{"id":230355,"date":"2009-01-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-25T21:53:26","modified_gmt":"2017-03-25T16:23:26","slug":"the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy<\/div>\n
. , \" Bgng\u00a7a1\u00a2;*e VRegi'o:1a1__Q\ufb01ice\n\nE\n\nEN THE HIGH comm' op KARNATAKA AT Bms\u00e9gige\ufb01a\n\nDATED THIS THE 23% DAY 0;' JANUAE? 2\u00e9Q'\u00a7    \n\nBEFORE'  \n\nTHE HONZBLE MR.JUs';':{:E \u00e9\u00abRL;;<:1MA:{As:v;w\u00a7*\u00a2 * \n\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEQXL, NG."83f;\u00a7'1'~vO"F- \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nThe Oriental Irssurance Cu'-)\u00a7Ltd;; fj  'V\nHaving its r_;:g1:s1;\u00a5.:*k*c:c1.V{i\u00a37\ufb01\u20ac,'_c at; , * V ' V \n"Oriental H\u00a33L"i:3'-*3"; "1'&\u00a3ew"{}3ii';i__an&.v  '\nits Bangalore *1?-;i;g;ioI:r.i;11..()'iTff1<:\u00a2 Vat \n\nLeo Sh\u00e9fipitzg"; Coi\ufb01pl\u00e9x,  \n\nNos. 44\/ 45, R '._51d6ncy  CTOSS\n\nBangainre 4- 560 ~f}().I" ci3_1ly\nRepresersfied byV.1ts'~..I_I1a} Manager\nHubli Qivisgnai C\")-f\ufb01w is\ufb02ow\nRtzprzzsenteci by its '\n\nA -  . APPELLANT\n   Sm-vri Raju, Advocate)\n\n'HA1\u00a7iZ\\'  A a.\n\nQ Sri.  S\/0 Ibrahim Sab\n  \"Muslim, \"Male, Adult\n' ..j\"~\u00bbNdW..aged 22 years\n' 'Residing at Biiiczhodu Gr:-zma\n\n   L\u00e9avanagem Dis\ufb01ict -~ 57'? 653\n\n... RESPQNDENT\n\n(By Sri: Aznbaji Rat) Najra, Advocate\nSmt: Maha Vijayalakshxili, Advocate)\n\n5\/\n\n\n\nC?\n\nThis MFA is \ufb02ied under Sectian 30(1) _<:ef\n\nagainst the Judgment an& Order dated\ufb01sfi\/1 \npassed in WCA N0. 138\/2004 on the f1}<:__{)f-.:11\u20ac:_T.'La'br;1;2r.A2 \n\nOfficer and C0n1missi\u00ab:)r;er for Werimien' C\u00e9ingje\ufb01gaiisn,\nDavanagere District, Davaglag\u00e9gr\u00e9zg   _ [5,\nCompensatian at" Rs. 1,61,28O\/~":x4v'iLf1Ti:i1{e:%s2s\u00a3.at _I?.%._.  --.\n\nThis MFA coming o:\ufb01 _fGr \n\nthe Court d('3}.iV\u20ac.'I'\u20acd the fGli0w*h3g; _\n  \n\nThis MisQ\u00a2Han\u00a2Qu$_  \ufb01led by tha\nOriental   undar Section\n30(1) VofV"t1"1\u00e9\u00a5':W0\u00a7;i%\u00a7Int3f3.%$"-  Act against the\njudm\u00e9nt'  30.85.2006 passed in W031\n\nN9. 133\/ "   "316 of the Labour O\ufb01icer and\n\n '  _(143v\u00a7j;\u00a3i:r::issi<:*.:1er f{5:"'vV0rl<1nen's Cempsnsation, Davangere\n\n  \u00bb.4D.r\u00a7v~;;mgere awarding cammnsation of\n\n  with interest at 12% per ajimum.\n\n' "   Par\ufb01es w\ufb02i be referred tea with reference: ta\n\n  M\ufb01tatus befere \u20ac116': Caurl: of Commissioner for\n\n" ~ .  "'War}qn\u20acn'3 Compensatjan.\n\n3\/\n\n\n\n3\n\n3. The contantion 0f the claimant heff'\u00a7t:het  regsnatien No.KA~\n\n13\/53:3 on ue.o$%,%A2Qo4k about 9.00 p.111. when the\n\nlorry   Camp an Siruguppa Raad,\n\n   turf\ufb02ad .... anai cozzsequantiy. the claimant\n\n I :\u00a7:ViSf..ai12.\u00a2\u20aci  Iznmediately, he was shifted to VIMS\n\nHasgitai, \n   .' RespeI1ci@11t N92 --- Thc Insurance Company\n\nV' V' .3133 objection statement denying 31} the avermrints\n\n'   in the claim petition.\n\nEx'\n\n\n\n:3\n\n5. The sum and substance of tha fmdi1\"ig\n\nCommissioner for Werkmexfs Compensafio:2.TVV'i*S\u00a7  \n\nzmdert\n\nThe Commissioner for Woi*k1'm_::i1's \n\ntaking file income of the V  a%t%I::s.%%3.6:3\u00e91'~kana\"\n\nconsidczring his age 3320  ad\u00e9ijjtixigv\u00e9reievant\nfactor 224.08 and   \u00e9ammg capacity\n\nat 40%, has a\\a*\u00a7'a\u00a7;f(\u00a7ed   1,61,280\/ --.