{"id":230232,"date":"2008-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008"},"modified":"2015-04-06T01:38:08","modified_gmt":"2015-04-05T20:08:08","slug":"ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ananda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev … on 7 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ananda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev … on 7 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n
1\n\n11\u00bb: THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE\nDated this the 7m day of JULY, 2003 \nBEFORE    \n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE 153. SREENIVASE.:::GQ';8fI') A:. j \n\n \n\nWRIT PE'I'I'I'ION No.27I3:1'1,'2O033M(I;R).--'I,'4    \n\nBetween:\n\nSri. Amanda Poojari,\n\nS \/ 0. Aithu Poojari,\n\nAged about 72 yrs., ._  p\nR \/ at. Kclagina Mane House,  '\nJogatte Post,   '\nThokur villagcz,   \"_' 3\nMangalore 'i'aluk--, 5;\" __\n\nD.K. Dist.   \n\n &&&&  *      .. PETITIONER\n{By Sri. x.R.am  %  petitioner.)\n. Th6-State 0!' Karnataka,\n By 'its S\u00e9czxgtazy,\n\n \" ljept'. i>f12:*::vcI1ue,\n\n. zca'\n\n. '  'IvLs..~B1dg;%,%V\"v \n _ '!3aI1gaiore5%k1%:\n\nThe L5a11d\"TI'ibunal,\n Mangalom Taluk,\n , Dakshina Kannada Dist.\n \"-' \"575 001,\n rep. By its Chairman.\n\n   Karnataka State Board of Wakfs,\n\n9%..\n\n\n\n \" \u00ab , _' Rep.  'its President.\n\n A 'V . (By Siti.R... B.S2\u00a7\ufb011yanaI'aya11a Singh, High Court Govt. Pleadcr\n- -.   ft')? R.N. )\n\n' A the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order (it. 26~3--\n\nNo.6,CuI1ningha111 Road,\nBangalore - 560 052.\n\n4. Mohiuddin Hale Jumma Masjid,\nJokatte,   \nMangalore taluk,\nDakshina Kannada, V\nRep. By its Vice President\nJ.Hussaix1. '\n\n \n\n5. The Land Acqtlisiti-{>'r;,Oi}71(jer';  :4 V\" ._\nKarnataka Ind11stI'i\"a1\u00bb~  g   '\nDevelopment Board, \"T V  \nBa3kampady,* _     \nManga1ore'%'53-*5 011.:  \n\nREsPoND\u00a7;1s;frsL%N0\ufb01%4Av.AN1;s  \n\nDELE'TED..AS*1}?ER\u00bb.CRDER.\n\n    .\n<\/pre>\n
6. Mo13AiL1ddin’H_.\u20acii\u00a7’  Masjid,<\/p>\n
2=.\u00a7’+:aI1gaIorc.Vta1’uk,
\n..fDa1<;shina K\u00e9umada,<\/p>\n
. . .RES'PONDENTS<\/p>\n
-k1k**1T:\n<\/p>\n
This Writ petition is \ufb01led under Articles 226 and ‘.227 of
\n2003 passed by Land ‘I’ribunal, Mangalore, vidc Annex. A, etc.<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition coming on for \ufb01nal hearing this day,
\nthe Court passed the following:<\/p>\n
@.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
– OR3DER–\n<\/p>\n
The petitioner claiming to be the tenant <\/p>\n
this writ petition seeking a writ of  <\/p>\n
order of the Land Tribunal dt.  ~26_-43-2’fJO3″‘:e vi\ufb01e on <\/p>\n
AI1nexure”A’. V _  _ .  ‘V _\n<\/p>\n
2. I have heard Sri.  B1:1a’t.,_ <\/p>\n
appearing for the pe\ufb01tioner,  Singh,
\nleamed High Court  % appearing for
\nrespondents No”.   ‘  Shetty, learned
\nCounsel    and Sri. Shantesh<\/p>\n
Gureddi,  for respondent No.6.\n<\/p>\n
3.  jffor disposal of the writ petition<\/p>\n
are as under : V<\/p>\n
   E””‘L1pAe1:;itioner  ing to be the tenant made an<\/p>\n
  7 to the second respondent — Land<\/p>\n
V V’ Tlibufial,  to register him as occupant of several items<\/p>\n
    different survey numbers, situated at Thokur<\/p>\n
 %yanaVg\u00a2,e’Man@1om taluk. The Land Tribunal by its earlier<\/p>\n
  V   cit. 19-5-77 ganted occupancy right in his favour. The<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\nthird respondent herein, namely, Karnataka State  of<\/p>\n
Wakfs, aggrieved by the order of the Land ‘I’I’i\u00a5::11;.aHa}V,.’V:VV\u00a2’:::l’*uhs’;4″V’i’E}-55\u00bb<\/p>\n
’77, granting occupancy right of the lands a  <\/p>\n
favour of the petitioner, cha1lengef;iW\u00a3k ;e’     <\/p>\n
W.P.No. 29751\/95 before t1ns_ee9u;-tV}–.f1 *eis cei1x\u00a2[by”
\n24-6-96, dismissed the writ
\nNo.3 had preferred  \ufb01en\ufb01alc Division
\nBench of this  byAAQr\u00a7:1er  the writ
\nappeal and  Single Judge dt.\n<\/p>\n
24-6-96   Well as the order of
\nthe  7,.’  occupancy right in<\/p>\n
favour of  ‘remitted the matter to the Land<\/p>\n
  te reconsider the matter afresh by<\/p>\n
  respondent -~ Karnataka State Board of<\/p>\n
   rmbu\ufb01az.\n<\/p>\n
as party to the proceedings of the Land<\/p>\n
4. ~v ‘g_’I’hat after remand, the Land Triburial by<\/p>\n
  the matter, by impugned order Almexnre ‘A’ dt.<\/p>\n
V.  –..’e26-332003, rejected the tenancy claim of the petitioner. The<\/p>\n
