{"id":227082,"date":"2008-12-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008"},"modified":"2018-07-10T13:11:08","modified_gmt":"2018-07-10T07:41:08","slug":"karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka State Road Transport … vs Karnataka State Transport … on 1 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Karnataka State Road Transport … vs Karnataka State Transport … on 1 December, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ravi Malimath<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT Bx;1\u00a7jGALoRE<\/p>\n
DATED ‘1’:-us THE 18%’ DAY OF li)3:s’)(3EI!.i45.’t3’\u00a7:\u00a7I’-“-.’)4Al{“?{“V,*.v1’12t3\u00a2Z\u00a7\u00e92.:.’ <\/p>\n
BEFQRE’gW<\/p>\n
THE HON’BLI\u00e9.’ MR.JUS’I:’ECE.A_’R.!XVi’P1\u00a7\u00a7Pxf;1},gi\ufb01\u00a7jx}:i* _ L<\/p>\n
WRIT PETITION’ j1~J\u00a2\u00a7;\u00bb3g3o’1 01:’ <\/p>\n
BETWEEN :<\/p>\n
K 1 Stats    2 <\/p>\n
Transp~Wrt~\u00a3’\u00bbt3I’p0rm:i0i1, &  L <\/p>\n
By   0.\ufb01”i”–‘\u00ab.\u00a21′ {R91.1t’-3 ,<\/p>\n
central 0\ufb01ic\u00a2,’?K.Ii,R.9ad_,  <\/p>\n
Bangalore-56’0*– % …PE’rmoNER<\/p>\n
(BYRSIiV*1′.PLVVIV’i’fI”al'(“;I43′ ESH & LAKbHMI S.HOLLA,
\n   * ADVOCATES.)<\/p>\n
V’   State ‘l’ra11sport Authority,<\/p>\n
By’itj._-=5 Secretary, M.S.Bui1ding.
\n E)r.B\u00bb.’R.A1nbcdkar Road,
\n~~ Ba3nga]ore~56O O01.\n<\/p>\n
.. Kdagadish Raddy,<\/p>\n
Major,<\/p>\n
S\/0 late T.N%.R  Raddy,<\/p>\n
Bus Owner, Madanapalli,<\/p>\n
Chittoor District,<\/p>\n
Andhra Pradesh. . . . . RESf”Ol:l?2N’I’S<\/p>\n
L’_,_…_.\u00bb<\/p>\n
{By 8Int.M..C.NAGASri1<3:2E, 1~:<;m%. ;%%j\u00a7):<;\u00a7}'  = "
\nS1~;.M.1"~1'.'v'.ACE-IAR,AB'J8CATE_F\u20ac?}.?{*R,:E}: .. "<\/p>\n
This Wm. Petition 1ST':-\ufb02ed t1i3.\u00a7:i\u00e9r *1;1't: i';-;f2'.7 _i\u00a7oi'vti1<\/p>\n
COI1S1L3.{l1′{;i\u00a3}I1 of incna praj\ufb02-.I1g~..t.o quasf1–..Ltif5: irrci\u00e9x’ aateci\n<\/p>\n
16.’? .203?’ of the Karmai;a};a”V\u00ab.SLa:c Tfa:1:s\u00a7;<3rEf\u00a7A;";pc1}a?;c
\n'1'1'1'13u11a\u00a3, bangaiore-;…as at""A13,;:6:X:u'e~A :1': Jr<i"'.tJ.\u00a7\\\u00e9os.1'fb
\nta :88;':\u00ab:03'7 gm  ' –  "\n<\/p>\n
This Writ Petitiezi fa;tte1’1ju.;=”‘:;7:’;:;;r\ufb01{\u00a3,:it,\u00a7 %,}::\u00e9:; uzzzsgia-:: the fa}.?u’:;vv’::’1g:\u00ab
\n%     %
\n  ‘State ‘1’raI1s;;::0rI; U11e:iertai<;11'1g
\n6:$t,at3i1s'.i=–3.(f:d vL:i1z'i\u00e91*.'p1'9v1s:ons 0: s<:c::t1{:11 :5 of the<\/p>\n
 "T Ej'raI:$:pz}1}: L},r3rp0r.:-amen. ACE, '19.i)U {h+$:'e3.1"1af:c:r<\/p>\n
. :i=t:.=.fc32'3f<,%<\u00a7. 1:9 as__ the {.1-orperatxo\ufb01j.<\/p>\n
  z '"I'T\u00a7'1\u00e9 seCond respczzact-:11t; \u00a3:u1<\/p>\n
 \u00a7}\u00a73.\u20aci peiitgamczr on 111te1f*–Sta.\u00a7e reums has ;:>1’e\u00a7ier1’ed<\/p>\n
‘ i<ev1s3101T1 Petimm Nos. .2 ff") {:0 180 of LZOUI i3eI0z'r:: the<\/p>\n
\u00a7x1a_"mataKa State Appeilate *i"1*1f;unai. "i'I1e 'i'r1i}una1 by<\/p>\n
