{"id":23186,"date":"2008-09-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008"},"modified":"2015-03-14T07:22:27","modified_gmt":"2015-03-14T01:52:27","slug":"the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.Gopalagowda & Nagaraj<\/div>\n
is raw men cotmr or xanxasrmm AT nmamiqgg  %  %\nmran THIS TIE 12:1: my or sz\u00ab:PrEamr\u00ab;.R \"2m%sF%  %\n\nPRESENT   \n\nTI-IE HoarBL:r:. sm.JUs'rIcE   #\u00ab%% f\n\nTHE HGIVBLE  NAGARA5\n\nM,\u00a5'.g N13,;  2     .\nc 4! w MFA.Cr\u00a7b3:'H9.4291   ~ \n\nmm.1=*.A No.2-437   j \nB : 1' % % A -_ & %\n\nTHE: SP'L.LAMii's Acig{5s's.i':*:0E~:A_  % %\n\nQFFICER   V  \nETSVESWARMAH CEI%E'iTR\u00a3:>3f' ,1 \n\n3&9 FLOOR, POE:-I'ULM%iBLr:\">C:{, \"\n\nBANC}ALt3*R;\u00a3E_.:36O mi,  %  APPELLANT\n\n \n\n \n\n Mmiyaiv\u00e9ai \n\n % :53p::: D{3*i.)i3A 'I'I~\u00a3AMMAiAE~\u00a3\n\n% \" \" ' 9  * 2\/A .~J_YO'I'HIPURA VILLAGE\n\n%   \u00a32i;3mz\u00a7;iALL1 HGBLI\n\n ._ \u00a3%;AI\\{GA;L{}RE2 sozfm TQ.\n\n',,m_$\"\"*~r\"\"-\u00ab---\"\"'~\n\n\n\nIN M.F.A CROB. No.\u00e929(g~E:\nBETWEEIV:\n\nMUNEYAPPA\ns\/r\u00ab'1:';CK,\nBANGALORE 4k560 \n\n D.E.\u00a7FENSE R\"EsEAR\u00a7f:H &\n\n'    'EIEZVELGPMENTV EERGANISAEEON\n % _i'3A2vIE3\u00a7lD\u00a73E_RC'%A\ufb01\nX  A ; ,.\u00ab::':Ms G.F\u00a3~\"'ICE\n'--,A(\u00a7ARAM;jPQST\nB.aN<3AL\u00a7\u00a3v. FQR,\n SR!' H.C.SE}NI)ARESH-CGSC FQR E132}\n\n-- THiS CROI3. $8 E*'\u00a7I..-ED U\/(3.41 135.22 CEF CFC AGAERST\n\n  J'f_3I3<3!sr[EI~3'I' & AWARD D129\/3\/20:33 PAS$E'D EN LAI3\n $6.158\/1\u00a7\u00a79 ON THE FTLE GP' THE H Anm. CITY {'3E'v"ii.-\n  k. mega BANGALORE PAIETLY ALLQWING THE REF1_:*REz~;cE\n\nPETYFEON .\n\n \n\n\n\n'I\n\nTEES APPEAL A\/W.CROB HAVING BEEN HEARD AND\nRESERVED FOR JUITBGMENT AND COMING ON FQR\nPRONCIUNCEMENT THIS BAY, ARALI HAG4\u00a7RAJ, :1\nDELNERED THE FOLLOWING:\n\nJIIBENT\n\nThe apmiiant herein namely the Spi.I..~a.nd \n\nOfficer, Bangalore, (hereinafter referred ff)   \n\nfor short) has \ufb01led the present  \n\nreferred to as. the "Appeal"}  conf\u00e9ctz\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9s  _\n\ncoxnmon judgmtint dated   ii\nAddi\ufb02ivii Judge,   Him as '$116\n"Reference Court" fcyr \u00a7hor}z} T'i:1  and other 69\n\ncoluaccted cases   farvvzzisi if mi;-ates' "te;:r*tE1e award in LAC\n\nNo.1f38\/   W119 has been ciaimant\nin L.A.C.N0.15\u00a7..[ is 0136 of the said 69 cases\n f\ufb01i\ufb01 '$.*ai\u00e9.__...\u00a5.;\u00ab.vA.C.Ne.E3\/98 has flied his; {3rs:;s~\n\nObj\ufb01cti\u00e9la.  200?' Challenging the very same comma:\n\n '1__;t31e award in his said case seeking\n\n. $I}i'zanc\u00a3m&:\u00a7{t'[.0f compensation awardad in respect Crf the iami\n\n  th\ufb01 Sai\ufb01 Case.