{"id":230862,"date":"2008-03-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2"},"modified":"2015-08-17T14:54:23","modified_gmt":"2015-08-17T09:24:23","slug":"b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2","title":{"rendered":"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller … on 10 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller … on 10 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n
Z 1 -\nIN THE HIGH counm or KBRNAIAKA Am \ufb01\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01baz\nDATED nus 'THE 10\" am or !~I.35.l1;C.?1'-I,, \u00a7I.';-:'x\"il\";':i \n\nE F in \"RE. A_ \n\n \n\nB\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTiQ\ufb01g\u00a7\ufb01BH\ufb01$\ufb01*B:A\ufb01i *\n\n$'a-\".39. HG. 1\ufb0238%:'2$05  r}$'ml\ufb023.'\u00a7\u00bb?G;'E'G05{I:K',\n\nIn M. No. 1uaa'a%x2o'cs\u00bbsL%=%i\n\nH.K. Kahhu;=. 4 _u\u00a2 ,VV_,\n\nE3.-\"0  .,     \n\nAged aiboutt :5r'e\u00bbs\u00a7;\u00ab--.1;a\"';    '\n\nE:::-KSP;I?\u00a2''\u00bb-I3;:V:i1re..r:,.V  '  \nHn\ufb01g\u00a7*H\u00a7g5E%\u00a3;\"KERIC;\"*\"\"\n\nRf: Heh:u1Ha\ufb01ar\u00a2*-_ '\n\nL?'a.I'V:.'.A'-_.';..':',._  *3.-..*.,'a=%.:_:.\"~;'_\\..=:t. ...PETITI\u00a3':&%'ER\n\nis: M\u00bb? mmmsnnmtait, \"'c';.a'\":=1-*3':\n\n:      %%%%% 14 \u00ab\n\n Thi-a. _I3::i;v:'\u00a7:ei*~iona1 Gontmllez,\n._ \"-'.__I*.fii*u*ii=:.;i_.c:\u00bbz:ga'.1 \ufb01ffice, K\"SR\"i'=C,\nA V   . .. ..RESPONDENT\n\n*~  ?',;En'.II 5__l= E_l;I_:Elil1'!IULL_A_'fi SLTAZELIEE; \n\n \"in:-it Ea *-- -'-* file un......\"-3\n\nEirticlea 226 and 22\"! aa\ufb01 tha Cenatitution of\n\nIndia; praying to meat aside the -order dated\n{IE-.1fJ..2DI35 passed on I.I).A.. No.'I1f199\"I by the\nI~Io:m'Zb1-a Laban: Caurt, Chifkzmagalur Wide\n%.:~.1'-.a.--.:'-.1.*.'e- J} ; qaaah the era; 2: Ne .\nI':5T.H$N.DS.2816.*'8.r'6'?00 dated 16.8.1997 passed\nby the x-aspondent mun-a' xurm Hi\"); to direct\nreinstatement or the petitioner with all\nconaequantial benefits.\n\n\n\n.\u00a7\ufb02dia\u00a2 F\ufb01ayihg\n\nBETWEEN :\nIn W.P. um. 10390\/2006:\n\nB.K. Kabbur  \n9.3%  Sab; ' 4\nH.-g-ad -'.=a.bc:'ut SCI ye-arm,\nEx-ESRTC 1':u:i'u'm:,  _\n\nBadge: I~To.5E'?1_.. K3RTC.',.__ \n\nE-L.\"-:::\u00ab Neahru Iiagar  \n\nBelay, Hgaaan piat;igt;} 'a_  *@;\u00a7B\ufb01TITIcNER\n\ngay 33:. H.\u00a7-- Egamg\u00e9\u00e9aa\u00e9\ufb01gx, ADVGCATE}\nAND : \"\"\nThe niviai$\u00a7a1*\u00a2Q\ufb01::e11\u00a2\u00a3, \"$\n\nNEBamm;\u00bb3e1;a:y5._ '.Ww_f ...RESPONDENT\n\n _:aY.$\ufb01I} EAiR\ufb01\ufb01ULiAH SHARIFF, ADVOCATE)\n\nu'E'hi:*.s_ E'.'f:=_.\".\"i..tt.;\"\".'LV\u00a3?e:a7_:ii:i11 ii: filed under:\n\n3:_:\u00bb:,ti.r:1':a'.s_' E25 \" 2 ':2:-I\u00a7_1:he Canatitzution at\n\nE1: M\n-4\n\n4.... 