.65\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n
vntue of tiae impugned Qrder disposed (;\u00a7T_ 5<\/p>\n
lacing iIT1fI’11CiiL1()1IS. Evan thougn :10 reii\u00e9f ‘v\u00e9\u00e9as  u\u00b0if<:_ <\/p>\n
resp011{ie1:1\u00a5;~'2 llerem, U16 pe'\u00a3:i"!:1o:i61*'is1agg3fieV\u00e9\u00ab;if-bi?-the<\/p>\n
\ufb01ndmgs ami obseivatiolisn"ma(\u00a7e \u00a5:3y twne: ii'z'i~E;u'tz1::w21ij 311 tilfi
\nceurse cf the order d3.sI\ufb011ss:{1g tf\ufb01'e…AAsa5.\u00a7:i I'('3V'iS10I}.
\npetitions. Hence tf1\u00e9'3a_i11\u00e9;L_Vgu\u00e9s?i10;*1\u00a3*d here.<\/p>\n
3.   for the \u00a7)(3t.11’JLO}16’1′<\/p>\n
51:’:   f\u20ac5;1E[i1;{\u00a7S.?f} _’ submitted that Whf’-:11 the<\/p>\n
‘i”rib1mai’ (;(i1:1_\u00e955:\u00ab ‘t(:i”\u00bb:\u00a3;i6:”‘conclusion ‘that the ravision<\/p>\n
pc:ij:t3Q1:1$  became n\ufb01rtictuotas and that no<\/p>\n
 ‘ ._i’L1;”tf_i\u00a7\u00a71″” fe;\u00a31_ef could be g’a11tc3d in iavcmr of “H16 rev1’s1n<\/p>\n
 g’>_\u00a7::t\u00a7i1:;jv:4″\u00e9t’:;\u00a7,9_r\u00e9V.T’VV’v.’iiI;:?:re1n, the “\u00a3’:t1bunai could. not have<\/p>\n
\u00a75mcc:;\u00a3\u00e9:1ed 1:0 decide either qtzestlons Of kaw or of fact.<\/p>\n
 AA T\u00a7.Ff\u00a31e:”‘\u00a3’i”i\u00a331zI1ai committed an error in conciuciing {frat<\/p>\n
 V iixt\u00e9r Siam ag\ufb01ement pe\ufb01amirlg to the 1m;er–Stat\u20ac<\/p>\n
‘ mums requires appmvai 01’ the ijentrai (,}(;:\u00a5:<:n11nex1t ta<\/p>\n
cui.11;1I1;3j:.t: Hits a concludaa CO\u00a3'1fI'\u00a3-E532 etc. "i'i"1ereiT0r&, in<\/p>\n
,_…–.\n<\/p>\n
{rage tile ‘\u00a7’r1E;>L111a1 was 0?’ sucth a \u00a2;:c3ns1(i@r\u20ac:d via the<\/p>\n
order should have been accordjngiy passed -. <\/p>\n
the manner as has been done. The  % T’ 1 ‘<\/p>\n
observations are not only J <\/p>\n
the ‘mterest of the petitioner <\/p>\n
4. Mr. M.R.V. Achar,
\nreefi\ufb01ndent submitted ‘  “.I_1o  of
\njurisdiction or authority  in the<\/p>\n
present     ‘or dismissal of the
\nrevision  ‘_    . me 111’ Jfrucmous, the<\/p>\n
Triburral was its observation and<\/p>\n
 its  :42: error therefore has been<\/p>\n
 figs Tribunal in making such an<\/p>\n
  obserurg-;!:io11..\n<\/p>\n
  191.0. Nawhree, learned Govt. Pieader<\/p>\n
  the contention of respo11dent-i2 and further<\/p>\n
  ” –rsnbmits that no interference is called for in View of the<\/p>\n
fact that the petitions have been rejected as wing<\/p>\n
havirzg become imiuctuous. Since no reij\u00e9i’  isf\u00e9\u00e9a <\/p>\n
ganted ta res-pendent-2 h\u20acT\u20acI13.,””‘tfl\u00a2 ;:%g4:’:t;ii:V’41″c}’1\u00a7;:’:4:’VV'<;::a?:'i111xi;~.A1:<\/p>\n
have any gxievance against the  A' 'T<\/p>\n
6. I have heard thr:.}t:aI’1jy:c\u00a3 \u00e9gtzwjiisel  for the<\/p>\n
pa\ufb02iies.\n<\/p>\n
‘?. it ISg’Ii\u20ac)\u00bb\ufb02”~\u00abI\u00e9;fiC:C5SS\u00a71_!i\u00a7TVhf0.__ the memts and de-
