n \n\n :\n\nSKI szgsmz M\ufb02\ufb01ijf\ufb01.      x = \nam SG*M'AY'{AB;iC3C}L1'A{'v'v\"   %\nmm $301,'? 74&\"EARs,   \nRf\ufb01mh\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01 Houag - %  \nms'? g}:\u00a3)\u00a7{,#L'\u00a7fI';E:,~1E3{.2__'i'\u00a7:\u00a7Ci\u00a7\u00a3\"L3fE? muss,\nm\ufb01admyaa '1*;aa1.13*\u00a7s:,     \n   * \n<\/pre>\n
    …PE’I”ITIONER<\/p>\n
{By an: F <\/p>\n
 \u00a7
\n:..\n<\/p>\n
AE :  -V<\/p>\n
%  \u00a7.4\u00e9=1\u00a7_\u00a7 Atii\ufb01msrmx GFFICEER
\n  AUTHORITY<\/p>\n
   PM Lmz,<\/p>\n
. ‘:3 9 zmv\ufb01mrsn,
\n 575 am.\n<\/p>\n
mwaswm men can Co LTD<\/p>\n
‘”‘\u00a7_–.IAV\ufb01\u00a5G :33 REGESTERED omca AT<\/p>\n
‘V  ‘i\ufb01i\ufb01f\ufb01 BLQCK, KORAIv{ARGAI.A,BANGaALORE<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 ERAHCH GFFICE AT ?ABA%OC)R,
\nB\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01, RI BY ITS DEHJTY
\nQEKERAL MANAGER.\n<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
‘A<\/p>\n
… RESPOHDEHTS<\/p>\n
;-mm cmmwr 0? mxwnmm WWW gen-mm” 09 KARNAMM emu COURT OF KARNMAKA HIGH COURT or a<Amm'm<.m mm: " zmm W %<&\ufb01%3\\%;X'%"mR;&L_. % {3E.$3_’i”\u00a3iI\u00a33T
\nJUDGE, am, I*&A.NGALORE AT AN\u00a7(–A.-A\ufb01iI\u00a7~.&LL\u20ac3’WFV  X
\nwar? PE”\u00a7I”IGN BY GRAHTIRG “f;G1\u00a7\u00e9i1\u00b0BI\u00a73A’i’IOH”
\nTm maszm mags? vssnzm  gay”\n<\/p>\n
13313239 3 Wm IR Tim Kamg\ufb01 or: cgrmamkm.<\/p>\n
‘FE-{IS wan.’  %~i%&A<.:r:xm:::z<3&'%'::=:ij ma
\n1-'\u00bb\u00a72L:Es.:mm Hmma. Ls * xs:;m1;:,\u00e9jmm mar, mm<\/p>\n
mam mus THE mLLowm$\u00bb:\n<\/p>\n
  court seeking’ for
\n31531;: 5;?  of  ta quash the order dated<\/p>\n
m.4.:f;:ac:;:–   Imsgmaua, same’ 11 is<\/p>\n
   tax the pctitien. I have heard<\/p>\n
u   leameci counsei far the petitioner as
\n ma gm:..m.smmm, learned Axiditional
\n Aciwcxaxa far rmpondent 1123.1 and
\n  leamed mammal for the<\/p>\n
h  V  _ u Hr\u00a7sp@&&m1: 39,2.\n<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
J
\na<\/p>\n
I-‘HGH COURT OF’ i(ARNA\u00a5’Ai(A HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH \u20ac<\/p>\n
“(EH CQURT OF K\ufb01\\RNAl’AKA HIGH Cj\u20acZ3i%%\u20ac”? (BF ?\u20acaM\u20acE\\E\u00e9i\u00a7$’@2\u00a3’7n\u00a7\u20acA M\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 COME? OF KARNATAKA<\/p>\n
2. The facts, which are net in dispute are that<\/p>\n
‘egg pcti\ufb01ssaer is that mama: of an man: at’ 83 <::en3:'a_of<\/p>\n
Land mm 33:. 15214 of Kenjaru Village, %
\nTa\u00e9uk which is acquired by the resmrnde:;t\u00a7" K
\ngmvi\ufb02crm of Pen\ufb01cicum   '1  <\/p>\n
[A.<:qt511ait?1m:1 af right of user:   Act  <\/p>\n
axquisitzixzm of the petttixrxxmez-53"'   ather
\nbits mg lands in   a
\ndated 31,12,19'?.'.?v 'fhc said Act.
\n'\u00a7'he paymeg\ufb01:   an acquired
\nis praifi\ufb01ed   Act. The award
\nrcla\ufb01rng'-ta"   was passed<\/p>\n
rm   mi' " ta be awaited<\/p>\n
 V' *?3\u00a7  Vsougm fur refarmse of the same<\/p>\n
V   the same wm referred to the 2'14
\n  .  1Z}.K., Mangalssrc in Miss. Case.
