{"id":228362,"date":"2009-11-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-15T14:47:16","modified_gmt":"2016-04-15T09:17:16","slug":"acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
Acting Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Bench: Anoop V.Mohta<\/div>\n
    SRJ arbp-80-09.sxw                    1\n\n               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n\n                   ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION\n\n\n\n\n                                                                        \n                    ARBITRATION PETITION NO.80 OF 2009\n\n    Union of India                            ]\n\n\n\n\n                                                \n    Acting through The Divisional             ]\n    Railway Manager (WA), Western             ]\n    Railway, Mumbai Central,                  ]\n    MUMBAI.                                   ]..    Petitioners\n\n\n\n\n                                               \n                 V\/s.\n\n    M\/s. Jeevat Construction                  ]\n    4, Manik Smuruti, 16th Road,              ]\n    Khar (W), Mumbai 400 052.                 ]..    Respondents.\n\n\n\n\n                                    \n                         \n    Mr.Suresh Kumar for Petitioners.\n\n    Mr. U.S.Samudrala for Respondents.\n                        \n                                      CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.\n                                      DATE : 26th NOVEMBER,2009.\n      \n   \n\n\n\n    JUDGMENT:\n<\/pre>\n
    1.           Heard Finally.\n<\/p>\n
    2.           The     learned   counsel      appearing             for        the<\/p>\n
    Respondents          on   instructions,      submits            that         the<\/p>\n
    Respondents are not pressing claim no.2 of security<\/p>\n
    deposit and claim no.10 about interest on the work<\/p>\n
    done payment. The Petitioner has challenged the same<\/p>\n
    only. In view of this, I am inclined to modify the<\/p>\n
    award to the above reasons.          In view of the judgments<\/p>\n
    of Hon’ble Supreme Court, whereby the Hon’ble Supreme<\/p>\n
    Court has observed and in fact modified the awards<\/p>\n
    under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation<\/p>\n
                                                ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:20:50 :::<\/span>
\n     SRJ arbp-80-09.sxw                         2<\/span><\/p>\n
    Act,1996 (for short “Act”).           The Hon’ble Supreme Court<\/p>\n
    in   the    matter     of   Delhi   Development           Authority            v\/s.\n<\/p>\n
    R.S.Sharma and Company, New Delhi (2008) 13 Supreme<\/p>\n
    Court Cases 80 has maintained the modified award. Even<\/p>\n
    otherwise, there is no bar under section 34 of the Act<\/p>\n
    to   modify      the   award   in    situation          like        where        the<\/p>\n
    parties themselves not pressing the claim. Now at this<\/p>\n
    particular point, it is difficult for Court                            to      deny<\/p>\n
    the modification and delay the proceedings further by<\/p>\n
    quashing the award solely on this ground. The early<\/p>\n
    disposal is main object of the said Act.\n<\/p>\n
    3.           In view of this, I am inclined to modify the<\/p>\n
    award as observed above.            The claim no.2 and claim no.\n<\/p>\n
    10 are disposed off as not pressed.\n<\/p>\n
    4.           With regard to the Counter Claim, there is a<\/p>\n
    clear finding on the Counter Claim of the Petitioner<\/p>\n
    as    given     in     paragraph     6.2       which       is      reproduced<\/p>\n
    hereunder:-\n<\/p>\n
                    The    Claimants      stated      that\n\n\n\n\n\n               Respondent    did     not    submit     any\n<\/pre>\n
               documentary proof & the details of
\n               break up of said claims.     The Claimant
\n               requested payment of second running
\n               bill but the Respondents did not pay
\n               and   therefore    they   could    not   be
\n               carrying out the work.       As such the
\n               Respondent   committed the      breach by
\n               termination      of     the       contract.\n<\/p>\n
               Respondent s right to claim risk and
\n               cost stands forfeited as per 64 of
\n               Indian Contract Act.\n<\/p>\n
                                                    ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:20:50 :::<\/span>
\n     SRJ arbp-80-09.sxw                  3<\/span><\/p>\n
    5.           Considering the rival contentions as well as<\/p>\n
    the reasonings so given, I see that there is nothing<\/p>\n
    to   interference    in   the   proceedings.             It      is     well<\/p>\n
    established within the frame work of law. The award<\/p>\n
    now modified as agreed to the extent of clause item<\/p>\n
    nos. 2 and 10 as referred above and the rest of the<\/p>\n
    award as well as reasonings are maintained.\n<\/p>\n
    6.           The Petition is accordingly disposed of.\n<\/p>\n
    7.           No costs.\n<\/p>\n
                                            (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. )<\/p>\n
                                             ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 15:20:50 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court Acting Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009 Bench: Anoop V.Mohta SRJ arbp-80-09.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.80 OF 2009 Union of India ] Acting through The Divisional ] Railway Manager (WA), Western ] Railway, Mumbai Central, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nActing Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-15T09:17:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\\\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-15T09:17:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":417,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\\\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-15T09:17:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\\\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-15T09:17:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-15T09:17:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009"},"wordCount":417,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009","name":"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-15T09:17:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/acting-through-the-divisional-vs-ms-jeevat-construction-on-26-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Acting Through The Divisional vs M\/S. Jeevat Construction on 26 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228362\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}