{"id":228056,"date":"2008-12-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008"},"modified":"2018-04-25T02:32:42","modified_gmt":"2018-04-24T21:02:42","slug":"the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH coum OF KARNAT}\u00a7kA::A'FV BANGALGREV ' _ \n\nDATED THIS THE 018'? DAXOF '::~.1;f\u00ab;CEMai:R.; .2063'   M\n\nBEFORE?' % %\nTHE H(}N'BLE M:2.:._ JL:s'ri<;":.\u00e9jA sA.13oPAN'NA"'V\nWRIT l?'ETiTIQ\u00a35i. V\ufb01g. 2oQ\u00e9%;L'2TER)\n   WW " Af % \n:m\u00e91f:*V P!\u00a7,'T\u00a7TI{\u00a7\u00a7*J__ :'Nnf32\u00a29 1 [_:2(}O4(L--TER)\n\n   \n\nBETWEEN}  \n\nTHE MANAGINE: z2iRI::s:;'z'o'12 'A\nADARSI3 mm \u00a3NS'\u00a3'FW_.. ITE  \n\n" '*ia.r\"\u00bb-\u00bb~\u00ab.w'. _\n\n\n\nPEENYA INDL. AREA\nBANGALORE -- 560 058\n\n2 THE DIRECTGR  *  '  *\nD!REC'\u00a7'ORA'I'E OF KANNADA AN!) CULTURE... _  '\nNRUPATHUNGA 20:51:;   ._ ; \"\nBANGALORE - 560 002\n\n(BY skms. NAIK,AI)V. FOR C\/R  '  \nSR! JAGADEESF-i MUNDARGI, A(3A_ 012 \u00a32-23'-. \u00ab_ AT \"\n\nThis Writ Petition is \ufb01xed' I1i?d1\"-if Ar;\u00a3i\u00e9i\u00a3:3 226 65 227 of the\nConstitution of India Praying -Ito; \"i;te\u00a3sf':_.~..t1ic..}a.wf.r;;--1It:l passed in\n\nl.\u00a53.No.?\/ 1997 dated.8.3.2{}04 vid\u00a7avAr1:)\u00a7;x_11:'eV~jC, .\n\nE': E!' gal   \nBETWEEN 3  4' '\nSMT Mji.-. sam\u00e9hm' ~ \n\n_._W'\/G S453} MID. APFAEAH ____ \n 13xGED-A3{';3_UT 39 YEARS\n'~.R\/ANG. 34-G . \n\n1  BANG:%._LOi\u00a7~E'-\u00abV560 058\n\n'SMETHA A'\u00a5*AA\u00a7e':f:v:3'Nrs\nzsr.cz:;-ass-, mama-c;owm\npxssma mm; \n\n.. PE'B'I'1'JNER\n\na V' * :;s2.11.v.\u00e9\u00a7 NAIR, ADV.)\n\n  THE DIRECTOR\n\nDIRECTGRATE OF KANNADAANDCULTURE\nNRUPATHUNGA ROAD\nBANGALORE -- 560 002\n\n\n\n2 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR\nADARSH FILM INSTITU'I'E\nNO. 39, NETHAJI ROAD\nCLEVALAND TOWN\nBANGALORE ~-- 560 005\n\n(BY SR1 JAGADEESH MUNDARGI, ACA F*.oR;R+2f\nsre: av. SHASFRY, ADV; mg 3-2; ' \n\nThis Writ Petition is \ufb02ied uI1d\u00e9i=.Ar*f._icles 226' 85 22'? of the\nCanstitution of India Praying to; g-:1:::s\u00a71rvii:!\u00a2 Aiinexumn-A daied\n8.3.2004 passed by the  Of>urt.V Earsgalnre, by which the\nLabour Court has denied 35% 3. the  ':0 the petitioner\n\nwhich is arbitrary, illegal and wntraryito.-t.hev--3\u00a2h\u00e9me of the Li).\n\nAct, etc. .\n\nThem   been reserved for orders,\ncoming on for, p-ton.ou:1ct:ment this day, the Court\npronounrgede the foiiopjving : '\n\n\"I-11%: brief leading to the present case are that the\n\n-. j;je1;ipI;)y<::t: Iigijzilame Smt..M.K.Sharat;ia was before the Labour\n\n \u00a3'x;it\u00a7ift'V  a petition \ufb01led under Section I004-A) 0f the\n\ni   ' 1 Disputes Act ('the Act' for short) oomplannn" ' g\n\n  the antler datwd 2.11.1996 sinct: then: was iznpmper\n\n acecpfanoa of the msigzxa\ufb01on thtsaugh the mm: was not\n\n2\u00bb\n\n'5\n\n\n\nvoluntary. Aecmdingly, the relief of  ' \n\ncontinuity of scwice: and consequential benc\ufb01\u00a7__sifa;9  \n\nIt was alleged that she was fI11*catcn;t$dma':3':".'