\n me Ems: court after cmsiderins the
\n pat faith 91: behalf cf the pctitic:-mt"<\/p>\n
  j caisimzm a the pcti\ufb01cm.\n<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
=?”ffIOUHT OF i(ARN\ufb02aTAKA ‘r\u00e9i\ufb01i–I I<\/p>\n
%%\u00a7%”3H C\u00e9ff\ufb01\u00e9m” GP KARNAYAKA !”\ufb01IG%~i QGTLIRT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HQGH QQEJRT O5 W%RN\ufb02’\ufb02’M{i& HE(T:”>%*”>-=”<\/p>\n
3. The: learned cexm\ufb01el appearing for the
\npgtit\u00e9snar whilsa %iJing that judgament passed bgthe<\/p>\n
Eistrict Smart waum contaend that in respmt cf ”
\nather ianda w\ufb01ch were agquimd under,
\nnati\ufb01twatisan igue\u00e9 under semin\ufb01. 3(‘1:\u00a7)  <\/p>\n
ea. ‘?.”?,:998 mm passir1g9t}f_1.e   .<\/p>\n
\nthe \ufb01istritz\ufb01 Ceurt), t\ufb01e K
\nhigher  acre and 10%
\nmm :23′ m    1: is thc
\ngievmam \u00ab:\u00a7f”1;i:saf   91′ the lamls
\n1;, ‘m aimilar, tha
\ncam;:er\u00a7:.;;\ufb013\u00a2n \ufb01g\u00e9i\u00e9rmmbcd as 2 1&1-the per<\/p>\n
aara   Qf  ‘s.;\u00a7i%&m9unt hag been paid. It is<\/p>\n
 V’ \u00ab:5: v\u00e9:.\u00a7iie\u00a71′:.a%s$wa:is;}zc3; \u00e9 i’  can-1111551 that in fact the
\n  have treatc\ufb01 @313!” ‘ 13; and the
\n  jlammizxt \u00e9etamnirzcd as in the said casc<\/p>\n
  gar %:~:+.g\u00a7;p3 shauid have been paid :9 cm petitioner<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
an
\n41<\/span><\/p>\n
mm Comm” 0? mmnmm Hgcm cmzw W \u20ac\u20ac\ufb02RM#iW\ufb01’Ln%%A a-mm comm out KMNAWM. mean COURT o:= KARNAYAKA HEGH comm” or KAWATAKA \u00abmm c<\/p>\n
in The iaarried counsel apgearing far the
\nmsvpam\ufb01\ufb01t 139%: seught ta juatify the <\/p>\n
mntsendm that the ea:-mpamsamn ”
\n\u00e9atermmad in acaardanca wan my and this  ,  <\/p>\n
 &ppmia2x-ad by the court  j;  ‘   4′ \u00bb  <\/p>\n
\u00a7. In the \ufb01ght sf’   a ‘V V<\/p>\n
yemwi af aha judgsmnt   belnw
\nwmzld inmate max  to
\n\u00a3333 :::t\u00a5\u00a31%s::1t\u00a7ac\u00a7;17a5:’jA;r}\u00a3::Vis.c%1   the: date of
\nn\u00a33ti\ufb01c\u00bbatian\u20ac.\u00a71  and tlw date
\n9% 111%’:   the lanai awnera in<\/p>\n
teams’:   hm bccn passed as per<\/p>\n
 E;sc,P;%_;fA:.’ ”  behw thereafter noticed the<\/p>\n
hack<\/p>\n
gayest sf the gze\ufb01tin\ufb01efa lang\/Wis dated<\/p>\n
$'{3%.Ai.:?\u00e91′:3\u00a7?;5?:’%:t11=e subsequent mrti\ufb01caticn which is<\/p>\n
 F’?\ufb01e \u00a7;;;b3atpt%%mam~ 0!’ ma Ex.P8 is dated 717.1993.
