{"id":232693,"date":"2009-07-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-04-18T02:07:11","modified_gmt":"2017-04-17T20:37:11","slug":"shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales … on 21 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales … on 21 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: H.N.Nagamohan Das<\/div>\n
'-IQ? :,.sR1 R,K. D\u00a7}SAE',\"ADVOCATE}\n\nIN mm mm: comm' or  \"  %\ncmctm' BENCH AT  '   % L\nDATED THIS 'mm 218'r;:A;:$\u00a7L;1Qf%'G:=?\"Jnx,Y;_\":_ \nTHE Horrnm MR. wsT\ufb01:\u00a7E a.i\u00a2;\" DA8 V'\nw. P.' \n\n-V  'QIWAX \nw. P. No.6J_.5G0f2(1'-Q9 \n\nBETWEEN;   '\n\nSH'R1MANJU'i'JAT'H% - _  .\nS\/G' RAMA\"{YA ~!LAGAR'v.. \" _\nAGE:38 YE'.ARS, OCC:E5{}_SINESS\nR\/O ARK;-AI.ULz, '1*AL'i.I1\u00ab;.a HANGAL\n:\u00a7isTR1cT\"HAvER1. * '\n\n' \" ~  PETITIONER\n\n \"1L '\u00e9*1+:;=i.';:\"\u00a7'R,:)Ixr1s101~zAL RETAIL\n\n 'SALES MANAGER\n\n\"  INDEAN OIL CORPORATION LTD,\n\nV __ \" \"INDIAN OIL BHAVAN\"\nMARKETING DIVISION\nKARNATAKA \u00a7}'ATE OFFICE\nKHANAPUIR' ROAD\nTELAKWADI, BELGAUM.\n\n2. SH RI BASAVARAJ\n\nS] O SHIVANANDAPPA BELLAD\nAGEE48 YEARS, OCCEBUSINESS\nR] O AKKLALUR, TALUK HANG:%L\nDISTRICT HAVERE.\n\n\n\n3. SHRI KOTPUR BASAPPA\nS] O CHANNABASAPPA BELLAD\nAGEI42 YEARS, OCC-:}%3USiNESS\nR\/O AKKI-ALUR, TALUK I-IANGAL\nDiSTRlCT HAVERI.\n\n{BY SR} C.V.ANGADI, ADVOCATE i?oR;z1; L \"\nspa; F'.V.PA'i'IL, ADVOCATE FOR' Rf2:--. '  \u00bb_ , \"\nSR1 SADIQ N.GOODWAL:'a,ADVOC,ATE FORR3) \n\nTms PETITIORIS FILED. QNDER ART}CLES_.f226 AND 22?\nOF THE CONSTiTUTIQ_N2.OFfiNDIA', -1?-RAv.zNG TO DIRECT R-1 TO\nCONSIDER THE LA1~zD\"c:;F9I~.:}:\u00a7ie:3:i Br-I%fi>:--;,2:.\u00a2PET1T1oNEI2 BEING\nPART 0;\u00bb vpc__N0E151,.,_ M'EAsUR3Nc\u00a7\"'30'sq\" METERS x 30 SQ\nMETERS OE' .NA---i..AN:33, S1f:fz1A\u00a7:*E.:;;~..A*a* !i;\u00a7iI{I--ALUR VILLAC}E OF\nHANGAL fr2x_Lui:2\u00e9s.,. }:)E'SFi2\u00a3C'F_4HASiEi5?l\"\"}\u00a5'OR APPOINTMENT OF'\n\nOPE}RATOR '\u00a7:\u00a7\"'VVUN_iD'ER\"-.\u00e9if\u20ac.\u00a7iE-XURE-A mus\/12\/2007 AS PER\nAPPLiCATIC}N-- VOFj_L'PE'\u00a7'\u00a3TiON--ER ANNEXURE.-C BT24\/1\/{)8 AND\nETC.  *   = \n\n;;;'t\ufb01'.%?.Nc$.6\u00bb1.5:{)t5g$'o_g\n\n \" -.T-1<:\u00e9j5'1*\u00e9T:3R'E\u00a71;sj:.~:V'.;1:=;vA\n'; sxo CWSNNABASPPA BELLA}?\n49 YRS, _(}\u00a3;C:AGRI... 83 msrmss\n\ni\u00a7,'C)"AKKIALUR\nTQ':H.\u00a7~NGAL., DiST:HAVER3.  PETITSONER\n\nV' , V  SRE SADIQ N.GO\u20ac3DWALA, ADVOCATE}\n\n: K.)\n\n.-- "  'fI;Vp;SP:rqVD\u00a7:\u00a74*i'S \n\n\n\nINDLAN on, CORPORATION 1:r::>.,\n(mamcmne DIVISION) \nKHANAPUR ROAD   n \nTILAKWADI, BEL(3AUM~59O 096- _\n\nREPTD. BY ms DIv1s3JoNgxL RETAIL'  \"\n\nSALES MANAGER.\n\nBASAVARAJ  \"\nMAJOR, OCC:I3USINE--S$\u00a7  j.