{"id":23151,"date":"2008-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-07-01T22:12:36","modified_gmt":"2016-07-01T16:42:36","slug":"karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda<\/div>\n
 \n\n\\IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA, CIRCUKEVBEQICH\nAT DHARWAI).   \n\nDATED THES THE 25TH DAY OF N{)V';3.\u00a7\\\u00a7'I':\"\u00bb~}\"a:\u00a7.I\u20ac,iV\"2i\u00a7'4()\"!*3;  _ \n\nPRRSERT\n\nTHE HGNBLE MR.JUsT1cE1'R.RRRERDRAR  R \n\n\nTHE RONRLR MR. i}T.jST1'(\"'3E\"i\u00a7{Si\u00a7EENIVASEV' GOWQA\nM.R.A\u00a7Ns; xtjakiv\/2060 f&,\nMFA CROB .No.99v\/iV0(}f7 IN_h{I_.F{A.\u00a7ifa; 103 17\/2005.\n\nM.F.A.No.1OI\u00a7:17%2_{}()\u20ac;:.    GA  ;. \n\n1. KARNATAKA 1'-IEERAVARI NIGAM LTD\nREP B35  MAR;-R::iNG I.)iREC'1'0R NO 1\nEVCOFFEE'-BOARB BUILDING, 3 FLOOR\n\nf '*}:)R_B R  VEEDHI\n\n BANG5ALQRE 1  APPELLANT\n\n (Rs:-,\u00a7%%i'S1\u00e9:.:R*%.R\u00a7;R1KANTH.J.BHAT : V.Y.KUMAR)\n\n   1. ,  SR1 ARRASAB SHRIMAN'? BALIKA1:\n\n_ \"AGE: NULL, R\/O HREKUDI,\n\" 'TQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELGAUM\n\nKAMAL APPASAB BALIKAI\nAGE: NULL, R\/O HREKUDI,\nTQ: CI-IIKODI, DIST: BELGAUM\n\n4\/\n\n\n\n3. THE SPECEAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICEE\u00a7'_\u00bbVV': E \nHIDKAL DAM, HUKKERI    E\n\nBELGAUM  1'  \n\n(BySri.:SNHA'I'1'IFORR1R2)   D     ;\n(BY 3121 C.S.PATiL, eovr. ADVOC;A'1'\u00a7i3 F'OR\"RS). % _ E\n\nMFA FILED Uls-54(:>B'.,:vGF LA\" Ac;  THE'\n\nJUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19\/ 1 1E\/2005 PASSED IN\nLAC No.29\/D4 ON THE FILE--o'E THE CIVIL -JUDGE(SS)\nCHIKODI, PARTLY' =.. \u00a3$'LL*:)\"Z1.NC}._   REFERENCE\nPETYFION FOR ENHANCED CQMPEN.SA'I'ION.\n\nMFACROB ND  0zi*kA2;D{;Ef?  120317 OF goes.\n\nBE'I'WEEN:'        \n\n1. SR1\"APPASAB\u00a7iA:SHi1%IMAN'F\"BALH{AI\nAGED   E\nOCQ;A.GRICtTLTURIS3'i3,\n\nR\/A'? \u00a7~\u00a31lREi\u20acU}\"Jl VTLLAGE,\nCHIKODI  v\nV, .;DIsT; BELDAUM,\n\nV.   :2; V.  E\u00e9ifmw  \"1A1.\u00ab APPASAB EALIKA:\n\n V . D  mm-\"ts,\n~. \" ---.VOCC;AC%RiCULTURISTS,\n'  R\/HI' \u00a3i;E2EKUD1 VILLAGE,\n {3H1K0D; TALUK,\nIEIIST; BELGAUM.  CROSS OBJECTORS\n\n   s N HATT} 65 K T KEWAD)\n\n\" YSND\n\n'V.\n\n\n\n1. KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD\n\nREPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING     \n\nNO. 1,COF'FEE BOARD BUILDINGS, _--  .-- ._ \n\n4TH FLOOR, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR\\!Ei\u00a7)DHL  xi  \nBANGALORE 1.      \n\n2. \"{'HE SPL LAND ACQUISFIION C}F'I'7'ICEI1'. * J  1\nHIDAKAL DAM, \"     \n13:31'; BELGAUM.   RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(By Sri.: sR1KANTH.J.B\u00a7i;:.T :–‘_VAV.\u00a7f;K\u00a3I_M:A1’2_F0R R1}
\n(By Sri.C.S.F’ATIL, GOVT. AD\\\u00bb1..C.ATE ‘ Eorem)<\/p>\n
MFA.CRQB::IN_ MI?A 1Q’;3 17\/Qgs p?1L\u00a7,b 11\/ O.XLI RULE
\n22 cm AG,g;a5;s5;.%% JUDC3:ME1\\”I””& AWARD DATED<\/p>\n
19\/ 11\/2Q_Q5″PA”S’*SED IN LAC.N0.,:29\/04 ON THE FILE OF
\nTHE CIVIL *JUDGQSD)\u00bb._’cmKOD1, PARTLY ALLOWING
\nTHE ‘:\u00a7eE1?ERE1*z~CE% _ *1?-‘ETi*rION FOR ENHANCED
\nc0MPENsA’\u00a7’IoN 85  FURTHER ENHANCEMENT<\/p>\n
OF’ COMPEN_SA’vTION}’.. = .\n<\/p>\n
..   cross objections coming 0:1 for<\/p>\n
 f V ” ‘i’;ea2″‘in”g   day, “‘S7REEEHAR RAG, J., delivered the<\/p>\n
JUDGBENT<\/p>\n
 AA [ I.Av. \u00a7i’o.2 is a\ufb01owed. Delay of 220 days in filing the<\/p>\n
   condoned.\n<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
Sri V.Y.Kt.1mar takes notice for The Kamataka
