{"id":232755,"date":"2008-03-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008"},"modified":"2016-09-05T11:21:24","modified_gmt":"2016-09-05T05:51:24","slug":"babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O … vs State Of Karnataka By Market … on 28 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O … vs State Of Karnataka By Market … on 28 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Manjula Chellur<\/div>\n
xn THE HIGH COURT or KARNAEAKA, BANGALGRE\nDATED THIS THE 28TH nay OF MARCH, \u00a7\u00a7b\u00e9fi= \nPRESENT  . ' a V\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE\"MAN$ULA CHE\ufb023UR \"<\/pre>\n
CRL. pmwxmxous No.3869\/01:5\/W 369\u00e9f2oQ2 \u00a7m\ufb01* <\/p>\n
V3477\/o2_ = ‘\/<\/p>\n
BETWEEN<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
MALLIKARJUN*s:nnAiiNeP\u00e9A4
\nSHEELAVANTHARA..’ 3″‘ *'” *<\/p>\n
5\/0 SIDDALINGAEA sHEELAvANrHA3A
\n37 22535 R\/\u00a2 E KG ezafs ‘ *’
\nMARUTEINBGAR =
\nK\ufb01p\ufb01cHI”RbADx
\nBELGA\ufb02M\u00a51\u00a7 ‘-v<\/p>\n
‘wma\ufb01nmr\ufb01fxa R\u00a7cHA\u00a3YA-M\u00a7rn<\/p>\n
8\/0 ‘RACEAYYA. B.MATH<\/p>\n
1: 43 rmAns R;c”H No 826\/5<\/p>\n
PG<\/p>\n
*MAauTH:nAsAn;,”xUnucHx ROAD<\/p>\n
3ELeAuM+1s<\/p>\n
K-R,PRABHU s\/0 Y A RUDRASHETTY
\nReam \ufb01BOUT 56 YEARS
\nRfAT’c.H.No.61, 5TH MAIN<\/p>\n
355 cnoss, SARASWRTHIPURAM
\nMYSORE<\/p>\n
.3 .\/Q<\/p>\n
4 YEAR
\n1\/2<\/span>
\nI NEW<\/p>\n
III}! I\\
\n1’13’. H.\n<\/p>\n
U!<\/p>\n
I
\nAGED ABOUT 5
\nR<\/p>\n
‘D\/EN’ Ti R13 75
\nEli. I-loIoW\\l’oiul<\/p>\n
EAMAKRTSHNA.\n<\/p>\n
0′!<\/p>\n
HI<\/p>\n
EXTENSIQN,
\nE FE I<\/p>\n
T TI
\nIN CRLP.3092 OF<\/p>\n
:I\\l’lI’\\ (I
\nU1′!-El’-F3<\/p>\n
2002<\/span><\/p>\n
n
\nIn)<\/p>\n
BABASAB RAJESAB PAKALI
\n.5.\/Q BAJESAB Em\ufb01a\ufb01\ufb01l
\n41 YEARS, R\/A TALLURA VII-I-AGE<\/p>\n
SAVPEAT 5′.’ I ‘\u00a3’A.’!’.aL’K ,<\/p>\n
BELGAUM DISTRICT . ‘.\n<\/p>\n
‘ IN CREE\u00bb. 7 “‘ “””””‘<\/p>\n
(By Sri : S K _V_EN”KAT_ — V” ‘ ‘
\nMID I<\/p>\n
swarm or KARNATAKA  ‘D”\n<\/p>\n
32 MARKET poLIc3_sTAwIQN.}._’_ *._ ,
\nBELGAHM DISTRICTi’;_ ;’ ‘\u00abuV R_RESPONDEN<\/p>\n
T comon
\n‘<} '\u00bb;N ALL PETI<\/p>\n
1'10!'-.'$<\/p>\n
:3" Sri. C.H. JAD\ufb02AV : say IR A13 PETITION$)
\ncRL;2.3369i2ao: Is FILED U75. 432 ca.\u00a7.c. BY
\nTHE ADVOCATE *3oR,;mH3_"9EwRs; pnayxne THAT THIS
\nHoN'BLE, counr 'MAYQ.3E' ELEASED T0 QUASH mnz
\nCOMI?I;AINTj. &"*E'IR"–_IN CR';1\\I0v;'221\/96 on THE FILE 0.?