\n\n\u20ac,..S\"\">\"\"\"\"'~------A--------....\n\n\n\n2. Sirl\ufb01\ufb01 there has \"been (ieiay {:\u00abf 1318 days  \n\npresent: cross objection, the e:rc}s\u00a7.gob}'ec\u00a3't)r'v* ~-- fhasi '~f11e\u00a7i \" = 2\n\nI.A.N.I\/O7 under Seetion 5 of tne%%4Li:;z::m:io\ufb01\n\nSeeking calld\ufb01natiau of the said dgf\ufb01ay. 23:3    L'\n\ncf delay' caused in filing the  the E.iO11?h16_\u00a7'i~3upreme\nC0'u1't has Gbserved at  .01' in the cam of\nState of Bihar   Sing}:\nreported in  as.\"u;'i}_.d\u00a2r:W\n\"Di$\ufb02:i'issin;;v\u00bbr;11 ie\ufb01hrlical g,mL11'1ds (if\nlimitation \u00e9woulci'. __i1:..g~.x1y way, advance the\ninterests Qi' fjusti\u00e9fi \u00bb- big: acinaitteclly, resuit in\n af \"_iV1:,Vsiir;\u00a3'....';_...'\"i'11c technicalitics Qf law\ncan\ufb01ot Lpreventxgs {mm doing substantial justice\n\n\" '.~ .   'vmidoing tt1c\"'i}1?cgaIitics perpetuated on {ha\n'=_ 2 . basis of v%',h\u20ac:_i'\u00a3:1pugncd jud gmcms. \"\n\n  E'oHo{iri{\u00a7g..t11\u00e9s;\u00a7'.':fgb\u00a7:\u00e9i;vati0:1$ WC hoi\u00e9 that the appiication flied\n\n th-5 cr\ufb01sg\u00e9bbj\u00e9\ufb01tars saeidng Can\u00e9\ufb01nation 0f 6:253;-1y dEi'S=\u20acI'V6 \u00a30\n\n   acmpting the reasans stated therein. However,\n\n cfas\u00e9-txbiector eiaimam: shail not be entitiai to the\n\n4'  i\u00a7#:g;:1*e3\u00a3 \u00abI311 the Ci\ufb01flip\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01a\ufb01iiti ameunt far the said {Jemima 01'\n\n Qieiay'.\n\nr\" \n\n\n\n \n\n3. The app\ufb01\ufb02ant herein has also \ufb01led 54 other appeals\n\nagmieved by the same common judme\ufb02t and the \n\nthe mspective iarzd f:i{3(1UiS\ufb01ZiOIT\u00a3 cases. The 1\"'e3\u00a7\u00a7:r2'1d\u00a7iI';is .312 \n\n501116 of the said appsais, being f:ii\u00e9\"-\ufb01ia.iu1a:1is:v'._iI'\u00a7 '--i,\u00a7'1E3Lf\n\nrespective iand a\u00a3':C{11.'iSiiZiOI1 Casess, u'\u00a7?1_3j.I:;<=:3 al\u00e9(',f..  \ufb01ifzsi " \n\nrespective (:r0ss-objections seei\ufb01jig\u00bb \u20acI1i1\u00e9!.IiC\u20aci1}i::\u20acI4i\u00a7}'VVi'\u00a7i' the V'\n\ncompensation awarded i1"1\u00a3l?1V<_=:i1' r\u00a7:spebtV'0f't}1e lands\nacquired under the said ca\ufb01iesg 5f6". ,gpp\u00a2als 3.11:1 the\n\nC\u20ac}I'I't':':S'pC!I1(ii}"1g L*rQs$+Qt\u00a7ieci:i0I1S-- .~hav\u00e9' 'b&4E'.\u00a7TfIiste<i togtttil\ufb01r as\n\n"M.F.A.Nos.\u00bb24e4}z34   camncetcd appeals" along with\nthe C01Te$\u00a7i\u00e9\u20ac:n(:%Ming  Of the said 56 appeeais\n\n'arid Uiltftil'  .