'A +-1..\n:. a q\":u_..-'5 I..a.u'5 Charge meme\n\n0 'E\n- A \"'L----dat'ed 115:' 23.9.2002 hearing Na.\n_'aEe,Ka;3a,5a.Bavi.sihbandi.Gai Haaf2SO7f@01\n de:1:fe:.;;1'% 2*'3_,_j9.E-:D05 passed against the yetitianer\n\"--.\u20ac'.=\";n:i~42I':+:--u':.\u20ac:e 'G\"} in order No. 423\/2005; direct\n\n. ...._.'-_.... *.... ...............L.. ....|:.' 1... _ ' ' ' '\n-.,;.e.-u.zu.a\u00ab.t;:ute:::.u=:u\u00bb w. 'cue \u00a7-'%'%t.1.'C1Gn%E lnt-.-'; aemlces\n\n._Fr\n\u00a31' nu.\n\nkzu\ufb01ifheu raspun-slant - Corporation.\n\nV' These Warit Petition Corning on for\nvaliminary Hearing in 'B' Group this day, the\nrt '.E|.':E..dI\u00e9'a the .1Eeli:.:n;ei%:-\n\nE': F. B E F.\nWrit. Petition No.1038EIf20D\ufb01 is directed\n\nagainst the award dated 05.10.2005 in I.D.A.\n\nNm.7lfl997. 5\u00a7&g\u00a3'\n\n--\\\n\n\n\npa'. .\n\nan-3-an\n\n2. The petitiazmer alleges \n\nCharge Sheet datad Gig\ufb01\u00e9rl\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9,{ aii@gi\ufb01g,}anW.V\n\nassault: on tha Aaai.ss't\u00a7I1t  Ws:_'\u00ab'.f3s.  \nthis regard an   s-I\ufb01s-.  and the\nEnquiry Dffi-:':neaAv::r.,4\":'~  ;:eport: on\n1o;o9.19a3, 1h\u00a7;a$#\u00a7$&; \u00b0gg 716.09.1933 an\n-Easier   \u00a7\u00ab\". m..:'\u00a3:,;:_ \ufb01g};  Eaased. 'rha\nP'5'*3it3;l\u00ab'5!\u00a5\u00a7'\u00a74--'+--51\".;_:.\u00bb\u00bb   \u00e9iiaputa in I.B.\ufb01.\n C-ourt held that, the\n-sra.:i\u00a31.i_4i\u00a7-*  and prcsper and also held.\n  is net proved, accordingly\n\n t:11'm\u00a3:e;L;15t:a:ttement with 75% backwagea.\n\n  maid award was called in question by\n\n .. \ufb01mianangaamant, as wall as by the petitioner\n\nEeforme this Court in W.P. Na. 3014811999 and\n\nIi.P. }~Iuc::.ED63'H'19B9. This Court allowed. the\n\nwrit: petitigzl filed M the ,a.;na;gement and set\n\n\n\nLabour Cnaurt. at para 8 this Court *'h@a\u00a7'L:'-Vf'qund\n\nas under :\n\n\ufb01r firm: that \n\n:\n\n,de*ec3u. \"-1f.I'i:--;-* ast~.a.+.~,.';.:.~...*.s.'\n\n 5. I211\nenquiry ____;'.~.1:'<:a<:e;e;_\u00a2iVV'.:J."\u00bb.*.1_r:;_:'a_,\u00bb _ _\nss:rui:in.rL.ai\ufb015\u00a7fA'-- ch-tent'..\u00a7\u00a71\u00a31g;?,Ti::.o;r:ing' to the\nsrnzan-::.Eus:iz:In ba.s\u00a7_a\u00a7'1f":E:f2az_t\u00a5'r;5\u00a7j~,ii__jtzhe liabour\nI'.'."ct:-11.gf*15:l'tZ\u00ab"1..i'g.I":::i'Lt;i\u00a7..__I';\u00e91t?5; passed the\n\n  . \n<\/pre>\n
4.,\u00bb “”” “113”;1,V\u00a73L!’-.’th\ufb01’t’;~~’\ufb02th.5 award is not well<\/p>\n
raaeuiriing .V  Einft  Jfama\ufb02d,<\/p>\n
 a\ufb01i’m.e..e\u00ab1r:itnas3a5s arm. while: considering
\n‘  –thsa,4V’=&vv.itiss=nce of three witneaaes the Labour:
