{"id":229298,"date":"2011-06-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011"},"modified":"2018-04-24T07:45:53","modified_gmt":"2018-04-24T02:15:53","slug":"mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                            Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                          Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                 Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                            Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/000987\/12678\n                                                                    Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/000987\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging from the Appeal<\/p>\n<p>Appellant                            :       Mr. Sushil Kumar<br \/>\n                                             D- Wing, Shipping Corporation of India,<br \/>\n                                             250, Sudam Kalu Ahire Marg,<br \/>\n                                             Worli, Mumbai &#8211; 400030<\/p>\n<p>Respondent                    (1)    :       Mr. Rajesh Khanna<br \/>\n                                             Public Information Officer &amp; SE<br \/>\n                                             Office of Superintending Engineer,<br \/>\n                                             Municipal Corporation Of Delhi<br \/>\n                                             3rd Floor, over Water head tank, Najafgarh,<br \/>\n                                             New Delhi &#8211; 110043<\/p>\n<p>                              (2)    :       Public Information Officer<br \/>\n                                             Irrigation and Flood Control Department<br \/>\n                                             GNCTD<br \/>\n                                             4th Floor, ISBT Building, Kashmere Gate,<br \/>\n                                             Delhi &#8211; 110006<\/p>\n<p>RTI application filed on             :       17\/08\/2009<br \/>\nPIO replied                          :       Transferred on 22\/09\/2009 &amp; 18\/01\/2010<br \/>\nFirst appeal filed on                :       29\/12\/2009<br \/>\nFirst Appellate Authority order      :       23\/02\/2010<br \/>\nSecond Appeal received on            :       19\/04\/2010<\/p>\n<p>Information Sought<br \/>\nThe Appellant sought information regarding &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>    1) The heavy encroachments on both sides of the roads of Sagarpur main Nullah.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    2) The details of the officers (including name, designation, contact information etc.) in the last five<br \/>\n        years, who were responsible for reporting the building of such illegal encroachments, or when<br \/>\n        there is any kind of encroachment on the above said roads, and have not informed your department<br \/>\n        regarding the same.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>3) Any record book or log book maintained for recording of any information of any illegal encroachment<br \/>\nit is it reported? If yes then a photocopy of the log book regarding the above mentioned road<br \/>\nencroachment should be given.\n<\/p>\n<p>4) The reporting officers of the above mentioned officers, in the last five years?\n<\/p>\n<p>5) A copy of the rules of your department, regarding the punishment of officers who do not report the<br \/>\nencroachment should be given. Date when actions against such officers will be intimated.\n<\/p>\n<p>6) A copy of any action taken in the past against any of the officers for the above mentioned<br \/>\nencroachment. If no action can be taken against these officers, then the reason of such a decision should<br \/>\nbe sent<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                               Page 1 of 3<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p> 7) Steps that have been taken by the office to ascertain the position of the illegal encroachment of the<br \/>\nmentioned roads, after being alerted by the citizen.\n<\/p>\n<p>8) A copy of all the communication exchanged between various departments regarding the same should<br \/>\nbe sent\n<\/p>\n<p>9) Time period after which action are taken, after being alerted about an illegal encroachment. Rules that<br \/>\nspecify this. A copy is needed of that rule.\n<\/p>\n<p>Reply of the Public Information Officer (PIO)<br \/>\nThe file was transferred back and forth from the MCD and the Flood Control Deptt. of GNCTD.\n<\/p>\n<p>Grounds for the First Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>No information provided by the PIO.\n<\/p>\n<p>Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\n<\/p>\n<p>The case at hand had already been decided (Appeal No. :108, dt : 30\/07.dt: 22\/09\/2009)<\/p>\n<p>Grounds for the Second Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>Unsatisfactory information provided by the PIO and unfair disposal of the appeal by the FAA.\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing on 24\/06\/2010:<br \/>\nThe following were present<br \/>\nAppellant: Mr. Sushil Kumar on video conference from NIC Studio Mumbai;<br \/>\nRespondent: Mr. Manoj Verma, EE(M-II) on behalf of Mr. Rajesh Khanna, PIO &amp; SE;\n<\/p>\n<p>        The PIO did not have a copy of the RTI Application. Commission had given a copy of the appeal<br \/>\nto the PIO and had adjourned the matter to 23 July 2010 at 11.30AM. The PIO also stated that the matter<br \/>\nrelating to the encroachment of the embankment of the nallah related to Irrigation and Flood Control<br \/>\nDepartment, GNCTD. PIO MCD stated that he had spoken to the Executive Engineer of Flood and<br \/>\nIrrigation Department who said that the demarcation details were available with the Revenue Department.