{"id":228696,"date":"2009-02-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009"},"modified":"2017-02-26T21:28:20","modified_gmt":"2017-02-26T15:58:20","slug":"jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>FAO No.2524 of 2007            -1 -\n\n\nIN THE PUNJAB              AND        HARYANA      HIGH      COURT       AT\nCHANDIGARH\n\n                                            FAO No.2524 of 2007\n\n                                            Date of Decision : 25.2.2009\n\nJatinder Kaur and another\n\n                                                         ..Appellants.\nVs.\n\n\nJaskirat Kaur and others\n                                                        ..Respondents.<\/pre>\n<p>CORAM : HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN<\/p>\n<p>Present:    Mr.S.C.Chhabra, Advocate for the appellants.<\/p>\n<p>            Mr.Sandeep Khungar, Advocate for respondent No.1.<\/p>\n<p>            None for respondents No.2 and 3.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Mr.Sardevinder Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.4.<\/p>\n<p>RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(ORAL)<\/p>\n<p>            This appeal is directed against the order dated 9.5.2007 passed<\/p>\n<p>by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ferozepur (Exercising the<\/p>\n<p>powers of learned District Judge, Ferozepur) whereby an application under<\/p>\n<p>the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short `the Act&#8217;) has been allowed and<\/p>\n<p>succession certificate has been issued to the applicant Jaskirat Kaur<\/p>\n<p>(respondent No.1).\n<\/p>\n<p>            At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No.1 has<\/p>\n<p>contended that the present appeal filed by the appellants (respondents No.2<\/p>\n<p>and 3 before the Court below) under Section 384(1) of the Act is not<\/p>\n<p>maintainable. It is contended that according to Section 384(1) of the Act, an<\/p>\n<p>appeal shall lie to the High Court from an order of the District Judge<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No.2524 of 2007             -2 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>granting, refusing or revoking a certificate and the High Court may, if it<\/p>\n<p>thinks fit, by its order on the appeal declare the person to whom the<\/p>\n<p>certificate should be granted and direct the learned District Judge on<\/p>\n<p>application being made, therefore, to grant it accordingly, in supersession of<\/p>\n<p>the certificate, if any, already granted. He further contended that application<\/p>\n<p>under Section 372 of the Act has been filed before the Additional Civil<\/p>\n<p>Judge (Sr.Divn.) Ferozepur exercising the powers of learned District Judge<\/p>\n<p>as a delegate of the District Judge in view of the provisions of Section 388<\/p>\n<p>(1) of the Act. He further submits that if the application under Section 372<\/p>\n<p>of the Act has been filed under Section 388(1) of the Act then according to<\/p>\n<p>its Proviso, the appeal shall lie under Section 388(2) of the Act to District<\/p>\n<p>Judge and not to the High Court. The relevant provisions of Sections 384<\/p>\n<p>and 388 are reproduced as under :\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;Section 384. Appeal- (1) Subject to the other provisions of<\/p>\n<p>            this Part, an appeal shall lie to the High Court from an order of<\/p>\n<p>            a District Judge granting, refusing or revoking a certificate<\/p>\n<p>            under this Part, and the High Court may, if it thinks fit, by its<\/p>\n<p>            order on the appeal, declare the person to whom the certificate<\/p>\n<p>            should be granted and direct the District Judge, on application<\/p>\n<p>            being made therefore, to grant it accordingly, in supersession of<\/p>\n<p>            the certificate, if any, already granted.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (2)An appeal under sub-section (1) must be preferred within the<\/p>\n<p>               time allowed for an appeal under the Code of Civil<\/p>\n<p>               Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (3)Subject to the provisions of sub section (1) and to the<\/p>\n<p>               provisions as to reference to and revision by the High Court<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No.2524 of 2007          -3 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            and as to review of judgment of the Code of Civil Procedure,<\/p>\n<p>            1908, (5 of 1908.) as applied by Section 141 of that Code, an<\/p>\n<p>            order of a District Judge under this Part shall be final.