{"id":231801,"date":"2009-04-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009"},"modified":"2015-03-18T21:27:40","modified_gmt":"2015-03-18T15:57:40","slug":"puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE-\n\nDATED THIS TIIE 24m DAY OF APRIL 2669\n\nBEFGRE\n\nTHE HOJWBLE MRJUSTICE S. .43,pUL AZJXEER  \"C %\n\nPf\/R_.(TPETITI0NJ\\F\u20acl 16618xg_m)ar; %(.S'-?RL.#%%   % * \n\nBetween:\n\nPuttalakshxnanmaa,\n\n\\V,fo R. Raxlgmlatiz,\n\nAged abeut 59 years,\n\nRfa Rangauatha Pura, -. ='\n\nNagavaiii Post,   . j  _  v_ \u00abV \n'I'umkm'Tq. & Dist,         Petitioner.\n\n(By Sri M.C ';.  i\" \"  V\n\nAnd:\n\n  seam      \n\n ' A Eept.  Rina} Deve1c~p111e:1t\nV  33334 P'\u00ab1fi\u20ac?\u00a53\u00a7T3\ufb01\"3j=\n . S.1':}}z3g;,., Df;z3--\u00b0\u00a7I11b\u20acdk3I Veed11\u00a3,\n' }3fiLi1g3i0I'\u00a3:. 5  001.\n\n _ '_  V . Th\u00e9 ~A\u00a7c_0t\u00a3ntant Genaerai,\n\n~--  .. {\"}\ufb01'1c\u00e9 'cf 111$ Aucout\ufb01ani Genera} (A & E),\n V K\u00e9tmatakza, Near MS. B\u00a5dg.,\n _ 'Bangalore W 560 001.\n\n\n\n3 The Chief Executive Officer,\nTaluk F3115-iiayaili,\nMini Vidhana Seudha,\n\nTmzzkzzr ~ 572 131. .... Rs-\":sp011de:1\u00a3$. .. V  ~  T ~ \n\n{By Sri T.P. Srinivas, AG:-X fer R1 & R2\nSmt. Veena Jadhav, Adv. for R3')\n\n......\u00bb\n\nThis Writ Petition is \ufb02ied under Ar\u00a3icl<V\u00e9's__2:2Z\u20ac\u00a7 8: 22'?_VA<)"'vL'ie 2  A' '\nConstitution, praying to quash the impt\u00e9gied letterdaiad  \n\nissued by K2, etc.\n\nThis Writ Petition comingknj: for.?f\u00e9\u00a3i;\u00a7\u00a7j\ufb01#f3r\nGroup this day, 1111:: Court made the; f0il0l_wi13g:v ' *\n\n %%%%    A'\nThe p;=;tjti\u00e9tf\u00a7er V  appointed by the 3"'\nI'\u00a3:$p(}fi\u00a3\u00a7\u00e91I{ 'as   and posted at Nagavaiii\n :l_"_fz;z:rr%1:urv'i'$3\u00a7\u00a7u\u00a3;:;-----\u00a32' Dsitrict, as per the appeintment\n\ner:.iV\u00a2':z\u00a2tc\u00a3.:r-.1V'.'s.%Idwt\u00a7.'z"\u00a7.. 197'}: ::1t is commaed that certain ether similarly\n\n \u00bb.___?}v3C\u20acd  writ petitions befere this Court in\n\n.. _T'T'_fW,4F';?*_\u00a7os.1531?:"to 1581351998 seeking reguiarisaiiotz crf their\n\n  Cfliift dispesed of the said writ petitiens on\n\nV'  by diregiing the: EEC}, Tipmr Taluig Tumlazr District to\n\n\n\nTs\n\n\n\nconsider their case for reguiarisatiorz and absorption in the   _.__ 4 \n\nin which they are working ii'! accordance with law.  ._\n\nZiila Panrrhafyatli, Tumkur, regularised the S\u20acIf:'L'iC\u20ac:$ '{)'I'?.!l".Ii'\u00a7  X \n\nas per the order dated 14.1.2000 (Axgnergtsre ;Cf\u00a7."--The   3\n\nretired from sezvicae en 30.6.2007   z51ge Vf;of\nsuperannuation. It is contendeg\ufb01ifgat  _pa3rr1%{--::2"t of\npe:1siona.ry bene\ufb01ts was rggesrted   his order\ndated 11.32093   'zmiixea this writ\npetition questioning'. 'V-\u00e9rder and for a\nmandamus    To _' Q1'-#".*.r;s2:1ti the pensiaanazy\nbene\ufb01ts I0 thevv"ps\u00a7t\ufb01it\u00a7o'rzer  'Extended to ceriafn other\n\ns\u00a5n1iiar!y s\u00a3tu;:ted persEm.<;.A ' " \n\n  ef the writ petition, the pensienary\n\n v._:\ufb01i;%2'::=\ufb01ts of time p\u00a7ti'iir\u00a7iie\u00a7' have been settled by taking into acceuat\n\n"s\u00a3r:2f*;%'is':eVTren\u00a7d :%r<2}<1 by hm' \ufb01orn the date of her regularisation ti}!