\u00a73:0ss~0bjections iinciutiing the\n\nprcsezlt  an-Ci  cr\ufb01iss-ebjaction), we haw disp\ufb01st\u00e9ci (if\n\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9e i\u00a7'i\u00a3?\ufb01;S**."gi12&i.._\u00a3\u00a71\u00e9 t:\u00a7ifr@spon\u00a7.i21g Cros.rs--\u00a7bj::<:i,iam ziazu\ufb01iy\nM.ia-gx;k:s:\u00a2s..2;;\u00a74;:%2\u00a7e4, 2433\/20% and 2449\/2304 ihe\n\n cazi\ufb01s\ufb01\u00e9il\u00e9irigA-{3:*t\u00a7'\u00a7;$~\u20ac}bje(:ti0n N'0S.379\/200?, 393;' 26310'? and\nM5383\/206'?   common judgment dat\u00e9d 32.9.2908\n% * --1%f\u00a7;1'A:~:s:1*itisAs:'\ufb01g said apmai\ufb01 5:' \u00a3116 Spi.LAO and aI}im?ir1g the\n' _'_'V{::2_z'19-%{\u00e9'\u00a7.=;g;\u00bb<\u00a7\u00a7fi\u00a7ii11g CFGSS-i3bj\u20acC{i9\u00a71S am iii1e:*eb3,\u00ab" \u20ac:'1i'12%11::i:'1g 351$\n\nWhw\u00a3\u00ab \n\n\n\nmarket; value from  15,000\/~ to  \n\nrespect 0f the iands acquired in    A 'V\n\nunder \ufb01rs': two preiiminary noti\ufb01catit\ufb01insi'-\u00a7i;\u00a7_iecf'i'%:Q3. \n\n13.5.1993<\/pre>\n
 and from Rs.3,45,ooo,*\u00a7jm I<ES.V'8V,.si';\u00bb(}–,.9:}(_}_jf)f}"~~~:{'jj\u20ac:r":acre"'V<\/p>\n
in respect of the landg acq1;\u00a7red,Ai\ufb02  f\u00e9S13\u20acC'tive cases
\nunder the third prelimirzarf  2.6.1995 with
\na\ufb01 consequential   in resp\ufb01ct of aii<\/p>\n
the iands.\n<\/p>\n
4. ‘\u00a3’h,\u00a7:  izhe c1’oss\u00bb0bjwi’.i-3:1 and
\nthe said three   ‘(grass-objections (E{}I’I’\u20acSpO\u00a71(Ziil}g
\nther\ufb01to ‘,i$\u00a71iicE1  diswsed of by us by the 3.:-ai\u00e9<\/p>\n
__ dated 12.09.2008 35 stated supra, have<\/p>\n
  a1’is\u00e9zLA\ufb01’emv tE1k;:–..Saii\ufb01.e C(}I}1\ufb021()I1 ju\u00e9gtrl\ufb01ilt and the I’\u20ac$[3\u20ac(3ILiV{‘i<\/p>\n
awards  passed by the samra R\ufb01ffif\ufb01lic\u00e9 Court<\/p>\n
i\ufb01;}\u00a7EA0g5\/98 and ath\u00e9r 69 ca\ufb01n\u00e9cted cases of wi\ufb01ch the<\/p>\n
 ” – \u00e9 ‘ ‘ : ._pjr\u00e9–\u00a7&if\u00a7.t\u00bb \u00a7}A.AA.C. N6. 158\/ 99 is one.<\/p>\n
”   Therefare We have E26 foiiew \u00a33133′ said Cammari<\/p>\n
 judmxant and dismiss the present apmal at’ the Sp1.L-\ufb01;C? and<\/p>\n
a\ufb02aw the prawn: cI*\u00a33ss=-r3bjt:(:’i*.i(3I1 and thei\ufb01b\ufb01i award in favaur<\/p>\n
,,ws”‘2’**–~\u00bb-\u00bb–\u00ab\u00ab<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
cf the cross-objector herein (claimant in L.A.C.No.158\/99)
\nthe same ameunt: of compcnsatien as awarded in <\/p>\n
common judgment in the said appeals.<\/p>\n
6. Since the land in the present L.A.C. _-N6.”  ‘ u<\/p>\n
been acqumed’ under the Proliminnrvi-_\u00ab  .<\/p>\n
02.6.1995 the cmss–objcctor    <\/p>\n
case) shall be entitled to .Ava1i1\u00e9*at  rate of
\nRs.8,40,000\/ – with all  thereon.<\/p>\n