\nR\/0 AKKIALUR ' ' :\n\nTQ:}1ATNGAL, 1;_:i'\u00a71\";1wz~;{3'.rgre.i'V;--_'_   \"\n\n(BY, SR1 F;x(';'1=A*3:__L, \u00e9.1\u00a7v\u00a7)\u00a7,\":AT_f_\u00a7VFc>\u00a73;v2 0\/ R2\n SRi\"C..XZ._ANGjADI,'AQVOCATE FOR R1}\n\n RESPONDENTS\n\n_ _ T'H1s\"\u00a7>ET:%r10_N\"t~3 FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 22?\n, THE CONSg'FITUfP\u00a50N OF :NDIA. PRAYING Ti} QUASH THE\n. A \"-----iFAF?UG\u00a7*\u20acED ORDERS DATED 22;1o\/03 PASSED BY THE R4\n\n\" ~ .w:3E\u00abAi~n$rEVxuRE~A AND THE ORDER DATED 19\/11\/O8 PASSED\n\n  'B1'..%::*;z4:g\" Rf'-?~1_'s?'IlZ)E ANNEXURE--f3 AND ETC.\n\n.V \" ..  THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR oanms THIS DAY,\n 'A T THE. scum MADE THE FOLLOWING:\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
in W.P.No.60016\/2009, t\u00a71\u00a7;p\u00a2\ufb01\ufb01Q’1″1\u00e9r*– <\/p>\n
a Writ of mandamus directing  z):s1\u00a7o:.ur;iei1!;_’N <:f."1"t\u00a72\u00a7"LLr:y5i}sicier."'~. "<\/p>\n
the land o\ufb01bred by the F-a\u00e9titgpnef'-aiid Vin:'i;\u00a31\u00a2 ;a1\u00a7g::;:a\u00a7ve.i'}o
\ndirect the respondent No. ufoa;  ap plications for
\nthe appointment of   thewa\ufb01otment mm:\n<\/p>\n
in favour of second   h  ..\n<\/p>\n
 2.’ . ‘I:1f-..2009, the petitioner has
\npray\u00e9\u00e9’-for  nature of cer\ufb01orari to quash the<\/p>\n
\u00bb,c:\u00a7?;iicr. dated 10.2068 disqualiifging the petitioner and to<\/p>\n
‘ V. 3 app\u00e9ipt.  as dealer.\n<\/p>\n
”  It is broughi to my no\ufb01ce that the first<\/p>\n
 ..;_\u00b0Vc:spc;;r1;:.9_1%;:1tT:;~indian Oi} Corporation Limited noti\ufb01ed to the<\/p>\n
pe\ufb01bli\u00e9 in the newspaper on 15.12.1200? in Vijaya Kaznataka<\/p>\n
 x  Dairy invriting applications from the public ts<\/p>\n
appoint dealers for 33.13 of their dicsci and petroicum<\/p>\n
pmdlixztz in di\ufb01hrcnt piaces in the Stain of Kamataka.<\/p>\n
 =;&”<Jw\\"'
\n. ,1 -i<\/p>\n
Petitioner in both the petitions, second A' and<\/p>\n
another person by name Umesh Z <\/p>\n
applications for dealership at  \u00a7:\ufb011_lc\u00a2.9{   <\/p>\n
Level I and Level 11 0omj1:.it\u00a7ec <\u00a7fAi:i'1'st
\nawarded marks to all   '1l:l:1t:\n<\/p>\n
same as per   w’.?’.’N\u00a2’;$15oo\/2009.\n<\/p>\n
Thereafter, the   complaint against<\/p>\n
the pe*n’tiQ:1\u20ac:::V  W_.P.  :stating that on false<\/p>\n
1*epJit;:si9:j:1f.=2li’ion,.ll:’\u00a7tl\u00a7: scculi\u00e9ldy marks. In this regard, first
\nI’\u20actS]:\u00a74Z\u00a5]V:1(\u00a7rCI2v1lC-‘\u00bb’.3v'(v).EI;”fA.i3*’\u00a2=E:\u00a5lI1:\u00a7:’lissticd shew cause notice and passed<\/p>\n
a_n_V orcl\u00e9i’ V_:V0:G….22A({)8V’.’Z.?..O08 disqualifying the petitioner in<\/p>\n
15(}f)]’:2i’}O9. Further, the first respondent<\/p>\n
 V   “a second Enterviesw and selected second<\/p>\n
  as the dealer in respctct of Akki Aim”, Hanagal<\/p>\n
Ta11lI\u00a7, Haveri District. So also the first respondent zefuscd<\/p>\n
”  ll  accept alternative lanai atfcmd by the pe\ufb01tioner in<\/p>\n