\n .”C’.’I:l’l1.1″.’_’C.v’V’.:’:_-!’.iL.:Lz\u00a7-‘Slit cmnsiderad the evidence produced<\/p>\n
in-‘a:fc_rh\u00e9< the Enquiry Ctffiacm: and found that, the<\/p>\n
V  Eh.-3:'-,;'& i .=.. pi.-r.:~.rad an… cunf i mad the Drier of
\npuniahxfuant .\n<\/p>\n
5 = Laaggiegl 59431531. for the petitioner<\/p>\n
fair and propar, it is for the management to 5<\/p>\n
\/.\n<\/p>\n
rra\/”, 0<\/p>\n
m5-.-\n<\/p>\n
provs the charge and it wan nut gp\u00e9\ufb01 \ufb01g tha<\/p>\n
managament ta refer ta the evide\ufb01ce\u00bbph&d\ufb01e\u00e9d<\/p>\n
bafora tha Enquiry 0ffi;et;- HE al\u00e9\u00a2t\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01mitt\u20acd~t<\/p>\n
that, the evidence Qrod\ufb01c9& EQt\ufb01\u00e9tma\ufb01ggt\ufb01\u00e9gt
\naid net grave tu\u00a7ltchat\u00a7%,’;t\u00a70\ufb01\u00a7””dt the
\nwitnesses tuxng\ufb01xhoatiit \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 otter witneaa was
\nnut a yarty to t\ufb01\u00e9 i\ufb01t\ufb01dt\ufb02tl\ufb01ng there was no
\nether m\u00a7tatiali\u00e9#t\u00a7@t_th\u00a7uh@t;rial before the
\ndctmea  submit tad that, the<\/p>\n
charga_havI\ufb01g-not=pt\ufb01v3d} the Labour Court was<\/p>\n
rs\u00bb _.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a33<\/p>\n
nst_3usL1i aa._ Ha_alsa railed n a judgment<\/p>\n
It<\/p>\n
\u00a2f tH\u00ae.\ufb01paxg\u00a2\u00a2\ufb01rt3:eported in iii iii? if if<\/p>\n
 m.\u00a7’tm::.~o: Inna llI!’1′.1\ufb01l vs. namzmm<\/p>\n
 Luann. coon an uarnm and<\/p>\n
tA \u00e9uhmitt\u00e9\ufb02 that, in case the enquiry is held as’<\/p>\n
mat; fair and prayer it is opsn to the<\/p>\n
“‘5: ‘
\nman=~%ment to laad evldense. In such<\/p>\n
circumstances, the Labour \ufb01ourt was hat<\/p>\n
justified in relying on the evidence prednced<\/p>\n
befora the Enquiry Gffiaan. sggg,<\/p>\n
$6:\n<\/p>\n
6. Learnad Counsal appearing “fdff\ufb01kthe<\/p>\n
Managament wuhmittad that, it is-$bt-\ufb01\u00a7@t\u00a7p\u00a2m<\/p>\n
to tha petitimner to contend that;
\nCnurt cannot uanaider thdt@\u00a7i\ufb02e\ufb01daAE\ufb01\u00a7$\ufb01\u00e9ad<\/p>\n
H$h;\u00a5F court<\/p>\n
1+’
\nI
\nI<\/p>\n
b%\u00a3cr%= thg IEnquizy
\nearlier procaadipga,”ht\u00a7=tcate\ufb01\ufb01ricaily f6u’d
\nand directed x\u00a3\ufb01\u00a7t;gi\u00a3h%Fm:\u00a7bQur Court to
\ncwnaidst,~th\u00a3 i\u00a7\u00a7id%n\u00a7\u00a73tptb&ttad before tha
\nEnquirzj?  in the light or the
\nchaervgtt\ufb01\ufb01g\ufb01ma\ufb01gt\ufb01y”thia court. The Labour
\ncm\ufb01gt hag \u00e9\u00e9\ufb01si\ufb01\u00e9g\u00e9\ufb01 the evidence prad_ced _y<\/p>\n
tha Hanagement before the Labour Court as well<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00e95tthg a\ufb01idsnce before the damastic enquiry.