<br \/>\nIf that was the case PIO of Floor and Irrigation Department should bring the PIO of Revenue Department<br \/>\nfor the Hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In view of this the PIO of MCD and PIO of Irrigation and Flood Control Department were directed<br \/>\nto appear before the Commission on 23 July 2010 at 11.30AM.\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing on 23 July 2010:<br \/>\n&#8220;The following were present<br \/>\nAppellant: Mr. Sushil Kumar<br \/>\nRespondent: i) Mr. Manoj Kumar Verma [EE (M-II), Najafgarh]\n<\/p>\n<p>            ii) Mr. Anil Kumar Chopra (PIO &amp; SE, Najafgarh)<\/p>\n<p>Mr. AK Chopra states that there is confusion as to who owns the land regarding which the information is<br \/>\nbeing sought. He states that he has talked to SDM Najafgarh who is the PIO concerned of this area. Mr.<br \/>\nRajeev Shukla (SDM, Najafgarh) has assured him that they will do a physical verification and reconcile<br \/>\nthem with their records and give a report about who owns the land at the place where information is being<br \/>\nsought. In view of this the Commission adjourns this hearing to 18 August 2010 at 5.00 pm. All the PIOs<br \/>\npresent and the Appellant are directed to be present at the hearing on 18 August at 5.00 pm.<br \/>\nThe matter is adjourned to 18 August 2010 at 5.00 pm.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                               Page 2 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p> Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing on 18 August 2010:<br \/>\nThe following were present<br \/>\nAppellant: Mr. Sushil Kumar on video conference from NIC Mumbai Studio;<br \/>\nRespondent: Mr. Manoj Kumar Verma, EE (M-II), Najafgarh on behalf of PIO Mr. Rajesh Kumar;<br \/>\nMr. A. K. Bhatia, Surveyor or works to SEFC-VI, Basaidara Pur Office Complex, Opposite ESI Hospital,<br \/>\nNew Delhi; Mr. S. K. Achaantani, Executive Engineer Civil Division-I (INFC Department), Basaidara Pur<br \/>\nOffice Complex, Opposite ESI Hospital, New Delhi;\n<\/p>\n<p>       &#8220;Mr. A. K. Bhatia states that efforts were made to get the demarcation from the Area SDM Mr.<br \/>\nRajeev Shukla, SDM(Nazafgarh). Mr. Shukla has stated that in the absence of Kila reference points as per<br \/>\nSizra of the Village the demarcation could not be accomplished for the reason that the area around the<br \/>\nNallah is heavily built-up. In view of this Dy. Commission (south west) would be able to get this<br \/>\ndemarcation done. In the absence of this demarcation it would not be possible to identify the responsible<br \/>\nagency.\n<\/p>\n<p>The matter is adjourned.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision announced on 3 June, 2011:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Commission contacted the Revenue department to see if information could be obtained for the<br \/>\nappellant. However from the letters (enclosed six pages with this order) sent by the officers, it appears<br \/>\nthat presently there is no information available since the demarcation has not been done so far. The<br \/>\nCommission is enclosing the communications received with this decision. This Commission can only<br \/>\nadjudicate on a matter where the information exists. In the instant matter no information exists and the<br \/>\nCommission does not have powers to ensure that the demarcation would be done.\n<\/p>\n<p>The appeal is disposed.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.<br \/>\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                        Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                              Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                           03 June 2011<br \/>\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(YM)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                              Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/000987\/12678 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2010\/000987 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal Appellant : Mr. Sushil Kumar D- Wing, Shipping Corporation of India, 250, Sudam [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-229298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-24T02:15:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-24T02:15:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1084,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-24T02:15:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-24T02:15:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-24T02:15:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011"},"wordCount":1084,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011","name":"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-24T02:15:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sushil-kumar-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-3-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Sushil Kumar vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 3 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229298\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}