{"id":229212,"date":"2011-05-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011"},"modified":"2016-01-20T07:48:02","modified_gmt":"2016-01-20T02:18:02","slug":"yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>      IN\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0THE\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HIGH\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0COURT\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0OF\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0AT\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0RANCHI\n                    W.P\u00a0(PIL)\u00a0No.\u00a01530\u00a0of\u00a02009\n                          \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n      Yuva\u00a0Shakti\u00a0Manch,\u00a0Bokaro..... ...      ...     .... Petitioner\n                          \u00a0Versus\n      The\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Ors. ....      ......\u00a0      Respondents\n                          \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n      CORAM:        \u00a0HON'BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0PRAKASH\u00a0TATIA\n                    HON'BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0R.K.\u00a0MERATHIA\n                          \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n      For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0M\/s\u00a0Ajit\u00a0Kumar\n      For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents:\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0D.K.\u00a0Dubey,\u00a0G.P.\u00a0I\n                          \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n                                                             th\n                                                   \u00a0Dated\u00a009\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0May,\u00a02011\n                                                               \u00a0        \u00a0\n                            \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n24\/          This \u00a0 Public \u00a0 Interest \u00a0 Litigation \u00a0 is \u00a0 going \u00a0 on \u00a0 since \u00a0 2009.\u00a0\n\n      Several \u00a0 orders \u00a0 have \u00a0 been \u00a0 passed \u00a0 by \u00a0 this \u00a0 Court \u00a0 taking \u00a0 serious\u00a0\n\n      view\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a09th\u00a0 October,\u00a02009\u00a0this\u00a0Court\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0Director\u00a0\n\n      General\u00a0of\u00a0Police\u00a0(Vigilance)\u00a0to\u00a0make\u00a0a\u00a0thorough\u00a0enquiry\u00a0and\u00a0\n\n      submit\u00a0report\u00a0regarding\u00a0misappropriation\u00a0of\u00a0public\u00a0fund\u00a0which\u00a0\n\n      was \u00a0 meant\u00a0 for \u00a0 construction \u00a0of \u00a0 schools.\u00a0 Again \u00a0 on \u00a05th\u00a0 \u00a0 October,\u00a0\n\n      2010\u00a0when\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0was\u00a0taken\u00a0up,\u00a0this\u00a0Court\u00a0issued\u00a0notice\u00a0of\u00a0\n\n      contempt\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Director\u00a0General\u00a0of\u00a0Police\u00a0(Vigilance)\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0\n\n      he \u00a0 should \u00a0 \u00a0 be \u00a0 not \u00a0 punished \u00a0 for \u00a0 non \u00a0 compliance \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 order\u00a0\n\n      dated\u00a09th\u00a0 October,\u00a02009.\u00a0The\u00a0D.G.P.\u00a0(vigilance)\u00a0was\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0\n\n      appear \u00a0 before \u00a0 this \u00a0 Court \u00a0 on \u00a0 6.10.2010 \u00a0 and \u00a0 on \u00a0 6.10.2010 \u00a0 the\u00a0\n\n      D.G.P.\u00a0(Vigilance)\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0position\u00a0to\u00a0answer\u00a0any\u00a0inquiry\u00a0of\u00a0\n\n      the\u00a0Court\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0was\u00a0adjourned\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a024th\u00a0November,\u00a0\n\n      2010\u00a0it\u00a0was \u00a0observed\u00a0 that\u00a0this \u00a0time \u00a0should\u00a0be \u00a0utilized\u00a0 by\u00a0 the\u00a0\n\n      State \u00a0 for \u00a0 putting \u00a0 its \u00a0 house \u00a0 in \u00a0 order \u00a0 and \u00a0 discharging \u00a0 its\u00a0\n\n      obligation.\u00a0Then\u00a0on\u00a08th\u00a0December,\u00a02010\u00a0order\u00a0was\u00a0passed\u00a0to\u00a0file\u00a0\n\n      fresh\u00a0progress\u00a0report,\u00a0after\u00a0taking\u00a0note\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0F.I.R\u00a0\n\n      has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0lodged\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0of\u00a0mis\u00adappropriation\u00a0of\u00a0\n public \u00a0 fund \u00a0 that \u00a0 too \u00a0 with \u00a0 respect \u00a0 to \u00a0 construction \u00a0 of \u00a0 schools\u00a0\n\nunder\u00a0Sarva\u00a0Siksha\u00a0Abhiyan.\u00a0And\u00a0on\u00a017th\u00a0 January,\u00a02011\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0\n\nreported\u00a0that\u00a0only\u00a0seven\u00a0out\u00a0of\u00a0thirty\u00a0two\u00a0accused\u00a0persons\u00a0have\u00a0\n\nbeen \u00a0 arrested \u00a0 and \u00a0 it \u00a0 was \u00a0 specifically \u00a0 observed \u00a0 that \u00a0 in \u00a0 case\u00a0\n\nremaining\u00a0accused\u00a0persons\u00a0will\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0arrested,\u00a0the\u00a0Investigating\u00a0\n\nOfficer\u00a0will\u00a0have\u00a0to\u00a0face\u00a0the\u00a0consequences.