\nVst \ufb01e \ufb01l\ufb01\ufb01 auhittad that, the urder paaaad by<\/p>\n
tAtthis’t@urt was nat questioned in an appeal at<\/p>\n
@\u00a3Q:w any other Forum and the said order is<\/p>\n
‘.I….+–1-.+- ..\n<\/p>\n
‘1 H\ufb02bu hh\ufb01 partiea. Having acceyted;<\/p>\n
it is nut opan tn the petitianar to argue tnis<\/p>\n
groud. He alga submitted that, the learned<\/p>\n
Single Judge cansidering all the aspects found<\/p>\n
that. the order of the Labour Court was not<\/p>\n
t\u00a7h\u00e9’@E5Q\ufb01tjt<\/p>\n
-.n_
\n, .\n<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
game .ieaue’ again.\n<\/p>\n
based on any reaeen and the Labe\ufb01rif\ufb01aurt<\/p>\n
should have eeneider the merit.<\/p>\n
aside the earlier   wh:_=.,1;ier_;
\nthis Court has ebeerve’c1.:thet,a”t1fie”:Leheur Ceurt
\neheuld. have Satttieieei*t\ufb01e>_material placed<\/p>\n
before the_demeetie enquiry before coming ta<\/p>\n
1.
\nH.\n<\/p>\n
(‘4?\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9iu\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb02ja\ufb01\ufb01ithit.tt\ufb01\ufb01f has
\nbetween age \u00a7a;;;\u00a2$;%e it is not open to the
\n  against the said order
\nnot itie2e\ufb01eerte”thie Court to cenaider the<\/p>\n
Since the parties have<\/p>\n
eeeggted the eid_; and in tetme at the said
\nex\ufb01ei, th” Laheur \ufb02eurt h*a exercised its<\/p>\n
‘power 59 considering the evidence before the
\nV”x;LE\ufb01q\ufb01iry Officer as well as evidence produced<\/p>\n
-diixing the course ef proceedings before the<\/p>\n
Laban: Ceurt. It is net in dispute that, the
\nManagement hag examined tuzee witneeeee
\nThough one witneee “ae turne\ufb01 hostile but he<\/p>\n
alae admitted that the incident has happened.<\/p>\n
.?. It is net in dispute thet[1t\ufb01ieeCautt,eet*<\/p>\n
is  n <\/p>\n
Further, two witnesses have apaien ah$\ufb01\u00a7 the
\ninnidant they may not be party to Ehg i\ufb01\ufb01ia\ufb01\ufb01t
\nbut Ihave stared about ith\ufb01-_in\ufb01i\u00a7\u00e9\ufb01t4xEhd\u00a2’t\ufb01\u00a7;i<\/p>\n
evidence of those two \ufb01it\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7$e&=\u00a7i@a\ufb01iy{Q$pw i<\/p>\n
(ff<\/p>\n
-.~a=.1.:; the incident g:g;\u00a2..i1%1;;p:;rgn:e;;’ V-.\u00a7sg’-;1\u00e9.1″””i1ii:idar1t<\/p>\n
\ufb02ing E\ufb01fi\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01 ii ;\n<\/p>\n
U.’<\/p>\n
another amlaye\u00e9’\ufb01i$tu\ufb01\u00aei\u00a3\u00a7iihe,pub1ic peace.<\/p>\n
a.   hav.-am; feund +;h.=.=~..,. the
\ncharg\u00e9 id gi\ufb01\ufb01a\ufb01 5n the \u00ae\u00e9Sis af t a 9via=nca.
