{"id":227201,"date":"2009-03-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009"},"modified":"2015-08-19T06:29:50","modified_gmt":"2015-08-19T00:59:50","slug":"davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                       CHANDIGARH\n\n                                       CWP No.14008 of 2007\n                                       Date of Decision: March 17, 2009\n\n\nDavinder Kumar Jain                                        ....Petitioner\n\n            Versus\n\nState of Haryana and others                                .....Respondents\n\n\n\nCORAM:      HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE\n            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA\n\n\n1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?\n2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?\n3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?\n\nPresent:    Dr. Surya Parkash, Advocate, for the petitioner.\n\n            Shri Rameshwar Malik, Additional AG, Haryana,\n            for respondent No.1.\n\n            Shri Raman B. Garg, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 5.\n\n            Shri Rahul Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.6.\n\n\nHemant Gupta, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>            This petition, filed in public interest, is for issuance of a writ of<\/p>\n<p>certiorari, mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing<\/p>\n<p>respondents No. 1 to 3 not to transfer the ownership of Government land at<\/p>\n<p>Railway Road, Kalka.\n<\/p>\n<p>            It is averred that the Municipal Council, Kalka, is owner of the<\/p>\n<p>land at Railway Road, Kalka. An area measuring 25 feet x 18 feet out of the<\/p>\n<p>said land, was given to respondent No.6 on Tehbazari. Respondent No. 6<\/p>\n<p>raised a permanent structure with brick and tin roof on the said land in<\/p>\n<p>violation of the condition of Tehbazari for which a notice dated 30.12.1987<\/p>\n<p>was served upon the said respondent. A civil suit for injunction was filed by<br \/>\n CWP No.14008 of 2007                                       (2)<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.6 against the Municipal Council, which was dismissed<\/p>\n<p>holding that respondent No. 6 has failed to prove to be in possession of the<\/p>\n<p>same on Tehbazari or as a licencee. The appeal against the said judgment<\/p>\n<p>was also dismissed. A perusal of the judgment of the learned trial Court<\/p>\n<p>(Annexure P.1) appended with the writ petition shows that the Municipal<\/p>\n<p>Council has taken a stand that the suit premises was given to the plaintiff on<\/p>\n<p>Tehbazari.\n<\/p>\n<p>             It is the case of the petitioner that respondent No.6 has not paid<\/p>\n<p>Tehbazari and without any Resolution of the Municipal Council, the land in<\/p>\n<p>possession of respondent No.6 has been decided to be sold to the said<\/p>\n<p>respondent even without receiving the arrears of Tehbazari amounting to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.16,19,978\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>             In the reply filed before this Court, it has been pointed out that<\/p>\n<p>a representation was made by respondent No. 6 on 12.8.1994 for purchase<\/p>\n<p>of the aforesaid land on the same terms and conditions on which 32 other<\/p>\n<p>similarly situated persons were sold land by the Municipal Council. On<\/p>\n<p>such representation, the Municipal Council passed a Resolution on<\/p>\n<p>23.11.1994 with the condition that the said respondent shall construct over<\/p>\n<p>the plot after leaving an area of 6 feet x 8 feet, so that the width of the road<\/p>\n<p>can be increased for the smooth traffic as and when need arises. The Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner sought approval of the State Government to sell the<\/p>\n<p>aforesaid plot vide its letter dated 19.7.1995 and on such recommendation,<\/p>\n<p>the State Government, through the Financial Commissioner vide<\/p>\n<p>communication dated 18.11.2005 permitted the sale of 61 sq.yards of<\/p>\n<p>Municipal land to respondent No.6 on payment of total amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2,18,380\/-. It has also been pointed out that respondent No. 6 has<br \/>\n CWP No.14008 of 2007                                        (3)<\/p>\n<p>deposited a sum of Rs.1,10,700\/- on 10.8.2007 towards arrears of Tehbazari<\/p>\n<p>@ Rs.3\/-per sq.feet. Pursuant to the approval granted by the State<\/p>\n<p>Government, the sale deed in respect of 61 sq. yards of Municipal land was<\/p>\n<p>executed on 12.9.2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the<\/p>\n<p>Municipal land has been agreed to be sold to respondent No.6 illegally and<\/p>\n<p>at a throwaway price. It is contended that the plot is situated on the Railway<\/p>\n<p>Road and the sale of such land has the effect of diminishing the width of the<\/p>\n<p>road, therefore, the sale of such plot is not justified and proper.<\/p>\n<p>             We have heard learned counsel for the parties, but do not find<\/p>\n<p>any ground to interfere in the decision of the Municipal Council to sell 61<\/p>\n<p>sq. yards of the Municipal land to respondent No.6. The process of sale of<\/p>\n<p>land was initiated with the Resolution of the Municipal Council dated<\/p>\n<p>23.11.1994. The petitioner was a member of the Municipal Council from<\/p>\n<p>the year 2000 till 2005. The Financial Commissioner, Urban Development<\/p>\n<p>Department, has approved the proposal of sale after the same was<\/p>\n<p>recommended by the Deputy Commissioner. Such approval has come<\/p>\n<p>almost after 11 long years of the Resolution having been passed by the<\/p>\n<p>Municipal Council. During 11 years, no steps were taken by the Municipal<\/p>\n<p>Council to rescind or modify the resolution resolving to sell land in favour<\/p>\n<p>of respondent No.6. No steps were ever taken by the petitioner as a member<\/p>\n<p>of the Municipal Council, to get the decision to sell the land modified. Still<\/p>\n<p>further, the plot is admittedly in possession of the petitioner or his<\/p>\n<p>predecessor(s) since 1956. Therefore, the argument that the width of the<\/p>\n<p>road shall stand diminished on account of sale of such plot, does not seem<\/p>\n<p>to be reasonable or plausible. In any case, if the authorities decide at any<br \/>\n CWP No.14008 of 2007                                     (4)<\/p>\n<p>subsequent stage that the area of the property sold is required for the<\/p>\n<p>construction of road, the same can be acquired in accordance with law, but,<\/p>\n<p>we do not find that the decision of sale of 61 sq. yards of land to respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.6, lacks bona-fide or is actuated by any extraneous consideration.<\/p>\n<p>            The petitioner and respondent No.6 are residents of Kalka, a<\/p>\n<p>small town in the State of Haryana. It appears that the inter-se disputes<\/p>\n<p>between the inhabitants of such area, are sought to be raised under the guise<\/p>\n<p>of public interest litigation. We do not find that any ground is made out for<\/p>\n<p>setting aside the sale of such land in favour of respondent No.6.<\/p>\n<p>            Consequently, finding no merit in the present writ petition, the<\/p>\n<p>same is dismissed. No costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>      (T.S. THAKUR)                         (HEMANT GUPTA)\n      CHIEF JUSTICE                             JUDGE\n\n\n\nMarch 17, 2009\n ds\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.14008 of 2007 Date of Decision: March 17, 2009 Davinder Kumar Jain &#8230;.Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others &#8230;..Respondents CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-227201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-19T00:59:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-19T00:59:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":868,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-19T00:59:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-19T00:59:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-19T00:59:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009"},"wordCount":868,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009","name":"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-19T00:59:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/davinder-kumar-jain-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-17-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Davinder Kumar Jain vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227201\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}