\n\n __  by the same, the appeliant\n\nhas preferfed   \n\n\"   .._j.{'heA V S\u00a5;:zi;staI1tia} qxxestion of law that has\n\n  'wet;  this appeal is:\n\nh 4_ \"E. Whath\u00e9r the COII12{11i$Si\u20ac)i\"1\u20acI'\n{aired in hciding '\u00a31131: the Claimant was\nearning Rs.3,i}()0\/-- per mcantli as 3\n01331161' Withsut any Substantia}\n\nevidence ta that effect'?\n\n2' Whether {he Qammissiozzer.\n\nermd in hoidiflg that the Csiaimant had\n6\/.\n\n\n\n5\n\nstxsstaizze\u00e9 40% 1035 cf  \n\ncapacity 3*\"\n\n8. PW'? is the dectoij sz_zhQ5?  the?\n\nClaimant. He has stated: '31} his-._ \u00a7\u00e9'\u00a3*ide:*;:{:E:.;   \n\nciaimant has sustameci   leg and\nthere was swelling h,A<=:"--V_'back pain. X--ray\nreveais that \u00a5:14)\u00a7;:fe_. wars"  and clavicle\nberm wag   {}:\u00a7".53.2005, he has\nexa1ni;m'3&'  the disability. Bones;\nwere ifxaf  \ufb01nable ta stand and sit:\n\nc0mf_o;r*tabl4'y~ f\u00a7Gf.a'V-.1oi1g t:i:In3. Taking intt} consideration\n\n "  -01"  aspect\u00e9g '\ufb01"';i\u00e9 doctor has stated in his evidence\n\n  u   has got 45% disability to the\n\n \n\nA1' beamed Counsel fer the appellant submitted\n\nVA   the pemexiztage of disabiiity taksn by the\n\n  \ufb02iommissioner fox' W0r1\u00ab:mez1's Cammnsation is on me\n\nhigher side. He further submitted that there is\n2%\n\n\n\nOw\n\ndisability of 45% $0 the partict\ufb02ar limb. N0m1a41\u00a7y_g:'-4.i_)'~\u00bb3"i\n\nof the ciisabiiity is the total may disability;  \n\nthe total bedy disability is :5%,% 1'E3iif'vV'4L't::\u00a5.\u20ac.\u00bb  I:'{.\u00a7\u00a3'\u00a7_.'\u00a7*'I'1('";',;V1"VV\n\nCommissioner for Worklnexfs (llzgmgic\u00e9risatioii \n\nin taking 1053 of earning  =\u00ab-E-()9?"&V_e'\u00e9r;\u00e91itla\u00e9)ug11"' \n\nthe ma: body disability is :;'a<z\u00e9{.f F\n\n18. Learned   fag" '  respondent:\nsupports   V' \n\nI1; 2 "Un{i\u00a7:_f' "ia\u00a79T:{<:iI*}e;:iI1eI1's Compe\ufb02satiaxl Act, tha\n\nbasic principie is nof {\ufb01e anatomical existence of a part\n\n.    pi\u00e9i*siS\u20ac\u00a7:nw  disaypearance of part of its\n\n'  " TIE: f\u00a5.1j{}CtiOI1 as meant in tha Act is not\n\nfufm:'a'.c:3;1  the physielogcal point sf View but \ufb01om\n\n  point: of view. This utility of thfi' part injmvd\n\n  'E73315 -430 be aansidered in relation to the part it plays in\n\n  -~--p\u00a7=:rf0rzni11g the functian which comprises the Wage\n\nearr\ufb01ng <:rapa(:ity. 'Thus far sash Ci)1E\u00a7\u20ac1'1S83.i0}ff1 there\n\nShouid be fuzictioxtxa\u00e9 disability anti such disability\n3\/\n\n\n\nshould affect the wage earning Capacity. \n\nbackground, let us examitle whether the C(\u00a7inIfz;i$SiGQ\u00e91* \n\nfor Worlgnezfs Compensatien taj\ufb01ztsg. \ufb01lm 1955  \n\ncapacity at 40%, evsn though tide  \n\nstated in his evidence that  is%%d:%sa1:11:a:y'afk45\u00e9\/0 'i:o \n\nthe particuiar limb is :'cg)zTeci"br fiat"\n\n12. In the instal\ufb01f. \u00a2asge,  has stated in\nhis evidenqei.\/iv     <':if' disabiiity to the\nparticuiatf  _ \u00abIt is the ccntention of the\nlearned" Ckauiiselw  appellant that {eta} body\n\ndisgbi\ufb01ty is "1   'Taking into consi\u00e9eration of the\n\n:A0c<:i1;wai;iQn Raf the claimant and also the jrijmy and\n\n by the claimant due to the accident,\n\n  Lk in  i21y*"-- 3;ri\u00e9r:i\u00a7?, the functienai disabimy that can be\n\nV' " V,as;s2?;s$<=:5;ii in this case is 23%. Therefore, in my view, th\ufb01\n\n :i3\u00a7s $ --9f earnirng Capacity is 20%. Consi\u00e9eiing the\n\n" W\u00e9ccupation of the <:Iai:mant, the assassment of income 0f\n\nthe claimant 3%: RS.3,O0Of-- per month is reasmzabie.