{"id":228154,"date":"1983-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1983-05-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983"},"modified":"2015-10-23T12:53:12","modified_gmt":"2015-10-23T07:23:12","slug":"madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983","title":{"rendered":"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal &#8211; Delhi<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 1983 ECR 1077 D Tri Delhi, 1987 (31) ELT 71 Tri Del<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p> G. Sankaran, Member (T)<\/p>\n<p>1. The captioned appeal was initially filed by the appellants before the Central Government as a Revision Application and has come on transfer to this Tribunal under the provisions of Section 35-P(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 for disposal as if it were an appeal presented before it.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The goods forming the subject matter of the dispute in the present proceedings are what are known as Cord Repair Fabrics, Pre-shaped Cord Patches and Criss-Cross Patches, the latter two products being made out of the first product. The appellants&#8217; contention is that these do not fall for classification under Item No. 16A(2) of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act (hereinafter referred to as CET), under which Item the Central Excise authorities have classified the products for assessment to duty. The appellants&#8217; contentions were rejected by the lower authorities and they went in revision before the Central Government which has now come to us on transfer under the provisions of Section 35-P(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act to be disposed of as if it were an appeal presented before us.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     The appeal was heard on 15-4-1983 when Shri S. Ignatius appearing on behalf  of  the  appellants,  reiterated  the submissions contained in the Memorandum of Appeal. Shri Hem Prakash, stated on behalf of the Revenue, that in view of the terminology used in Item  16A(2) of the CET, plates, sheets and strips of rubber, unhardened, whether combined with any textile material or otherwise, would fall within its scope. The present goods are rubber sheets combined with textile material. In view of this, the particular terminology  used   in  the   CET,   the   Explanatory   Notes  under  the   CCCN were not relevant to interpret the scope of the CET Item.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.     The   main  contention  of   the  appellants   is  that  the  terminology of  Item   16A(2)  of   the  CET  has  been borrowed  from  the  corresponding headings of   the  Customs  Cooperation  Council  Nomenclature,  particularly 40.05  and   40.08.  In  the  Explanatory  Notes  pertaining  to  these  headings of the CCCN  there is a provision to the effect  that plates, sheets and strips consisting of parallel textile yarn agglomerated by gumming and\/or calendering with  rubber, whatever their weight  per sq. metre, would not fall  within  these  headings.  Such  plates,  sheets  and  strips  are  classified under Heading No. 59.11  of  the CCCN  which covers &#8220;Rubberized textile fabric other than rubberized knitted or crocheted goods&#8221;. On this reasoning, the  contention is that the subject goods which consist of  parallel  rayon warp yarn agglomerated with rubber with only thin cotton weft to support the weight would fall outside the scope of plates, sheets and strips within the meaning of Item No. 16A(2) of the CET.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.     Item No. 16A(2) of the CET reads thus :\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;16.A.   Rubber Products, the following, namely :\n<\/p>\n<pre>(i)    xxxxx\n \n\n(ii)   Plates, sheets and strips, unhardened, whether vulcanised or not, and   whether   combined   with   any   textile   material   or   otherwise.\n \n\n<\/pre>\n<p>The headings of the CCCN referred to by the appellant no doubt, mention plates, sheets and strips, but there is mention in the headings of a combination of plates, sheets and strips with any textile material or otherwise, as in case of the CET Item. In the scheme of the CCCN, there is a specific Heading 59.11, namely, rubberized textile fabric to cover specifically plates, strips and sheets of rubber consisting of parallel textile yarn agglomerated with rubber. Since the CET Item specifically talks of plates, sheets and strips of rubber whether combined with any textile material or otherwise, the analogy sought to be drawn by the appellant with the headings of the CCCN is inappropriate. The CET will have to be interpreted-on the basis of its own nomenclature. Rayon or nylon yarn which is used as warp and agglomerated with rubber is certainly a textile material.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.     The appellants&#8217; other contention is that the Cord Repair Fabrics are manufactured by them in the form of rolls and are not manufactured in  the form   of   sheets.  Sheets  have  been  defined  under   Item   No.   16A, CET, and,   therefore,  one  has  to  fall  back  on  the  ordinary  meaning  of the   expression   in  Chambers  Twentieth   Century   Dictionary:   &#8220;Sheet  &#8230; a large wide expanse or thin piece: a large broad piece of cloth, especially for  a  bed&#8217;  sheet  rubber &#8230;&#8221;  It  is appellants&#8217;  case  that the  product  is cleared in the form of rolls and is marketed in rolls. The fact the goods are produced and marketed in rolls would not, in our view, detract from the position that these are basic sheets which, from the convenience point of view, are packed and marketed in the form of rolls. It is not as though the product would be a sheet only if it is cut into a square or rectangular shape. The appellants&#8217; further contention is that pre-shaped cord patches and criss-cross patches are made out of cord patches by processing of her latter. The cord repair fabric is stated to be cut to specific sizes of square shape and two or more such layers are assembled and pressed and a layer of rubber stock is applied at the base to form criss-cross patches. The cord patches are stated be cut from cord repair fabric to specific sizes of oval shape and more than two such layers are then assembled and pressed and a layer of rubber stock is applied at the base. The final product is cured and it is in oval shape and the edges are also shaped. Having regard to the process of manufacture, as stated by the appellants, which, has not be n disputed by the Department, these products would be more appropriately classifiable under Item 68 of the CET Schedule.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.     In the result, we hold that the classification made by the lower authorities of  Cord  Repair Fabric under Item  No.   16A(2) is correct; the appeal against this- classification is rejected. Insofar as Criss-Cross Patches and   Pre-shaped   Cord  Fabrics are  concerned,  we  hold  that   the  correct classification is under. Item No. 68  CET. These should be re-assessed to duty on this basis. The consequential relief  should be granted  to the appellants by the excise authorities within two months from the date of communication of this order.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.     The appeal is disposed of accordingly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal &#8211; Delhi Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983 Equivalent citations: 1983 ECR 1077 D Tri Delhi, 1987 (31) ELT 71 Tri Del ORDER G. Sankaran, Member (T) 1. The captioned appeal was initially filed by the appellants before the Central Government as a Revision [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[41,33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-customs-excise-and-gold-tribunal-delhi","category-tribunal"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1983-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-23T07:23:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983\",\"datePublished\":\"1983-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-23T07:23:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983\"},\"wordCount\":1045,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi\",\"Tribunal\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983\",\"name\":\"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1983-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-23T07:23:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1983-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-23T07:23:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983","datePublished":"1983-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-23T07:23:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983"},"wordCount":1045,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi","Tribunal"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983","name":"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1983-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-23T07:23:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/madras-rubber-factory-vs-collector-of-central-excise-on-27-may-1983#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras Rubber Factory vs Collector Of Central Excise on 27 May, 1983"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228154"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228154\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}