{"id":228614,"date":"2009-04-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009"},"modified":"2017-04-27T22:08:38","modified_gmt":"2017-04-27T16:38:38","slug":"ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH comm' OF KARNATAKA,   \n\nDATED mm 13TH DAY OF\u00bbAA?RIL_'\u00a72QQ\u00a7V..V:V*'    \n\nBEFORE   *  % V  \nTHE I~ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE\u00a7'L_.NARA,YAI\u00a7A-$'\u00a3\u00a5?AM*{:\nwnrr rmrrrzozi z\u00a2o.;9\u00e96\u00a2i124)o9% {I'ILR\u00a7_. \n\nBE'I'WEEN. %%%%    L\n\n1 RAMDEEP EUELETECPE ,,(:NI31A)\n\nPRIVATE L115\/\u00a3I'E'.ED '    %\nSANDEEPNELAYAM,  REDDY COLONY\nSE:jJE'O.R-C, 'BASAVANAGAR,\n\n?% \u00abBMIGALQRE -- 560 037.\n\n  :R:s:PF\u00e9ESENtIfE;3 BY ITS DIRECTOR,\n\n _c.RA:\u00bb1A;A_I--I. REDDY  I&gt;E'm*10NER\n\nmy SR1P;$ MANJUNATH &amp; H.C SHWARAMU : ADV )\n\n%  %%15\" STATE 012 KARNATAKA\n\n\u00b0-B Y\"I'I'S FRINCIPAL SECREFARY T0 GOVERNMENT\nDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE\n\n\"   \"M.S.BUH4DIN(}, BANGALORE 560001\n\n A % W2 THE DEPUTY CQMMISSIONER\n\nBANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT\nBANGALORE _\n\n\n\n3 THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER\nPREVENTION OF UNAUTHORISED\nCONSTRUCTION CELL\nOFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER\nBANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT\nBANGALORE\n\n(By SR1 SATYANARAYAN SINGH,   \" *   _   A'\n\nTHIS WRIT ?E'I'l'I'ION FELEIZ) PRA\u00a5IN;:} ~'iI'(f)'\u00bb._II:1~IR'\u00a7;\"3Ci'3.\"\"*--.\nSECOND RESPONDENT TO tREFUvNt:s, RS._I1; 6i8,?5,'000\/;\"_<\/pre>\n<p>ALQNG WITH INTEREST AT 18\u00b0_x6*~p.a. mew  ores<br \/>\nDEPOSIT TILL THE DATE 01? pAwy:ENT A&#8217;NS&#8217;AI,SOv;&#8217;COST OF<br \/>\nTHIS PROCEEDIGNS.\n<\/p>\n<p>mus up c:omu-Ma an Fonz H66-\u00b0*?w\u00a752 t3s:&#8217;:7i&#8217;:c5&#8242;:a\u00e9j4  ccam\u00e9r&#8221; room, comm&#8217;<br \/>\nM\ufb01\ufb01f &#8216;TI-IE&#8221; Fm.u0L&#8211;.hr\u00a3(v;_; !t\/   2 &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7&#8217;e;tti:i:::.I1er.S &#8216;-pxjtayver  for direction to the respondent to<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ytRs.t\u00e9:fs,i;,tooo\/&#8211; aiong with interest @ 13%. The<\/p>\n<p>  noti\ufb01caticm dated 15\/ 06 \/2007 as per<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;A;1nex1ire&#8211;A..&#8217;:  auctioning the public. property a land<\/p>\n<p>  guntas in SY. No. 87 of Byatarayanapura<\/p>\n<p>  Yelahaxxka Hobli, Bangalore Nerth. Pursuant to the<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;T . . _ _  e%{1id&#8217;\ufb019ti\ufb01ca\ufb01on the petitioner participated in the auction and<\/p>\n<p>tttie\ufb01posited the amount refezred to above. Thereafter,<\/p>\n<p>according to the rzoti\ufb01catien auction was held and the<\/p>\n<p>V<\/p>\n<p>  T     <\/p>\n<p>petitioner was the highest bidder and he deposited  <\/p>\n<p>amount. It was thereafter founci  e\ufb01etietled  T<\/p>\n<p>was net available to hand over t9 the rieti\ufb01ener,   3<\/p>\n<p>2. Hence he     to the<br \/>\nrespondents to retmfri   basis of his<br \/>\nrepresentation   Ceri\u00a7n; _ieevi:ef1ep.V:fegommended this<br \/>\ncase to the   06\/09\/2008. The<br \/>\n13e\ufb01\ufb01\u00b0ner    auction was noti\ufb01ed<br \/>\nunder sect:ie;3j&#8221;69  Revenue Act 1964. The<\/p>\n<p>auctien &#8220;S\u00a3.at1&#8217;1.Vt(iZ&#8217;_VJ set  attracts public duty. A\ufb02zer the<\/p>\n<p>ee\ufb012pI3&#8217;ance of terms &amp; conditions of auction it is<\/p>\n<p>the  %\u00a2r~r1;\u00a2;-gponaen: to hand over the property to the<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01iti\ufb01oner or  returning the deposited amount to the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;4:&#8217;\ufb01et:1ftieI\u00a5er. Bet in this case either of the things have not been<\/p>\n<p>3. Petitioner Counsel relied on judment in (2004)<\/p>\n<p>3SCC 553 (ABL Internationai Ltd., and Another V\/s Export<\/p>\n<p>Credit {Imrarantee Cerporation ef India L1:d.,_   i <\/p>\n<p>submitted that Whenever there is  A &#8216;4<\/p>\n<p>state in dischargng its public gmty \ufb01&#8217;1o {zght it.1vis.,<\/p>\n<p>in nature, High Court can  by  power<br \/>\nunder Articie of 226 of  &#8216;V\ufb01e%%a1so relied<br \/>\non another judment in    (KLR -~ RES)<br \/>\ndisposed of on   has issued such<br \/>\ndirections to  the amount. Hence the<br \/>\nlearned  _&#8217;eVt;bII1itted to issue direction<br \/>\nto the reseomfient&#8217; :5  deposited amount of Rs.