\nNiravari Nigam Ltd anti Sri C.S.Pati1, takes <\/p>\n
Government.\n<\/p>\n
The claimants’ Land acquji\u00a7\u00e9Vd”  ‘0i\\ ‘ T, A’<\/p>\n
cons\ufb01uction of a canal. The <\/p>\n
at the rate of Rs.25,000\/-  “Ti1_c\u00a7  ‘Court:
\nhas considered the vi\u00e9mds   ‘ vig\ufb01ioi\u00e9fntial and
\nwanted compensation   128.12\/~ and
\nRs.15\/- mi”  Nigam Ltd. (for<\/p>\n
short,   I appeal challenging the<\/p>\n
compensation  excessive and aiso contend that<\/p>\n
 the”   Vipotcntial. The ciajmants have \ufb01led<\/p>\n
V.   seeking enhancement of the<\/p>\n
 the rate of Rs.1’7\/- per sq. fi.\n<\/p>\n
  The award of the LAO \u00e9iscieses that the<\/p>\n
” ‘A   :–.:<:)pi11i9n bf the panchas Show that the vaiue of the {and<\/p>\n
:  between Rs.25,000\/- and Rs.32,000\/~ per acre.<\/p>\n
T " "The LAO has reiiad upon the sales sta\ufb01s\ufb01cs of the lands<\/p>\n
sold in the years 1997 ta 1999 which are prior to the<\/p>\n
 l<\/p>\n
noti\ufb01cation. The sales sta\ufb01stics disclose <\/p>\n
are sold at Rs.25,000\/– to Rs.32,000\/-_.~~pef::~ecsc.\u00ab.A <\/p>\n
lands are dry lands. The Value $91'  'V:.'{jhe '<\/p>\n
dxy lands of Hirekudi village oozes  Rs:.' \u00a3';:3'.,c()(:)VQ %<\/p>\n
acre for the relevant year. I ' V<\/p>\n
3. The C1aiII.;li;\ufb01if,S,A VA  hand, have
\nproduced the records  115311.163 bearing RS
\nNos.393\/3,_  \/  L213\/3, 328\/1 and RS
\nNo.4\u00ab09 __of  converted for Non-\n<\/p>\n
Ag~icuia;.u-ai  ‘. sai\u00e9 lands adjoin the lands in<\/p>\n
question.  have also produced evidence to<\/p>\n
 _ ShOV.\u00a7\u00a7gf.V1}\u00e95.t   is converted to NoI:1-Agtricultural<\/p>\n
 pI;;rp;oseVA_, sites are formed by one Padalale, each site<\/p>\n
 is sold for Rs.-47,000\/-. The sale deed<\/p>\n
;_or p:1.otzNVo.2 (\u00a7: dated. 17.2.1999 is marked as Ex.P.29. The<\/p>\n
V’ V’  noti\ufb01cation in respect of the land in question<\/p>\n
 in the year 2001. Survey No.309 is within the<\/p>\n
 V   sfijiage limits of Hirekudi village. However, on perusal of<\/p>\n
the certi\ufb01ed copy of the village map produced discloses<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
that RS No.388 is situate immsdiateiy <\/p>\n
Miraj read. The said Land is nearer to.  <\/p>\n
\nI-Iirekudi. The sale deed also    <\/p>\n
situate about 4 kms away ‘    *’<\/p>\n
adjoins Chikkodi .- Mira} road}  q\ufb01ss\ufb01on are
\nsituate far off from   {the North.\n<\/p>\n
4.    recor\u00e9s to Show
\nthat ths  question have been
\ncanveffgzd purpose. The said lands are<\/p>\n
also situgzs to thewgstjcmkmn ~ Mira} Road, quite far<\/p>\n
 awajffrom W\u00e9s\ufb01_ <:) f' Cilikko\u00e9i – Miraj Road, and they are<\/p>\n
H   in the middle between Hirekudi village and<\/p>\n
__1\\ii_ii'%\u00a7j Road. Censidcring the location of RS<\/p>\n
V –V No.\u00a738 lands in qucs\ufb01on, We find that RS No.388<\/p>\n
 '' .ha's-._:ac :N comparison to the lands in question. The<\/p>\n
—   have also not produced any material to show<\/p>\n
” Etxat in the NA converted lands any plots have been formed<\/p>\n
and sols. The Reference Court has mainly relied upon the<\/p>\n
‘\ufb01k,<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\nsale deed Ex.P.29 pertaimng to RS Ne.388 to determine
\nthe value. If the said decument is excluded, there is
\nabsolutely no credible material to assess the marketjllvalue<\/p>\n
of the lands in question.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5. There is no materiai eit11e:\u00b0~’***;r;I:;j;y \u00bb “tcj \u00ab.\/sheiwg <\/p>\n
