{"id":230172,"date":"2008-12-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008"},"modified":"2014-05-27T19:55:48","modified_gmt":"2014-05-27T14:25:48","slug":"abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.MC.No. 4156 of 2008()\n\n\n1. ABDUL HAKKIM, S\/O.SULAIMAN PILLAI\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. TAJUNISA BEEVI, D\/O.BEEVIKUNJU\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.SREEKUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :11\/12\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                            R. BASANT, J.\n             -------------------------------------------------\n                   Crl.M.C. No. 4156 of 2008\n             -------------------------------------------------\n         Dated this the 11th day of December, 2008\n\n                                ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>     The petitioner in this Crl.M.C. challenges an order<\/p>\n<p>directing payment of an amount of Rs.2.89 lakhs under Sec.3 of<\/p>\n<p>the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986<\/p>\n<p>(for short &#8216;the Act&#8217;).       The learned Magistrate had initially<\/p>\n<p>directed payment of an amount of Rs.3.89 lakhs.               In revision,<\/p>\n<p>the order was modified and the amount payable was reduced to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2.89 lakhs.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. Marriage and divorce are admitted.               Liability to pay<\/p>\n<p>amounts under Sec.3 of the Act is also admitted.              There is no<\/p>\n<p>serious dispute that an amount exceeding Rs..2.89 lakhs is<\/p>\n<p>liable to be paid on such divorce under Sec.3 of the Act.<\/p>\n<p>     3.    What then is the dispute?           The short and pointed<\/p>\n<p>dispute is that the amount payable has been paid and<\/p>\n<p>discharged. According to the petitioner, an amount of Rs.3.25<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.M.C. No. 4156 of 2008 -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>lakhs has already been paid to his divorced wife under Exts.D3<\/p>\n<p>and D4.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. It will be apposite to specifically note that at present the<\/p>\n<p>direction is to pay only an amount of Rs.2.89 lakhs under Sec.3<\/p>\n<p>of the Act.     According to the petitioner, as a matter of fact,<\/p>\n<p>Rs.3.25 lakhs was agreed to be paid and the same had been paid<\/p>\n<p>and discharged under Exts.D3 and D4.          The matter is at the<\/p>\n<p>stage of admission. The respondents have not come before this<\/p>\n<p>Court to challenge the impugned order, it is submitted.<\/p>\n<p>      5.   Be that as it may, the only question that is to be<\/p>\n<p>considered is whether Exts.D3 and D4 evidence discharge of the<\/p>\n<p>liability.  The claimant &#8211; divorced wife, denies the receipt of any<\/p>\n<p>amount under Exts.D3 and D4.         A perusal of Exts.D3 and D4<\/p>\n<p>reveals the inherent improbabilities of Exts.D3 and D4.       Ext.D3<\/p>\n<p>is allegedly an agreement executed by the spouses under which<\/p>\n<p>payment of an amount of Rs.25,000\/- in full settlement of the<\/p>\n<p>liability on divorce under Sec.3 of the Act is stipulated and<\/p>\n<p>acknowledged.        Rs.7,500\/- is to be agreed to be paid as<\/p>\n<p>maintenance during the period of Iddat.              An amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.17,500\/- was agreed to be paid as future maintenance. Thus,<\/p>\n<p>in all the amount payable was fixed at Rs.25,000\/-. Payment was<\/p>\n<p>made and the same was acknowledged under Ext.D3.                 But<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.M.C. No. 4156 of 2008 -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>significantly the claimant wife has not admittedly signed in<\/p>\n<p>Ext.D3. Going by the evidence relied on by the petitioner there<\/p>\n<p>was a talk of settlement.   The wife was not prepared to accept<\/p>\n<p>the divorce and she had not executed Ext.D3.             In these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, Ext.D3 it is elementary cannot bind the claimant<\/p>\n<p>wife.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6. It is contended that the father of the claimant who was<\/p>\n<p>examined as P.W.2 had received the amount of Rs.3.25 lakhs.<\/p>\n<p>Rs.25,000\/- was paid under Ext.D3 on 19\/7\/00; whereas a further<\/p>\n<p>amount of Rs.3 lakhs is said to be paid under Ext.D4 on 20\/7\/00.