\nTHE MARKET VPQLICE smamxon, BELGAUM, FOR THE
\norrsmcms.PU\ufb02:sHA3Lg"u\/ss. 403, 409, 477{A), 457,
\n471,\u00ab42o R\/wpsEc.34.1pc AND AFTER CHARGE suamm,
\nggexsimggp 'Ag .cc }94\/2000 on THE FILE ov THE
\nJMEC., I; COURT} EELGAUM IN ORBER TO PREVENT THE<\/p>\n
,%BUSE as Paccsss es couaw.\n<\/p>\n
.c3:;p.3o92\/2002 5 FILEB 3\/3. 432 ca.\u00a7.c. BY<\/p>\n
” T’I’I’IE”v4>_AD.VQ\u00a7I\u00a3.-TE FOR THE PETRS. RATING THAT THIS<\/p>\n
. “HON sag  \u00a25\ufb01RT MAY BE PLEASED TD Q\ufb01ASH THE
\n. COMPLAINT’ a FIR IN CR.N0.221\/1996, on THE FILE
\n“\u20ac.>E’ V_ “F;AP;KET POLICE STATION , BELGAUM FOR THE<\/p>\n
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U\/S. 403, 409 477(3), 467,
\n468;… “471, 420 R\/W. 34 OF IPC. AND AFTER CHARGE<\/p>\n
\u00bbAA SHEET, REGISTERED AS CC.NO. 94\/2000 on THE FILE
\n‘w_QF JMFC-II counw, BELGAUM.<\/p>\n
CRI..P.3477\/2002 IS FILED 11\/3. 482 CR.P.C. BY<\/p>\n
I’1\ufb01 El |’I’| DO
\nTHE .:”~;’a.’:’v’O\\…..-a’.’a.’:-.. FOR TH E-‘E’..u.R. .I.’:\\.AYING ‘1’”u.n”J.’ THIS<\/p>\n
HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASI-I THE<\/p>\n
COMPLAINT & FIR IN CR.NO.221\/1996. ON EH51 FILE
\n9: NHEKET EQLICE SEAEEQN, EELEAEE wEG3\ufb01_I\u00a3E<\/p>\n
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U\/ss.4o3, 409 47j}A),V.457,<\/p>\n
Ace M1-r no  –   “-\n<\/p>\n
-.100, -.u.;., -“.0 R;’W. 34 9- IPC. }\u00a2~m_.AE’TEBEV–.C?.A_1?.CE<\/p>\n
SHEET, REGISTERED AS cc.No.94\/2000 om THE EILE of,<\/p>\n
4..-no—‘.– -nu -u.\n<\/p>\n
aJ_1VF\u20ac-Ii CGURT, EELGAUTI Iii UREER  ‘bl’
\nOF PROCESS SCENE OF OFFENCE’  T<\/p>\n
These CRIMINAL spsrxmioxs \u00a2\u00a2m;ng ‘d\ufb01”*\u00a35:
\nHEARING, this day, the .\u00a7’:<':u_rt  t.ha_ f.re'1lowing:'=<\/p>\n
bard  'their
\npetit1on\u00e9:s;Eha.s\u00a2 e1so_:ne"iea&ned 5.9.9.
\n'W2- Thee\u00e9 three crlwwbetitione arise out of<\/p>\n
reg;i,strat.ieri:'j'-of \u00bbE.a4V%":,:_.\u00e9'se "against the petitioners in<\/p>\n
F' C 1i!e.V94.,\/Op …e -..-._f.':., II eourt,
\n.1"s.:—elqam, in C::f=.r~Io.221;'19% of Iviuket Eolice<\/p>\n
'v.,Stai:i.en., '\u00bb.Eelgaum, for offences punishable under<\/p>\n
"3_ geetie\ufb01s gas. 409, 477(A), 467, 468, 471, 420 r\/w<\/p>\n
 Eectibn334 IPC.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
-EAEUSE \u00bb<\/p>\n
.4,<\/p>\n
Except accused nos. 2 3′. 3 bus conductcir-sj, all<\/p>\n
other accused were of the ran1cV.&..__’L:~f’-i\u00e9siipeiice<\/p>\n
constables as on the date of rezjis\u00a2;:re.fi\u00a7’or3E’ <\/p>\n
czrime number against them” “far    ‘<\/p>\n
offences.\n<\/p>\n
4. It is not  en tile
\ncomplaint of   “xvthe above
\ncrime number  ii on 29.3.1995
\nallegingh.  h\ufb01h.i”i91wgi+hshts pertaining to
\nthe   1;: the custody of the
\n were misused by these<\/p>\n
poiaice’  collusion with two has<\/p>\n
.513 3 .h.ppe::ent.’.3g eecuse no 2 ……=ed during tne
\npend;r;.\u00e9\u00a7~ ef the petitien en 31 1.63 and the<\/p>\n
 ab_2~.’iies against him.\n<\/p>\n
 As on the date of .fiJ…1.ng of the Crl.<\/p>\n
“*~3etitions under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking<\/p>\n
sineshing as: th<\/p>\n
was also filed in the concerned police atation.<\/p>\n
Records submitted to the Court by thegwp\u00e9eitijtrtoners<\/p>\n
would reveal a departmental enquiry V  <\/p>\n
against the complainant  xVal;1_.e\u00a3_i;ing; <\/p>\n
that he was careless and
\nnot keeping the bus A-}.;;r;.:_;n\u00a3s~  _sai5e\u00ab:._;’castody
\nallowing m.1′.s-1.:ser of  has ihwarranjtis by the
\nstaff. As a    was given minor<\/p>\n