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>          &#8220;Section 388 Investiture of inferior Courts with jurisdiction<\/p>\n<p>          of District Court for purposes of this Act &#8211; (1) The State<\/p>\n<p>          Government may by notification in the Official Gazette, invest<\/p>\n<p>          any Court inferior in grade to a District Judge with power to<\/p>\n<p>          exercise the functions of a District Judge under this Part.<\/p>\n<p>          (2)Any inferior Court so invested shall, within the local limits<\/p>\n<p>            of its jurisdiction, have concurrent jurisdiction with the<\/p>\n<p>            District Judge in the exercise of all the powers conferred by<\/p>\n<p>            this Part upon the District Judge, and the provisions of this<\/p>\n<p>            Part relating to the District Judge shall apply to such an<\/p>\n<p>            inferior Court as if it were a District Judge :<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                Provided that an appeal from any such order of an<\/p>\n<p>          inferior Court as is mentioned in sub section (1) of Section 384<\/p>\n<p>          shall lie to the District Judge, and not to the High Court, and<\/p>\n<p>          that the District Judge may, if he thinks fit, by his order on the<\/p>\n<p>          appeal, make any such declaration and direction as that sub<\/p>\n<p>          section authorises the High Court to make by its order on an<\/p>\n<p>          appeal from an order of a District Judge.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          (3)An order of a District Judge on an appeal from an order of<\/p>\n<p>            an inferior Court under the last foregoing sub section shall,<\/p>\n<p>            subject to the provisions as to reference to and revision by<\/p>\n<p>            the High Court and as to review of judgment of the Code of<\/p>\n<p>            Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), as applied by section 141<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No.2524 of 2007            -4 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>              of that Code, be final.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (4)The District Judge may withdraw any proceedings under this<\/p>\n<p>              Part from an inferior Court, and may either himself dispose<\/p>\n<p>              of them or transfer them to another such Court established<\/p>\n<p>              within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the District Judge<\/p>\n<p>              and having authority to dispose of the proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>            (5) A notification under sub section (1) may specify any<\/p>\n<p>              inferior Court specially or any class of such Courts in any<\/p>\n<p>              local area.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (6)Any Civil Court which for any of the purposes of any<\/p>\n<p>              enactment is subordinate to, or subject to the control of, a<\/p>\n<p>              District Judge shall, for the purposes of this section, be<\/p>\n<p>              deemed to be a Court inferior in grade to a District Judge.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            In order to substantiate his argument, learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1 has relied upon decisions in Mosamatt Parmeshwari<\/p>\n<p>Devi and another v. Geeta Devi and others AIR 2001 PATNA 107;<\/p>\n<p>Vadia Banerjee Vs. Sardar 1999(2) Civil Court Cases 129(H.P.);<\/p>\n<p>Karunamoyee Sett &amp; Others Vs. Lakshmirani Devi &amp; Others 1994(1)<\/p>\n<p>HLR 37 (DB) (Cal) AND Manohar son of Bapurao Sapre Vs. Bhaurao<\/p>\n<p>son of Tukaramji Shirbhate and another AIR 1996 Bombay 29.<\/p>\n<p>            I have given my thoughtful consideration to the contentions<\/p>\n<p>raised by learned counsel for respondent No.1 and perused the record.<\/p>\n<p>            Undisputedly, in this case the powers of learned District Judge<\/p>\n<p>have been delegated to the Civil Judge (Sr.Division), Ferozepur who has<\/p>\n<p>decided the application under Section 372 of the Act. Had the application<\/p>\n<p>been decided by the District Judge himself in whatever manner, the appeal<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No.2524 of 2007             -5 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>would have definitely been maintainable before the High Court but since the<\/p>\n<p>application under Section 372 of the Act has been decided by a delegate of<\/p>\n<p>the District Judge then in view of Proviso to Section 388(1)(2), the appeal<\/p>\n<p>shall lie to the District Judge and not to the High Court. In the case of<\/p>\n<p>Mosammat Parmeshwari Devi and another Vs. Geeta Devi and others<\/p>\n<p>(supra), it is held as under:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                     &#8220;It is manifest from the provision of S.388(2) and its<\/p>\n<p>             proviso clause that any inferior Court who has been invested<\/p>\n<p>             with the power to exercise the function of a District Judge shall<\/p>\n<p>             within the local limits of its jurisdiction have concurrent<\/p>\n<p>             jurisdiction with the District Judge in exercise of all the powers<\/p>\n<p>             conferred by this part upon the District Judge but the proviso<\/p>\n<p>             clause makes it abundantly clear that where the inferior Court<\/p>\n<p>             has passed any order under sub-sec.