{"id":229575,"date":"2000-05-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2000-05-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000"},"modified":"2016-03-01T12:44:59","modified_gmt":"2016-03-01T07:14:59","slug":"sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000","title":{"rendered":"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 86 (2000) DLT 94, 2000 (54) DRJ 172<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: M Sarin<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: M Sarin<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>Manmohan Sarin, J.<\/p>\n<p>1.     The  petitioner is a proprietor of Avon Guest House located  at  C-43, South  Extension-II, New Delhi. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order  dated 19.7.1997, passed by the Dy. Commissioner of Police, cancelling the licence of  the  petitioner  to run the Guest House. Petitioner  had  preferred  an appeal  against  the  order of Dy. Commissioner of Police  before  the  Lt. Governor,  which  was also dismissed by the Lt. Governor, vide  a  speaking order dated 16.9.1998.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   Learned counsel for the petitioner attempted to urge that the impugned orders  dated 19.7.1997 and 16.9.1998 are not sustainable. He submits  that the orders have been passed in violation of principles of natural  justice. Secondly, that the orders proceed on grounds which are extraneous to  those set out in the show cause notices issued to the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the impugned orders are the result of mala fide action of  the police, at the behest of his business rival, who is determined to ruin  the petitioner.  Lastly,  learned counsel urged that the  cancellation  of  the licence  in so far as it is based on the contravention of Regulation 31  of the  Regulations  for Keeping Places of Public Entertainment in  the  Union Territory  of Delhi under the Delhi Police Act is not sustainable  inasmuch as  the  said regulation contemplates a plurality of occurrence of  the  offence. Not only this, it mandates knowledge of the petitioner and mens  rea on  his part. He further submits that the proceedings are vitiated  on  account  of  reliance on extraneous grounds not included in  the  show  cause notice.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.   I  have heard the counsel for the respondent, in opposition,  as  also perused  the show cause notices, replies thereto, and the  impugned  orders passed. The submission that the order is passed in violation of  principles of  natural  justice is devoid of merit. The first show  cause  notice  was issued  on 13.11.1995, which was duly replied to on 21.12.1995. The  ground in  this notice was that the premises in question is located in a  residential  area and hence Guest House could not be run. A  supplementary  notice dated  10.5.1996  was issued wherein a specific ground of the  Guest  House being  used  for prostitution was taken. Particulars of  the  couple  found indulging  in prostitution were also mentioned. Petitioner in fact  sent  a detailed  reply on 22.5.1996, setting out its position. A third show  cause notice  was also issued on 18.2.1997. In this notice, it was  alleged  that while  licence  had  been granted for 9 rooms and 17  beds,  petitioner  in contravention  was found to be running 20 rooms. Reply to this  notice  has also been given on 17.7.1997.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.   From  the  foregoing, it would be seen that the  petitioner  had  been provided  more than adequate opportunities for setting up his  case  before the  Authorities. Petitioner, in replies to the show cause notices as  well as in his submission before me, has sought to urge that the petitioner  has been wrongly framed for prostitution. The couple in fact used to reside  in the  adjoining Guest House and had booked a room in the petitioner&#8217;s  Guest House  and the petitioner bona fide, in the normal course, had  booked  the room  at request. Therefore, it could not be said that the  petitioner  had the knowledge of the room being booked by the said couple for prostitution.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   It is not necessary for me in writ jurisdiction to go into these  disputed questions, which call for appreciation of evidence. It is  sufficient for me to notice that there was sufficient material before the  Authorities to reach the conclusion and the conclusions which they have reached cannot, having  regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, be vitiated  on account  of either being perverse or those which could not be reached by  a reasonable  person.  A  perusal of the orders of the  Dy.  Commissioner  of Police as well as Lt. Governor show that they have duly considered the case set  up against the petitioner as well as his defense. It is not a case  of non-application of mind, as is sought to be urged by counsel for the  petitioner.  Moreover, as rightly observed by the Lt. Governor in the  impugned order, there has been contravention of the regulations by the petitioner on different  counts  and it is not a case where on the basis  of  a  solitary ground, the petitioner&#8217;s licence is sought to be cancelled.\n<\/p>\n<p>     In  view of the foregoing discussion, I am of the view that no  ground is  made out for interference by this Court in the exercise of writ  jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.     The writ petition has no merit and is dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000 Equivalent citations: 86 (2000) DLT 94, 2000 (54) DRJ 172 Author: M Sarin Bench: M Sarin ORDER Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. The petitioner is a proprietor of Avon Guest House located at C-43, South Extension-II, New Delhi. Petitioner is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-229575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2000-05-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-01T07:14:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000\",\"datePublished\":\"2000-05-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-01T07:14:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000\"},\"wordCount\":797,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000\",\"name\":\"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2000-05-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-01T07:14:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2000-05-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-01T07:14:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000","datePublished":"2000-05-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-01T07:14:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000"},"wordCount":797,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000","name":"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2000-05-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-01T07:14:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-pawaskar-vs-lt-governor-of-delhi-anr-on-11-may-2000#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sudhir Pawaskar vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi &amp; Anr. on 11 May, 2000"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}