\n\n.,,, , ,  " \u00ab .31? 54:3 :2? hefretirement.\n\n\n\n3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would eenteigd  \n\n2"" reependent ought to liave ineiuded the pei5iod\u00bbii:ife1_::.1"the'1  i _ T \n\nher appointment as per Annexure 'A' till date <if.:fetiremet:t'"--t'er:tlie  it\n\npurpose of settiement of the pension. It ieViVitri_;it1edVV \nhas \ufb01led a representation as   \nbefore the 3"' f8Sp0l1dent -- the ---eeeordaiaee\nwith Rule 224-B of    'Ruies requesting\nhim to count her    i1ua1ifying service\n\nfor pension.\n\n4. 0;; me other .4 iearined HCGP appearing for the\nreepeiidetit\u00e9 that the pension ef the petitioner has been\n\nsettiett'   the qaalifying service from the date Of\n\nwregularisatien of he} service till the date ef her retirement.\n\n_petit'iet1er is not entitled for any ether pensienazy\n\niii.'=_hei1efrt$t.VV  \n\n\n\n5. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was appointed by the\n\n3"' respenrielit as per the Qfdef dated 6.8.1977 (Ainieuxre 255;') as\n\nAssistant Teacher on temporary basis. The competent authority \n\nregularised her sertrices as per Atmexure 'C' order dated 14.1.2Q{}0xj   "\n\nand she retired from service on 30.6.2907 cm attaining the \n\nSuperannuation. It is aiso not in dispute ti";-;e'.t  ;;ei1_si\u00e9n3.rf,r" \n\nbenefits were settied taking into consideration her eeryiees  the '\n\ndate of reguiarisatien as per the order at  'Cttiii ithetriatei\nof her retirement on attaining esge oi' s}_1.i3ere;uiu'atien. The\nquestion for censideratien isewhetilerr ief'\u00a7erv'ieev--rendered\n\nby her \ufb01mm  deter   per the order at\nArxnetrure 'A' {mine date  regtiliiriezttien as per Ax1ne2:wre 'C'\nerder sheuld Ahave bie'en__vta1=:.e.\ufb02 ir:t(3V"'2ieeount for the purpose ef\n\nset\ufb02eiiient  \nH5.\u00bb Evie 'asserted by Ne.FI).06.SR.A.2004 dated\n\n ' 5.20Q\u00a7"    frem 12.5.2906, which is as under:\n\nix:\n\n\\\n\n\n\n"Z24-\u00abB Request for taunting of qualifying serVice.~~~.. \u00bb  \n\nfor pension:  _\nt\ufb01onvithstanding anything c<mtainedwin._mles' .f2"1 f;".~: \nA, 224-A, 235, 2354:, 235-13, 247, 24%, iz\u00e9:-s\u00a7f25\u00bb<i3-.%  4'\nA, 2-sits-(AA, 252(1)), 416, 41? em t'e1np1o;z\u00e9etV.' ft '\ndegires to have the bene\ufb01t of coizxttiiag th\u00a7ir'~pt_'\u00e9%*io_i:.s  \nservice \u00absf additional years as qu-a!:it3ririg..$en!i'c\u00e9 'far \npension, as the case :1ta'3\u00bb*_R\u00a3'}e_  shall\nmake 3 request in   \nAutherity w\u00a3thi:3\u00ab.t\u00a7\u00a7ree  '-dat\u00e9__\u00a7\u00a7fjaini:tg\n\nthe Goverfttitt\u00e9ttt   years from\n\nthe date__;}t'   Lltggai\u00e9e may be. No\nclainit mad\u00e9ta\ufb01a\u00bb;  \u00ababct%\u00e9"spm_:i\ufb01ed time limit, shall\n\nbe entertained b\u00a7;f\ufb011~t\u00a7V'3t\u00a7pQ1\u00a7tii%ng autharity.\n\n2. mg agtgjoitttirtg' atithtirity in tam Shall, with\n 1'3<;ords'iz1"*supg)zt sf the ciaim, ebtain the\n' , 3'\u00a7}p!\"t3'\u00a7? 3Lin  the Gevemment before passing the\n\n ._ ozgk;-i\"'.