{"id":228909,"date":"2008-10-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008"},"modified":"2015-08-16T21:51:58","modified_gmt":"2015-08-16T16:21:58","slug":"bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad … on 23 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad … on 23 October, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
sw-ou.nvr'1w\u00b0-ui'ar1 .....~m Wm. W mmnmm mam (mum ow KARNMAKA H561-E mum' cw mmamrm Ham couw\ufb01\ufb01\n\nIN THE HIGH coum\" OF KARNA:TfA;(A A T 1  \n\nCIRCUIT 8ENCH._:'A'fj \u00e9;rLQAI\u00e9sA *  3   7\n\nDATED THIS THE 23??_L>A%v%r\u00a7F ocToa%Eak%20os k L %\n\n   .\n<\/pre>\n
VS\/oKal.1appa  ”\n<\/p>\n
Age   v
\n  Agrictiltiz p <\/p>\n
– .. R\/0 I\u00a5I3,z1(ii1<;':za"Vil1age<\/p>\n
H*um11abad._ Tami:\n<\/p>\n
V  i.B:dar_Dism\u00a2’\u00a3.”‘<\/p>\n
Q :A:ji1,?i <\/p>\n
S:’5:–Ka!1\u00e9}pPa
\nAge 2_9 years
\nQctr” :” Agxiculture<\/p>\n
” Rio Handikera Village<\/p>\n
Humnabad Taluk<\/p>\n
V Bidar Diatxict.\n<\/p>\n
aEFAt?i2Ekk%A:%%%<\/p>\n
THE HON’BLE MRJ4.)$TI’\u00a2EV”‘MO\u00a7\u00e9.A#\u00a7l.j’VSH.ANTANAGOUDAR<\/p>\n
 gggmmaa, asmsse\/goo5<\/p>\n
, Appeilants<\/p>\n
(By Sri Avinash A Uplcmkar, Adv.,)<\/p>\n
_.,_ ._ ..-..,..n  .._.v…u W m.m.mNM:Ae\\A mun cuuxr cw WMAIAM was cougar as KARNATAKA Hum mum<\/p>\n
And:\n<\/p>\n
The State of Karnataka<\/p>\n
By Humnabad Police<\/p>\n
Bidar<\/p>\n
Rep by S.P.P.,<\/p>\n
High Court Building .V  ‘ ‘~ . \u00ab.
\nBangalorcrl.    ” sV\u00bb”;’.iV\u00a7espo11:1en\u00a3_ <\/p>\n
{By smx. Anuradha [}csa1,’VuLii.ti_'(i1. $.19.’ <\/p>\n
This  V-A_1jpc’a1A 1s’1\ufb02cd”-under Section 374 of
\nCr.P.C. against thtig judg:21ex;t”zIat\u00a7:d 539-7-2005 passed by the
\n19.0., I+”\u00a7_’C3-i_\u00a7;’  in , s.c;N\u00a2;’4’\/ 2000 convicting the
\nappeIIz3iits_=4a\u00e9c'{}’:;ed”-_Vjfor. _ t3r1\u00e9”v.: offences punishable under
\nSect:io11,323  326 of”IPC  \u00a2.tc.,<\/p>\n
._  coming on for hearing this day,
\nthe  d\u00e91i:V'{\u00a23I’8d’th,__6 fsllowing :<\/p>\n
‘”JvDGKsNr<\/p>\n
   appeal is \ufb01led by the convicted accused<\/p>\n
 judgment ans order (}fCOI}ViCtiO1’1 passed on
\n  2005, by the learned District 8; Sessions
\n‘ ” }:J11 (,;ig\u20ac, Guibarga, in Sessions Case No.4,!20{}0. Accused<\/p>\n
  txfic-id Ibr the offences punishable under Sections<\/p>\n
326, 504 and 30’? I”\/W. Section 34 of IPC.<\/p>\n
\\’\u00bb\/\/A)<\/p>\n
2: nnwrlt \u00bb wnvlurn-Irnnl  uwrwa\\I:’ur’|Ir”l\\I\\l”\\ % lI\\.7li ‘9bu\\IEJi\\I: ‘MI!’ RIQKEVHHHWH !’1I\\3’f1         <\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
seeing the assault, the daughter of the  —-~<\/p>\n
PW\u00bb-2 Vidyavathj came there to  V’   \ufb01ne<\/p>\n
instigation of accused NQ’;1″; “s.c(_:L1Aseg:1′  ‘ (\u00e9piic\ufb02szlii<\/p>\n
No.2) assaulted on the  of
\ntalwar. Consequently,’  itljiiiies.
