{"id":230652,"date":"2008-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-07-31T23:25:12","modified_gmt":"2018-07-31T17:55:12","slug":"sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
3%'\n\n\u00a7:';m\u00a7'%% _ _ \n\"THE MA.N\"A\u20ac3EM'ENr.0F KSPRC\n\n _ REP. BY I'lfS'D{'\u00a5iSiONAL CONFROLLER\n\nIN THE HIGH comm' or-' KARNATAKA AT BANG4\u00a7i;G'F\u00e9'E:: f.  \n\nDATED THIS THE 13111 my 01:' NQVEMMR  ~ _ _: \"  \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE !~iON'BL\u00a73 MR. JUSTICE I{'S'BOPA\u00a7ii\u00a7'.F\u00a7   K\n\nwan' PETITION N0.  \n\nBETWEEN :\n\nsRiRKRIsHNAMUR'i'HY 3  .  - \nS\/O1ATESRI.RANi\u00a7;-EIAH  i   \nAGED ABOUr__6:'-$35233'. 'V  ._    .\nR\/AT N<3.148s3\/Cries,  . ' "\n\n6TH CROSS, K'R...V-mam\nMYSORE\u00a7'?{3'r3\u00a3)8if, " *\n\n PETYPIONER\n\n(By srmi: Ma\ufb01mm .N'\u00abKI}Li{RRNI, ADV. FOR SR1 v.s. NAIR)\n\nM23932\u00bb; D1'$iI310:~&,"'\nMYSORE.  \n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
 ”  5i-Bgr ;~;~;r_in: KS BHARATH KUMAR, ADV. 3<\/p>\n
% L<\/p>\n
a.-\n<\/p>\n
Q<\/p>\n
THIS wan’ PETFPEON IS FILED UNDER AR’f’ICLES’_’226″~8s3′
\n22? GE THE cowgrmmon OF INDIA, wrru A PR5?’-E.R.__TO;\u00a7_
\nQUASH THE AWARD passer) BY THE xuousmmz.;-zwaxau-arA;,,_’-\u00abT ~
\nMYSORE IN REF’.NO.46\/2005 171′. 13.7.2007, THE ‘carerimsn  _
\nCOPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AS-‘AN”f\u20acE’\u00a7{URE”D,  ‘
\nBY wmcn THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, HA3 REJECTE1) fr:-{E
\nCLAIM 0? THE PETPTIONER WHICH IS ARBETRARY,
\nAND AGAINST’ THE SCHEME OF I’.D.\u00e9’;C’F; DiRE’C;’i’\u00ab. ‘i’,I_~I’i~.? *
\nRESPONDENT TO RE.S’i’0RE- ,’m_E BNSIC PA,’:'” or 1132*<\/p>\n
PE’I’]’i’lONER W}THO{}T REDUC\u00a7i\\!C}’~..!_’I’ BY ._3′ gm-:.RE.1_u’Err:*AL
\nSTAGES Wm-I CUMULATIVE  EFFE.cT~._ ‘ir?ITH’, ALL
\nCONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS.\n<\/p>\n
This Writ Pctitien     heatrm g in
\n‘B’ group , this day, the  :\n<\/p>\n
The ‘ps.:_i:i’tipner’  -is{‘vs%3rki11g as a Tza\ufb01c Cmzmoilcr<\/p>\n
in  \u00bb  : cut. The respondent\u00bb<\/p>\n
    certain misconduct against the<\/p>\n
 he had despatched the velxicle which<\/p>\n
 mac! {mm Mangaiorc to Madurai shmmn” g<\/p>\n
  11umbc1’ of passengers as 3 as against 55<\/p>\n
   in the bus. 011 checking at Kakakcrla, it was<\/p>\n
  that thcm was nonjiasuc cf tickets to 33 paasengcm.<\/p>\n
P.\n<\/p>\n
It is on that basis, it was alleged that the same  V’<\/p>\n
pilfcmge. On the said charge, fh\ufb01~’d0.mcS\ufb01t3  <\/p>\n
held against the petitioner herein  it:<\/p>\n
Enquiry O\ufb01\ufb01cer submitting A .thcu t 1e\u00a7s7’1A1_:(1i”I’1’ii\u00bb:s:i1t-
\nManagement maxed the qxjder at  1999
\nixnposing the punishment bf  mere’ ments<\/p>\n
with cuxnuia\ufb01ve e\ufb01hzjt. , &<\/p>\n
2. T}1c;;~”-‘ii-c;j;’\u00a72biac:1\u00a3a:r:1:-V ii3A:.”$i;?:\u00a53.’?..\u00a7:n:’V::\u00a7;a1e13t1y raised a<\/p>\n
dispute 3;\ufb01A1dGUV\u20acV  if   the same to tlm Lalzrour<\/p>\n
Court undei\u00bbsecm\u00a3n_ iqipfgig eat’ the Industrial Disputes Act<\/p>\n
 _ Vida:  057: The respondent appeared and \ufb01led<\/p>\n
 gxtiztacment against the claim statement \ufb01led by<\/p>\n
at:   issue relating to the validity of the<\/p>\n
V Vt _ dom\u00e9s\ufb01c  was considered as a pm  issue and<\/p>\n
W ” ”   1,gbour”com by its oxdar dated 30.33307 held the same<\/p>\n
  and proper. Thczea\ufb01mr, the Labour Court<\/p>\n
  pmeccdf\u00a7 ed te consider the matter on merits and by its award<\/p>\n
” dated 13.7.2007 xegecaxglzthe reference as being devoid of<\/p>\n
merit. The pc\ufb01t\u00e9oner is therefore berm this own’  5&:i.-s’\u00b0_*> ”<\/p>\n
3. On hearing the ibr eh\u00e9  i”\n<\/p>\n
have perused the wxtit papers  isxipugncd
\nin this petition.   ‘A ‘  A H\n<\/p>\n
4.  t\ufb01a is\ufb01ic  the domesm<\/p>\n
enquiry as 31:41′  heki ho be \ufb02air and<\/p>\n
