{"id":230748,"date":"2008-12-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008"},"modified":"2017-01-10T08:18:25","modified_gmt":"2017-01-10T02:48:25","slug":"sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 7683 of 2007(M)\n\n\n1. SAROJINI, W\/O. C.K.CHALLAPPAN, AGED 72,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.OM PRAKASH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n\n Dated :01\/12\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                          T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.\n                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n                           W.P.(C). No.7683\/2007-M\n                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n                    Dated this the 1st day of December, 2008.\n\n                                 J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>       The petitioner is the widow of Sri.C.K.Chellappan, a freedom fighter,<\/p>\n<p>who actively participated in the Punnapra-Vayalar Freedom struggle. Ext.P1 is<\/p>\n<p>the application for grant of Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension. The claimed<\/p>\n<p>underground period is more than six months from 30\/10\/1946 to 30\/11\/1947,<\/p>\n<p>pursuant to the late husband of the petitioner being arrayed as an accused in<\/p>\n<p>case No.P.E.7\/1122 ME of the Special Magistrate Court, Alappuzha. Ext.P2 is<\/p>\n<p>the order sanctioning pension to the petitioner under the Kerala Freedom<\/p>\n<p>Fighters&#8217; Pension Scheme. Ext.P4 is the non-availability of records certificate<\/p>\n<p>issued from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Alappuzha. Ext.P5 is the<\/p>\n<p>certificate issued by Sri.H.K.Chakrapani wherein it is stated that the petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>late husband remained underground for more than six months from 30\/10\/1946<\/p>\n<p>to 30\/11\/1947 and the case number is mentioned as P.E.7\/1122 (ME). Ext.P6 is<\/p>\n<p>the true extract of the convict register in respect of the certifier and Ext.P7 is the<\/p>\n<p>order granting pension under the S.S.S Pension Scheme to the certifier.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, by Ext.P8, the application was rejected by the Central Government.<\/p>\n<p>       2.     A reading of Ext.P8 shows that the State Government has not<\/p>\n<p>forwarded a positive recommendation. The main reason stated in the letter of<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.7683\/2007<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       -:2:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the State Government, dated 22\/09\/2006, extracted in Ext.P8 is that the affidavit<\/p>\n<p>from Shri.S.Damodaran, Ex-MLA cannot be accepted and the District Collector<\/p>\n<p>has in his report stated that in the application for State Pension, the petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>husband has claimed only six months of underground hardships and the case<\/p>\n<p>does not show that he has any kinship with case No.P.E.7\/1122 ME.<\/p>\n<p>       3.     The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the State<\/p>\n<p>Government did not properly consider the matter in the light of the certificates<\/p>\n<p>produced by the petitioner. It is pointed out that the applicant in Ext.P1 has<\/p>\n<p>clearly shown the underground suffering. The certifier, Sri.H.K.Chakrapani is a<\/p>\n<p>competent certifier and the particulars have been stated by him in Ext.P5. It is<\/p>\n<p>therefore, submitted that the report forwarded by the District Collector is<\/p>\n<p>without verifying the true aspects relating to the late husband of the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>In Ext.P8, the other ground stated is with regard to the validity of non-<\/p>\n<p>availability of records certificate from the State Government. The said reason is<\/p>\n<p>not correct, in the light of the fact that this Court had taken the view in various<\/p>\n<p>cases that once the State Government forwards a positive recommendation, a<\/p>\n<p>separate non-availability of records certificate is not required. Therefore, the<\/p>\n<p>crucial question is to whether the action of the State Government in forwarding<\/p>\n<p>the letter dated 22\/09\/2007 without positive recommendation is correct or not.<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.7683\/2007<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     -:3:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       4.   Now that the petitioner has produced Ext.P5, the matter has to be<\/p>\n<p>reconsidered by the State Government.             There is no dispute that<\/p>\n<p>Sri.H.K.Chakrapani is a competent certifier. The certificates relating to him<\/p>\n<p>have to be considered along with other materials available with the State<\/p>\n<p>Government.\n<\/p>\n<p>       5.   Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to<\/p>\n<p>consider the application of the petitioner along with the other available<\/p>\n<p>materials and forward a fresh verification-cum-entitlement report showing<\/p>\n<p>appropriate recommendation to the first respondent within a period of two<\/p>\n<p>months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment.           The first<\/p>\n<p>respondent will reconsider the matter in the light of the fresh verification-cum-<\/p>\n<p>entitlement report forwarded by the State Government and pass appropriate<\/p>\n<p>orders within two months thereafter.        If pension is sanctioned, then the<\/p>\n<p>entitlement of the applicant for receipt of arrears from the date of receipt of<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 will also be considered by the Central Government.<\/p>\n<p>       The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                       (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)<\/p>\n<p>ms<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 7683 of 2007(M) 1. SAROJINI, W\/O. C.K.CHALLAPPAN, AGED 72, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY For Petitioner :SRI.J.OM PRAKASH For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-10T02:48:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-10T02:48:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":662,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-10T02:48:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-10T02:48:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-10T02:48:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008"},"wordCount":662,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008","name":"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-10T02:48:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarojini-vs-the-union-of-india-on-1-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sarojini vs The Union Of India on 1 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230748\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}