\nAccording to .”t.’rg(_:   sccused had<\/p>\n
assaulted Pws. 1 and_ ::ss\u00bbs}ithsa:T%i:i.1s:::ion to commit their<\/p>\n
murder; ‘ ” X *<\/p>\n
3. In ordej\ufb01’ tciv :)1’\u00e9i.fe ths fjfssecu\ufb01on in all
\nexaminsd 14 Witimfssss -.:\ufb011a%.fked 11 documents<\/p>\n
and two materisd Lo’bjsc::su. ‘ ‘V <\/p>\n
 injured Witnesses. PWs.6, ‘7<\/p>\n
  eye  to the incident; who have<\/p>\n
.Vf11\u00a7%:3\u00a7\u00a31″11Qstil\u00e9.~.  4, 5 and 12 are the mahazar
\n   the spot panchansma and seizure
\n‘_  Exs.P–2 and P3 respectively. PW’~\u00bb8 is the<\/p>\n
ifwho treated PWs.1 ans 2 and issued wound<\/p>\n
sun-re<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
ceriziticate as per Ex.P–‘7. PW–1U is th\u00a2v~.V.iif3;festigating
\nO\ufb01icer. PWs.i1, 13 and :4 am
\nwho involved in the investigation.    u ‘\n<\/p>\n
4. The trial  aI’tt\u00a7r.\n<\/p>\n
Nos. 1 to 3 for the  Sections
\n504 and 307*   pr  and convicted<\/p>\n
accused Nos.   1 85 2 herein<\/p>\n
 lbf’  J<)ii_'<_\u00a72r:;r:\u00a7iSV' fpiinishable under Sections<\/p>\n
2: wwrvw\\u  I\u00a7\u00a3"IrM'%.l"'|\u00a5iP'\\E\\J"$ l"'I!M'a'l&"I Kuhl\ufb01l\ufb01i KJI" \u00a7'%.H!\u00a7I'M-\\:Al\\H          <\/p>\n
324 and 326 r\/wf11s\u00a2\u00a2t:ipth';,:y}  them to
\nnridergo rigorou$ _ period of 6 movraths
\nfor the offence g\ufb01nrggshgbi\u00e9 E\u00e9ection 324 1'\/W.
\nSectiovg_1_34  and  rigorous imprisonment
\nfor a    and to pay fine of Rs.2,50o\/-
\ne;;u:1;%tbr thekgtzz\u00e9\ufb01tf\u00e9i."_1ga;1%:it\u00a7hab1e under Section 326 r\/w.<\/p>\n
Setf\ufb01on   detault clause. 'I'h& trial (301111<\/p>\n
   ;airec:\u00a2a  that both the sentences to run<\/p>\n
,.5;:gj+1iC2t1:1'<\u00a7n\ufb02y and the sentence already undergone by<\/p>\n
…n.._..m  …vu.u W ewmmnm mew mum" as KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 0; KARNATAKA ::\u00a7}Em W<\/p>\n
H COURT<\/p>\n
.5,<\/p>\n
them shall be set off. The trial Court acqx\ufb01tfed accused
\nNo.2 of the o\ufb01ences alleged against  ii   <\/p>\n
5. The prosecufgioifi     1′. __
\nevidence of PWs.}. and’ 2 d\ufb01lpport  are
\ninjured eye    it may be
\nmentioned   _ A.  A[}idionka.r, learned
\ncounsel A V    the appellants fairly<\/p>\n
submits cannot escape the<\/p>\n
punishabie for the “$25 of :90.