\n_ ”   ?\u00a7’$er?$;\u00a7’;:>z’%, the mart kelsw hm some :0 1:113 ganclusien
\n  the mlexmt date for dctermxmng’ m:<\/p>\n
V \u00bb : ‘\u00a33$31$\u20acE’}.%\u00a7.i\ufb02\ufb01 Wauid M the date af noti\ufb01caticxn and as<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
WQURT OF KAQNATAKA ‘X-\u20ac\u00a5C5H 1<\/p>\n
iwi\ufb01\ufb02iwi \u20acZ0U%7\u00e9”!” 0? mwmmm 3-‘HGH QGLJRT OF KARNATAKA H16-H COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT CW wwezwmmm i”\u00a7\u00a5\u20ac?r<\/p>\n
such mnaidermg the fact that there is a gap of mom<\/p>\n
than 23 ycaxs bctwzazzn that 2 ncsti\ufb01cations, the ra1:\u00e9:~–.ax<\/p>\n
which the market value Wm determined is ”
\nand zhsarefere the same did next cali far   ”  <\/p>\n
can this aspect, 1 \u00ae net \ufb01nd    <\/p>\n
tha mutt belmnz,<\/p>\n
En Hnwever befZ::_;e  “the
\ncase an: -a\ufb01wt cf the  ta be.\n<\/p>\n
ns\ufb01cai is  .    ware
\nacquired 5311;.  in normal
\nmarge  witfnin a. remnablc<\/p>\n
time gs  had the bme\ufb01t of the<\/p>\n
 amagajg %.31.1\u00a3,in;  iri\u00e9itant ca\ufb01e\ufb01zhe award has hem<\/p>\n
   i..e., nearly mar 25 years from<\/p>\n
 It is needless to my that if the<\/p>\n
 _ Ii_11ter\u00e9$\u00a3  \u00e9\ufb01o dsrxiecl E9 the ps\ufb01tionsr, the same may
\n‘     No eioubt it was not open for the
\n   Eacisw tn go ism this asgzaact ef the mattcr airme<\/p>\n
  fwhat Wm required to be d  is the rate of<\/p>\n
1-:\n<\/p>\n
EGH COURT OF KARNATAKA E-HGH  0F E(A\ufb01N\ufb01;\u00a7”\ufb01E(A HEQEH CQMW OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA t-HGH COURT OF E(ARNATN'(A HIGH C<\/p>\n
wwenaazia\ufb01. Hcwwer, Sac\ufb01nn 11 {2} 92′ the Act
\nwansuid in\ufb01icate: that in thg event cf there being <\/p>\n
in paymaai: nf campenaa\ufb01on, thc. ma avmar ” <\/p>\n
enmaa far the inmmt @ ma per
\nthis aspect mum have te be    <\/p>\n
view \ufb02it c\ufb01mt\ufb02tances  to    L.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7as.s;%z”ng me avmrdw  ;agesen\u00e9:y;   it
\nappmguriate that the ‘permitted to
\n51% f=”%31″mni afi\u00a7:z;  sccldng
\nintereast an   ‘view :21’ Seciion
\nEH2} ilif  is made by the
\nperm-;ne:;’% mg   a\ufb01:er tal\ufb01ng new of the<\/p>\n
 the case pass appnapriate<\/p>\n
   thjza  If the delay in msmg the<\/p>\n
  is the peti\ufb01aners, the<\/p>\n
i  _  be iiwle tar gay interest on the
\n 1_  of aamensa\ufb01en dewrmzkied. Hence
\n‘  2% rmwd tr: th: pctitianer tn gm: sppmpriatc
\n  reggreamtatinn within a id Of 4 W:-31$ mam the<\/p>\n
3 A. \u00e9aze sf rsaeipt ef the cap}; of 2.113 arder, Dr: such<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
EZEUR? OF KARNA”\u00a7”\ufb01.K\ufb01 HEGH n<\/p>\n
%~%l@\u00a7~{ CQMR? QF KARNA}”AK\ufb02c. l~*I!G\u00a7-f QGMRI OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH QQURT 0% %'{\u00a3%\ufb01Mii’\u20ac\u00a5AW\\ r-HQ’<\/p>\n
reprassntation being made by the pe\ufb01\ufb01oner, the
\n1′!\u00a7Bp\ufb01=\u00a3’%\u00a7a&\ufb01?’B shall mnaidcr an\u00e9 dispose of the aamn<\/p>\n
an: way \u20ac33? the anther in aecordmme with ” <\/p>\n
pezriod mi’ we months thareafcer.<\/p>\n
‘With {ht above  !’.=_   <\/p>\n
\u00a7\u20ac!t1*t\u00a3a::r1 sgmas dimmed 9:. <\/p>\n
Rs crr\ufb01ex as tat:  ._ <\/p>\n
‘F5\/*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna 4%?-i CQURY QF KARNATAKA I-il\ufb01ei-E C;{}i;3.:RT OF KARNATAKA. H563 cmm (BF E(AR\u00a7\\\u00a5i4Wf%\u00a7(\ufb01 HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CQURT OF KARNATAKA E-NGH C as 1~\u00a7i.”%H 3:32:21′ GI?’ KARHATAM AT Baneamgeg I3.\ufb01’\u00a7*E\u00a7 ms mm am my 01?’ AUGU$’rg\u20ac*;\u20aciI$’:: % _ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-227072","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-06T15:59:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-06T15:59:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1132,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-06T15:59:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-06T15:59:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-06T15:59:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008"},"wordCount":1132,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008","name":"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-06T15:59:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sundar-moolya-vs-the-land-acquisiton-officer-on-20-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Sundar Moolya vs The Land Acquisiton Officer on 20 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227072","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227072"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227072\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227072"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227072"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227072"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}