{"id":230820,"date":"2010-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010"},"modified":"2014-12-13T03:34:53","modified_gmt":"2014-12-12T22:04:53","slug":"smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n
SN THE HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT\nBANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 22\"\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.3Ds'HcE HULUVADI.G....RJ3M_'E\u00a7VH \n\nCRIMINAL APPEAL NOJ723 OFHDZM7 11]}  % E 1\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSmtlndumathi,\n\nW\/0 M.R.Ramesh,\n\nAged about 27 years,\n\nWe No.7, 3\"\" Cross,\n\nAshoknagar,\n\nBSK 1\" Stage, '- _ f 1   __ \nBangaiore-56()Of0.__  H    I  LAPPELLANT\n\n(By Sfi';SC',V'ijD\u00a7kH'1i1Hei1<.\u00e9\u00a7\u00a3*S:1i;.t.H.G.Sandhya Vijaykumar,\nAdvs.)   ' .  O\n.\/:.\\_1iI2:--\n\n '~  _ S11j\ufb01*Kz;u\u00e91k;11'a1thHa; V ~ ---------- -\u00ab *\n V' W\/0 'f};'1zig2111"na,\n _ Ag\u00e9dj. ziimilt. 45_'y:;a1fs,\nO" RVI"Q._2I6\/3'-.C,'Bzilaji Road,\n\nH Biock, .1*.h;yaOga1'ajanaga:',\nBangz}101j\u00a7:--56()()28. "RESPONDENT\n\n  {By Sri'.B.S.Hadirna11i, Adv.)\n\nQ: -.5 ) "\/-\na re \n\n\n\nThis Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378(4) of\nCr.P.C. praying to set aside the iinptigned judgment of acquittal\norder dt.6. l0.07 passed by the Xll Addl. C.i\\\/l.l\\\/1., Bangalore, in\n\nC.C.No. 13067\/2005. and convict the respondent\/accused for the\noffence P\/U\/S. I38 of N.I.Act.\n\nTh;-is Criminal Appeal. coming on for hearing t'liis\u00bb.dz1y,\n\nthe Court delivered the following: .\u00ab ' "\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
This appeal is by the complainant;againstthe”orde\u00a7’~..ofi=\u20ac:he<\/p>\n
XII Addl. CMM, Banga]ore,_”–in (3llC..llVl0.Vl3i3:($7}Q200Sh ..l3datled.ii’<\/p>\n
6.10.2007 dismissing the ct)mpl;1i.nt~and.._acqnit’ti:3gthyel accused.<\/p>\n
 Accoiidiagg the_:ceIn’pllainant, accused had borrowed a
\nloan of  September 2004 and has repaid<\/p>\n
Rs\u00bb.’i.3,l50li\/f on “i=2..1..Q.:04 and towards discharge of the balance<\/p>\n
 lo’an_ given a cheque for Rs.86,500\/~ dated<\/p>\n
 on Sri Sudha Co~operative Bank Ltd., R.V.\n<\/p>\n
 Road~~b1′:1nch, Baiigalore which, on presentation, came to be<\/p>\n
 slipshonoured for insufficient funds. Accordingly, after issuance<\/p>\n
0  to M __ot”leg’al notice, for non–payment, the case came to be filed. The<\/p>\n
2′? V-\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\nA<\/p>\n
learned Magistrate after enquiry, holding that there is no
\nsufficient evidence to show that the complainant has lent a loan
\nof Rs.l,()0,()00\/– and further noting that, transaction above<\/p>\n
Rs.20,00()\/– shall have to be made by way of cheque oi’..l?)-eiitiaiid<\/p>\n
Draft and also, having taken note of the reply_.–;,j:ivieti.’.,byf “titer.<\/p>\n
accused to the legal notice, th1’ow.i.n,g theib’urfl’eni\u00b0r)n.’the’<\/p>\n
complainant, has dismissed the eom}:i’lairi–.t{ *Hence,”this apj_5eali;7–:<\/p>\n
3. Heard.\n<\/p>\n
 The  accused is that, the complainant
\nand herliusbaiid ifo.i'”c:.ivbly_.itooicthe cheque from her by illegally
\nt1’espassing._jnt<) her hou'se:,.by abusing and assaulting her. But,<\/p>\n
the argument of .t_heilea1"necl Counsel for the appellant is that, the<\/p>\n
 ;1c"ct1sed"thast*tfi_led a icoiniplaiiit against the appellant wherein she<\/p>\n
V has"a.din,itted~the loan. transaction between them and when the
\n" appellant"i~n.sisted for payment of cash, she had issued cheques<\/p>\n
fr)?-.._whi_eh .the- complainant was not agreeable, in which, 'B'<\/p>\n
K <\/p>\n
_'\u20ac<\/p>\n
-“1<\/p>\n
report has been tiled and such being the case, dismissing of the<\/p>\n
complaint by the trial Court in limine is erroneous.<\/p>\n
5. Though, the stand taken by the accused i_s..that~..the<\/p>\n
cheque was forcibly taken from her, but the compiaiiit.  .<\/p>\n
her against the appellant shows .that._4theI”eiiiiisi’*a;\u00bb <\/p>\n
transaction between them. As per i”the7.decisi(5n_V’uf_the’_:}3.pe:\u00a3._<\/p>\n
Court reported in AIR 2010 sictis98 iniithe oifsliiahgiappaiii V<\/p>\n
Vs. Mohan, there is ar”1.,.j.ni_ti_al'”pre.sunipt_ion in”fav’our of the
\ncomplainant as per Section’iiV3′,-Yo? and i.t is for the<\/p>\n
accused to :_iebiutf’-..the._lp;:es’urnption available, not by mere<\/p>\n
plausible explanation;sbutgprcicif of explanation is necessary. In<\/p>\n
.7′<\/p>\n
 the”*eii’c__u1nstances;-.the’ approach  by the trial Court in<\/p>\n
 i dilsirnitssvihg—-.complai.nt that the transaction between the<\/p>\n
parties s_houiid”have been through demand drafts or cheques is<\/p>\n
 er1’oneou\u00a7s.\n<\/p>\n
” ,  6. Hence, appeal is allowed and the impugned order of<\/p>\n
the trial Court is  aside. The accused is convicted for the<\/p>\n
:3: . ,<\/p>\n
offence punishable under Section B8 of N.l.Ac:t and se:’i’:.\u00a2nced<\/p>\n
to pay Rs. 2 ,55.()(‘)()\/A, out of which, Rs.l,5(),()0()\/- <\/p>\n
to the Complzainant anti Rs.5_,0()()\/– shall be 1″()rt’.\u00a2_i_f<'\u00b0L(iV_t():fheiSt:itelu <\/p>\n
In default to pay the amount,  <\/p>\n
impI'is0nm_ent for a period <)1"ti3;"z=:\u00a2 :n()m..hs'.'–<\/p>\n
Bkp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh SN THE HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22″” DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.3Ds’HcE HULUVADI.G….RJ3M_’E\u00a7VH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOJ723 OFHDZM7 11]} % E 1 BETWEEN: Smtlndumathi, W\/0 M.R.Ramesh, Aged about 27 years, We No.7, 3″” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-12T22:04:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-12T22:04:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":566,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-12T22:04:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-12T22:04:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-12T22:04:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010"},"wordCount":566,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010","name":"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-12T22:04:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-indumathi-vs-smt-kanakarathna-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Indumathi vs Smt Kanakarathna on 22 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230820\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}