\n\n It iS gi\u00e9ar \ufb01nm the aforesaid Rate that every empioyee\n\n 'd\u00e9sifes _tc'3:\"have the bene\ufb01t of eottnttng hisfher previettg service of\n\n \"addit\u00a7\u00e9nal years as quaiifying service fer pengion, as the case may\n\n3\nH\n'H\n\nitg\ufb01\n\n\n\nhe, shall make 3 request in Writitsg to the Appointing  \"\n\nwiti\ufb01n three years \ufb01um the date ofjoining the Goverttm\u00e9itt se\ufb01t\u00e9c\u00e9\n\nor within three years from the date ef ei'f'er\u00a7tH<tf:the..vs\u00a3t.id   _ \n\nAppeinting Authority in turn shalt, with"--.re {:;z1\u00a3site  1'\u00e9?m\u00a7:*ds; it: \n\nsupport ofthe clam, obtain the approt\u00a5a1..V\u00a7f the Gdveftitza\u00e9ntttijef\u00e9\ufb01tre\npassing an appropriate ordmv   '_\n8. As stated above, the afc;1fg\u00e9ai_d  tats effect on\n\n12.5.2066<\/pre>\n
. The petitit\u00e9g\u00e9f’ hag, \ufb01led’:ari”a\u00a7pl’ic3tit\u00a71\u00e9 in accordance<\/p>\n
with the :tfores;ii\u00e9itvt’.;*?.:;\u00a7\u00e9:’.Vbe\ufb01tfethe .’ Appointing Authority on<\/p>\n
13.4.2869. Iti ether Wcrtis..A1&Ftthiti:”ajyexiod sf three years \ufb01rom the<\/p>\n
date of cgmrzing intta fqr\ufb01zse ‘ta-ftltie aforesaid Rule, pe\ufb01tioner has made<\/p>\n
 x_a:i “app\u00a7’icati’b\u00a71.  “T116 3″‘ respondatat has to consider the said<\/p>\n
apt\ufb01fcatio\ufb01  with the aforesaid Rule and pass<\/p>\n
V V’ a,ppr0pt’i\u00abate c;rderS”‘thereon \u00a311 accordance with law.<\/p>\n
  ‘9V.”‘in” the reault, I direct the 3″ raspoladeztt to coxzsider the<\/p>\n
:’_4a}p;1-li’:V*atian ef the petitismer at Arttzezszure  dated \u00a33.4.2{}09 amt<\/p>\n
Q.\n<\/p>\n
KS3<\/p>\n
pass appfopriate orders thereon in accordance with iaw..~wi\u00a3fii:i__’  ” <\/p>\n
period of three mzmths from the date of receipt e:>_f’M g\u00a7\u00a7p\u00a7{ cf 1<\/p>\n
Grder. The petitioner is permitted to  2 _ <\/p>\n
application Annexure  aieng xvi\u00a3\u00a71_<_a co1\u00a7"f,'. <5'f this _9iV*:i\u00a3t.1* t\u00a7i <\/p>\n
competent autharity for his considerat\u00a7\u00e9n.._V'A'<\/p>\n
Writ petition is disposed }:\u00a7f"a.ccc.\u00a5fdi;1gi\u00a7\u00e9'~;.__<\/p>\n
BMMx2942a<39\\,i_a_:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE- DATED THIS TIIE 24m DAY OF APRIL 2669 BEFGRE THE HOJWBLE MRJUSTICE S. .43,pUL AZJXEER “C % Pf\/R_.(TPETITI0NJ\\F\u20acl 16618xg_m)ar; %(.S’-?RL.#%% % * Between: Puttalakshxnanmaa, \\V,fo R. Raxlgmlatiz, Aged abeut 59 years, Rfa Rangauatha […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-231801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPuttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-18T15:57:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-18T15:57:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":199,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-18T15:57:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-18T15:57:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-18T15:57:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009"},"wordCount":199,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009","name":"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-18T15:57:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/puttalakshmamma-vs-the-secretary-on-24-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Puttalakshmamma vs The Secretary on 24 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231801"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231801\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}