.  \n\nher resignation. In fact the contents e'i\u00bbf__tI:1=-:=-;_ 'V\n\nindicated that it is submitted "view   { \n\nmeted out by Sri B.P.Lols3:s}1,  Wilt; isth\u00e9\u00e9 son of\n\nthe Managing Director.  " me'  denied t1~..e_\n\nalicgations anci V_\u00a7roV111:a:a\u00a7;Va1}r act and as\nper p1'0ocdm1;,*'fhr;   accepted pu:rsua11t\nto the I'\u00a3*:i;$\u00b0p()I1Ei2it)*I1v :"t!\u00a7e .TEX:{\u00a2u\ufb01v& Committae. The Labour\n\nCourt after   iival czcmten\ufb01csns, has by its\n\n_awmd.;fAd'a~em o3.a,3 .2oo%: in I.I).No.7\/I997 allowed the\n\n   Itinsmtemcnt of the emplcyee into\n\n  of setvicx and oeinsequcn\ufb01al bene\ufb01ts.\n\n The b7a<3k&*3_\u00e9.$ge.%f"'to the extent cf 65% is also awaztied.\n\nV'  The management is calling in question the said\n\n  'awaid dated 08.03.2904 in its entirety in W.P.No.3{)060fO4\n\n   \u00ab (i,), while the ctmpioycc is chalicnging the saiti award in\n\n12\n\n'1'\n\n\n\nM3\n\n2~A was net mged cariicr; even otherwise the: H1.\u00bb-.'--\u00a5\u00a7't~z;a,  '   b \n\nto non--employmcnt is an industriai 55  \n\nSection 2(k); the question of _   'V\n\nwould not arise since the V. 'is _   the\nmanagement and workmgn  Sri\nB.P.Lokesl1 is Icla\ufb01ng   of the\nmsignation letter   '_  is not valuntary\nand even   has been sent ta\nthe  s  po\ufb01oe complaint had\nbeen     the management on\n\n2.11.1996, \u00a5i1e;sp\u00a7.tr.   that the resignation is not\n\n V.i11tt:11a:i.c:%l;V ii; has  these aspects indicate that it\n\nV.   after forcilzg the that respondent to resig<\/pre>\n
 __o\u00a7i’hi\u00a7r; when the entire action was illegal and<\/p>\n
V V’ _W’}16Il .i’h\u20ac ‘iisapolldcnt was: entitled to be reinstated, full<\/p>\n
.4 H ” 4.44’bV\u00a7}i(;k!xr_agcSs1″s;ihouId have been awarded.<\/p>\n
7. The Eeanwd Government Acivocatz would mrntend<\/p>\n
A   “ihat mcrtly because fhe: petitioner institute is being aided by<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
I
\nF4<\/p>\n
1 I. In this backcimp, the macd arises for    _<\/p>\n
consider the: {:0-rmcmess er otherwise of th_e..   ”  <\/p>\n
3.3.2004 passed on its mezits. A p{f%i’u$;:”\ufb02 &cff”tI;\u00e9:  J T<\/p>\n
the moulds secured fmm the  C-cgtiit
\nthat the first rcspond\u00e9azg  ‘  I:’1ei’v\u00a7’.e1f as
\nWW.1a11d marked     of her Cass.\n<\/p>\n
On behalf of   Director was
\nexatmizncd as   Sari Median Raj
\nwas   ‘;;sttendcr Sri Kodanda
\nRamaialfvwa\ufb01\u00e9’  The documents at Exhs,<\/p>\n
M1 to M16   ”  of the: discussion made<\/p>\n
_._by   the ocaursc of the award would<\/p>\n
