{"id":230202,"date":"2008-09-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008"},"modified":"2018-09-19T15:10:16","modified_gmt":"2018-09-19T09:40:16","slug":"maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Jayant Patel<\/div>\n<pre>  \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n \n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/8562\/2008\t 2\/ 4\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 8562 of 2008\n \n\n=========================================================\n\n \n\nMAGHABHAI\nMITHABHAI PARMAR (DABHI) - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT &amp; 2 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nKAMAL M SOJITRA for\nPetitioner(s) : 1, \nDS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for Respondent(s) : 1, \nMR\nPRASHANT G DESAI for Respondent(s) : 2 -\n3. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 11\/09\/2008 \n\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>By<br \/>\n\tthis petition the petitioner has challenged the communication dated<br \/>\n\t17.6.2008 issued by respondent No. 3 whereby the petitioner is asked<br \/>\n\tto vacate Block No. 3\/41 Shitalnath E.W.S., and is called upon to<br \/>\n\tshift to Block No. 15\/222 Satyam Vidhyalay E.W.S Scheme.\n<\/p>\n<p>Heard<br \/>\n\tMr. Sojitra learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Asthavadi for<br \/>\n\tMr. Desai learned Counsel for the respondent-Corporation.\n<\/p>\n<p>Upon<br \/>\n\thearing learned Counsel appearing for both the sides, it appears<br \/>\n\tthat pursuant to the order dated 4.8.2004 passed by this Court<br \/>\n\t(Coram: M.R. Shah,J.) in Special Civil Application No. 1989 of 2004,<br \/>\n\tthe alternative accommodation was provided to the petitioner by the<br \/>\n\tCorporation vide order dated 5.11.2004 (Annexure-C) and the<br \/>\n\tpetitioner is occupying the same at Shitalnath E.W.S. In the very<br \/>\n\tcommunication, it was informed that if the petitioner is desirous to<br \/>\n\tget the block on permanent basis, he would be required to make<br \/>\n\tpayment to the Corporation. It appears that the petitioner has not<br \/>\n\tmade any payment to the Corporation, and the matter remained<br \/>\n\tas it is. In the meantime, as per the Corporation, the block which<br \/>\n\tis in occupation of the petitioner, is already allotted to one<br \/>\n\tanother persons namely Kachhava Sonaji Kalaji. It was not possible<br \/>\n\tfor the Corporation to permit the petitioner on permanent basis and<br \/>\n\ttherefore, the petitioner is called upon to vacate the same, and the<br \/>\n\tpetitioner is also asked to shift at another block No. 15\/222<br \/>\n\tsituated at Satyam Vidhyalay E.W.S Scheme.\n<\/p>\n<p>Mr.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tSojitra learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is<br \/>\n\talso another block allotted to the mother-in-law of the petitioner<br \/>\n\tsituated at Shitalnath E.W.S. and the petitioner may shift to the<br \/>\n\tsaid block, which is in the occupation of the mother-in-law of the<br \/>\n\tpetitioner and the mother-in-law of the petitioner shall shift to<br \/>\n\tSatyam Vidhyalay E.W.S. He also submitted that the petitioner is<br \/>\n\tdesirous for permanent allotment, and if the block of Shitalnath<br \/>\n\tE.W.S. which is in occupation of the mother-in-law of the<br \/>\n\tpetitioner, is not allotted to any one, the same may be allotted by<br \/>\n\tthe Corporation to the petitioner, and the petitioner is also ready<br \/>\n\tto pay requisite amount for such purpose.\n<\/p>\n<p>On<br \/>\n\tbehalf of the respondent-Corporation under the instruction of the<br \/>\n\tTrikam G Patel, Divisional Superintendent, Estate Department,<br \/>\n\tAhmedabd Municipal, who is present in the Court, it has been<br \/>\n\tsubmitted by the learned Counsel that the Corporation has no<br \/>\n\tobjection in considering the proposal for shifting vice<br \/>\n\tmother-in-law of the petitioner, provided she is agreeable but for<br \/>\n\tsuch purpose the petitioner will have to move appropriate proposal<br \/>\n\tto the Corporation. It has also been submitted that otherwise block<br \/>\n\tNo. 15\/222 situated at Satyam Vidhyalay E.W.S. can be allotted to<br \/>\n\tthe petitioner on permanent basis, if he is desirous to pay<br \/>\n\trequisite amount to the Corporation.\n<\/p>\n<p>Under<br \/>\n\tthese circumstances, the petitioner shall move appropriate<br \/>\n\trepresentation within a period of one week from today to the<br \/>\n\trespondent -Corporation by showing willingness on the part of the<br \/>\n\tmother-in-law of the petitioner, and also to deposit requisite<br \/>\n\tamount for permanent allotment to the Corporation. If such a<br \/>\n\trepresentation is made, the Corporation shall decide the same in<br \/>\n\taccordance with law, preferably within a period of one month from<br \/>\n\tthe receipt thereof. Until the decision is taken, the interim relief<br \/>\n\tgranted against coercive action shall continue to remain in<br \/>\n\toperation. It is also observed that Corporation shall abide by the<br \/>\n\tdeclaration made before this Court for considering the proposal<br \/>\n\tand\/or allotment on permanent basis in accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>Disposed<br \/>\n\tof accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>  (JAYANT PATEL, J.)<\/p>\n<p>Suresh*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008 Bench: Jayant Patel SCA\/8562\/2008 2\/ 4 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8562 of 2008 ========================================================= MAGHABHAI MITHABHAI PARMAR (DABHI) &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT &amp; 2 &#8211; Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR KAMAL M SOJITRA for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-19T09:40:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-19T09:40:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":609,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-19T09:40:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-19T09:40:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-19T09:40:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008"},"wordCount":609,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008","name":"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-19T09:40:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maghabhai-vs-state-on-11-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Maghabhai vs State on 11 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230202\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}