{"id":228130,"date":"1961-07-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1961-07-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961"},"modified":"2015-11-30T00:58:18","modified_gmt":"2015-11-29T19:28:18","slug":"chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961","title":{"rendered":"Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1963 MP 208<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: P Sharma<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p> 1. This appeal has been filed by the defendant against whom an order of ad-interim injunction has been passed.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2. A preliminary objection was raised by the<br \/>\nlearned counsel for the respondent to the maintainability of the appeal. He argued that an order passed under Rule 3 of Order 39 Civil Procedure Code is not appealable under Clause (r) of Rule 1 of Order 43 Civil Procedure Code. I find that this question was considered by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Sarajuprasadsingh v. Gangaprosad, AIR 1951 Cal 446. It was observed therein by Roxburg, J., that such an argument confused the temporary and limited nature of the injunction with the question of the finality of the order itself. Whether an order of injunction is to operate only till cause is shown by the opposite party against it or it is to continue to remain in force till the disposal of the suit itself, it is nonetheless an order of temporary injunction within the<\/p>\n<p>meaning of Rule 1 or 2 of Order 39 Civil Procedure Code. Such an order would be appealable under Order 43 (1) (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure.\n<\/p>\n<p> The   same   view   was   taken   by the   Allahabad High  Court  in the   case of L.   D.   Meston   School Society  v.  Kashi  Nath,   AIR  1951  All  558.  I  have not been referred to any decision to the contrary. I am myself of the opinion that Rule 3 of Order 39 Civil Procedure Code merely  lays  down a  rule   of procedure to be   followed while   issuing   temporary injunctions.    It lays  down  that   the  Court  should not,   except   where   it   appears   that   the   object of granting the injunction would  be defeated by  the delay,  issue an order of injunction&#8211;without giving notice to the opposite party to show cause why it should not be issued.    An  injunction without previous notice   to  the  party   affected   thereby     is   a deviation from  the  ordinary course  of justice   and should not issue without strong and grave reasons. (See Baddam v. Dhunput Singh   :   1 Cal WN 429). But where an order of temporary injunction is issued   ex  parte that   order  is   nonetheless   an   order under Rule  (1)   or  (2)  of Order 39  Civil  Procedure Code and would as such be appealable.    It is no doubt unusual for  an  ad-interim   injunction  to  be the  subject-matter of an appeal  for the     obvious reason that the normal course is to appear before the Court issuing the injunction and to show cause against  the  continuance   of  the   temporary   injunction during the pendency of the suit.    If the party showing  cause  is   successful   no occasion   arises   for it to come up in appeal; but if it is unsuccessful an appeal   against  the   final   order   will   lie.       Where, however,  an appeal against an ad-interim order has been filed the   appellate   Court   will not  be   bound to  apply its mind  to all those matters which the original Court is bound to consider on cause shown by the party affected by ad-interim order.    To do so  would  amount to holding proceedings pursuant to the reply to  the show cause notice in the appellate Court.     I do not feel inclined in this case to go into the merits of the various  questions to which the trial Court will  be  bound to  apply  its mind   before   arriving   at   a   decision   whether  the order of temporary injunction should continue during the  pendency  of  the suit.    Suffice   it to   say that the trial Court is bound to consider whether (1)  the plaintiff has  a prima facie  case,      (2)   the balance   of   inconvenience   in the   event  of   injunction not being granted lies on his side and whether substantial   or   irreparable   loss such   as   cannot   be easily   estimated   in   terms   of money   is   likely   to be   caused  if  the   injunction prayed   for  were   not granted.     The   trial   Court  has   then     to   consider against   what   property   the   order       of  injunction should be issued.     Merely because a suit has been filed   involving   considerable   properties   would   not justify an injunction restraining the  defendant by a   sweeping  order from   making  use   of  all   those properties.     Such an order is  likely to  result     in grave hardship to the party affected thereby.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. With these observations I need refer only to one matter which calls for interference at this stage. The agreement between the parties in this case would itself show that a steam-engine and 14 &#8216;charkhis&#8217; were installed by the defendant. I for one fail to see how he can be restrained from<\/p>\n<p>making use of these properties in such manner as he likes. I shall, therefore, order that the order of ad-interim injunction issued by the trial Court shall not apply to these two properties.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. With regard to the ginning factory and the &#8216;dal&#8217; mills the trial Court should make a careful inquiry as to whether the plaintiff is prima facie the owner of these two items of property. If the matter calls for a detailed inquiry the trial Court would be well-advised in vacating its order of injunction in so far as it concerns these two properties also. As for the Blackstone and Ruston engines which the plaintiff supplied to the concern the order of ad-interim injunction issued by the trial Court appears to me to be un-exceptionable. Whether or not the order should be confirmed in this regard on cause being shown, I would, for obvious reasons, leave to the trial Court itself to decide.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. The result is that this appeal is partly allowed. The order passed by the trial Court is modified to the extent that it shall not apply to the steam-engine and 14-&#8216;charkhis&#8217; belonging to the present appellant. There shall be no order as to costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961 Equivalent citations: AIR 1963 MP 208 Bench: P Sharma JUDGMENT 1. This appeal has been filed by the defendant against whom an order of ad-interim injunction has been passed. 2. A preliminary objection was raised by the learned [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madhya-pradesh-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1961-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-29T19:28:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chhaganlal S\\\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\\\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961\",\"datePublished\":\"1961-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-29T19:28:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961\"},\"wordCount\":963,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961\",\"name\":\"Chhaganlal S\\\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\\\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1961-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-29T19:28:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chhaganlal S\\\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\\\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1961-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-29T19:28:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961","datePublished":"1961-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-29T19:28:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961"},"wordCount":963,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madhya Pradesh High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961","name":"Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1961-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-29T19:28:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chhaganlal-so-shivchanjdi-vs-niwasdas-goyal-so-seth-kaluramji-on-17-july-1961#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chhaganlal S\/O Shivchanjdi vs Niwasdas Goyal S\/O Seth Kaluramji on 17 July, 1961"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228130"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228130\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}