1-n-In-i as an? AF *.~..m-gm\u00bb-.=’r._ ..-I n’ W!-‘I-H”: it 15:15 1\u00bb-+- n+- r’i:’|”nz’I
\n‘ElI\ufb02LTGXIH\u20aciI W ‘ \\’|& ‘h””‘<v'I\ufb01 Kmdj T ' g\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01 'Iii? I \u00a7l\\f\u00a3('WIL 'HIIB\u00a7f\ufb02C El \\IFOI| W\u20ac"HI<\/p>\n
'an.-\n<\/p>\n
.I I!’ -1 Ana-5!  _   _”V _ _V c’;   .n_1_ _
\n‘5 . 53 1 L53! .’._ .  ‘.I’.’,.1l.LV\ufb01’ J-.-“E SQ ‘~=Ca1: \u00a313 13113<\/p>\n
P)<\/p>\n
enquir=g_i*s_V;oonoernec\u00a7i.._ V”*’1*ni;_s Vwould only go to show
\nthat i\u00e9hen H  was launched against him,
\nsinmltaneoasl1_f*._ ‘a\u00ab.___2’c:\u00abo:i1plaint was registered suo<\/p>\n
moto  V_*(far;vc”LaJ4:\u00e9;J:V””i}\\Vrho was facing a clepartmental<\/p>\n
\ufb02eixqairy, againaitv the accused persons in question.<\/p>\n
 75v’. ,W’n’en t e Court go s throag the eatire<\/p>\n
“‘\u00abreco’rcZ,s3 of the c.c. as stated. above, it is<\/p>\n
 x T noiticed that except submitting the charge sheet<\/p>\n
it   the Court along with the necessary<\/p>\n
investigation papers; right from the time of<\/p>\n
investigation till the time of filing the charge<\/p>\n
sheet, entire investigation was done by the very<\/p>\n
same police inspector against whom _;;epv;L’1.”i:.:ne’ntal<\/p>\n
enquiry was launched with regard ‘to .jr;:ivs1iso’s_4’i of,<\/p>\n
warrants. The a.1legaticn'””i’s. t1\u00a7.at_..”:t’hese’–f;:>oV1ice’ <\/p>\n
constables colluding withiconc:1’1m_Atcrs..
\nof these warrants thoiugh-~..V_theA”ojfficer “i1i=oherge “of<\/p>\n
the poiioe station 1;a(Vi”..’I1t3\u00a7I_\u00a3 ‘ii-,|!\u00a7Ll\u00a7!\ufb01 th, tau<\/p>\n
lm<\/p>\n
‘m’:n-V-:n+-a +”.|’\\ “‘1″|\u00a2 ai’;\\'”.!’!,15’I\u00a3+’$1H13.\u00e9\u00a7’
\nV’T%|L1.I.%H WW’ ‘d..’i W I’? D<\/p>\n
7. f!.’1:’e_V ‘_’J.earne_d:fccnns_eJ,_’ the petitioners
\nthough;   of the Court several
\npoints.’Tliicei\u00a2f:.3n.on–eciisc1o*sui’e of custody of these<\/p>\n
wai’:a:;-ants’  \u00bbthe__:”petitioners and admitted and<\/p>\n
-i-:1r\\+- ”  “‘I”r\\.I’\ufb02 I-1-In-hen-1 -V-nn|.rI|-luau:-u-I “P’\\al\\IIl\u00a3!:|\\f\\:Q 14 1-1
\n” uIu_a?||oJ Iv ‘ ‘-u$cf’h’Tr’i:i’., J: In \u00a7JrIIrI ‘wIII\u20ac\u00a7$ GI’-:f\\::\u00a2[v\u00a7$\u00a75ulx ya EIIJIIQ .&-J1<\/p>\n
 ooore\ufb01oe with the prccecuire, the  need not<\/p>\n
“gone  at this stage for the simple reason<\/p>\n
“~tha.t” ‘ the complainant who was facing departmental<\/p>\n
 AA ggenquiry could. not have fairly investigated the<\/p>\n
V  silegations made against these persons by lodging<\/p>\n
a complaint. Even if he faced a departmental<\/p>\n
enquiry he could have lodged a complaint<\/p>\n
initiating prosecution against the guilty,” As he<\/p>\n
was interested in the matter, in other”aor$e},in<\/p>\n
the anxiety of proving his innocence-fiiti  4_<\/p>\n
possible for the interested person to eaedle the i=<\/p>\n
guilty against the innocenty Zoii<\/p>\n
8. In that vie\ufb01” of the\ufb01gmatterp was the
\ninvestigation weep jooapletely ioonei by an
\ninterested person .whoffWaa\u00a3 raging departmental
\nenquiry, Idez\u00e9jioit\u00e9gijf ‘V  possibility 01:’
\nthe aaio\u00a7_iperaon;{=heing;V_hiaaed during the
\ninveatigationa._–orhereforei placing reliance on
\n  ‘Apex Court in AIR 1995 so
\n2339   STATE or naarmm especially<\/p>\n
a 4nm_”After considering the facts and
\n :vv:”\u00bb\u00ab.oirVcanx’netanoea of the case, it appears<\/p>\n
‘to as that there is discrepancy in the<\/p>\n
V’-iclepoaitions of the No.2 and 3 and in
\n“g the absence of any independent<\/p>\n
