{"id":229693,"date":"2009-08-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009"},"modified":"2014-05-30T14:25:16","modified_gmt":"2014-05-30T08:55:16","slug":"state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
\n\n5  \n\n5 I' \n-- I ~   \/2;\n\nE a \n\n\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATA KA AT BANGALOQE\n\nDATED THIS THE 26\"' my OF AUGUST  \n\nBEFORE 2\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE MOHAl\\i*,SH;\u20ac\\M'Ti4:\\iA\/.$fOi}b'AR\"'4.j\u00e9. %\n\nwan pgjrrrom No.941is\/zoos ceM.aE5;  \n\nBetween :\n\nState Public Information Officer. V ~ \n8: Deputy Registrar (Estabiishiiieri\ufb02 * \nThe High Court of Kamataka ' * \" '\nHigh Court Building,   , \"\nDr.Ambedkar V\u20ac:'edi1_i--\u00ab.  b   V.  \nBanga1ore-560     ~   .. Petitioner\n\n( By Sri N.=;iganai1ti\u00e9;;vVS;:';\u00a7Z?ou<:1o'eI._ for f\n\nSriranga 'Assoc1'at_eS~)f v,  _ \n\nAND :\n\n2  iiiiii H\nRe_sidir1g. at Appie4VSOft,\nNo.3o9,"io$tCr_o's-5 " V _ Q\n15' Main", --.ShiVar1;3gar,V\n\n  'Nest of Chord. Road,\n Bangalore'-'56!) 0'10. .. Respondent\n\n' " '{ By Sr:;\\I.A\ufb01barasan, Party-in--person }\n\n\n\nThis Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 8: .227 of the\nConstitution of India praying to quash the order dated\n\n14.5.2008 [Annexure--G) passed by the Karnataka Infozinahtioizvvp\n\nCommission.\n\nThis Writ Petition coming on for hearingtpthi-sop  llpthewl  0 \n\nCourt made the following :\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Heard the learned advocates aippeafingl on of<\/p>\n
parties and perused the stateInentVl4l’oI_l”1:objections l\ufb01lledl\ufb01by the<\/p>\n
respondent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2. Petitionerpphas   the order at
\nAnnexure-‘G’      the Karnataka
\nInformation  _   Egtate Chief Information
\nCommissioner .li’as\ufb01d\u00a3.1’fectedl”‘thpe’*–.petitioner to furnish certain<\/p>\n
records free of cost to thellcoinplainant.<\/p>\n
  3.V-‘:c_j’l’l1e..erestpondenthelrein \ufb01led an application before the<\/p>\n
P{f3.1ic.=llnforrnatioiii;:Cfficer–Deputy Registrar of High Court of<\/p>\n
 e,_.A_.ppKarnataip{at,l  for furnishing the certified copies of the<\/p>\n
_llgfo1i’owing linfoijmation\/documents as per the provisions of<\/p>\n
 1.] of the Right to Information Act, 2005 :<\/p>\n
Guidelines, rules pertaining to scrutiny of <\/p>\n
Writ Petition.\n<\/p>\n
Guidelines, rules pertaining to classifica’tion_:u’ii” <\/p>\n
of Writ Petition.\n<\/p>\n
Guidelines, rules which pres:eribe’sA.’to lpostla   <\/p>\n
Writ Petition only on eaVrly.4_hear’i’11glapplicatiorla <\/p>\n
Of 1T1\u20ac1’Il0.\n<\/p>\n
Procedure, guidelines and rules._foll’owed when
\nthe respondent has  not. 7filed._  V G’ Written
\nstatement as per  l~Honourable<\/p>\n
Number\u00bb.oi”o::easi0.nsVtirnesreduests made by
\nRespond’en_ts_’for potstponirig the hearing and<\/p>\n
the ifeas ons p’r.ojeeted”‘by them.<\/p>\n
l\\lumbet” of hearings’: held in Writ Petition<\/p>\n
  26\u00e9’57g2.o04.\n<\/p>\n
 “times the Writ Petition Number<\/p>\n
”  “?;’665″i’.1\/f2.\u20acV).’04 posted for hearing.<\/p>\n
  p Ofdets of Hon.Judge in all hearings of Writ
\n _ “Petition Number 26657\/2004.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9.<\/p>\n
10.<\/p>\n
1}.\n<\/p>\n
12.<\/p>\n
13.<\/p>\n
14.<\/p>\n
Objections, Written submission, Written<\/p>\n
statements filed by the respondents in W1-it<\/p>\n
Petition Number 26657\/2004.\n<\/p>\n
