{"id":231219,"date":"2008-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-08-13T05:29:39","modified_gmt":"2017-08-12T23:59:39","slug":"mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The &#8230; on 24 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The &#8230; on 24 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALO\u00a7?ET.\n\nDATED THIS THE 2413. DAY 01? NOVEMBER  % \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HOISPBLE MR. JUSTICE   T\n\nWRIT PETITION No.632o\/2oo5(LA-K%mpB) %    \n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1.\n\n3.\n\nMr.C.Jayaram,\nS\/o.Mr.Chowdappa, -. V'\nAged about 62 ya:-.ars,   . \nR\/at.154,  \nA\ufb02ahara. B?\u00ab118\ufb01\u00a7.1w Pest; \nBangalore 3:- 03?'..  \"\n\n. Mrs. \n\nW\/0-Misc-JaYaf&amp;ii1s%    .'\nAgml ab\u00e9ut 53    % \"\nR\/at. 154,'Ka1*iya\u00a7.;1m.az1a'\n  Post,\n\n -    \n\n Developers\n\"?.'?I'i'\u00a3I_ate\"i..t11,, Ajcaompany\n\n tinder the\n \"Act, 1956,\n\n ._I-{aving its Iegstcred emcee\n\n uAt.!+\u00a7o.52, Vittal Mallya Road,\n  g\ufb02angalom, represented by its\n.  Director, Mr.Arun Advani.\n\n. . . PETHTONERS\n\n    (By Sri.Vivck Holla, Adv. for\n\nM] 3.1-Iona &amp; Holla, Advs.)\n\n\n\n 'A'-\n\nAND :\n\n1. State of Kamataka,\nBy its Principal Se-eretmy,\nDepartment: of Commerce &amp;\nindustries, Vikas Soudha,\nBangalore.\n\n2. Special Deputy Ccmmiwioner,   \nKarnataka Industrial Areas \nDevelopment mm (IGADB), \nNmpathunga Road, BangaloVre._\n\n3. Special Land Acquisition\nO\ufb01ioer, KIADB Complex,  _   \nPeenya, Bangalore. '    . ;RE'_SPONDENPS\n\n(By Sri.Keshava Ready,  R'1,%     \nS1'i.GiI'ii\u00a70\"~'(\u20acia B4, Adv}; '  '\n     \n\nThis   Articles 226 and\n227 of the Coi2stitu.t.ionr;f iadha with a prayer to quash.\nthe  ._,r.1c:t3:iicat1on dated 69.02.2004 vide\n\n ' This  coming on for hew\u00e9ng, this day,\nthem:-xdye t\u00a7:e..fol2owmg:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>&#8216; u   upe:&#8217;\u00a71tioners claim to be the absolute mvners of<\/p>\n<p>   in question. Pursuant to a preliminary<\/p>\n<p> ggeaeeanon dated 09.02.2004 under Section 28(1) of the<\/p>\n<p> Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, the \ufb02<br \/>\n. .~ 3&#8217; L<\/p>\n<p>\/ <\/p>\n<p>said land is sought to be acquired. The claim of the<br \/>\npetitioners is that they have filed objections,<br \/>\nhowever, the same has not been considered. &#8221;<br \/>\n\ufb01nal noti\ufb01cation issued and gazetted on  1<br \/>\nunder Section 23(4) of the Act is   T<br \/>\ninasmuch as there is no   <\/p>\n<p>and 28(3) of the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The contention of   no notice<br \/>\nof the proposed    and when<br \/>\nthey oame     pendency of the<br \/>\naoquisitioij prox\ufb01  \ufb01n  iosfre mm their ob3ect1ons&#8217; &#8216;<br \/>\nbefore the   main grievance is that<\/p>\n<p>their olnjee\ufb01ons  ifaotibeen considered and no orders<\/p>\n<p>we esotipulated under Section 23(3) of the Act.<\/p>\n<p> V  &#8216;;\u00e91:r:;iii;e&#8221;v.ooquioi1ion pxooeednw&#8217; are vitia&#8217; ted<\/p>\n<p>     set-a$de.\n<\/p>\n<p>   On notice, respondents have mmtsered<\/p>\n<p>  and \ufb01led their statement of objections. The<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; oontention of the respondents is that pursuant to the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>e*&#8221;&#8216;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-\n<\/p>\n<p>.. 4 ..\n<\/p>\n<p>notice issued, the petitioners have \ufb01led theh&#8217; objections<\/p>\n<p>and having considered the objections, a.<br \/>\nnoti\ufb01cation has been issued and possession has  ._<br \/>\nbeen taken and handed over to the<br \/>\n30.05.2006.   \u00e9 M% &#8216;V     _\n<\/p>\n<p>4. This writ peti\ufb01on is  $o\u00a3:..22\u00a7r1 <\/p>\n<p>2000. This Court while<br \/>\nhas passed an  Z  an<\/p>\n<p>02.06.2006. The said   <\/p>\n<p>5.   