{"id":23258,"date":"2008-08-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008"},"modified":"2017-09-04T18:27:11","modified_gmt":"2017-09-04T12:57:11","slug":"sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi … vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi … vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n
 Sri \u20ac:.:Re(_;\"-E);\u00a7'r'a:tx9; \u00a5<I:r,i_$h_if.:a)\n\nIE T\ufb01\ufb02 I-IIGH CQURT OF KARHATAEQA AT SAHGALQRE\nDATED THIS THE 22*" DAY 0? AEEGUST, 2098\nBEFORE-\n\nTHE HON'BLE\u00ab MR.-JUSTECE SUBHSESH BABE\n\nCRIMINAL Rmlsxczx PETITIGN NQ.10Ei5} :200?... ' , --:   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri i\ufb01evaraju,\n\nProprietor,\n\nM! S.Sz'i Lakshmi Casiings,\n\nI"~I<:-.f3C:\/'3, Eshwara Cc-mpiex,\n\n151 Grass, 5'31 Block, 3"' P11a.s\u00a2:*.,\n\nBSK 3"' Stage, near \n\nTheatre, Ba;t1ga1orc~85.  *    \n  PETITEONER\n\n{By  K. N arish,  &v--..\u20ac's:%3t\u00e9L}. \n\n_\u00e9.5\u00a7..Q1\n\nM} S.G.!42.D\u20acve1\u00ab;1pers, *\nNo.14?-5--143, 15' FEQGT,\nt'3(R=P1a:za, i3,_'\u00a7ff_3uR'ea:i, . _ \nBasavanagi1}_idi,    V\nB:.a\ufb01ga;0mj'36Q'.L\u00a7G\u00e9,  ..... \n(reprer,st::,:r,1;e::1 by its' A' ' \nfvianaagiiig P:41'in_t\u00a3I',.  .V V "\n\n. i\u20acESf3QNDE3?\u20ac'1'\n\nV (By S:ti.N.i\\LRajurs., Eiiiziz)\n\n _ T1iis {$31.39 is L\ufb01lcd u\/$31-:;;*?g:} R\/W 401 of r;::,p.\u00ab:::' praying\n\n  to_ 'set Vasidsz the jutigeszment an\ufb01 order passed an 6.37.2006,\n\n\u00e9:~..:";fmti<:x\u00a7: Ad:i1;AA\u00bbV  \n\nMagistzate. Bangalore. con\ufb01rmed in Cr1.\u00a3;;bi\u00bb:$;--1;.?s1? \n\n16.73309? on the file ef the Fast   '\n2. Rssgaonxzient compl\u00e9\ufb01lant  a:1 o:i1er fer\n\nsupply of \u00a311311 Casting 1:0 the   in termg of\n\nEXP8 d_ate\u20ac3.\ufb02?.'   o'\u00a7'" saiC1 Work Order, the\nen\ufb01re: suyp}yVV"xi2%\u00a7.s--   days from the date of the\nartist ant} ?"f.,\u00a7?s.'%rer day payabic for the delayed\nSniiij\u00e9plgff  the  'is not made in time, the secmtity\n\nch\u00a7\u00a7q1;&"gi\u00a7\u00a7cn'E:4y' Vt}i%:..1\u00a7t:1;itio11er wouid he encashed,\n\n3; \ufb01ndgr Work 91115: the ccmplaizaant was is pay 50%\n\n Aadvaiicafamcunt. It is stated that, '.7S,0O0,!'- was paid as\ng\u00e9gahxst the Said aclvance. pe\u00e9iiioner had issued a\n by Way of 3,15-zzurity which wguld be encashabi-:2 in the\n\n Ae:s._ri\u00a3:';1t of mm supply sf materials in time. Since the geiitioner did\n\nS not make supply wiizhin 1? days, ezompiaitlazat pmsented the\n\nchtsqutz fax" encashment. It was rcturnad 11-}? the Bank with\n\nen\ufb01orsament "ixxsu\ufb02icient fund" on 11.5.2904. Thereafter at the\n\ncx.J_\n\n\n\n..3,.