{"id":232839,"date":"2010-11-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010"},"modified":"2014-02-28T00:46:12","modified_gmt":"2014-02-27T19:16:12","slug":"dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH comm or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 9% my or NovEMBr;:\u00a7<t;f ,\nBEFORE  k V'   '\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE \n\nMiscellaneous First Appeal 1V"o__.  \u00a32909  \n\nBETWEEN\n\nDayananda Salian V  \n\nS\/o. Late Krishna Salian \n\nAged about 35 Years A -V * \u00ab\nResiding at Kin.iyarabettuf;. ' _ _ .\nUpinaakote, Varanibzalli Viillage, fj  on t 'V\nUdupi Ta'11.,1i; afid._Di.striot_. _.  \n\n. ..Appel1ant\n\n:';_{By 'sri.'a"s:'sA'ArigaL;ram.)\n\nAND\n\n.1    aya .nS'.Hev_ged.e,\n" Aged about 38 years.\n\n  W'\/o';Nithyaranjandas Shetty,\n\n '  Afnaiitha Nagara,\n Manoi--_pa;=l.\n[__Id'-.1p~i Taluk.\n\n _ 2. z"i"'.}ie Oriental Insurance Company,\n\nV  Rep. by its Divisional Manager,\n' 2"" Floor, Vishnuprakash\nCourt Road.\nUdupi Taluk and District.\n\n... Respondents<\/pre>\n
(By Sri. P B Raju, Adv. for R2,
\nR1 \u00bb~ Served)<\/p>\n
This MFA is \ufb01led U\/S 173(1) of MV
\nJudgment and award dated: 27.Q9.2008″p’assed’*in’–l\\\/IVC” <\/p>\n
No. 394\/2007 on the file of”Ad’ditional\u00ab oiviiiqudge
\n(Sr.Dn.) & Member, MACT, Ud~.;1pi1;”rp*artrly’allowingtiie<\/p>\n
claim petition for compensation and* ‘seeking,<\/p>\n
enhancement of compensatiori.<\/p>\n
This appeal coming poni’fora.Adrr1’issioni_fithis day,
\nthe Court, delivered the foilovsririg: _ <\/p>\n
Thi=isyappe’al’7;__s:  for enhancement of
\ncornpensation  the”‘Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
2. I-I’ea_rd.v  is admitted and with the<\/p>\n
cmfislent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, it<\/p>\n
t   upfor final disposal.\n<\/p>\n
 _For3\u00a7the sake of Convenience parties are referred to<\/p>\n
 x as  are referred to in the claim petition before the<\/p>\n
if   ‘Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
4. Brief facts of the case are:\n<\/p>\n
6\/<\/p>\n
That on 9–ll~–~O6, when the claimant wasgriding<\/p>\n
his motor Cycle bearing registration <\/p>\n
from Kunjai towards Brhamavar side, near Ch.antha_jr <\/p>\n
Krishi Kendra, car bearing relgistrafiol\ufb02 <\/p>\n
5567 came in a rash and negligent”manne1j and <\/p>\n
against his motor cycle. Alsaa”result,._the:’I=clatInant fell’<\/p>\n
down and sustained:~..;nju_rie\u00a7,’\u00a7  hevvlfiled a claim
\npetition beforethe  compensation
\nof 3′ .    judgment
\nand awatd  of ?. 1,041,850\/\u00bb
\n  by the quantum of
\n the Tribunal the claimant is<\/p>\n
in appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.<\/p>\n
‘   ivthiere is no dispute regarding occurrence of<\/p>\n
itaeijidenttf’negligence and liability of the insurer of the<\/p>\n
offending vehicle, the only point that remains for my<\/p>\n
V’ .Vco’n_.sideration in the appeal is:<\/p>\n
Whether the quantum of
\ncompensation awarded by the Tribunal is
\njust and proper or does it call for
\nenhancement?\n<\/p>\n
6\/<\/p>\n
6. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties<\/p>\n
and perusing the award of the ‘l’ribunai, <\/p>\n
View that the compensation awarded by  <\/p>\n