<\/p>\n<p>In both significantly the claimant wife has not signed.    In both<\/p>\n<p>the father of the claimant\/wife has affixed his signature; but only<\/p>\n<p>as a witness to evidence payment of amount to the wife.<\/p>\n<p>Significantly, there is no contention raised that the wife had<\/p>\n<p>received the amount.     An attempt is now made to advance a<\/p>\n<p>contention that the father has received the amount and has<\/p>\n<p>signed Exts.D3 and D4 to acknowledge that payment.             The<\/p>\n<p>contents in Exts.D3 and D4 cannot support this theory at all.<\/p>\n<p>     7. The father of the claimant\/wife as P.W.2 explained that<\/p>\n<p>his signature was obtained under duress.            The admitted<\/p>\n<p>evidence on the side of the petitioner is that there was a talk of<\/p>\n<p>settlement.    An agreement was almost struck; but the wife<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.M.C. No. 4156 of 2008 -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>refused to accept such agreement or the divorce and that is why<\/p>\n<p>the wife did not sign Exts.D3 and D4.\n<\/p>\n<p>      8. I must say that Exts.D3 and D4 are inherently<\/p>\n<p>incompatible. If Ext.D3 is correct, there is no liability to pay any<\/p>\n<p>further amount.    Why an amount of Rs.3 lakhs has been paid<\/p>\n<p>under Ext.D4 later is not satisfactorily explained at all. In these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, I am of opinion that the courts below were<\/p>\n<p>eminently correct and justified in coming to the conclusion that<\/p>\n<p>Ext.D3 and D4 does not discharge the liability of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>under Sec.3 of the Act. The evidence of the witnesses examined<\/p>\n<p>by the petitioner who asserted that the father had received the<\/p>\n<p>amount on behalf of the claimant\/wife is inconsistent with the<\/p>\n<p>contents of Exts.D3 and D4 documents relied on               by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.  Thus, the oral evidence is incongruent to Exts.D3<\/p>\n<p>and D4.      Exts.D3 and D4 are inter se incongruent.           The<\/p>\n<p>evidence available is consistent with the theory advanced that<\/p>\n<p>the wife who refused to accept divorce did not receive any<\/p>\n<p>amount under Exts.D3 and D4.\n<\/p>\n<p>      9. I am, in these circumstances, satisfied that the courts<\/p>\n<p>below were eminently justified in coming to the conclusion that<\/p>\n<p>Exts.D3 and D4 cannot be pressed into service to conclude that<\/p>\n<p>the amount of Rs.3.25 lakhs was paid to discharge the liability<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.M.C. No. 4156 of 2008 -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>under Sec.3 of the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>     10.  As stated earlier, there is no worthwhile dispute also<\/p>\n<p>about the quantum payable under the impugned order which is<\/p>\n<p>less than the amount that is claimed to have been paid under<\/p>\n<p>Exts.D3 and D4.\n<\/p>\n<p>     11. This Crl.M.C. is, in these circumstances, found to be<\/p>\n<p>without any merit. The same is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                      (R. BASANT, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>Nan\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.MC.No. 4156 of 2008() 1. ABDUL HAKKIM, S\/O.SULAIMAN PILLAI &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. TAJUNISA BEEVI, D\/O.BEEVIKUNJU &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC For Petitioner :SRI.M.SREEKUMAR For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-27T14:25:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-27T14:25:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":937,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-27T14:25:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-27T14:25:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-27T14:25:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008"},"wordCount":937,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008","name":"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-27T14:25:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-hakkim-vs-tajunisa-beevi-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Abdul Hakkim vs Tajunisa Beevi on 11 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230172\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}