\n:neIits”Gi”t_’i:1;\u00e9\u00a3 1n\u00a3j::ag;:ie\u00a7i-0I’di\u00e9i*”‘}321ssed by the ‘i’*1’1Tt:\u00abu11a\u00a3.
\nSuIIice\u00a7’~1;dn1e11ti0f1%\u00abr;ia\u00a7 1:.’q\u00a7;.~revision pe\ufb02tions have been<\/p>\n
dismissed  iizimbtuons and no iurther 1’e\u00a3ie:’i1as<\/p>\n
 grantad tr} ir1\u20ac:”‘petitioner therem. in that mew or<\/p>\n
 % _ti3\ufb01:  “1n\u00a7:it1;.e’xf’  ‘1″rii:n_1na1 has cammztted an error in<\/p>\n
 its  and makmg an Qbservation which are<\/p>\n
V’-\u00bb.wi1oii’\u00a73vj’i21Cai1ed for. ‘\ufb01le \ufb01ridmgs anci observations<\/p>\n
 IaIi\u20aci{_if{\u00a7’ by the ‘i’}’i\u00a5::u11a\u00a3 are beyond its autizority and the<\/p>\n
   _j_:({1pug11ed order is Uzereibre iiabis to be ixltaxierad With.<\/p>\n
x\/’A–\n<\/p>\n
seheme in o\ufb01ieial Gazette under sub
\nthe proposal shall be deemed to
\nlapsed In that view of the  in.-zj
\nnoti\ufb01cations of the inter
\nthe approval of the
\nproposaz and deenzecijifc;-.]1ave’  %<\/p>\n
one year ofits    STA
\nhad no
\nnature on a  on the
\nnoa\ufb01zx:mon’ ff __:’n  26-3-1998
\n        perm<\/p>\n
  were not legal<\/p>\n
ezaciwnenzsitoe  vehicles of KSRTC an the
\n‘ V’   it both routes were tying’ in<\/p>\n
V’  “the  Vareeitz of respective States. ”<\/p>\n
learned counsel therefore submitted that the<\/p>\n
    Tribunal that the inter State ageement
\n‘jitppltwal of the Central Government to<\/p>\n
 AA  into a concluded contract was wholly
\n   imeailed for and beyond the jurisdiction of the Tribune}.<\/p>\n
The \ufb01nding also that when the scheme is not published<\/p>\n
as an approved scheme, the proposals are deemed to<\/p>\n
&\\.\u00bb*”‘”\n<\/p>\n
been japseci. ‘i”nc:rei’re the STA wgrdid’  “110<\/p>\n
autjimrity to g;ra11’i: psrrriit of wna’t\u20acVe1’**m;\u00a7’iA1H’e.: ;:-2r1dVL_ ‘tits <\/p>\n
K_.\/<\/p>\n
finding that temporary pamiirgl ‘2V\u00e9IT\u00e9’*-  ‘iisaai <\/p>\n
t10(:u111<\/p>\n
‘liaese: 0b:\u00a7er*a?3;1:i0:”1e}VAV.II\u00a7f:\u00a7:\u00e91Ci%=;V .i.\u00a7y-..t,ne ‘fi”i\ufb01ur1al woujd
\naifect {hit i\ufb01gai I”ig,f1\ufb01;V{\ufb01”  ._ if{I1e ‘\u00a3’r1E3uI1ai so<\/p>\n
1611: that ‘ti_i\u00e9s\u00a7;j,.\u00a3\u00a7bS\u00e9Iv.\u20acn ii\u00a3}11S’w9oi:;i<i…E:e Izecessarjv, H1 that<\/p>\n
evefzt tf1E:\u00e9:srr:;ie1*_' SI1()–'L1i(\u00a7 have been a.pprGp1'1a:eiy
\npasserj." %   '\u00a30 the (3OI1{3iUS1()1"}. that the<\/p>\n
p\u20ac;t2?;:0nc:i'V's, 'Case has" become lmructuous, the 'i'3ri_buna1<\/p>\n
 _ V'f1asgVi3r:_ begmxzd its jilrisdicti\ufb02\ufb02 in znaimag such<\/p>\n
-.Q’l:;Se.IfV–.at:{\u00a71:$:: Hence it: is gust. and I1\u20acCt3SS8_I’\u00a7\u00a3 mat: that<\/p>\n
gaortici;-,’\u00ab:\u00e9i” the order shouid starm deleted from me:<\/p>\n
 .. VT1_3:11pi:g::1ed order’.\n<\/p>\n
 9. i\ufb01ar ma aimresazd 1’eas0;1s, the :”<3iiz)w1I1g order<\/p>\n