W.P.No.6016\/2009. Therefore, both the petitieners are<\/p>\n
before this Court for the prayers speci\ufb01ed above.<\/p>\n
5;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. After healing arguments for  it is<\/p>\n
brought to my notice that the first <\/p>\n
issued a revised guidelines for-iKissan   <\/p>\n
policy cimular No.1()8–\u20ac)2\/07 meta “\u00e98.tO2;;2oo:{. ”  5<\/p>\n
zevised guidelines, it is _that.V’!}__zis
\nall the eartier policies as _czbot’2\u00e9’in.re\u00a7\u00a7czrd to issues,
\nwhich have been   Admittedly, the<\/p>\n
newspaper _no:i\ufb01cat’ic3n  1;5.3t:\u00e9’;\u00bb’2Qo7, evaluation of<\/p>\n
app\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01e\ufb01zs   I  Level II committees, tlm
\nsu1:;=.:e{1i1e:t1t-  disquaiifying one of the petitioner,<\/p>\n
1j1_<)_!:  the V\ufb01iternative site offered by another<\/p>\n
v.':}_jf\u00a7ct:;ti:o13t:r  appein\ufb01ng the second mspondenst as dealer<\/p>\n
V    :\u00e9'a1;1E\u00a7sz\u00a7quc11t to the revised g11idc}.incs. Thcmfmre, in<\/p>\n
   of submit\ufb01ng applications, their rejection and<\/p>\n
;ap\ufb01o\u00a7nt1nent of deaicr are ali governed by the Itviscd<\/p>\n
2  'ttguideiines dated 23.02.2007. Clause 19 of the mused'<\/p>\n
' \ufb01lideiines reads as under:\n<\/p>\n
XV\/i<\/p>\n
“19. Procedure for handling o\u00a7G1ievanoc;s  u  <\/p>\n
The foilowing steps   fof of <\/p>\n
grievances\/complaints. with reg\u00e9iti ta seliectidxz ‘sf V<".='=–4t':.92":1"l\ufb01z'*Vss'–iI)
\ncase of KSK V  h V V V' 2 " V<\/p>\n
an Screening of .o0H1pIai\ufb01tsVi::y (*2; _COIl'lfI'Ii\ufb01.'<'3<': of 2 officers (of
\n'B' grade  "&bov5e) qne"e\u00ab.a_ch frgam Retail and LPG
\nDiscipline from Jwithiix the Sta-3 Officeto be nominated
\nby State? Retails" Head and .State{_LPf\u00a3'~: Head.<\/p>\n
Ir SerL*e.rji'z*1g   s\ufb01i\u00e9mit its report to State\n<\/p>\n
4.R.3taiij Head who \u00a7viI1___fotj:va3t1 it to State Head with his<\/p>\n
 rec\u00a70m”Ih\u00e91_1datiC.n.”–\n<\/p>\n
G ‘ Stat:-.”‘Hea{i will” take ‘f1:zrther decision and in case any
\n\u00ab invesfij\u00a7a~tiO11.. required State head will nominate an
\nL inves5tigaT,ingV\u20ac}fficer of minimum ‘B’ grade anc\u00a7 above for
\nme same.  ‘ ~’<\/p>\n
 Past of fi’:e…grtievance redrcssal will be as per regular R08<\/p>\n
2 ‘ ‘complaints received after 30 days of empanelment wili
\n\u00bb Vv “~!1(3t_ b6__t:nteI’tained.”\n<\/p>\n
‘  AT In View of the fact thai in thc revised guidelines,<\/p>\n
 x j a  is pnievided and a procedure is laid dawn for<\/p>\n
V’ *  f\u00e9dmssal of grievances and complaints. The peti\ufb01oncrs<\/p>\n
without exhausting ghe remedy available under the revised<\/p>\n
guidelines are before this Court in these two writ petitions.<\/p>\n
:1
\n\/A;;._~ .r”k\/” \\”\n<\/p>\n
4\/ xx\n<\/p>\n
1. <\/p>\n
delay, A11 contentions urged in these two writ petitions are<\/p>\n
