{"id":227144,"date":"2008-12-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008"},"modified":"2015-06-14T17:51:46","modified_gmt":"2015-06-14T12:21:46","slug":"r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>             R. F. A No. 2271 of 1990                         (1)\n\n           In the High Court of Punjab &amp; Haryana at Chandigarh\n\n                                             Date of decision : 4.12.2008\n\n\n1.    R. F. A No. 2271 of 1990 (O&amp;M)\n\n      Mehar Chand (deceased) through LRs.               ... Appellant\n                                  vs\n      Union of India                                    .... Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>2.    R. F. A No. 2003 of 1990 (O&amp;M)<\/p>\n<p>      Union of India                                    &#8230; Appellant<br \/>\n                                        vs<br \/>\n      Mehar Chand (deceased)                            &#8230;. Respondent<\/p>\n<p>Coram:       Hon&#8217;ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal<\/p>\n<p>Present:     Mr. P. C. Dhiman, Advocate, for the landowner.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Mrs. Lisa Gill, Advocate, for Union Territory, Chandigarh.\n<\/p>\n<p>Rajesh Bindal J.\n<\/p>\n<p>             This order shall dispose of Regular First Appeal nos. 2003 and<br \/>\n2271 of 1990 filed by the landowner and Union of India respectively against<br \/>\na common award of the learned court below. The landowner has approached<br \/>\nthis court for enhancement of compensation whereas the Union of India has<br \/>\napproached for reduction in the compensation awarded to the landowner.<br \/>\nThe facts have been extracted from R. F. A. No. 2271 of 1990.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 10.7.1964,<br \/>\nissued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, &#8216;the<br \/>\nAct&#8217;), Union of India acquired land in Village Kanthala, Chandigarh, for the<br \/>\ndevelopment of Sector-29, Chandigarh. The Land Acquisition Collector (for<br \/>\nshort, &#8220;the Collector&#8221;) vide his award dated 3.9.1964 assessed the market<br \/>\nvalue of the acquired land at Rs. 1,402\/- per acre. Dissatisfied with the<br \/>\naward of the Collector, the landowner\/claimant filed objections. On<br \/>\nreference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below vide award<br \/>\ndated 2.5.1990, determined the market value of the acquired land at Rs.<br \/>\n8,000\/- per acre.\n<\/p>\n<p>             R. F. A No. 2271 of 1990                           (2)<\/p>\n<p>            Learned counsel for the landowner submitted that as against<br \/>\nEx. A-6, Ex. A-7 an award of the land acquired in Village Burail should<br \/>\nhave been considered as Village Burail is situated adjoining to Village<br \/>\nKanthala where the land in question is situated. The acquisition there was<br \/>\ncarried out on 8.3.1973 and value of the acquired land was determined at<br \/>\nRs. 50,000\/- per acre. Referring to the judgment of this court in F. A. O. No.<br \/>\n475 of 1983 The Union of India and another vs Amar Singh and others,<br \/>\ndecided on 15.11.1988, the submission is that a reasonable cut for the time<br \/>\ngap be applied considering that the acquisition in the present case was made<br \/>\nin the year 1964.\n<\/p>\n<p>            On the other hand, learned counsel for the Union of India<br \/>\nsubmitted that the reference court had determined the compensation relying<br \/>\nupon a judgment of this court in R. F. A. No. 78 of 1967 Rattan Singh and<br \/>\nothers vs The State of Punjab and another decided on 4.12.1973 whereby<br \/>\nfor the acquisition of land vide same notification, the compensation payable<br \/>\nto the landowners was assessed at Rs. 8,000\/- per acre which was directed to<br \/>\nbe paid to the landowner in the present case. Accordingly, no further<br \/>\nenhancement is possible. Referring to Ex. R-1, she pointed out that in this<br \/>\naward, learned court made reference in para 8 to an earlier judgment in<br \/>\nR. F. A. No. 472 of 1966 decided on 6.4.1972, where for the acquisition<br \/>\ncarried out vide notification dated 10.7.1964, the compensation was<br \/>\ndetermined at Rs. 2,400\/- per acre. The submission is that the amount of<br \/>\ncompensation payable to the landowner should be reduced to Rs. 2,400\/- per<br \/>\nacre.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.<br \/>\n            The fact that vide judgment in Rattan Singh&#8217;s case (supra) Ex.<br \/>\nA-6, this court had determined the fair value of the land acquired vide the<br \/>\nsame notification is not disputed. The contention of the learned counsel for<br \/>\nthe landowner that as against A-6, the other award Ex. A-7 pertaining to the<br \/>\nacquisition of Village Burail carried out in the year 1973 should be relied<br \/>\nupon is totally misconceived even if the plea is that the land under<br \/>\nconsideration therein is located in the vicinity. Even reliance of judgment of<br \/>\nthis court in Amar Singh&#8217;s case (supra), is totally misconceived to claim that<br \/>\na reasonable deduction for the time gap in two notifications be made. It may<br \/>\nbe added here that the acquisition in Amar Singh&#8217;s case (supra) was made in<br \/>\n             R. F. A No. 2271 of 1990                           (3)<\/p>\n<p>the year 1973 where relying upon an award for the acquisition made in 1977<br \/>\ncertain deduction was made. If the principle followed in Amar Singh&#8217;s case<br \/>\n(supra) is applied in the present case it would mean going back by 13 years<br \/>\nfor determination of fair value of the land in the present case. The award for<br \/>\nthe acquisition carried out in 1977 is sought to be relied upon for the<br \/>\nacquisition made in 1964 which cannot be permitted. As far as reference to<br \/>\nearlier judgment of this court in Ex. R-1 is concerned, even reliance thereon<br \/>\nby the counsel for the Union of India is totally misconceived as even after<br \/>\nconsidering that fact the learned court below determined the compensation<br \/>\npayable at Rs. 8,000\/- per acre. And learned counsel for the Union of India<br \/>\ndid not point out as to whether any appeal was preferred against judgment<br \/>\nreferred to as Ex. R-1, where inspite of referring to earlier judgment<br \/>\ndetermining compensation at Rs. 2,400\/- per acre, the same was assessed at<br \/>\nRs. 8,000\/- per acre. As against this, the best precedent available is Ex. A-6<br \/>\nvide which the fair value of the land acquired vide same notification was<br \/>\ndetermined in the present case.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In view of the earlier judgment of this court in Rattan Singh&#8217;s<br \/>\ncase (supra), I do not find any reason to differ with the same as there is no<br \/>\nindependent evidence on record in the form of sale deeds\/ transactions to<br \/>\nshow that the value of the acquired land as has been determined by the court<br \/>\nbelow was more than what was determined therein.\n<\/p>\n<p>            For the reasons recorded above, both the appeals are dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<pre>4.12.2008                                            ( Rajesh Bindal)\nvs.                                                       Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008 R. F. A No. 2271 of 1990 (1) In the High Court of Punjab &amp; Haryana at Chandigarh Date of decision : 4.12.2008 1. R. F. A No. 2271 of 1990 (O&amp;M) Mehar Chand (deceased) through [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-227144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-14T12:21:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-14T12:21:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":934,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008\",\"name\":\"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-14T12:21:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-14T12:21:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-14T12:21:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008"},"wordCount":934,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008","name":"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-14T12:21:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-2271-of-1990-om-vs-union-of-india-on-4-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R. F. A No. 2271 Of 1990 (O&amp;M) vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227144\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}