appearing for<\/p>\n<p>the pe\ufb01\ufb01un\u00e9xfs &#8216; &#8220;&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;L0\ufb0130nu0-usly contend that<\/p>\n<p>_ notta?i&#8217;1:4!.;;st1andiIa1g&#8217;tI_:1;f\u00a7&#8221;fa0i tixat the: objections having been<\/p>\n<p>   bmn considered and the \ufb01nal<\/p>\n<p> He furttmr submits that<\/p>\n<p>H Vv .poss0\u00a7si0r\u00a7&#8217;.he{s not been taken by the respondents as<\/p>\n<p> by W.\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;6.&#8217; The learned counwi appwring for rcspondmlts<\/p>\n<p>VT  3 would stnenuously oemtend that objections have<\/p>\n<p>n  &#8220;been considered. Hence, the question of quashmg&#8217; the %<br \/>\n L<\/p>\n<p>1 5 &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>_ 5 _<br \/>\nnotificatian would not arise. Further, he has made<\/p>\n<p>available the records relating to the aequisitiori<\/p>\n<p>proceedings.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. The contention of the petitioner that  =s\u00a7r&#8217;_a\u00a7a&#8221; &#8216;   u<\/p>\n<p>not issued to them cannot be    is <\/p>\n<p>noticed that objections havc. %   \ufb01.lcd ?%4rg;:A%   <\/p>\n<p>petitioners. Indeed in the<br \/>\npetitioners would admit<br \/>\naccepted the not;ice.    on what<br \/>\ngrounds the   acquired.\n<\/p>\n<p>Indeed it  1:0  the said reply is to be<br \/>\nfound in the&#8217;?   The order sheet<br \/>\n the was listed an 26.05.2004 and<\/p>\n<p>if&#8217;a{s.$.Vd\u00abefci&#8217;1;\u00a7d t0 &#8216;1?.06.2004. On 17.06.2004 it is noted<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216; was absent. and the matter was<\/p>\n<p>_ _\u00a710f\u00a2;1&#8217;ed&#8217; &#8216;t0.   and it was dJre.ctod&#8217; that a notice<\/p>\n<p>A  23(2) is also required to be issued 01 the<br \/>\n  &#8216;l&#8217;hereaita*, on 04.10.2004, once again<br \/>\n%    be noticed that the petitioners are absent and the<\/p>\n<p> 0\u00bbuInat:tcr is resaved for orders. The records do not<\/p>\n<p>disclose that any order is passed by the Land<br \/>\nAcquisition O\ufb02iccr on the objections \ufb01led by<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Indeed it is to be noticed.:that   &#8221;<br \/>\nare initiated under Section 23 of<br \/>\nof the Act would  tho &#8220;of  a<br \/>\npreliminary noti\ufb01cation&#8217;  2342)  and<br \/>\nmandates the authoriticc   the owner<br \/>\nor where the ovj;rx;:::=:;:;f&#8217;V:-is   the occupier<br \/>\nof the land an  or believed<br \/>\nto be __ Show cause, within thirty<\/p>\n<p>days  dotc\u00abof of the notice, as to why the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;land sooma not&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>    to the preliminary&#8217; noti\ufb01cation,<\/p>\n<p>I   the&#8217;  have filed their objoctions, which is<\/p>\n<p> the records. Section 28(3) of the Act<\/p>\n<p>   that an opporttmity is required to be given<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;:&#8217;  objections are nequimd to be considered and<\/p>\n<p>   &#8216;fhczcaitcr, \ufb01nal noti\ufb01cation is to be issued. In the case<br \/>\nC<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-7-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>on hand, it is to be noticed that no such exercise far;<\/p>\n<p>been done in so far as the petitionem are concerned. . &#8216;  .1<\/p>\n<p>10. Mr.V&#8217;wek Holla, learned counsel   % 3 1 V<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners relies on a Division   _v<br \/>\nCourt in mac or Kulkarni<br \/>\nCommtmoner, Eelgawn and\n<\/p>\n<p>11) Ka:&#8217;.I..J. 290 wherein<br \/>\nq\ufb02brded as    which is<\/p>\n<p>   j Vto the Issue&#8217; of<\/p>\n<p>II. _&#8217;1&#8217;hcV    appearing for the<br \/>\n  onu\u00e9  of this Court in the case. of<\/p>\n<p> v\/s. State ojxamataka<\/p>\n<p>   in 199717) Kar.L.J. 410 to<\/p>\n<p>.  his \u00e9tmmn\ufb01on that&#8221; consideration and disposal<\/p>\n<p>  o\ufb01f\u00e9ctions demonstrates application of mud&#8217; by<br \/>\n :V:a11&#8217;_1&#8217;3.*11&#8217;ity and such pr%dings cannot be held to<\/p>\n<p>.:_&#8221;&#8221;bc. \u00a7&#8217;itiated. Indeed this decision is referred to by me in<\/p>\n<p>(52%<\/p>\n<p>.3-\n<\/p>\n<p>the case of Hi\ufb01aidas Irmestment Pvt.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">State ofxamatatca in W.)