\nHowever, accord;%;1g__td  has not proved
\nits case beyond r\u00e9asdllabl\u00e9  i’espect of accused<\/p>\n
No. 1 is.vconcer.r_1\u00e9d.dA.\n<\/p>\n
Tlif’:   by Smt\ufb01nuradha Desai,<\/p>\n
le;1\u00a7;’t’1t’:d Add];  on behaif of the respondent<\/p>\n
.1   dcpesed that \u00a7>W~–i2 — his daughter is<\/p>\n
Z ” ‘ A7’…:;:1A:;’Li:{=iedf.t9″;3cCi1$ed Nd}. and there was a di\ufb01’erence of<\/p>\n
vb\u00e9\ufb01een the two aiter two years of the marriage.<\/p>\n
55:?”-ix\/f _,,J<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
In that context, a complaint has been  <\/p>\n
against all the three accused as all the.  \u00bb <\/p>\n
were harassing PW~2. In view}: of-.tl1fe saine;-  ‘<\/p>\n
continued between the   ‘On  ‘griape <\/p>\n
incident, while ~1  2  shop of
\nSaclanand at  No.2 (already
\nacquitted by\ufb01lie ”  1 and 12 in
\n\ufb01lthy  No.3 assaulted
\nPWs.1   suifered simple
\ninjuries : ”Us1;1tlefed gievous injuries.<\/p>\n
Accused No.1  ” igis\ufb01gated accused No.3 to<\/p>\n
Vasgaulp  _l”.l[s.  After the incident, PW-1 has<\/p>\n
legged” t31e._V4c9pu:1jjiaint as per \u00a7\u00a73x.l’~I. In the cross-<\/p>\n
iv”a..__V_exam’in\u00e9t’iii0n’ ef’j_PW~l, nothing worth is elicited so as to<\/p>\n
 _discard his evidence. However, it is elicited in the cross-<\/p>\n
  that there is rivalry between the parties<\/p>\n
V’   {hat three cases are foisted against the accused.<\/p>\n
m\\..rwuas\\i wa muwwnvwtirwiuwt ansvuu uwuna  mmwwmlmmn E1|\\.’.’.!8’1 MQJUK! WV AHKNAIMKM WIUM CWUKE K}? K&KNA1AKA      <\/p>\n
.. ouwuru<\/p>\n
.3-\n<\/p>\n
7. The evidence of PW~–1 is fully “the<\/p>\n
evidence of PW~–2, who has also dep0sed..e\u00a71~
\nevidence of PW\u00bb 1. She has   K<\/p>\n
No.3 assaulted PW~1 as  as,”  her <\/p>\n
at that point of time,  No.   accused
\nNo.3 to assault onvliet. _  is deposed by PW-
\n2 that because oi’v’.t}1e j:ass,zg.ce,;1t’.\u00ab’b3f: No.3, she<\/p>\n
sustained’   ‘of\u20ac :.1_eft_…hggmd: “””‘Even in the Cross-<\/p>\n
.. -mwouarwlxi g.-.3′ nnnn:-unsxn nsura uuuna we m~w’.NA\u00a7AE%.A HIGH C\ufb01L}URT Q? KARNAYAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGW COURT<\/p>\n
examination, %_she.;*t-:iierate_s’Vf,\ufb01e ‘mirierayirts of the accused<\/p>\n
Nos.1 and  . —\n<\/p>\n
8. Thus, if  elearAiit'(\u00a7i1i the evidence of these two
\n tf1\u00e9t'” it was accused No.3 who<\/p>\n
assiaauited’ =   2. Consequently, they have<\/p>\n
 % “~*g$1f}exeti..eee11;ai\u00a7\u00a7;’ As is clear from the complaint
\n” “.–1\u00abE;;_._I:’~1,VLacc:jsed No.2 (who is acquitted by the trial
\n allegedly abused PWs.1 and 2. A bare
\n of the complaint Ex.P-1 discloses that the<\/p>\n
%L””\u00ab.le1iegations made against accused Noel and 2 are<\/p>\n
we run u—\u00ab. no mm mm<\/p>\n
.9-\n<\/p>\n
almost similar in nature. The trial  <\/p>\n
accused No.2, against whom similar ‘aiiegatidiis’ <\/p>\n
made as made against: aceirsved  to <\/p>\n
convict accused No.1. \u00bb.H_aviIig..   131::
\nfound in Ex.P–1, ceupie\u00e9V”e’e.\\%?ith ti1e..eVei:;e1deeVVet” I-‘Ws. V1
\nand 2, the j1zd\u00a711..;;’:;*1ts_ .\\:ii’s.convVietien recorded<\/p>\n
against accused No.  1V ._ <\/p>\n
9.5 The gieposed that PW~2 has<\/p>\n
it? wwwa\\I V_.,..,’ mmw..mm nau\ufb01 euum W mmnmm men com’: 0? KARNATAXA men comm es mmnmm HEGH cause’<\/p>\n
sustained    as, she has
\nsuffered \ufb01eeetufe’  whereas, PW-1 has
\nsustained ‘oneuxsimpleu The doctor has deposed
\n  lacerated wounds 1 ).\n<\/p>\n
if   had used the chopper, which is a<\/p>\n
  the injured would have sustained
\n 0%”  i\ufb01juries. As the injured has sustained
\n\ufb01gzounds, learned eounsei for the appe\ufb02ants is<\/p>\n
‘.  in making his submission that the assault<\/p>\n
Imist have been made by a club. Added to it, the<\/p>\n
1”<\/p>\n
2%’<\/p>\n
Xvi<\/p>\n
LU!..\u00a5KH $1)?’ Ki-\\W.NIM\ufb01\u00a5%\ufb02 Ms-31.3%” klU\u00a3\u00a3\u00a7{%’A’\u00a7Jh_:K\ufb02\u00a7(NME\u00a3kE\u00a7M mt.-;\u00bbw %o\u20ac\u00bb%.J\u00e9M\u00a5 Mi?” B\u00a7.MKN\ufb01\\E\ufb02\ufb02M ruuw mwum U?” RHKNHKRNA HIUE1 uwuiw war Iu\u00abwai\\u=-Lemma rnwn MWUWI<\/p>\n
