{"id":228864,"date":"2008-03-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008"},"modified":"2017-10-23T13:04:49","modified_gmt":"2017-10-23T07:34:49","slug":"a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 16901 of 2005(K)\n\n\n1. A.A. PAUL, AGED 67 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,\n\n3. KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT\n\n4. M.K. FRANCIS, S\/O. KOCHUPAPPU,\n\n5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.BABU CHERUKARA\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.A.MANHU, SC, SIDCO\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI\n\n Dated :11\/03\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                             V.GIRI, J.\n                             -----------\n                       W.P.(C)No. 16901 OF 2005\n                       -----------------------------\n           DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2008\n\n\n                          J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      According to the petitioner, he purchased an extent of 58 =<\/p>\n<p>cents of land in various survey numbers in Kattoor Village from<\/p>\n<p>Irinjalakuda Kuries and Finance (P) Ltd. under Exhibit P1 sale<\/p>\n<p>deed. The vendor of the petitioner had obtained the property<\/p>\n<p>under Court auction, by executing the decree in O.S.No.200\/92,<\/p>\n<p>which is a suit filed by it for realisation of the amount due under<\/p>\n<p>a loan transaction. Apparently, the Court sale was confirmed and<\/p>\n<p>Exhibit P2 sale certificate was issued in favour of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>under Exhibit P3.     According to the petitioner, he thereafter<\/p>\n<p>moved for delivery of the property.           According to him, an<\/p>\n<p>application under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC was filed by the<\/p>\n<p>Tahsildar contending that the property covered by Exhibit P1<\/p>\n<p>document had already been attached at the instance of SIDCO<\/p>\n<p>and that therefore the said property was not liable to be sold in<\/p>\n<p>Court auction. Apparently, the petition under Order XXI Rule 58<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)No.16901\/05         2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>CPC was treated as a claim petition and it was dismissed under<\/p>\n<p>Exhibit P5 order dated 23.3.1999. The Court held that sale had<\/p>\n<p>been effected earlier, sale certificate issued and therefore the<\/p>\n<p>petition under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC was not maintainable. It is<\/p>\n<p>seen that in the meanwhile, the same property was brought to<\/p>\n<p>revenue sale and the 4th respondent purchased the same.              He<\/p>\n<p>approached this Court in O.P.No.2201\/03 contending that the<\/p>\n<p>revenue sale in his favour was held on 16.4.1996, that the sale was<\/p>\n<p>confirmed on 4.7.1996 and that nevertheless the sale certificate was<\/p>\n<p>not being issued. This Court under Exhibit P8 judgment disposed of<\/p>\n<p>the writ petition directing the Tahsildar to give the documents of<\/p>\n<p>title of the property to the petitioner therein and also to do<\/p>\n<p>everything that is required to confer title on the petitioner therein to<\/p>\n<p>get mutation effected.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.    The petitioner preferred Writ Appeal No.630\/03 against<\/p>\n<p>Exhibit P8 judgment. Exhibit P9 is the memorandum of appeal. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner referred to the Court sale at the instance of Irinjalakuda<\/p>\n<p>Kuries and subsequent purchase effected by him under Exhibit P5.<\/p>\n<p>The Division Bench of this Court in Exhibit P11 judgment declined to<\/p>\n<p>interfere with Exhibit P8. The Court held as follows:<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)No.16901\/05           3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            &#8221;     We are of the view, if the appellant is<\/p>\n<p>            aggrieved    by   the   issuance   of   sale<\/p>\n<p>            certificate and has got a superior claim<\/p>\n<p>            over the property in question those are all<\/p>\n<p>            matters to be taken up by the appellant<\/p>\n<p>            before    appropriate   forum.     Disputes<\/p>\n<p>            between the parties cannot be adjudicated<\/p>\n<p>            by us in this writ appeal.      Under such<\/p>\n<p>            circumstances, this writ appeal is disposed<\/p>\n<p>            of. We make it clear that the judgment of<\/p>\n<p>            the learned Single Judge and the issue of<\/p>\n<p>            sale certificate would not stand in the way<\/p>\n<p>            of the appellant in agitating his rights<\/p>\n<p>            before appropriate forum. We are also not<\/p>\n<p>            expressing any final opinion with regard to<\/p>\n<p>            the rights of the parties.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Therefore the Division Bench made it clear that if the petitioner has<\/p>\n<p>got superior claim over the property in question, then it is upto him<\/p>\n<p>to agitate the matter before the appropriate forum.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)No.16901\/05          4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     3.     It is after Exhibit P11, the petitioner has preferred this<\/p>\n<p>writ petition essentially challenging Exhibit P12 sale certificate<\/p>\n<p>issued in favour of the purchaser in the revenue auction.<\/p>\n<p>     4.     I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>the learned Government Pleader as well. In my view, the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>cannot maintain a challenge against the sale certificate in<\/p>\n<p>proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for more<\/p>\n<p>than one reason. Firstly, the petitioner&#8217;s contentions in this behalf<\/p>\n<p>were considered by the Division Bench in Exhibit P11 judgment.<\/p>\n<p>The Division Bench held that if the petitioner has superior claim over<\/p>\n<p>the property, it is upto him to approach the appropriate forum in<\/p>\n<p>that regard. In other words, if the petitioner asserted a title to the<\/p>\n<p>property stated to have been acquired prior in point of time, then it<\/p>\n<p>is upto him to assert title and seek to defend the same against all<\/p>\n<p>others including the subsequent purchaser. It is upto the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>to seek appropriate reliefs in this regard.        In my view, the<\/p>\n<p>appropriate forum for the petitioner would be the Civil Court.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, the challenge merely against the sale certificate issued<\/p>\n<p>under the provisions of the Revenue Recovery Act would not be<\/p>\n<p>maintainable. The petitioner has not challenged the revenue sale in<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)No.16901\/05         5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>favour of the holder of Exhibit P12 certificate under the provisions of<\/p>\n<p>the Revenue Recovery Act.        Of course, it is possible that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner may not consider it necessary to do so, consistent with<\/p>\n<p>his claim that his vendor had acquired title to the property prior to<\/p>\n<p>the acquisition of title by the auction purchaser and that he has<\/p>\n<p>superior claim over that property. At any rate challenge against<\/p>\n<p>sale certificate may not really improve the case of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>For all these reasons, the petition is bereft of merits and it is<\/p>\n<p>dismissed subject to the right of the petitioner to take appropriate<\/p>\n<p>action as already permitted by this Court under Exhibit P11<\/p>\n<p>judgment.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                             V.GIRI, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>dsn<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 16901 of 2005(K) 1. A.A. PAUL, AGED 67 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, 3. KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT 4. M.K. FRANCIS, S\/O. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-23T07:34:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-23T07:34:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":873,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008\",\"name\":\"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-23T07:34:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-23T07:34:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-23T07:34:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008"},"wordCount":873,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008","name":"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-23T07:34:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-a-paul-vs-district-collector-on-11-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A.A. Paul vs District Collector on 11 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228864\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}