-&#8220;.No.8177\/2006  0 <\/span><br \/>\nof on 09.08.2007. But however, What is  1   .,<br \/>\nthe case on hand is that objectms<br \/>\nthere is no indication that  oojeotio\ufb01s, 0.<br \/>\nconsidered. In fmt there   of<br \/>\nconsideration of  _  of  View<br \/>\nthat the Division   apply.\n<\/p>\n<pre>Consideratioo    mean as\nobserved    case that\n<\/pre>\n<p>there must be mind by the authority. To<\/p>\n<p>my mind,  is fno of mind and no orders<\/p>\n<p>   \ufb01led. Hence, I am of the<\/p>\n<p>  subsequent to Section 28(2)<\/p>\n<p>  V  &#8216;liebie  Consequently, following onder<\/p>\n<p>   X\u00bb  00(3)&#8217; Petition is aztawut in part.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;    (b) The \ufb01nal noti\ufb01cation at Armexme &#8216;B&#8217; in so far<\/p>\n<p>as the petitioner&#8217;s land bearing Sy.No.4I<br \/>\nmeasuring 5 acres 17 guntas of Kariyammana<br \/>\nL<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; 9 &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>Agrahara village, Varthus Hobli, Bangalore<br \/>\nEast Taluk is concemed, stands quashed.<\/p>\n<p>(c) The pe\ufb01tioners shall take these<br \/>\nnotice to them and shall appear beftire&#8217; 4_    *<br \/>\nLand Acquisition Of\ufb01cer oI1_\u00a7&#8217;=\u00a7  _<br \/>\nwithout waiting for further  j;    2 _ <\/p>\n<p>(:1) The Land Acq11isition&#8217;V_(}f(i.cc1V&#8221;&#8216; <\/p>\n<p>proceed to consider tt1e Vt3b%iec\u00a7;ion&#8217;s-  oompiy<br \/>\nwith the mandatory p11)iiisiv\u00e9t;s&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;o\u00a3.Seciidn&#8221;28(3)<br \/>\nof the Act  #    same in<\/p>\n<p>Rule made&#8217;   Vc.wttt\u00a71\u00a71_&#8217;xt_i.1&amp;&#8217;1&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;lHi(:sa1ted above.<\/p>\n<p>12,   Ia&#8217;*V\u00a7   learned Additional<\/p>\n<p> for respondent No.1 is<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;A.{ile.. 1i;cmo of appearance withirl four weeks.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;spa<\/p>\n<p>sci\/~<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The &#8230; on 24 November, 2008 Author: Ajit J Gunjal IN THE HIGH COURT OF&#8217; KARNATAKA AT BANGALO\u00a7?ET. DATED THIS THE 2413. DAY 01? NOVEMBER % BEFORE THE HOISPBLE MR. JUSTICE T WRIT PETITION No.632o\/2oo5(LA-K%mpB) % BETWEEN : 1. 3. Mr.C.Jayaram, S\/o.Mr.Chowdappa, -. V&#8217; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-231219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The ... on 24 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The ... on 24 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-12T23:59:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The &#8230; on 24 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-12T23:59:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":901,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The ... on 24 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-12T23:59:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The &#8230; on 24 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The ... on 24 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The ... on 24 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-12T23:59:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The &#8230; on 24 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-12T23:59:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008"},"wordCount":901,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008","name":"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The ... on 24 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-12T23:59:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-jayaram-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-the-on-24-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr C Jayaram vs State Of Karnataka By The &#8230; on 24 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231219","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231219"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231219\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}