{"id":231754,"date":"2009-09-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009"},"modified":"2018-06-12T20:36:14","modified_gmt":"2018-06-12T15:06:14","slug":"parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nAS.No. 275 of 1999(C)\n\n\n\n1. PARAKANDI JANAKI\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. P.P.KUMARAN(DIED)\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.K.SUMOD\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID\n\n Dated :18\/09\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                             HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.\n                         ----------------------------------------\n                              A.S.No. 275 of 1999\n                         ----------------------------------------\n                Dated this the 18th day of September, 2009\n\n                                    JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>       The Plaintiffs in O.S. No. 8 of 1995 on the file of the sub court,<\/p>\n<p>Thalassery are the appellants herein.               The suit filed for partition and<\/p>\n<p>separate possession was dismissed by the trial court. Hence the appeal<\/p>\n<p>The parties hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs and defendants as arrayed<\/p>\n<p>in the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.     It is the case of the plaintiffs that the plaint schedule property<\/p>\n<p>originally belonged to one K. Kunhiraman The property was obtained by<\/p>\n<p>one otherni by executing a registered marupat No. 186\/1905                      and<\/p>\n<p>thereafter the said otherni has been in possession and enjoyment of the<\/p>\n<p>plaint schedule property. Subsequent to the death of otherni her right was<\/p>\n<p>devolved on her children Karinchi, Kalliyani and Koran and they had been<\/p>\n<p>possessing and enjoying the property. Subsequently Karinchi died and<\/p>\n<p>her    right devolved on her           children namely 1st defendant Raman,<\/p>\n<p>Cherumarathi. Cherumarathi also died and her right devolved on her sole<\/p>\n<p>son Koran. Kalliani also died and her right devolved on her son, the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>defendant. Subsequently Raman also died and his right devolved on his<\/p>\n<p>children the plaintiffs, and Koran. On the death of Koran his right devolved<\/p>\n<p>to his wife and children namely defendants 3 to 7.                 Thus  the plaint<\/p>\n<p>schedule properties were enjoyed and possessed jointly by the plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">A.S. No. 275 of 1999                   -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and the defendants. It is submitted by the plaintiffs that the 3rd defendant<\/p>\n<p>argued that the plaint schedule property exclusively belonged to her<\/p>\n<p>husband late.Koran.      In that premise,    she had cut and removed one<\/p>\n<p>jackfruit tree , one teak tree and one mango tree worth Rs. 5,000\/- and<\/p>\n<p>now she is attempting to cut and remove the valuable trees and thus<\/p>\n<p>committed mischief in the plaint schedule property.       The plaintiffs have<\/p>\n<p>prayed that the plaint schedule property shall be divided into six equal<\/p>\n<p>shares and for allotment of \/6 to the plaintiffs, \/6<br \/>\n                                   1                     1 thshare to the 1st<\/p>\n<p>defendant and \/6 2  th share to the 2nd defendant and the remaining \/6   2  th<\/p>\n<p>share to the defendants 3 to 12.. The plaintiffs have also prayed for<\/p>\n<p>mesne profits and for \/6 share of the value of the trees worth Rs. 6,000\/-<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                       2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>cut and removed by the 3rd defendant.\n<\/p>\n<p>       3.    The 2nd defendant admitted that the plaint schedule property<\/p>\n<p>originally belonged to otherni who is the grandmother of the 2nd defendant<\/p>\n<p>and subsequent to the death of otherni the property devolved upon her<\/p>\n<p>legal heirs and one among the legal heirs was late.Kalliyani who is the<\/p>\n<p>mother of the 2nd defendant. Since       2\/6 right over the property devolved<\/p>\n<p>upon late Kalliyani, after her death, the said share of property may be<\/p>\n<p>allotted to the 2nd defendant.\n<\/p>\n<p>       4.    Defendants 4 to 10 and 12 in their written statement denied<\/p>\n<p>the allegations in the plaint are false.      According to them     the plaint<\/p>\n<p>schedule property is not identifiable on the basis of the description in the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">A.S. No. 275 of 1999                 -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>schedule.     Koran alone had exclusive title and possession over the<\/p>\n<p>property and after Koran&#8217;s death the property belongs to them along with<\/p>\n<p>defendants 3 and 11 as their exclusive property ,that they have obtained<\/p>\n<p>purchase certificate   from the Land Tribunal Kuthuparamba along with<\/p>\n<p>defendants 3 and 11and hence they are not liable to pay any share of<\/p>\n<p>mesne profits. It is contended that the plaint schedule property exclusively<\/p>\n<p>belonged to them and pleaded for the dismissal of the suit.<\/p>\n<p>       5.     The evidence in this case consists of oral testimonies of PW1,<\/p>\n<p>DW1 Exts. A1 to A3, B1 to B5 and Exts. C1 to C3.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       6.     