  __4’4\u00a7\u00a7a;-stitioner feeling aggicved by the same, has presented this<\/p>\n
present writ petition. %<<\/p>\n
of the Board and therefore the impugned order AI1ne;;ure 'A'
\nis just and proper and it does not wazrrant iI1teIfe1'ei1ee–\u00ab.,_t.11is<\/p>\n
Court.\n<\/p>\n
7. Sri. Sathyanarayana Sizagh, A   <\/p>\n
Government Pleader appearing for;”:?es};’j_)e()’x’i(iei1i;$   _2, <\/p>\n
fairly submitted that the  1%:as%  the
\nmatter as required under…  of  Reforms<\/p>\n
8.    parties. ihave
\ngone througgh”    ‘A’. Before
\nconside1fii1g’ev   tenami\ufb01r of the petitioner, the
\nTribuna\ufb01e  \ufb01re\ufb02y, whether the lands in<\/p>\n
respectof  has claimed tenancy, belong to<\/p>\n
 91′ I1e’t.’—–The Tlibunal in the event of answering<\/p>\n
 v\u00abqee$tiee”‘a;fii;jma\ufb01ve1y, holding that the lands belong to<\/p>\n
: V’     then it is required to consider whether these<\/p>\n
.  ‘.._’_Ia:u1ds tenanted Land and vested with the Govemment as<\/p>\n
‘    vlg\u00e9l;-74 and thereafter, it is required to eonsiclezr whether<\/p>\n
  lands were leased by the Wald’ Board by its ‘mutavali’ in<\/p>\n
   favour of the petitioner, with the consent of the Wakf Board<\/p>\n
%4<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\nand Whether the petitioner was cuitivating the <\/p>\n
tenant as on 1-3-74 and prior to that.<\/p>\n
9. The Counsel appearing   <\/p>\n
submitted that the Land Tribimal  “not   ,<\/p>\n
aspect of the matter While    order
\nAnncxure ‘A’. That beingko,  “just and proper to
\nrcmit the matter to, the  ‘  reconsideration.<\/p>\n
Hence,     <\/p>\n
The writv  Exile issued earlier is made
\nabsolute. “me smpuggaa the Land Tribunal dt. 26–3–<\/p>\n
2003   ‘A’ to the Writ petition is set<\/p>\n
;%as:a\u00a2.   remitted to the Land ‘I’rib1ma1,<\/p>\n
Mar 1gaIorc;”tor\u00e9co1:sider the matter as under :<\/p>\n
 :1 % r “‘””I’11e Land Tiibunal \ufb01rstjy shall decide all the
\nVlozhrads in respect of which the petitioner
\n‘ claimed tenancy in Form 7, belong to the Wakf<\/p>\n
Board or not.\n<\/p>\n
5%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ananda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev … on 7 July, 2008 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda 1 11\u00bb: THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE Dated this the 7m day of JULY, 2003 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE 153. SREENIVASE.:::GQ’;8fI’) A:. j WRIT PE’I’I’I’ION No.27I3:1’1,’2O033M(I;R).–‘I,’4 Between: Sri. Amanda […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAnanda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev ... on 7 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ananda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev ... on 7 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-05T20:08:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ananda Poojari S\\\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev … on 7 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-05T20:08:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":668,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Ananda Poojari S\\\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev ... on 7 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-05T20:08:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ananda Poojari S\\\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev … on 7 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ananda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev ... on 7 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ananda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev ... on 7 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-05T20:08:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ananda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev … on 7 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-05T20:08:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008"},"wordCount":668,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008","name":"Ananda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev ... on 7 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-05T20:08:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-poojari-so-aithu-poojari-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-rev-on-7-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ananda Poojari S\/O Aithu Poojari vs The State Of Karnataka By Its Rev … on 7 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}