(1) of S.384, then the<\/p>\n<p>             appeal shall lie to the District Judge and not to the High Court.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                     &#8220;The submission of the learned counsel that the District<\/p>\n<p>             Judge has got no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain an apper<\/p>\n<p>             where the jurisdiction exceeds Rs.One lac has got no force in it<\/p>\n<p>             because there is no such bar under the Act. The decision cited<\/p>\n<p>             by the learned counsel in the case of Bhim Singh Vs. Mohan<\/p>\n<p>             Lal Agarwal, 1991(2) Pat.LJR 325, will have no application<\/p>\n<p>             in this case which relates to the case under the general<\/p>\n<p>             provision of the C.P.C. and not under the provision of this<\/p>\n<p>             Act.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                      &#8220;Relying upon the aforesaid decision, I hold that the<\/p>\n<p>             appeal against the order passed by the Subordinate Judge shall<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No.2524 of 2007            -6 &#8211;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            lie to the District Judge and not before the High Court in view<\/p>\n<p>            of the provision of S.388 (2) and proviso clause of the Act.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>            Similar view is taken in Vadia Banerjee Vs. Sardar (supra);<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Karunamoyee Sett &amp; Others Vs. Lakshmirani Devi &amp; Others (supra)<\/p>\n<p>and Manohar son of Bapurao Sapre Vs. Bhaurao son of Tukaramji<\/p>\n<p>Shirbhate and another (supra).\n<\/p>\n<p>            In view of the consistent view of different High Courts on this<\/p>\n<p>issue, I hold that the present appeal is not maintainable having been filed<\/p>\n<p>before this Court against the order passed by Addl.Civil Judge (Sr.Division)<\/p>\n<p>Ferozepur, who has decided the case as a delegate of the District Judge.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the present appeal is dismissed as such.<\/p>\n<p>            At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant has prayed that<\/p>\n<p>the present appeal has been filed in this Court in compliance with the<\/p>\n<p>provisions of Section 388(3) of the Act within the period of limitation under<\/p>\n<p>the mistaken belief that since the Addl.Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.) has exercised<\/p>\n<p>the powers of District Judge, therefore, the appeal tantamounts to have been<\/p>\n<p>decided by the District Judge himself.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the<\/p>\n<p>appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to file an appeal against<\/p>\n<p>the order passed by Addl.Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.), Ferozepur dated 9.5.2007<\/p>\n<p>before the appropriate Court in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\n\n                                          (Rakesh Kumar Jain)\n25.2.2009                                       Judge\nMeenu\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009 FAO No.2524 of 2007 -1 &#8211; IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.2524 of 2007 Date of Decision : 25.2.2009 Jatinder Kaur and another ..Appellants. Vs. Jaskirat Kaur and others ..Respondents. CORAM : HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-26T15:58:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-26T15:58:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1502,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-26T15:58:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-26T15:58:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-26T15:58:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009"},"wordCount":1502,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009","name":"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-26T15:58:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jatinder-kaur-and-another-vs-jaskirat-kaur-and-others-on-25-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jatinder Kaur And Another vs Jaskirat Kaur And Others on 25 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228696"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228696\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}