<br \/>\n68,75,009\/&#8217;.V1.  , -_ ._ <\/p>\n<p>     Government Advocate submitted that<\/p>\n<p>vteheze ieka dieqziel\ufb01ica\ufb01on clause in the noti\ufb01cation at Item<\/p>\n<p> of A1iIi.exure-A and alse submitted that under such<\/p>\n<p>  been ageed by the petitioner and therefore he is<\/p>\n<p>  V  , _  er1\u00a5;it1ed to the reliefs prayed for in this Writ Petition.<\/p>\n<p>5. I heard the arguments made by both the parties.<\/p>\n<p>6. The Government pleastier    _v &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>judgment produced by the pet:it,i_or1ei*&#8221;&#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>6203\/2008 (KLR~&#8211;RES) wherein tne:fpe:~ee\u00a2ncrk&#8217;\u00a7was  to<br \/>\npay 75% of the amount   foo   by the<br \/>\nP\ufb01titioner.    A\u00bb   &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>7. It    that the public<br \/>\nproperty    to be auctioned by<br \/>\nissuing a notitioationi\u00e9oo&#8217;  petitioner participated<br \/>\nend he  i\ufb01\u00e9vfieet bidder. Thereafter he made<br \/>\n   to hand over the property to him<\/p>\n<p>hue it difficult in handing over the same<\/p>\n<p>T&#8217;  it  beexeeonverted into public: road. Accordingly he<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  request: to refund him the amount<\/p>\n<p>   While issuing notice A11nexure~&#8211;A it is out of<\/p>\n<p> provision Section 64A of the Land Reforms Act. It<\/p>\n<p>is a public duty on the part of the respondent to auction the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;T<\/p>\n<p>property cenferring right on the   is 3 Vjitize\u00bb <\/p>\n<p>requirement of Annexure~A to depoeit \ufb01le &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>duty was fastened to the responde,t_1 f&#8211; to  &#8216;ever<\/p>\n<p>property to him which could not&#8221;VEreTdone as  praperty itself<br \/>\nwas not available.  aiscs Vemitied for<br \/>\nrelief as prayed in the p&lt;itit1;c&#039;)\ufb021-A._      &#039; &#039;<\/p>\n<p>e   <\/p>\n<p>  &quot;   is aliowed. The first respondent is directed<\/p>\n<p>to  on Annexure -~ 13;&#039; within a period of<\/p>\n<p>T&#039;  months  date of receipt of copy of this order. With<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  Petition is disposed of)&quot;.\n<\/p>\n<p>sal-\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>BSV<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009 Author: L.Narayana Swamy IN THE HIGH comm&#8217; OF KARNATAKA, DATED mm 13TH DAY OF\u00bbAA?RIL_&#8217;\u00a72QQ\u00a7V..V:V*&#8217; BEFORE * % V THE I~ION&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE\u00a7&#8217;L_.NARA,YAI\u00a7A-$&#8217;\u00a3\u00a5?AM*{: wnrr rmrrrzozi z\u00a2o.;9\u00e96\u00a2i124)o9% {I&#8217;ILR\u00a7_. BE&#8217;I&#8217;WEEN. %%%% L 1 RAMDEEP EUELETECPE ,,(:NI31A) PRIVATE L115\/\u00a3I&#8217;E&#8217;.ED &#8216; % SANDEEPNELAYAM, REDDY [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-27T16:38:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-27T16:38:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":635,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-27T16:38:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-27T16:38:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-27T16:38:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009"},"wordCount":635,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009","name":"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-27T16:38:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramdeep-buildtech-india-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-13-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramdeep Buildtech (India) vs State Of Karnataka By Its on 13 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228614"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228614\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}