{"id":230964,"date":"2009-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009"},"modified":"2018-10-05T05:47:39","modified_gmt":"2018-10-05T00:17:39","slug":"ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
MFA No.10'?8 of 2008\n\nIN mm HIGH comm 01-' KARNATAKAL  \ncmcurr BENCH AT n:--1ARwA1\u00a7   7;%    %\nDATED THIS THE 4TH DAS\u00a7'.:0F--AUGif$\u00a7;53\u00a7i3\u00a7.'_'_:V\u00ab,  M' x V\n\"RE3Em'*V%_  % ; 1   %  1\nTHE I-ION\"BLE nm.JUs'r:cic: jn;mHA\ufb01 \nTHE Ho1~r*m.E \nMIscELL'A3NE::f\u00a7:\u00a7s 'm,:V.\u00a7\u00a7?s13o08 {MVC)\nBETWEEIE; V. 3 % M    V V\nRamc\u00a7sh,*.  '  .. ' '\nAged about 35 ,yf::-ifs,' ' -~ ., \" \" e \n\nR\/ 0 J . P\ufb02agar, \nGangavatl\ufb01 Taiuli, \" '\n\n .  K9;:pa1*D:sm\u00a2:-; .  %%%%% \" \u00ab ...APPELLAN'1'\n\n' V:fVE\u00a7;*VS3f:i4.\"R\u00a7:1\u00a7\u00e9ts1:ekar R.Gt3;1jaHi, Advocate)\n\nA ND ; '.  \n\n1,.uSa.ri ga'pf\u00a7a, S\/0 Pampamla,\nAA ? agedabout 45 ymrs,\n'Driver; Tempo Trax N0.\n\n\"  3:33?\/3393,\n\nR\/0 Sunkad Oni, Karatagi,\nGangavathi Taluk,\nKappa} District.\n\n\n\nMFA N01078 of 2908\n\n12. T.Sambash1va1'a0, 'I'.I{1rshna Murthy,   L\"\nAged about 40 years,     \nOwner 8:. Supplier, R,' 0 Budagtxmpa . \nKamtagl, Grangavathi Taiuk,   .. \nKoppa} District. .  '\n\n3. United India Insurance C,\u00a2;-Q\nSanman Tourist CQmpIex,_____  \nIslampur, Gangavafn'-.11, \" \" L. '\n\nKappa} District, _   ;   \nBy its Manager.  --   ___ -_;..,aEsPoNDENTs\n\n(By Sri. C.V.3I\u00a3$1:';\u00a7,'ay,di,  for R3; kk  %\n\n\"This. m?;:'sc_ei13n'e{iu,$ .f'1.1'st appeal is fiied under\nSection 373(1)  ti\"1\u00a2T=1yi\"Q__1;c>r Vekucies Act against the\njudgmem: and'aWa1\"d, \u00a31-ated 16.08.2007 passed 'H1 MVC\nNO.83\/2035\"QI}.W_IZhC1 ~f11\u20ac of Civil Judge (Sr.DI1.) 822\nMember,  Gajlgavathi, partly aliawhlg the claim\n\n \"  _ pati\ufb01gx; far com\ufb01gsnmtiozl and seeking enharicemant for\n, 'L\"t\u00a3}I3.1p\u20acI1S\u00a73;\ufb01{}I1.\n\n. 7  Viiii\ufb01c\u00e9\ufb02aneous first appea} Coming can for\nfmfthex nriiers this day, NAGARATHNA, J , delivered ths\nfG11e}x?i.r;g:'\n\nJUDGEEENT\n\nThough the appeal is posted for Qrders, with the\n\n{L'--E3Z{1S\u00a3}.11Z Qf caunsel 0:1 130?}: sides, it is heard \ufb01zlaliy.\n\n3,\n\nI\n\nJ'\n\n\n\nMFA N0. \u00a3078 of 2008\n\n2. This appeal is med by the injuIed~\u00a7Ciein1ant\nseeking enhancement of compensation by \njudgment. and award passed  MVC  \n\n16.08.2007.\n\n3. The relevant faef\u00e9'    that on\n1 1.04.2004 at about   veas traveling\non a motor cycle   when a tempo\n\ntrax bearing  driven in a rash\n\nand Igeg\ufb01gexit,1IiV\u00e9i;1nei**.das}1e(i'\"a\u00a7ainst the claimant which\nresulted  hgie. jiejugries. Contending that he had\n\nsuffered  he filed the claim petition\n\n' ' . v.cempeneatio'i1 on various heads.\n\n. '  te the said petition, the iI1s1zra:1ee\n\n eoeipaiey hadiapeared and fiied its written stateneent denying\n\n v.e];1ege.t;ien made in the claim getitien and sought its\n\n   \n\n\n\nMFA No.1078 of 2008\n: 4 2\n5. On the basis of the above pleadings, the \n\nframed the following issues for its consideration}: '   \n\n\"1 ) Whether petitioner preves that   \nbeing the driver of Tempo =Ne.__KA-, \n\n37\/ 3393, drove the  in Irish _c;ir:\u00a7r_\/2 negligent I'. \nmannerand caused the affcideraf? \" 'V   \"\n\n2) Whether respondent_ Nos? ;5:'ovessV \u00bb   <\/pre>\n