 . \u00a51o :IV:i01;btVvAiI\u00a3\u00a3iif’,;:\u00a7lti\ufb01__ that the Labour Court has taken note of<\/p>\n
  was available on mcrord and has<\/p>\n
.t}:1crea\ufb02er”—-@t:o1.:ic.=: ta its tzucmclusion. Hmvcvcr, while examining<\/p>\n
H ”   canb\u00e9tizesa of such conclusion, the oantcntz\u00e9on put forth<\/p>\n
 of the petitiorner Iegax\ufb01ing the natum of pmof<\/p>\n
 to contend that the msipation is not a vcxluntazy<\/p>\n
” ” “act in the prestmt facts of the case is to be oonsidemd. As<\/p>\n
44<\/span><\/p>\n
attendant circumstances an: necessary to he  tc$.:s3:iow9 <\/p>\n
that the same is not voiuntazy as  ‘by  _ <\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioner. _ ‘f’hafv: ..  ”  ‘V<\/p>\n
acceptance, the \ufb01mt mspondent  a.%: hcj”  \u00a53.\u00e9:iV6
\nCDIl1I31aiI1\u20ac=d E0 316 P0506′  mgig\ufb01a\ufb01grn has
\nbeen obmincd by force.     cnomplainm
\nand   t\u00a71’  Pursuant
\nto such C\ufb02l\ufb01fil\ufb01i\ufb02f,   have visited the
\npe\ufb01\ufb01onerv*\ufb021s\ufb01:\u00a7t:f\u00a5\u00e9  ‘E admitted by the
\n  ‘    cmss–cxam:inat:ion. These<\/p>\n
aspects wc1iVI\u00e9_ ii1c},ic}3$c’VL’;a”t.i\ufb02cre was no izltcntion to give up<\/p>\n
 _or mlix\ufb01g\ufb01ish h\u20acI;.’\u20ac\u00a7f.7.i:(L\u00a7\u00a7f””I:?\u20acSpif\ufb01 the contents of the so called<\/p>\n
__and the submqucnt action of the first<\/p>\n
 that the resignation is not voluntaly,<\/p>\n
V .t}1crc”.””is  iiieniai of the allegations in the lcttcr of<\/p>\n
 but by a $i1:\u00a3;tp}e letter of acceptance ciatad<\/p>\n
 (Ex.M16} the resignation Iettcr dated 11.9.1996<\/p>\n
VT  ‘was: actbeptcd. If such letter has been accepted, the contents<\/p>\n
1;.\n<\/p>\n
1’11 qucs\ufb01on was not diseon\ufb01nuad, she would haw.’-  .<\/p>\n
dchitely in a better pcmi\ufb01on due to the benefits of V’<\/p>\n
service. Thereibrc, keeping all theseeA\u00bbVaspac:i\u00a7s  <\/p>\n
goidcn mean has to be struck as<\/p>\n
Supreme Court. While considtizjing that aspecii, ={3+n\u00bb’i1rt
\nc\ufb01ot also loose sight of the  f;!1__c pc;..i:’i\ufb01o1:V1_\u00a2r_i.:-.5. a $111
\ntraining institute which  b3f’t 1.1ue:’– .C3\ufb01\u00a7cxnment and not<\/p>\n
a out and out busincag csta\ufb01\ufb01shmcng  with pro\ufb01t<\/p>\n
meativc a1OI3\u20ac.””‘\u00a7’I(f\u00a3i\u00a7i\u00a7,f\u00e9,. :3  c:}'”fh;i1s  nature, the awaztl of
\nbacIi’wagcs ‘\u00a3_zt    Lahcmr Court would not<\/p>\n
be justi\ufb01ed.  into consideration, in my<\/p>\n
v’.vi::w, it be agi\ufb01itxpxjatz fo award 35% of the amount as<\/p>\n
  ‘t\ufb01tigg said extent, the impugned award calls<\/p>\n
for  ._ V V V ‘V<\/p>\n
 *1[‘Z._ Raving dwidcd these aspects of the mafia’, the<\/p>\n
   vi\u00e9ouzd be with regard to the liability to ccamply wit}:<\/p>\n
‘T .\u00a7.\u00a7e”a1$Ia11i. Thcsugh the learned amuse; for the pctiticner<\/p>\n