C’.\n<\/p>\n
inspire confidence about the
\nreliability of the prosecution case.
\nWe have also noted another disturbning<\/p>\n
feature in this case. PW-3, Siirij
\nChand, head Constable axrestedf’the”
\naccused. and en eeereh being  i.~
\nby him a pistol and the cart1:j,_d\u00a7g’e.e’:ig\u00a7?eifet T
\nrecovered from the accused.  jv2ia._5VVVe’1j\u00a2. A
\nhis complaint e.’-._   :”‘\u00a3’T.’ii::;-“ta—t
\ninforrnation report’ was’-A.i’odged.v–“–tah\u20ac1 “the.
\ncase was ini~t_yi”eted.v.  . V He
\nc:orr;pJ.a.1′.nant  shouJ._c\u00a7.__  not.\u00bb __ have” \u00ab gtogeeded
\nwith the ‘ihveetigetioh he: the case.
\nBut it appears to as thet he was not
\nonly the oom\u00a9iainen\u00a7t4\\wt\ufb01ie case, but<\/p>\n
he 3;.-“:er:’ti_e With. the” ‘ mrestiqation
\neh 4 ‘V ‘ t V s 161
\nVJ’1:’_.”Ev’5.’.’C..{*1:;;g\u00abuoh’.V\u00bbp_teo’ti;n:.i-.\u00bb.i;’1r.Vic::Az1s’VL_ 4a.’reV’~–.
\nallowed. State is at libL3rty..hto4Lifnfestig’ate:hthe”-
\nmatter afresh from th-:.-_’staqc=,_ of c:c;:=\u00a7;sl.aViVi:’1t.:} u”‘.3.a’i.1<\/p>\n
bonds\/surety bonds stah’&:dancelVled’;’h <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O … vs State Of Karnataka By Market … on 28 March, 2008 Author: Manjula Chellur xn THE HIGH COURT or KARNAEAKA, BANGALGRE DATED THIS THE 28TH nay OF MARCH, \u00a7\u00a7b\u00e9fi= PRESENT . ‘ a V THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE”MAN$ULA CHE\ufb023UR ” CRL. pmwxmxous No.3869\/01:5\/W 369\u00e9f2oQ2 \u00a7m\ufb01* V3477\/o2_ = […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-232755","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBabasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O ... vs State Of Karnataka By Market ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O ... vs State Of Karnataka By Market ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-05T05:51:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\\\/O … vs State Of Karnataka By Market … on 28 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-05T05:51:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1451,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\\\/O ... vs State Of Karnataka By Market ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-05T05:51:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\\\/O … vs State Of Karnataka By Market … on 28 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O ... vs State Of Karnataka By Market ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O ... vs State Of Karnataka By Market ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-05T05:51:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O … vs State Of Karnataka By Market … on 28 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-05T05:51:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008"},"wordCount":1451,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008","name":"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O ... vs State Of Karnataka By Market ... on 28 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-05T05:51:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/babasab-rajesab-pakali-so-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-market-on-28-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Babasab Rajesab Pakali S\/O … vs State Of Karnataka By Market … on 28 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232755","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232755\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}