7. Hence  V’ judgment
\ndated 12.9.2008 appeals and me
\n  the foHowmg’<\/p>\n
(1) kI.A.z\u00a7o..:[o?.\ufb011\u00a2<:m;der Section 5 or the Limitation<\/p>\n
    Qmss-Objection is allowed and the
\n  d\u00a2i.*a3=. \u00a7\u00a7 3.318 days caused in \ufb01ling the same is<\/p>\n
_   .A'.T'\u00a7:9'I1doncd subject to condition that the<\/p>\n
A   shall not be entitled to ttm i'[1f1CIV6St an the
\n enhanced campensation for the mid pemd of
\nA' '*-.__de lay.\n<\/p>\n
(:1) The present M.F.A.No.2437\/2004 \ufb01led p3% % j:1;e<\/p>\n
Sp1.LAO, Bangalore, 1s hereby d1sm1sS<:<1.'V.
\npresent Cross-Objcct1on No.-429\/20(3'?j'Isv
\nwith costs. The muss-objector, _'.h\u00e9rf1;i.Ij.\u00bb  W!r1_'cy  K "
\nclaimant in L.A.C.No. 153 <\/span>
\nthe enhanced market va1u\u00e9’~ at 1
\nRs.8,40,000 \/ – with  ‘cons”eq1;\u00a2ia?i;11VVAV” ‘V ‘<\/p>\n
bene\ufb01ts ttlcreon. ales-s the \u00e9m\u00e9tmt of’campi=:nsation
\nwhich he has    terms of the
\nimpugmd_  j*ju\u00a31g1\u00a7;_1eiit ‘ am. the respective
\nawa:’d:_’t1}si$;rr:\u20ac%1V  by the Refer:-,-nee
\nm%%<L;.a.<:;No.158\/99 shall be
\n   judgrmnt. The Cross-~
\nonjecter  % __dc~iposit the de\ufb01cit Court Fee
\n 8 fm\u00e9i\ufb01s   date of drawing up of the<\/p>\n
=\u00bbWH  MMMMM Sd\/_
\nFJEKEE<\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nJUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008 Author: V.Gopalagowda & Nagaraj is raw men cotmr or xanxasrmm AT nmamiqgg % % mran THIS TIE 12:1: my or sz\u00ab:PrEamr\u00ab;.R “2m%sF% % PRESENT TI-IE HoarBL:r:. sm.JUs’rIcE #\u00ab%% f THE HGIVBLE NAGARA5 M,\u00a5’.g N13,; 2 . c 4! w MFA.Cr\u00a7b3:’H9.4291 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-14T01:52:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-14T01:52:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":463,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008\",\"name\":\"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-14T01:52:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-14T01:52:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-14T01:52:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008"},"wordCount":463,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008","name":"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-14T01:52:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-spl-lao-vs-muniyappa-so-dodda-thammaiah-on-12-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Spl Lao vs Muniyappa S\/O Dodda Thammaiah on 12 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23186\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}