Ext.B1 is the purchase certificate issued in the name of Koran<\/p>\n<p>who is the husband of the 3rd defendant and father of defendants 4 to 12<\/p>\n<p>Ext.B2 is the certified copy of the relevant order passed by the Land<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal Koothuparamba. Koran died in the year 1990 .After perusing<\/p>\n<p>Ext.B1 purchase certificate, the Commissioner has opined that Ext.B1<\/p>\n<p>tallies with the description of the property shown in the plaint. The trial<\/p>\n<p>court held that Ext.B1 to B5 discloses the fact that the said Koran, the<\/p>\n<p>predecessor in interest of the defendant 3 to 12, had been enjoying and<\/p>\n<p>possessing the plaint schedule exclusively without interference by any of<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiffs or defendants 1 and 2 and hence         late Koran, was the<\/p>\n<p>absolute owner of the plaint schedule property on the strength of Ext.B1<\/p>\n<p>purchase certificate    and Ext.B2 order passed by the Land Tribunal,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">A.S. No. 275 of 1999                  -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Koothuparamba. The trial court also observed that since the plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p>have not      challenged Ext.B2 order,     Ext.B1purchase     certificate has<\/p>\n<p>become final    and conclusive and therefore Koran has         become     the<\/p>\n<p>absolute owner of the plaint schedule property and being the legal heirs of<\/p>\n<p>the deceased Koran, defendants 3 to `12 have got exclusive right over the<\/p>\n<p>property. The trial court concluded that the plaint schedule property is not<\/p>\n<p>available for partition and dismissed the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.     Before this Court the appellants\/ plaintiffs have produced an<\/p>\n<p>order passed by the Appellate Authority (LR) Kannur, in A.A. 142\/1998.<\/p>\n<p>The appeal was preferred by the plaintiffs in the suit (appellants herein)<\/p>\n<p>against Ext.B2 order passed by the Land Tribunal, Koothuparamba in<\/p>\n<p>O.A. 5150\/1975.       The Appellate Authority held that     the late Koran<\/p>\n<p>obtained pattayam in collusion with the 11th defendant(Jenmi), undermining<\/p>\n<p>the right of the appellants in the plaint schedule property, that the<\/p>\n<p>appellants have also right over the plaint schedule property and that<\/p>\n<p>Ext.B1 Purchase certificate was issued in favour of Koran without<\/p>\n<p>conducting proper enquiry and therefore the Land tribunal has erred in<\/p>\n<p>passing Ext. B2 order.     The Appellate Authority quashed Ext.B2 order<\/p>\n<p>and cancelled Ext.B1 certificate purchase Certificate.<\/p>\n<p>      The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the matter is<\/p>\n<p>now pending before the Land Tribunal Koothuparamba after remand.<\/p>\n<p>According to him      the suit was dismissed by the trial court solely on the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">A.S. No. 275 of 1999                 -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>basis of Ext.B1 purchase certificate and Ext.B2 order which were later<\/p>\n<p>cancelled    by the Appellate Authority in the appeal preferred by the<\/p>\n<p>appellants. Since Ext.B1 purchase certificate is cancelled and Ext.B2<\/p>\n<p>order is quashed by the Appellate Authority&#8217;s order in A.A. No.142\/1998,<\/p>\n<p>produced by the appellants\/plaintiffs and the fact that the matter is now<\/p>\n<p>pending before the Land Tribunal Koothuparamba for a fresh adjudication ,<\/p>\n<p>I am of the view that   the judgment and decree passed by the trial court<\/p>\n<p>dismissing the suit, requires re-consideration<\/p>\n<p>      In the result, the judgment and decree under appeal are set aside.<\/p>\n<p>The suit is remanded to the trial court         for denovo consideration in<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law. While re-considering the case the trial court shall take<\/p>\n<p>into consideration the claims of the plaintiffs and the order to be passed by<\/p>\n<p>the Land tribunal after remand by the Appellate Authority.       There will be<\/p>\n<p>no order as to costs. The plaintiffs are entitled to refund of the court fee<\/p>\n<p>paid in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                   (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE)<br \/>\nes.\n<\/p>\n<p>HARUN-UL-RASHID, J.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>A.S. No. 275 of 1999\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>18th September, 2009<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM AS.No. 275 of 1999(C) 1. PARAKANDI JANAKI &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. P.P.KUMARAN(DIED) &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE For Respondent :SRI.M.K.SUMOD The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID Dated :18\/09\/2009 O R D E R HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-231754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-12T15:06:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-12T15:06:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1164,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-12T15:06:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-12T15:06:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-12T15:06:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009"},"wordCount":1164,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009","name":"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-12T15:06:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parakandi-janaki-vs-p-p-kumarandied-on-18-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parakandi Janaki vs P.P.Kumaran(Died) on 18 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231754"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231754\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}