\u00a0Then\u00a0again\u00a0on\u00a025th\u00a0\n\nJanuary,\u00a02011,\u00a0this\u00a0Court\u00a0observed\u00a0that\u00a0substantially,\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0\n\nprogress\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a017th\u00a0 February,\u00a02011\u00a0again\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0observed\u00a0that\u00a0\n\nthe \u00a0 Investigating \u00a0 Officer \u00a0 has \u00a0 so \u00a0 far \u00a0 not \u00a0 shown \u00a0 result\u00a0\n\nnotwithstanding\u00a0the \u00a0earlier\u00a0order\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0this\u00a0Court.\u00a0On\u00a08th\u00a0\n\nMarch,\u00a02011,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0informed\u00a0that\u00a0one\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0officers\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0\n\narrested\u00a0and\u00a0rests\u00a0were\u00a0not\u00a0arrested.\u00a0On\u00a026th\u00a0 April,\u00a02011,\u00a0this\u00a0\n\nCourt \u00a0 constrained \u00a0 to \u00a0 direct \u00a0 \u00a0 the \u00a0 Director \u00a0 General \u00a0 of \u00a0 Police,\u00a0\n\nJharkhand\u00a0to\u00a0handover\u00a0the \u00a0investigation\u00a0about\u00a0the \u00a0conduct\u00a0of\u00a0\n\nthe \u00a0 Investigating \u00a0 Officer \u00a0 of \u00a0 this \u00a0 case \u00a0 to \u00a0 a \u00a0 senior \u00a0 responsible\u00a0\n\nofficer\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0State\u00a0to\u00a0see\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0and\u00a0how\u00a0and\u00a0under\u00a0what\u00a0\n\ncircumstances \u00a0 the \u00a0 Investigating \u00a0 Officer, \u00a0 investigating \u00a0 this \u00a0 case,\u00a0\n\nhas\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0able\u00a0to\u00a0arrest\u00a0the\u00a0remaining \u00a013\u00a0accused\u00a0persons\u00a0\n\nand\u00a0also\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0report\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard.\u00a0\n\n       Today, \u00a0 a \u00a0 report \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondent\u00ad\n\nState.\u00a0Annexure\u00ad1\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0report\u00a0submitted\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Additional\u00a0\n\nDirector \u00a0 General \u00a0 of \u00a0 Police, \u00a0 Criminal \u00a0 Investigating \u00a0 Department,\u00a0\n\nJharkhand, \u00a0 wherein, \u00a0 after \u00a0 narrating \u00a0 the \u00a0 facts \u00a0 with \u00a0 respect \u00a0 to\u00a0\n\ncharge\u00adsheet \u00a0 submitted, \u00a0 it \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 stated \u00a0 about \u00a0 the \u00a0 efforts\u00a0\n\nwhich \u00a0 have \u00a0 been \u00a0 made \u00a0 for \u00a0 arresting \u00a0 the \u00a0 remaining \u00a0 accused\u00a0\n\npersons\u00a0and\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0process\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a082\u00a0and\u00a0\n\n83\u00a0Cr.P.C\u00a0were\u00a0also\u00a0initiated\u00a0against\u00a0one\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0namely,\u00a0\n Archana\u00a0Kumari\u00a0and\u00a0a\u00a0schedule\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0annexed\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0that\u00a0\n\neven\u00a0public\u00a0notice\u00a0were\u00a0issued\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0named\u00a0accused\u00a0persons\u00a0\n\nwho \u00a0 are \u00a0 accused \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 criminal \u00a0 case \u00a0 under \u00a0 Sections\u00a0\n\n403\/406\/409\/120<\/pre>\n<p>B\/467\/468\/471\u00a0\/201\/109\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Indian\u00a0Penal\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Code.\n<\/p>\n<p>        It \u00a0appears \u00a0that \u00a0the \u00a0report\u00a0 \u00a0has \u00a0been \u00a0 \u00a0submitted \u00a0only\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>justify \u00a0 the \u00a0 action \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Investigating \u00a0 Officer \u00a0 who \u00a0 could \u00a0 not\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>arrest \u00a0 the \u00a0 13 \u00a0 accused \u00a0 persons \u00a0 who \u00a0 were \u00a0 said \u00a0 to \u00a0 be \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Government\u00a0Servants\u00a0at\u00a0a\u00a0particular\u00a0point\u00a0of\u00a0time.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        According\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0respondents,\u00a0out\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>of\u00a013\u00a0accused,\u00a0services\u00a0of\u00a0nine\u00a0persons\u00a0have \u00a0been\u00a0terminated,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>who \u00a0 were \u00a0 working \u00a0 on \u00a0 contract \u00a0 basis. \u00a0 However, \u00a0 four \u00a0 accused\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>persons\u00a0are\u00a0in\u00a0service\u00a0but\u00a0they\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0traceable.