}? has relied 011 the decisiozx of a \ufb01ivisien \ufb01cnch of this Court<\/p>\n
a
\nV.\n<\/p>\n
25<\/span><\/p>\n
in WA 1310.134\/2003 to omzitend that the ”  <\/p>\n
should be heid liable, the same wo\ufb02id >0}? T <\/p>\n
since in the amid case, the ism1c:.1:7elatmi:i=
\nand pensicarxary bene\ufb01ts 1zndc1;’V””t]V\u00a7t:  \ufb01nds in
\nrespect of an aided post! ‘~.I;_t:1   of the<\/p>\n
view” that the Pegasus: s Lis\ufb01is   with the<\/p>\n
implcmenta\ufb01ozzy. tjht:  \ufb02ic payment of’<\/p>\n
backwagcs  action taken by the
\npetitianer   ‘i;aug;ht and as such
\nthe fa. the secnnd vcspondcnt
\nhercira. u M   ‘ <\/p>\n
 ~   the fo\ufb02owing:\n<\/p>\n
%% Vi    oanm
\n*~i)   w.P.Ns.32491\/04 stands dismissed.
\n W.P.No..’3006Q[04 is allowed in part.
\nCcwnscquent thereto the awmti datad<\/p>\n
83.2004 inscrfar as the gant of<\/p>\n
baqzkwagcs is modi\ufb01ed hoiding that the<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
‘n<\/p>\n
Akc<\/p>\n
26<\/span><\/p>\n
first I’\u20acSf_)(:)lZld\u20acI1t hctwtan would  .<\/p>\n
to only 3&6 01′ tm  j.\n<\/p>\n
In all other     <\/p>\n
08.03.2004  110  ~:u\u00a7;?’j1\u00e9\u00e97
\nstands ..   V
\nThe partiw to  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH coum OF KARNAT}\u00a7kA::A’FV BANGALGREV ‘ _ DATED THIS THE 018’? DAXOF ‘::~.1;f\u00ab;CEMai:R.; .2063′ M BEFORE?’ % % THE H(}N’BLE M:2.:._ JL:s’ri<;":.\u00e9jA sA.13oPAN'NA"'V WRIT l?'ETiTIQ\u00a35i. V\ufb01g. 2oQ\u00e9%;L'2TER) WW " Af % :m\u00e91f:*V P!\u00a7,'T\u00a7TI{\u00a7\u00a7*J__ :'Nnf32\u00a29 1 [_:2(}O4(L–TER) BETWEEN} […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228056","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-24T21:02:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-24T21:02:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":732,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008\",\"name\":\"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-24T21:02:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-24T21:02:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-24T21:02:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008"},"wordCount":732,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008","name":"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-24T21:02:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-managing-director-vs-m-k-sharada-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Managing Director vs M K Sharada on 1 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228056"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228056\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228056"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228056"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}