whether the NA converted laritds    <\/p>\n
petential or that the con’\u00a2ersio:1s’~,_ai3’eV I1:\u00a5,e1}.i;;)1.;lVe.t,edliI1:l’<\/p>\n
anticipation. of the acquisitieti;-.,:_ ‘ET1_j1ere”i~sl_ ebselntely no
\ncredible material avs\ufb01al\ufb02e ‘~.o::t.l.\u00bb’;f’eeejV1*r1i”tfor this Court to<\/p>\n
detemiiI1e__ _\u00a7\u00ab.1_;st __ proper compensation. The
\nclaimants-.have 335:5′ \ufb02l\ufb01ifltl convincing evidence to prove<\/p>\n
the 4:;\u00a7n”arAket value; Qniy one witness is examined and<\/p>\n
    placed on Ex.\u00a7’.29, the sale deed of a. plot<\/p>\n
   View of the paucity of evidence, we do<\/p>\n
V –V r;etlRfeel is guest and proper to speculate in \ufb01xing the<\/p>\n
K Lznaikuetvyiralue of the lands in question in the interests of<\/p>\n
  and interests of the parties. It is just arid<\/p>\n
” Eieeessary that the order of the Reference Court is 120 be set<\/p>\n
aside, the matter to be remanded to the Reference Court<\/p>\n
for \ufb02esh consideration and disposa} in accordance with<\/p>\n
_ law. The parties are permitted to adduce further’ Veirif\u00e9ence<\/p>\n
in the matter.\n<\/p>\n
6. Keeping in View the faet that”  = <\/p>\n
time has eiapsed and the pa\ufb01’\u00a7ie-;.~}—  ‘jo._f_’A \u00bbe~;e<\/p>\n
compensation, we direct _V as}-ar1V’ inte;fi;:%;1’v.,t:3;e\u00e9:;s11I'<–:u;,L'<\/p>\n
KNNL shall deposit  5.2  T_  rate of
\nRs. 1,50,00()\/~ per aci'e"–   made 'by the
\nLAO ix} each case, Jada within four<\/p>\n
weeks.7._ 'are\ufb01\u00e9srmitted to Withdraw the amount<\/p>\n
depositezis. It  the Reference Court sha\ufb02<\/p>\n
 disgmfiee of the  within three months.<\/p>\n
   that the Reference Court need not be<\/p>\n
  of the factual observations made<\/p>\n
V –V regai*'d.ir1g. t\ufb01e location ef the lands and the market<\/p>\n
" 'V "  and ail other contentions are kept open.<\/p>\n
  is further clari\ufb01ed that in respect of each case if<\/p>\n
  KNNL has already deposited a sum of Rs.1,50,000\/– per<\/p>\n
acre, no further deposit be made.\n<\/p>\n
4\/<\/p>\n
In both appeal and cross–obje(:{ions,  <\/p>\n
entitled to refund of Court fee.\n<\/p>\n
nvb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda \\IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA, CIRCUKEVBEQICH AT DHARWAI). DATED THES THE 25TH DAY OF N{)V’;3.\u00a7\\\u00a7’I’:”\u00bb~}”a:\u00a7.I\u20ac,iV”2i\u00a7’4()”!*3; _ PRRSERT THE HGNBLE MR.JUsT1cE1’R.RRRERDRAR R THE RONRLR MR. i}T.jST1′(“‘3E”i\u00a7{Si\u00a7EENIVASEV’ GOWQA M.R.A\u00a7Ns; xtjakiv\/2060 f&, MFA CROB .No.99v\/iV0(}f7 IN_h{I_.F{A.\u00a7ifa; 103 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKarnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-01T16:42:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-01T16:42:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":972,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-01T16:42:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-01T16:42:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-01T16:42:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008"},"wordCount":972,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008","name":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-01T16:42:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-neeravari-nigam-ltd-vs-sri-appusab-shrimant-balikai-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd vs Sri Appusab Shrimant Balikai on 25 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}