\nI #0_\ufb01@fifi#&i\ufb01$&%3 t\ufb01gie is any juatificaticn
\ntn ii\ufb01terf%\ufb01%ji\ufb01ifh\ufb01 the award. The only
\ngontan\u00a3i\u00a2g”it\ufb01&ti:waa urged by the learned<\/p>\n
g\ufb01\ufb01g\u00e9i far \u00a355 yetitioner is that, the Labour<\/p>\n
riv<\/p>\n
aura \ufb01ught mat ta ua\u00a5e ceneidered the<\/p>\n
, F<\/p>\n
“evid\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9 adduced before ths Enquiry Gfficer.<\/p>\n
V”n, I find that, thara is nn justification in the<\/p>\n
v\u00b0–$aid contantion in viaw 9f the earlier order<\/p>\n
paasad by this Court.\n<\/p>\n
9._ \ufb01ccardingly, W.P. Na. 10338f2U06 is<\/p>\n
diamiaaed. \ufb01ince the other writ petition<\/p>\n
(W?\n<\/p>\n
ug-\n<\/p>\n
filed is the consequence to the  of<\/p>\n
punimwaruent aubesaquently passed  <\/p>\n
petitioner. In view <:s\u00a7J ""'t1:\u00aba vf:r;a;f’.”j:L;iV:i:u;\u00bb=.=.VV1:vii<2JnVL'v-.&<:-ff <\/p>\n
the award, the 19.19. No.af1L3_3'9Df2'OvCI\ufb01.. %g]'s.. "n.ot
\n%ur'..*i'.*e fa:-r. monaider'-a}{:'i.cn. V.  the<\/p>\n
awe is also r:\u00a7.i.*.a31jeiaa:\u00abw:i'.–."L_:'– V'<\/p>\n
  , ,    % S.-3\/.:v<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller … on 10 March, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi Z 1 – IN THE HIGH counm or KBRNAIAKA Am \ufb01\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01baz DATED nus ‘THE 10″ am or !~I.35.l1;C.?1′-I,, \u00a7I.’;-:’x”il”;’:i E F in “RE. A_ B THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTiQ\ufb01g\u00a7\ufb01BH\ufb01$\ufb01*B:A\ufb01i * $’a-“.39. HG. 1\ufb0238%:’2$05 r}$’ml\ufb023.’\u00a7\u00bb?G;’E’G05{I:K’, In M. No. 1uaa’a%x2o’cs\u00bbsL%=%i […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230862","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nB K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller ... on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller ... on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-17T09:24:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller … on 10 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-17T09:24:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2\"},\"wordCount\":918,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2\",\"name\":\"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller ... on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-17T09:24:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller … on 10 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller ... on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller ... on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-17T09:24:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller … on 10 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-17T09:24:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2"},"wordCount":918,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2","name":"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller ... on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-17T09:24:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-k-kabbur-vs-the-divisional-controller-on-10-march-2008-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B K Kabbur vs The Divisional Controller … on 10 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230862","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230862"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230862\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230862"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230862"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230862"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}