is passed:\n<\/p>\n
0\/aw<\/p>\n
The impugned order dated 16.7<\/p>\n
the Karnataka State Appe\ufb02ate Tribunal in  Ij:v<\u00a7\u00a7-s4"1";?*'6_& <\/p>\n
to 180 of 2007 is partly  to'   \u00bb<\/p>\n
order at para 10 as   in  <\/p>\n
order and the same    the <\/p>\n
impugled order. _ V V _ V
\nThe 'I'1'ib11nal  and issue the<\/p>\n
corrected     = <\/p>\n
Sd\/"'
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Karnataka State Road Transport … vs Karnataka State Transport … on 1 December, 2008 Author: Ravi Malimath IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT Bx;1\u00a7jGALoRE DATED ‘1’:-us THE 18%’ DAY OF li)3:s’)(3EI!.i45.’t3’\u00a7:\u00a7I’-“-.’)4Al{“?{“V,*.v1’12t3\u00a2Z\u00a7\u00e92.:.’ BEFQRE’gW THE HON’BLI\u00e9.’ MR.JUS’I:’ECE.A_’R.!XVi’P1\u00a7\u00a7Pxf;1},gi\ufb01\u00a7jx}:i* _ L WRIT PETITION’ j1~J\u00a2\u00a7;\u00bb3g3o’1 01:’ BETWEEN : K 1 Stats 2 Transp~Wrt~\u00a3’\u00bbt3I’p0rm:i0i1, & L By […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-227082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKarnataka State Road Transport ... vs Karnataka State Transport ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Karnataka State Transport ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-10T07:41:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karnataka State Road Transport … vs Karnataka State Transport … on 1 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-10T07:41:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1273,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Karnataka State Transport ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-10T07:41:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka State Road Transport … vs Karnataka State Transport … on 1 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Karnataka State Transport ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Karnataka State Transport ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-10T07:41:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karnataka State Road Transport … vs Karnataka State Transport … on 1 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-10T07:41:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008"},"wordCount":1273,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008","name":"Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Karnataka State Transport ... on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-10T07:41:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-state-road-transport-vs-karnataka-state-transport-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka State Road Transport … vs Karnataka State Transport … on 1 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227082\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}