proper. : Theze   \ufb01ssile which was Iaiaed be-foxe<\/p>\n
the Lahour”‘–s:g:u;1ze1\u00a7g;ra to the delay in raising the<\/p>\n
 clzi.-3’1:>1;t:_\u00a7.’V The   has advertnd to this mattsr in<\/p>\n
V.   &:.a t”issue was held against the management and<\/p>\n
 merits was considcmd by the Labour<\/p>\n
 In this mgmi, the Labour Court noticed the<\/p>\n
  wevieticncc tzzndered by Smt. Anuradha as MW} who was the<\/p>\n
  ~ \u00ab’ Estab1isI3ment Supc\ufb01ntendcnt of the mspomlent –<\/p>\n
.L<\/p>\n
‘r.\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
Managcmexnt. The documents market} at Ex.M1 to .4<\/p>\n
also 1;1ot:teed’ by the Labour Court. ‘l’hc1ca\ufb01cr–,’:t’<\/p>\n
valid’ ity 01′ the domestic enquiry had 33%, \u00bb   u u<\/p>\n
Court: was of the View that in    <\/p>\n
repozt tendered by the cnquixy
\nsaid documents had    and
\n3 \ufb01nding had bean    documents.\n<\/p>\n
As such, it was of the  ‘Limposing the<\/p>\n
punishment    J _  <\/p>\n
6. N\u20ac2._de=1.1l$i,_   the Labour Court notmm” ‘ g<\/p>\n
V these; ggspects, I  mg view that it cannot be said that the<\/p>\n
V.    in any event. Hawcvcr, one aspect of<\/p>\n
tiiz:  was required to be considered by the<\/p>\n
 _  C-ailirt considering the gavcncss of the charge<\/p>\n
 Vp\ufb01nishmant that has been imposed is that the<\/p>\n
 Court: ought to have ocrnsidereci the explanation put<\/p>\n
 by the pc\ufb01tioncr \ufb01mt pmty, with regard to the<\/p>\n
 A” ~  of such an Emcidcnt having occurred.<\/p>\n
1:\n<\/p>\n
q.’ In tlim regard, it was mntcnded that the ” <\/p>\n
from the place where the ha\ufb01ic   J <\/p>\n
bus. Therefore, it was caon\ufb01:-.1:;dedv4″th:at at <\/p>\n
dispatch eonect number of paszs\ufb02  avm.\n<\/p>\n
has been nomad’ and    \ufb02ue uaa’  I
\nticketlcss passengens if   has between<\/p>\n
the said   of the Tra\ufb01c<\/p>\n
Cantmllf-:;f. –_ *  plausible explanation at<\/p>\n
least. for   the proportionality of the<\/p>\n
    that extent, I am of the View that<\/p>\n
  punishment by withholtfmg two m(:re:in’ cuts<\/p>\n
.  4  not’ the earning of the petitiomr but also<\/p>\n
   tcmainai bene\ufb01ts. Therefore, to that cxiaent, the<\/p>\n
‘  bade;  modi\ufb01ed hokiing that the index’ of imposing of<\/p>\n
   of two incmments is upheld but the 3%<\/p>\n
:~ shou.Id not be with cumjga\ufb01w c\ufb01icct.<\/p>\n
fiance, with the above observations and  ‘7 *  ‘<\/p>\n
the petition stands disposed of with no order as   — ._<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna 3%’ \u00a7:’;m\u00a7’%% _ _ “THE MA.N”A\u20ac3EM’ENr.0F KSPRC _ REP. BY I’lfS’D{‘\u00a5iSiONAL CONFROLLER IN THE HIGH comm’ or-‘ KARNATAKA AT BANG4\u00a7i;G’F\u00e9’E:: f. DATED THIS THE 13111 my 01:’ NQVEMMR ~ _ _: ” BEFORE THE !~iON’BL\u00a73 MR. JUSTICE I{‘S’BOPA\u00a7ii\u00a7’.F\u00a7 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230652","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-31T17:55:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-31T17:55:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":793,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-31T17:55:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-31T17:55:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-31T17:55:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008"},"wordCount":793,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008","name":"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-31T17:55:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-r-krishnamurthy-vs-the-management-of-kstrc-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri R Krishnamurthy vs The Management Of Kstrc on 18 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230652"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230652\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}