Procedure, Guidelines, rules f0H0’\\2iI\u20ac\u00ab’Z1,.”_:’:”j:1–i~,,\/L.i<\/p>\n
Writ Petition” ~ .. ‘Nu:-xiigsi\u00e9. _  <\/p>\n
posting the
\n26657 \/ 2004,<\/p>\n
Early hearing applicatio’n.;”‘=meInox_ gird.   <\/p>\n
other request made by… “advocaite…_,for\u00a7<\/p>\n
petitioner
\n2665772004.\n<\/p>\n
in    Number
\nNumber    Petition
\nNumber 1,f;*935;<2ooe;-   .– " V
\n  WritdWPetition Number
\n1  \/2006 \ufb01e-sted. for beating.\n<\/p>\n
_Ordersau’of:V1~Io.n.Judge: in ali hearings in Writ<\/p>\n
 “Petition Nuhm’oer…1<7935\/2006.<\/p>\n
 Written submission, Written<\/p>\n
W'  \ufb01ied by the respondents in Writ<\/p>\n
W  is.\n<\/p>\n
Z Hposting<\/p>\n
“Procedure.\n<\/p>\n
‘Petition Number 17935\/2006.\n<\/p>\n
Guidelines, rules followed in<\/p>\n
the Writ Petition
\n1 7935 \/2006.\n<\/p>\n
Number<\/p>\n
17. Early hearing application, memo and any<\/p>\n
other request made by the advocate <\/p>\n
petitioner in Writ Petition Numlger\u00bb  <\/p>\n
17935\/2006.”\n<\/p>\n
The Public information Officer <\/p>\n
Annexure~’B’ dated 3rd August 2007, inforrning the,.’ifespondenti V<\/p>\n
herein that the information sough’t:for by” the  in
\nrespect of the guidelines, rules   of the
\nwrit petition, guidelines and  tovlclgassi\ufb01cation of
\nthe writ petition, the.lproce(\u00a7lure,’v’ rules followed
\nby the High  has not filed his
\nstatement,   High Court Act and
\nRules, 195fa:;’–._   relating to Sl.No.2, the
\nPublic InforrnationOfficerV  the respondent herein that
\n pgshoulgg lviciepositwnd  to furnish the list regarding<\/p>\n
cIass\u00bbificatiVori_ of __writ petition. As regards information<\/p>\n
 relatiungfto’  request of the respondent was not<\/p>\n
 considered as the request was not specific. As regards S1.Nos.6<\/p>\n
“the cohcerned of\ufb01cer informed the respondent herein<\/p>\n
  itoay obtain the certified copies of the order sheet<\/p>\n
 [pertaining to the Writ Petition No.2e657\/2004 and Writ<\/p>\n
-6-<\/span><\/p>\n
Petition No.1’7935\/2006 in accordance with the Rules. Being<\/p>\n
aggrieved by the said order at Annexure~’B’, the <\/p>\n
herein filed complaint under Section 18 (1) of the  V’<\/p>\n
Information Act, 2005 as per Ann.eX,ure–‘iCllmbelfo\u00e9re” the<\/p>\n
Karnataka Information Commission. Itwis i:’e1evant.to  <\/p>\n
the respondent did not challenge’flthe. order
\nThus, the order Annexure–“B’ has  finality,” However,<\/p>\n
the respondent herein chose.”\n<\/p>\n
to file  under Section
\n18(1) of the Right toA,_Infor’;rv;f1_at–i:f.>.I?  2008,
\ncontending therein?__’:th;;$t:i:. the information
\nis not furnishedlto  lfees within the time
\nlimit. The themstatement of objections
\nbefore the Kax*na’taha  Cornmission. After hearing,
\nthe impugned order._:ViAs’ -passedltas per Annexure–‘G’ to the writ
\npetition’xthelbetiltioner to furnish High Court Act 81<\/p>\n
Rules ..or’dVei::sj’neet in two writ petitions free of cost to<\/p>\n
Q A A A ..the complainant,’ ”  ‘<\/p>\n
 information as sought for by the respondent in<\/p>\n
 \u00ab_lr’es;;ec’t._lof Item Nos}, 3 and 4 mentioned above are available in<\/p>\n
  High Court Act and Rules made thereunder. The<\/p>\n
said Act and Rules are available in market. If not available,<\/p>\n
the respondent has to obtain copies of the same fron1s\ufb02thle..<\/p>\n
publishers. it is not open for the respondent to  M<\/p>\n
of the same from the petitioner. But st1iangely,_’the if<\/p>\n
Information Commission has directed the petitioner”‘to’ <\/p>\n
the copies of the Karnataka High Court   of
