{"id":230677,"date":"2009-06-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009"},"modified":"2017-04-23T18:22:47","modified_gmt":"2017-04-23T12:52:47","slug":"ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road … on 24 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road … on 24 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n
-1...\n\nIN T\ufb01\ufb01 HIGH CGURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 24'-\"' my 0:: JUNE, 2oog..II  \"\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE Momma MRJUSTICE S;;AWBi:)'U:, mesa  \n\nCIVIL MISCELLANEOUS P5111169; A:I~':o.34  2:3 3    \n\n i\n\nM\/S LAKSHMI CARRIERS . , _ ._ \nNO.3G17, 19TH MAIN, VIJAYA NAGAR   \n\nmo STAGE,MYSOREV57D\u00a3317___  V \u00bb\nREPBYTHEMDCVP_v1U\u00a3\u00a7Al_I   - \n\ns\/0 LATEVENKATAKF\u20acI.SHNAIAHi  \n\nAGED ABOUT 42_.Y:EAR$  ~ ~    '  PETm0NeR\n\n{By Sri k..sHiRf:\u00a7AR:\"'s; p,'\u00a7';\\$z'I3AjvKu:~a}gxR; ADV.)\n\n\u00a3419\n\nTHE KARNATAKA STA'?E RQA9 _ '\nmamspom\" CC;':RP\u20ac.}RAT1.QNz_ ' '\nCENTRAL OFFICE'   '-\nK.H.RQ:j%D, SHANTHINIAGAR ,\n\n BANC:A_LOR_E:St\">0 027  ***** \n REPRESEENTED as<I.;Ts\n'--.VMAa:AG1r~;5._v;3igEc:oR  RESPONDENT\n\n' ~. F.={ByI'SfI'I_i3._S\u00a5*I?3iI\u00a5I1?-\u00a3APPA, ADV.)\n\n 4 THIS CIVIL MISCELLANESOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11\n\n GFATHE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TC)\n\n ' f3~.P\u00a7\u00a7I.3I.N__.{ AN ARBITRATOR ANS REFER THE MATTER TOF IBISPUTE\n BETWEEN THE PEFTITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS FOR\nI *A{3.IUDICATIC)N LEAVING ALL CONTENTIONS OPEN.\n\nTHIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION COMING ON FOR\n\n" u:<:iiVR'\u00a3i)ERs "ms DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:\n\n\n\n,2...\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioner has \ufb02ied this Civii.\n<\/p>\n
petition under section 11(5)  the j,Annitraimi.:,.. \u00a7\u00a7;iT<\/p>\n
Conciliation Act, 1995 for appo_intm\u00e9n_t”of an.si:.:;;:r;:oi- ta  f.<\/p>\n
resoive the dispute arising out “of:_’agreeniant’ at Ainhexurs<\/p>\n
B dated 26.05.2003.\n<\/p>\n
2. The pgtitioher pii.r\u00a7tiant to a tender
\nnoti\ufb01cation by  it had offered to
\nprovide:vi2″bus\u00e9s:v on hire basis. As the
\nprivate 06p\u00e9rstorsV: new buses as per the<\/p>\n
conditions of’*ti1e’ notificstish, the petitioner had purchased<\/p>\n
-*’-izwo of-‘the’ bus. The body of the bus was<\/p>\n
“‘–.re:i.1iired  itzonstructed as per the speci\ufb01cations,<\/p>\n
instniCtion.A\ufb01lsnit\ufb01i requirements of the respondent.<\/p>\n
 ‘Therefsrefthe rapondent had issued a letter of intent<\/p>\n
 “rijated”\u00ab–.24.04.2003 directing the petitioner to show the<\/p>\n
 __”–\u00ab1pro’of0for having purchased the chassis within 45 days. As<\/p>\n
  the letter of intent at Annexure-A, the petitioner<\/p>\n
purchased chassis and entered into an agreement dated<\/p>\n
26.05.2003 (Armexure~B) with the rmpondent. As per the<\/p>\n
Ki<\/p>\n
-3…\n<\/p>\n
ietter of intent, the buses were required to be <\/p>\n
the petitioner within 3 months from the  <\/p>\n
referred to above. At the time of constrocti_o’n”o\u00a7:Vtvhe”:hodyve. “‘<\/p>\n
of the buses, the officials of the resporadeht’were::’reoo’lteb;.:l.j\u00ab<\/p>\n
to inspect the same. Howeikef, the oflic;ieisi._:v\u00abofH
\nrespondent had submitted ti1e_..4\ufb01;I’i>a;i”VrueE\u00a5.i’t\u00a7;3.2Oo3.