Trax bearing No.1?#37\/3393’npt’vin’ieoived in the<\/p>\n
.3) Whether  for compensation? If
\nso, what amorgnt  <\/p>\n
 In   case, the ciaimant examined<\/p>\n
hi1;1.s;eIff? .VJ…E*  doctors as P.Ws.2 and 3 and<\/p>\n
   335.9,: to 81, while the respondent did not<\/p>\n
   V  V”ee\ufb01idenCe. On the basis of the material on<\/p>\n
fsesrgg  ‘I’rib:.1na1 awarded Compensation of<\/p>\n
 ARs.5{},\u00a5\u00a7”O0\/~ with futtire interest at the rate of 8% per<\/p>\n
  from the date sf claim petitisn till deposit. Being<\/p>\n
 = –Viaggieved by the meaw award, the claimant has<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
preferred this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
MFA 140.1078 of 2008<\/p>\n
7. We have heard the learned \ufb01ne<\/p>\n
appellant arid the learned counsel for  <\/p>\n
insurance company.\n<\/p>\n
8. It is submitted ‘Cf ‘the  lg\u00e9hst <\/p>\n
had suffered shorten\u00a7I1g of  leg by 1- Ex.P.5 is
\nthe wound certi\ufb01cVe1i:eV:s” and   examined with
\nregard to the pe;’cen\u00a3a”e-  tile; and, further, he<\/p>\n
was eaxninsgu  business, but the
\n‘}’1’ib1;1i1a1H  aV\u20ac%e1’d4ede’_’ 3 me\u00e9igte compensation on the
\nheads”\u00abQf” f10ssV_.”<\u00a71'V.f1;:t);1I*v\u00ab:~" earning capacity', 'pain and<\/p>\n
sui7E'e:*i1LA1g' }iu1::cii   'nef aWa1'ded any Compensation with<\/p>\n
 .regertE's:Ato'V%' 'less efeinenities'. He, therefore, requests the<\/p>\n
A Geu rt;..fe.Ve13ha:1ce the eompensatien.<\/p>\n
 \u00a7e'r con'u"a, supporting the judgne\ufb01t and award<\/p>\n
  ..of_. the 1. Tribunal, counsel for the insurance company
\nA' '._Vs'ub'Amits that considering the nature ef the disabiiity and<\/p>\n
 " – 'izhe assessment of income of the appellant, eempensatien<\/p>\n
MFA No.10'78 of 2008
\n: 6 :<\/span><\/p>\n
has been awamied in a just and proper
\n\u00e9oes not call for any interference in this appe\u00e9l;’
\n10′ Considering the xeivay,s_pbm.issie\ufb01\u00a7::,’V”:fheV
\npoint that arises for our CO\ufb02Si(3.\u00a2IE3:iG;l
\nthe appellant is entitled  V V\n<\/p>\n
11. From the  it  neticed that
\non account of the  and, as<\/p>\n
per the Wogn\ufb01   fhe Tribunal has<\/p>\n
note\u00e9i met ::WaS’ev.\u00a7IioIitening of right lower limb and
\nthat  “waV’s  to an extent of 30% as per<\/p>\n
 but  did not consider the said injury<\/p>\n
\u00bbA  e.e1::se\u00abe\ufb01;e_nt disability as gievous and teak the whole<\/p>\n
   at 5% only. However, We feel that taking<\/p>\n
 the ..iifV:ee’i:ee of the appellant to be Rs.4,{){)0\/- and<\/p>\n