\ncost under Right to Information Aet4\u00a7>”v\u00ab_l’I’l1e  order in<\/p>\n
respect of the same is illegal: and <\/p>\n
The information. in respectfpof’  to 17 is<\/p>\n
relating to Writ  N\u00a7i2i3\u00ab$57.g2eo4l:\u00e9’:{d Writ Petition<\/p>\n
No.17935\/2006,   diswal party to the said
\nproceedings:V’.._A’Ihus,vlaccordiiig\ufb02top: Rules of the High Court, it
\nIS open for the”‘respVonlde.nt_t’o:li’le an application for certified
\ncopies of order-‘ A.  or the relevant documents for
\n(‘See Chapter–17 of Karnataka High Court<\/p>\n
Rules;   open for the respondent to obtain<\/p>\n
lvjrlcertified copies ‘ the order sheet pending as Well as the<\/p>\n
”  of matters, the State Chief Information Commissioner<\/p>\n
 is not justified in directing the petitioner to furnish copies of<\/p>\n
 free of costs. If the order of the State Chief<\/p>\n
lk\/9<\/p>\n
_3,.\n<\/p>\n
Information Commissioner is to be implemented, then, it-..fwill<\/p>\n
lead to illegal demands. Under the Rules, any persoIitW”ho.,:is..<\/p>\n
party or not a party to the proceedings, can obtain   it<\/p>\n
the High Court as per the procedure  it<\/p>\n
mentioned supra. The State Chief Inf’or1n:a’tio’n eon:mis4s15_11ef’eiii<\/p>\n
has passed the order Without app-lying his ‘mind to’,the._:re-levant<\/p>\n
Rules of the High Court.  Chiefllnfovrlmation
\nCommissioner should have   Court Rules
\nbefore proceeding further. ‘order is illegal
\nand arbitrary, the ;’safae’is.lia’o?le”.”totbevvdiiasned. Accordingly,
\nthe following order :\u00bb   ‘C it C<\/p>\n
The impu’=gned”l54.5.2OO8 vide Ar1nexure–‘G’
\npassed by the Karnatal\u00a7a’lnfo’rrr:;ation Commission, is quashed.<\/p>\n
Writ petiti is . allotlied ,ae_e_oi”dingly.<\/p>\n
sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
woes:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar 5 5 I’ — I ~ \/2; E a IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATA KA AT BANGALOQE DATED THIS THE 26″‘ my OF AUGUST BEFORE 2 THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE MOHAl\\i*,SH;\u20ac\\M’Ti4:\\iA\/.$fOi}b’AR”‘4.j\u00e9. % wan pgjrrrom No.941is\/zoos ceM.aE5; Between : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-229693","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-30T08:55:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-30T08:55:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":980,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009\",\"name\":\"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-30T08:55:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-30T08:55:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-30T08:55:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009"},"wordCount":980,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009","name":"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-30T08:55:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-public-information-officer-vs-n-anbarasm-on-26-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Public Information Officer vs N Anbarasm on 26 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229693","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229693"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229693\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229693"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229693"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229693"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}