<\/p>\n<p>        From\u00a0the\u00a0facts\u00a0referred\u00a0above,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0apparent\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0State\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>is\u00a0yet\u00a0helpless\u00a0in\u00a0arresting\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0persons\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>that\u00a0it\u00a0was \u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0relating\u00a0tot\u00a0he \u00a0construction \u00a0of \u00a0building\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>under \u00a0 Sarva \u00a0 Siksha \u00a0 Abhiyan \u00a0 and \u00a0 there \u00a0 is \u00a0 clear \u00a0 case \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>embezzlement\u00a0of\u00a0huge\u00a0fund\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0project,\u00a0who\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0spared\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>even\u00a0the\u00a0children\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand.<\/p>\n<p>        In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0reasons,\u00a0let\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Secretary,\u00a0Government\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0as\u00a0well\u00a0as\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0Home\u00a0Secretary,\u00a0Government\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0look\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>into\u00a0the\u00a0affairs\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0going\u00a0on\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>find \u00a0 out \u00a0 as \u00a0 to \u00a0 why \u00a0 these \u00a0 persons, \u00a0 who \u00a0 are \u00a0 not \u00a0 the \u00a0 hardened\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>criminals, \u00a0 could \u00a0 not \u00a0 be \u00a0 arrested \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 police \u00a0 authorities,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>ignoring \u00a0 the \u00a0 serious \u00a0 view \u00a0 taken \u00a0 by \u00a0 this \u00a0 Court \u00a0 on \u00a0 several\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>occasions. \u00a0 We \u00a0 cannot \u00a0 appreciate \u00a0 the \u00a0 reports \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n                 officers\u00a0who\u00a0investigated\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0conduct\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Investigating\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                Officers.\u00a0The\u00a0State\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0progress\u00a0report\u00a0by\u00a07th\u00a0June,\u00a02011.<\/p>\n<p>                         Put\u00a0up\u00a0this\u00a0Case\u00a0on\u00a07th\u00a0June,\u00a02011.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                (Prakash\u00a0Tatia,\u00a0J)<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(R.K.\u00a0Merathia,\u00a0J)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Alankar\/\u00ad\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011 IN\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0THE\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HIGH\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0COURT\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0OF\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0AT\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0RANCHI W.P\u00a0(PIL)\u00a0No.\u00a01530\u00a0of\u00a02009 \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad Yuva\u00a0Shakti\u00a0Manch,\u00a0Bokaro&#8230;.. &#8230; &#8230; &#8230;. Petitioner \u00a0Versus The\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Ors. &#8230;. &#8230;&#8230;\u00a0 Respondents \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad CORAM: \u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0PRAKASH\u00a0TATIA HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0R.K.\u00a0MERATHIA \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0M\/s\u00a0Ajit\u00a0Kumar For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents:\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0D.K.\u00a0Dubey,\u00a0G.P.\u00a0I \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad th \u00a0Dated\u00a009\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0May,\u00a02011 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad 24\/ This \u00a0 Public \u00a0 Interest \u00a0 Litigation \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-229212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-20T02:18:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-20T02:18:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":295,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011\",\"name\":\"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-20T02:18:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-20T02:18:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-20T02:18:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011"},"wordCount":295,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011","name":"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-20T02:18:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yuva-shakti-manch-bokaro-unit-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-9-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yuva Shakti Manch, Bokaro Unit vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors on 9 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229212"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229212\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}