kit\ufb01 open. .\u00bb\n<\/p>\n
8. It is brought to my notice_..\u00a7f.h?at=V.’<\/p>\n
respondent has not ftu11ishcc1Mcopic$””of:’s\u00a2i:\u00a3c’–_of ‘fh=t ‘~ <\/p>\n
documents sought for by the  1  ii-3. s{;,_ th\\\\[,,,<\/p>\n
fimt respondent shall pmv\ufb02c tix\u00e9pdpics  <\/p>\n
sought for by the <\/p>\n
 ”   $1l(E’._IyV)V\u00e9fiV’:iOIiS an: hereby dismissed.<\/p>\n
 %%%%%  332%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales … on 21 July, 2009 Author: H.N.Nagamohan Das ‘-IQ? :,.sR1 R,K. D\u00a7}SAE’,”ADVOCATE} IN mm mm: comm’ or ” % cmctm’ BENCH AT ‘ % L DATED THIS ‘mm 218’r;:A;:$\u00a7L;1Qf%’G:=?”Jnx,Y;_”:_ THE Horrnm MR. wsT\ufb01:\u00a7E a.i\u00a2;” DA8 V’ w. P.’ -V ‘QIWAX w. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-232693","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales ... on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales ... on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-17T20:37:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Manjunath S\\\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales … on 21 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-17T20:37:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":811,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri Manjunath S\\\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales ... on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-17T20:37:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Manjunath S\\\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales … on 21 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales ... on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales ... on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-17T20:37:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales … on 21 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-17T20:37:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009"},"wordCount":811,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009","name":"Shri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales ... on 21 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-17T20:37:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-manjunath-so-ramayya-ilagar-vs-the-sr-divisional-retail-sales-on-21-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Manjunath S\/O Ramayya Ilagar vs The Sr Divisional Retail Sales … on 21 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232693","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232693"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232693\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232693"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232693"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232693"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}