\n\nrequest of the pefitionar accused, the cheque was 3333111\npsmsented on 9.6.2904 and the: same wag again m1:u:rned.;"f\u00bb:1r\n\n"izlsui\ufb01cient fund". Thereafter, the complaint vms \ufb01led. '   " \n\n42 One (2.R.G0pa?.akrishna was examined as '-l\u00e9w T'\nproduced E:-:s.P1 ta P13. The prstiticner g:5fAA}1ii2:as-_:.*;3f  \n\nDW} and 33.39 pmduced Exs.D1 t-:2: 1319. '!;};11f:  Ca:\u00bb,\u00a5I;v;-z_.".t'z~3.4,11:<\u00a7. \n\nLowar Appe\ufb01at\ufb02 Court concun'--3n\ufb02y'--v.Vl i\u20ac3d that, "111cV'vpf\ufb01:1$\u00e9:\u00e9 is\nproved.\n5, Learneezi calms-:3} fer' \ufb02it: \u00a7::i\u00a7iii0z;\u00e9rV"\u00bb31iL1mittsd that,\n\ncampiajnt itself is net  as?'-.3118 "cs;-heque is given\n\niiowards s\u20acc1i;\u00b0it}r_ 9.;I:;{fi'--'V3\u00a7?;;\u00a7:=i';'vQ\ufb01gi\u00e9ilfur\u00e9eabl\ufb01. In thi$ zegald, be\nrelied on the    and submittz-:1 that,\nin the 'i3I0;*i<'. 'V Q.1'<:\u00a5\u20ac"i4_,   1'?'.:{1ays supply was is be made.\nH'\u00a7;s\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7%e\u00a7Ver;  {\u00a7i'~r1:Ia}?;  couid be Emried. In this regard,\n\nhe  D4 and D5 an\ufb01 submitted that, there\n\n _j3.&%:s.9. a ch\u00a3?\u00a71g6V_  suggested by the camplamant and an\n es;-f this?' Ebert: was a deiay in making supply, as $"E.lCh,\n 44j".\ufb02;}\u20ac.  of enforcing the cheque does not arias. patticxxmly\n. ----a'{;\u00ab2f;\u00a7."s5'V_'ii}f secuzity, it cannot become a debt and it is uncertain\n\n' L j  \n\n6. Lsazne\u00e9 counsel for the respondent submitted that,<\/pre>\n
Ex.P8 is not Eu dis;:>u’z.e. in terms ef Ex.F’8, Rs.?’5,GOOj ~ was paid<\/p>\n
as an advance to the accused and in turn accused had given 23.<\/p>\n
..4,..\n<\/p>\n
cheque as a sacuxitjg. Furtlzsr submitted that, within 17 days the
\nsupply was made. No supply was ma\ufb01a in time, I1-:31′ the<\/p>\n
complainant suggz\u00e9sied any change<\/p>\n
referrtad \u00a39 31: Exs.D’.’25. D3, D4 a\ufb02d DE”)<\/p>\n
suggeste\u00e9 by the complainant near there is any   3<\/p>\n
in design. The de’5~ _ig:;\n<\/p>\n
are net thy: d\u00bb:*$ig*n..’eit’1:I:f  <\/p>\n
before the Court to Show that the c0m};\u00a7i\u00e9iii\u00a7.\u00a7:at_ had-i’s1 1_\u00a7gg\u00a7s\ufb01\u00e9dVV <\/p>\n
change in design. Peii\ufb01ouer has not p1*<3'<.?i:=r__i thebV_:Aa'i11e'; ;\u00a5{ci"  V<\/p>\n
referrsz\u00e9 to the lsgal netice dated '1vL3'I'?',2()O4;~- .D\u00a3:$\u00a7ite".b9fW'1he
\nsenrice of legai notice, no I'\u20ac}}j\u00a74' is gixtsii. '\u00a331-51*; was $a"c:h;\u20ac\u00e92.t::gz5; in
\ndesign or accused was not Iiai\u00e9i\ufb01 to'  t1_1;\u00a7'—s\u00a7;};r;{\u00a7"u;1t, he cmzld<\/p>\n
not have kept quit \u20acV\u00a3I}:\u00e9\ufb01ET "z.2::\u00a5tie:e.\n<\/p>\n
‘7 .  between the pzaxtias,
\nthem was a ‘~:\u20ac”3:iT–~\u00a7r0n Casting by the accused
\ntea the’ Cr;-mp;_\u00a3su.i:za\u00a51t’-.::f_itLb.i”;1 .  it is also mat in dispute that.