…\u00a7(}..\n<\/p>\n
doctor in his examin3.tion—in-chief, has stated.  the<\/p>\n
injuries must have been caused by   <\/p>\n
object.\n<\/p>\n
10. In this context; sgji
\ncounsel appearing for   the
\nstick which is   oooimission of
\noffence is  3.  the context of
\nvillagers.’  are used in day-\n<\/p>\n
today._.li fe  eherefone, it may not fall
\nwit}; oeedly Weapon. The same is<\/p>\n
controVeftedVV”i:)}}’V  Desai, learned A<\/p>\n
\u00a7<\/p>\n
2mm” 0%” mEemm.m<:.a. mom coum\ufb01o\ufb01 mmpgmm Maw'-3 kmumg W m…..W,,,,…mm_ H<\/p>\n
-11..\n<\/p>\n
considered opinion, that accused No.3 has committed<\/p>\n
the oifcnce punishable under Section  “As<\/p>\n
aibrementioned, no case is made out  <\/p>\n
No.1 by the prosecution.\n<\/p>\n
At this stage, ..\n<\/p>\n
counsel for the ._ the wixocident has
\nocczurred about  tho spur of the
\nmoment.   time, the accused
\nmust  their family members
\n  \ufb024l(:I”].i(:I*lCY may be shown to<\/p>\n
the  of the same, the foilowing order<\/p>\n
 1′-1a<1e~V:  ., V' "\n<\/p>\n
  judgxnent; and order of conviction
\n . ‘A’f\u00e9Vcorded against accused No.1 is set
\n aside. Accused No.1 is acquitted of all
\nthe charges leveiled against him.<\/p>\n
6)) The conviction recorded against accused<\/p>\n
No.3 (i.e., appellant No.2 — Aljun 3\/o<\/p>\n
rxwunu E ‘&’I”w.rlI*mu1\\’bb’4v2z<\/p>\n
      Mlwm MQJWKE WV \u00a5\\f’\u00a7lV{lW.P”MiWhI\\\ufb01’\\ H”HL3’f”\u00e9 wwuwg wa mwwnmammnmnww a :<\/p>\n
Kallappa herein) for the o\ufb01erzee
\npunishable under Section 326 of
\nset aside. However, he is
\nthe offence punishable
\n324 and 325(\u00a21pc\u00a7ghqane\u00a2s\u00a2g\u00a2uggc\u00a2a”;
\nto undergo
\none month  1″()_r\u00b0\u00bb.::  the
\netfences and  \ufb01gs ‘(ji’10V’,f;,)(}()\/-,<\/p>\n
in deiai\ufb01f;’:%.. ~-._of  he is
\nsentenced to’  for a<\/p>\n
 of months\u00bb  e
\nin  f1i::e”‘ti1e entire’ amount of fire<\/p>\n
      namely Vidyavathi.\n<\/p>\n
    accordingky.\n<\/p>\n
 5′?\n<\/p>\n
 ‘vz_,\/\u00bb
\nmbmm $HANTA.HAGOUDAR)
\nJUDGE<\/p>\n
Sd\/~<\/p>\n
V’  *bIc\/bsn, IUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad … on 23 October, 2008 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar sw-ou.nvr’1w\u00b0-ui’ar1 …..~m Wm. W mmnmm mam (mum ow KARNMAKA H561-E mum’ cw mmamrm Ham couw\ufb01\ufb01 IN THE HIGH coum” OF KARNA:TfA;(A A T 1 CIRCUIT 8ENCH._:’A’fj \u00e9;rLQAI\u00e9sA * 3 7 DATED THIS THE 23??_L>A%v%r\u00a7F ocToa%Eak%20os k […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-228909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad ... on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad ... on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-16T16:21:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad … on 23 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-16T16:21:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1496,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad ... on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-16T16:21:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad … on 23 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad ... on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad ... on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-16T16:21:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad … on 23 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-16T16:21:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008"},"wordCount":1496,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008","name":"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad ... on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-16T16:21:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimsha-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-humnabad-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bhimsha vs The State Of Karnataka By Humnabad … on 23 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}