\nHowever, due to the de~rai.$ito oia%tiale i;5:a:t  the rmonaent,
\nthe buses weresnot pLlt”‘int\u00a2[ \u00a7’i3.e\u00a7fetliohv.:.i’ii1roediateiy, out
\nthe)! startec:i1\u00a33:–t\u00a3i;8t2ti\u20ac}’3”. Therefore, the
\nrespondent  of R52 [aims for late
\narrivals?__enti*  oeoe:t_ies; As per the agreement at<\/p>\n
Annexure?-8; the  ei\u00e9retequired to be provided at the<\/p>\n
 _ oussstend. as the oonlnaencement point of the journey. The<\/p>\n
 end at the bus stand of destination point of<\/p>\n
 the officials of the respondent made<\/p>\n
 . the””‘;xeti.tione’\u00b0r’to provide the buses at the depot which<\/p>\n
,.:wo.u_id benomaliy 10-15 Kms away from the bus eane.<\/p>\n
 bractice was adopted by the officials of KSRTC in<\/p>\n
  -lvorider to pick and drop the conductor from the depot where<\/p>\n
he has to report to the duty. Further, the respondent<\/p>\n
never allowed the bus of the petitioner to be parka at the<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
bus stand or depot. There are differences between the<\/p>\n
routes provided by the KSRTC and the actua! dista_n;:;e.4:’oEV_<\/p>\n
the routes. The difference between Bangaioref\ufb01yso-re;<\/p>\n
Donimaiai is about 40 ions for 2 buses which it  <\/p>\n
in the said routs. This has resulted in_-..totaui*..,ioss’*-toVithegri<\/p>\n
petitioner to the tone of ns.s..2o l\u00e9iths. A  the”<\/p>\n
agreement, the respondent ougvhtoto _Vhav’e*pta_iti tire hire
\ncharges within the stipu\ufb01ted  ‘tiiitfthe respondent
\nwas delaying the peyment_.for_ theV._roaso’ns ‘best known to it<\/p>\n
resulting in loss  ‘:*i’hve—-VV’respondent had<\/p>\n
failed to  Hemount and settie the
\naccount ofthepetiti’oinors’.–.._::”Therefore, petitioner had no<\/p>\n
other aiternatiiie not to ‘invoke the arbitration clause<\/p>\n
‘\ufb02p”rovid’ed  Annexuree\u00e9i agreement by issuing notice as<\/p>\n
r’eqiiireudr*  provisions of Arbitration and<\/p>\n
  conciii\u00abo_tion~~’\u00a7\u00a3tiV’ dated 12.9.2007 caning upon the<\/p>\n
.4_f.fi;j’\u00ab\u00ab.respond\u00e9n.t_AA3to appoint an arbitrator. The respondent has<\/p>\n
  f”aii_ed,_to–‘ take steps to appoint any arbitrator to resoive the<\/p>\n
‘  …_'”g3″i_sp\u00a3:te. That is why the petitioner has filed this petition<\/p>\n
v\u00b0\u00bb\u00bb._.’}for appointment of an arbitrator for resolution of the<\/p>\n
K\u00bb<\/p>\n
.r~”‘i<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
dispute. The respondent has not filati any statggfri\u00e9r\u00e9-t”rj”;a\u00a7’v-.V.<\/p>\n
objections.\n<\/p>\n
3. Learned counsel for the  as”\n<\/p>\n
clause-39 of the agreement Vbzv.~ic:2i\\._rjneA)'<"Ls:r__e;..'E-,,V
\nmay be referred to,  an &V.r-ari5i:tr\u00e9t\u00a2_r, ' hameh:\/i, Sri
\nM.Nara~\/anappa, Chief  KSRTC,
\nresiding at Nq.,1g15_O,   Kengeri
\nSateiiite Tewriz;   t <\/p>\n
4. in the AV!rd’\u00a7:tj’j:v>:f’trg4\u00e9–A\u00a7fer\u00a7:\u00a7aid discussion, I pass the
\nrenewing; t t t  <\/p>\n
   Mlscelianeous Petition is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
 “V47″_~$ri’x~.,’ii\ufb02arayanappa, Chief Traffic Manager
\nt  (Rem, KSRTC, residing at ~o.11so, Raiiway
\n: Parallel Road, Kenaeri Sate\ufb02ite Town,
\nBangalore – 560 060, is appointed as the So\ufb01e
\nArbitrator to resolve the dispute between the<\/p>\n
parties arising out of the agreement dated<\/p>\n
tr<\/p>\n
-I<\/p>\n
25.11.2082.\n<\/p>\n
(3)<\/span><\/p>\n
(4)<\/span><\/p>\n
(5)<\/span><\/p>\n
r”*mx!’.j<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
Learned Arbitrator on receipt of a copy4jcf:’t!\u00a7Tis.s_
\norder shalt enter upon the
\nnotice to the parties. .__and*””‘;irr\u00e9r:_\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3d  _’_AiVn  ‘<\/p>\n
accordance with the   rcv$a!\u00a7’in\u00a7V:”rth\u00e9?1vr.j<\/p>\n
dispute. V V _
\nRegistry is;__directed:VV’jt9_ sgnd..3r.;’\u00a7pyVvf%of this
\norder to th\u00e9”i\u00e9a.r_na_d 5Ar\ufb01i’i:r\u00a7f$t\u00a7’Ir’–.. _<\/p>\n
The _partiess.””areifAdir’a\u00a7te\u00a7\u00a7   ibe\ufb01ar thdr own<\/p>\n
1 gos:t\u00e9;._ <\/p>\n
Sdfw
\nIudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road … on 24 June, 2009 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer -1… IN T\ufb01\ufb01 HIGH CGURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 24′-“‘ my 0:: JUNE, 2oog..II ” BEFORE THE Momma MRJUSTICE S;;AWBi:)’U:, mesa CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS P5111169; A:I~’:o.34 2:3 3 i M\/S LAKSHMI CARRIERS . , _ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-23T12:52:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road … on 24 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-23T12:52:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":822,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-23T12:52:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road … on 24 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-23T12:52:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road … on 24 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-23T12:52:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009"},"wordCount":822,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009","name":"M\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road ... on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-23T12:52:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-lakshmi-carriers-vs-the-karnataka-state-road-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Lakshmi Carriers vs The Karnataka State Road … on 24 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230677"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230677\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}