\ngyf\n\n\n\nAge 0f the ciaimant is 20 years and '{".h\u20acI'\u20acfOI'\u20ac:,. the\n\nreievant factor is 2:24.80. Therefare, the  is\n\nentitled for compensatiozl of Rs.8{),640\/\n\ng24.0o x :20\/200). The cempgnsaa-.ia::~ * \n\nRs.1,61,230\/---- as awarcied \n\nW0rk:men's  \n\nThe claimant is entitlgd for  at  ammm\n\non the compensation i\ufb01iarfi f\u00a7m.\u00e9'\u00bb.t11onti1 fmm the\n\ndate  frat;-3 \u00e9:_.\u00a7ii.:'\u00e9\u00e9::-f deposit.\n\nII".'\u00a5.VV'Vi't3\u00a7.i\u00bb.' V :t\u00a3Irge i3.b0ve \u00e9iscussien, I pass the\n\nfeixqgs\ufb01ng:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
 –;N\u00a7i.SL\u00a3\u00a7e11an\u20ac0us First Appea} is partzy<\/p>\n
– ‘\u00a3113 C\ufb01mpensatimz ammmt 0:” Rs. 1,51,:’2.8{1\u00ab\/ –<\/p>\n
H as awaztle\u00e9 by the Commissioner far
\nWarkme\ufb01s Compensaiticsn is redtlaed \u00a30
\n1?S.80,.640,f~. \u20ac\/<\/p>\n
C) The claimant is entitled for interest at 12%”<\/p>\n
per annum on the colnpexisatiox} <\/p>\n
fmm one month from the date…..’4′  ~ A
\nadjudication tjlithe date cefdeposit.   <\/p>\n
Ci) The excess amoumz, 3  <\/p>\n
refunded to the Ixisuxance   . 2 V’ ”<\/p>\n
6) The corapensation  –;}ayei\u00a531::=> _  fhe
\nclaimant shaIJ “‘-.be   to the<\/p>\n
cancemed Cemmissinrl\u00e9zf _.f;;ir .AA.’;1&_’Qrlanen’s<\/p>\n
 _ \u00e9 ‘ ‘ ‘ ,<\/p>\n
Sd\/–\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
%$V%” \u00a7<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009 Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy . , ” Bgng\u00a7a1\u00a2;*e VRegi’o:1a1__Q\ufb01ice E EN THE HIGH comm’ op KARNATAKA AT Bms\u00e9gige\ufb01a DATED THIS THE 23% DAY 0;’ JANUAE? 2\u00e9Q’\u00a7 BEFORE’ THE HONZBLE MR.JUs’;’:{:E \u00e9\u00abRL;;<:1MA:{As:v;w\u00a7*\u00a2 * MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEQXL, NG."83f;\u00a7'1'~vO"F- BETWEEN: The Oriental […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-25T16:23:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\\\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-25T16:23:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":124,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009\",\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\\\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-25T16:23:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\\\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-25T16:23:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-25T16:23:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009"},"wordCount":124,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009","name":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-25T16:23:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-riyaz-so-ibrahim-sab-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Riyaz S\/O Ibrahim Sab on 28 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230355"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230355\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}