” ~ AAe;seessiz1g the permanent disability at 10% 3.11:? by<\/p>\n
eipelying multiplier 0f 16, a sum of I2s.’76,800\/- is<\/p>\n
‘ awarded on the head ‘loss of future eaming capacity’.<\/p>\n
Simiiariy, on the head ‘pain and suffering’ instead 01′<\/p>\n
MFA N0.10’78 of 2008<\/p>\n
Rs.1,6-O0\/–, 9. sum of Rs.15,000\/~ is awarded;  the
\nhead of medical and incidental
\ncompensation would be Rs. 1\u00a7,Q()’O\/~.’_\\.1;;1.A4,:  3:
\npermanent disab\ufb01ity   ”\n<\/p>\n
coxnpensation on the headjose’-of:
\nRs.15,000\/-, therelqy   of
\nRs.1,21,800\/– msteazffor awarded by the
\nTribunal.    shall carry
\ninterest afeiee    011 deposit of the
\nsaid \u00a5sun:; it%Aes :;a:1 to the appenant.
\n  reasons, the reassessed<\/p>\n
e0:1\u00a7per:sat:ie n” is as \ufb01a\ufb02ows:<\/p>\n
e Pain  ‘sii\ufb01e\ufb01ng Rs.15,00G\/-\n<\/p>\n
A “‘  chaxges Rs. 15,060] ~<\/p>\n
13.58 eff  earning capacity Rs.’?6,800\/ ~\u00bb<\/p>\n
 Le3s’~ef’:3:e1eI1ities Rs.15,000\/-<\/p>\n
Total Rs.1,2 1,800\/-\n<\/p>\n
Kins’<\/p>\n
MFA Nc.1078 of 2008
\n: 8 :<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
13. The enhanced compensation shail cany.-interest<\/p>\n
at the rate of 6% per annum from the date cf’.
\ndeposit. Out of the enhanced compensa\ufb01a\ufb01,.
\nRs.50,000\/- shall be ciepositedf any  1
\nfor ax} initial period of \ufb01ve:\n<\/p>\n
be entitied to draw the  ini\ufb01erea-t
\namount. Balance :4 be”1eeAlea4sed to the<\/p>\n
appellant.\n<\/p>\n
% Sd\/.;\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
sa\/-\n<\/p>\n
FUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar B.V.Nagarathna MFA No.10′?8 of 2008 IN mm HIGH comm 01-‘ KARNATAKAL cmcurr BENCH AT n:–1ARwA1\u00a7 7;% % DATED THIS THE 4TH DAS\u00a7’.:0F–AUGif$\u00a7;53\u00a7i3\u00a7.’_’_:V\u00ab, M’ x V “RE3Em’*V%_ % ; 1 % 1 THE I-ION”BLE nm.JUs’r:cic: jn;mHA\ufb01 THE Ho1~r*m.E MIscELL’A3NE::f\u00a7:\u00a7s ‘m,:V.\u00a7\u00a7?s13o08 {MVC) BETWEEIE; V. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-230964","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRamesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-05T00:17:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-05T00:17:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":581,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-05T00:17:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-05T00:17:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-05T00:17:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009"},"wordCount":581,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009","name":"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-05T00:17:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-vs-sangappa-on-4-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramesh vs Sangappa on 4 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230964"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230964\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}