\nR_s’;?\u00a7\u00a7OO’\u00bb3g    of acivan-::s t0 the. accused. T213<\/p>\n
9.-;:<\u00a7;1s\u20ac\u00e9 1\u00a7.aL1 isg\u00e9u\u00e9xi E3; —.r_;heq12e by way of secrlszrity. No doubt, the<\/p>\n
:"V"L._\u00a7;\u00a7:c11:i1..j\u00a7f   V\u00e9\ufb01fome uniesg accused btiiflelllii\ufb01 liabl-3. In
\n gage,  \ufb02'1e was 1101:. made and accussd had recaived
\n b},?..3x.7a:;;r czf advance. If that is. $0. accuaed became Iiahkt<\/p>\n
  \ufb01x\ufb01 adtzzazxce ameunt. Accused has not pmmizci 1:115<\/p>\n
  ' ~._kACl1\u00e9:;r:\u00a7;g\u00a7\u00e9"ef9\u00a5\u20ac3igI1 3101" has proved \ufb02ilat hf: haazi mack: :'-;u}3p\u00a7y in 17<\/p>\n
 The dcscuments produced at E:-:s.D2 to D5 are neat either<\/p>\n
a\u00e9dmsseci to the compiainant nor $31:-:re is any' matrzrial ':0 Show<\/p>\n
that 1:136 cemplainant had scsughii for chgmge 0f dmignt If there is<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span>
\ndelay can the part of the accused himself ta suppiy the matszarial,<\/p>\n
he became liabl\ufb01 to {gay Rs.?5,f}{)\u20ac)\/ –, which he had received and
\nfor which he had issued the cheque. It is mm the amount
\nbecome uncertain. The: amount bsceme certain in v*i\u00ab:*:\u00a7;*.r ”
\nsupply not made in time. in ‘ixiew of this evidence,  T’
\nany error in the judgements of ‘Elm {3{)1I.1x’t;ib’V\u00a7A.=Aia::’-‘;’n7’ ,\u00ab
\nhave concuzren\ufb02y found that, the: e\ufb01efgce   ”\n<\/p>\n
Section 138 of the Negotiable l:1s%3’1.11nc\u00a71 i:3b Act is–.  S\n<\/p>\n
8. At this stage, leaxneti:Co_un:\u00a7\u00e9’i’f:\u00a7;~jygg\ufb01tion\ufb01f \u00e9izbmits
\nthat, the trial Court: has impeged   I,20,0G{)} ~<\/p>\n
The same may be <\/p>\n
9. Leafned ‘c:o11:i5\u00e9;’f;..}4for_\u00a3i<3.\u00a7:M'"rgsfpondent theugh se1'i0us1}*<\/p>\n
objected. submi\ufb01e\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9hhafg af\u00e93\u00a7asi.'LRs. 1.06.001)!\u00bb be ordered.<\/p>\n
 '  –.1G."vC$\u00e9zzs:Lric'\u00a3'i11g botiiiilfze submissions. the sentgnce of the<\/p>\n
tzial  T.  in so far as the mmpensa\ufb01on is<\/p>\n
' Vv*g:<3Vncerzie:1 The_s\u00e9\ufb01tc\ufb01ce of the trial {Smut is modified,' instead cf<\/p>\n
 Rs. }.2f}%{\u00a7G{)} ~, it is made as R's.1,0-5.000\/–. Out of Which,<\/p>\n
5 I:bv:: ~ is entit\u00e9ed to mceive R$.1,(){},@00\/~ and<\/p>\n
 \/ ~ towards 512$ 1:0 be CI'\u20acdit*3d in the accemlt 01? State, In<\/p>\n
V"-..d\u00bb:f:'e:111t, the accused to undergo sentsnce (pf 'CWO mcazzths simple<\/p>\n
L' sgjgmsonmsnt.\n<\/p>\n
The accused is peimiited, \u00a39 drspesit thc \ufb01,1:3.\u20ac: amount after<\/p>\n
dedzzcting the ameunt already ziepszasited.<\/p>\n
Accorvdingiy, this revisian stands dispssed Qf.<\/p>\n
mp; —<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi … vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi Sri \u20ac:.:Re(_;”-E);\u00a7’r’a:tx9; \u00a5<I:r,i_$h_if.:a) IE T\ufb01\ufb02 I-IIGH CQURT OF KARHATAEQA AT SAHGALQRE DATED THIS THE 22*" DAY 0? AEEGUST, 2098 BEFORE- THE HON'BLE\u00ab MR.-JUSTECE SUBHSESH BABE CRIMINAL Rmlsxczx PETITIGN NQ.10Ei5} :200?… ' , –: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi ... vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi ... vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-04T12:57:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\\\/S Sri Lakshmi … vs M\\\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-04T12:57:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":638,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\\\/S Sri Lakshmi ... vs M\\\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-04T12:57:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\\\/S Sri Lakshmi … vs M\\\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi ... vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi ... vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-04T12:57:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi … vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-04T12:57:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008"},"wordCount":638,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008","name":"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi ... vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-04T12:57:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-devaraju-prop-ms-sri-lakshmi-vs-ms-g-r-developers-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Devaraju Prop: M\/S Sri Lakshmi … vs M\/S G R Developers on 22 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23258","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23258"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23258\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}