not just and proper, it is on the’}oWe’r side .;ar1dcid\u00abtherefore<\/p>\n
it is deserved to be enhanced.\n<\/p>\n
7. The claimant has sustairi’e_d*the ioliexizingfiinjuries:<\/p>\n
1)<\/p>\n
Fracture it disI.o:;a}i(,;n.’ ff:o.f ”  torsomrietatarsal<\/p>\n
joi:1tS'{R);’foo’t.:::  M<\/p>\n
    {R} foot.\n<\/p>\n
~  (R) foot.\n<\/p>\n
‘ 1  (R) thigh.\n<\/p>\n
=  15X3X1em over (L) thigh.\n<\/p>\n
 about 32(1):}\/2 em over (L) leg.<\/p>\n
vii} 5 7,.\n<\/p>\n
” _ viii)<\/p>\n
iX]<\/p>\n
 avulsion (L) great toe.\n<\/p>\n
Fracture T12, L1, L2, L3 and L5 lumbar
\nspines (CT).\n<\/p>\n
Multiple CLWS over the forearm (R). Injuries<\/p>\n
1,2,3.4, and 8 are grievous in nature.<\/p>\n
&”‘<\/p>\n
Injuries sustained by him are evident from the<\/p>\n
wound certificate — EX.P.3, disability certi\ufb01cate <\/p>\n
medical certificate -\u00bb Ex.P.9, scan report  <\/p>\n
supported by oral evidence of the’c’1airnant,ia’n.ddoctor<\/p>\n
examined as P.Ws.1 and Zpprespectixlfely.<\/p>\n
P.W.2 — doctor__has state’d__in.,_yhis’evidericfe that he
\noperated the clairriant.  of femur and<\/p>\n
assessed permanent: V 1 70\/oz  <\/p>\n
8. cofis,1cie;\u00a7t,:,ngltihtaigiature  injuries, \u20ac25,000\/–
\nawa1{deC1  towards pain and suffering is
\non theiower “itpV”i”s$.deserved to be enhanced, and<\/p>\n
I yaiwara R\u00e9.5o,,ooo\/A4 under this head.<\/p>\n
i  i.  \/– awarded by the Tribunal towards<\/p>\n
linjedicvalllefxpenses is as per medical bills produced by<\/p>\n
 A the”claimant for Rs.46,844\/–, the same is just and<\/p>\n
  ‘Vprloper and therefore, it does not call for enhancement.<\/p>\n
l 10. Claimant was treated as inpatient for 18 days in<\/p>\n
Mahesh hospital, Brhrriavar, and continued treatment<\/p>\n
QK ‘<\/p>\n
unhappiness which the claimant has to undergo for the<\/p>\n
rest of his life. 315,000\/– awarded by th.e__’4ff’rib’una.l<\/p>\n
towards loss of amenities is on the lower sidev and it’  V’ <\/p>\n
deserved to be enhanced by \u00a7?._<\/p>\n
award ? . 20,000\/– under this <\/p>\n
13. Claimant is aged  33  0.011}\/Iliiltiplierl<\/p>\n
applicable to his   income is
\nassessed at  doctor has
\nstated,   of 17%. Loss of
\nearning   55\/0. So future loss of
\nincoriie \/-i (\u20ac3,500\/\u00ab x 15\/ 100<\/p>\n
x 12 xisiand it <\/p>\n
   ***** “awarded by the Tribunal towards<\/p>\n
  “futuire”\u00ab:nedica1 expenses is just and proper and there is<\/p>\n
no scope for enhancement.\n<\/p>\n
 AA 0. -Thus the claimant is entitled for the following<\/p>\n
‘ ~..VVco:ripensation:\n<\/p>\n
1] Pain and suffering ?. 50,000 \/ ~\n<\/p>\n
2) Medical expenses 3. =i16,850\/ —\n<\/p>\n
3) Incidental expenses ? . 5,000 \/ —<\/p>\n
4) Towards loss of income
\nduring laid up period ?’ 14,0xO0_\/’-_<\/p>\n
5) Towards loss of amenities ? 2O,’f)O”O’\/:’~; ..<\/p>\n
6) Future loss of income 1′.\n<\/p>\n
7) Future medial expenses ‘R’ V A<\/p>\n
. “”~,.l0{G00\/~’  it<\/p>\n
Total r \u00ab    <\/p>\n
16. Accordingly the  alloiyed  <\/p>\n
Judgment and award of  ‘modified to the
\nextent stated herein”4’ah_ove;.jdheu is entitled for
\na total    as against
\n?. 1.04.8001\/To with interest at
\n6%  of ?. 141,800\/~
\nfromizithe pl  petition till the date of<\/p>\n
realiosatioln,_:e>;cl.udi~ng”‘ interest for the delayed period of<\/p>\n
.. ..  _   in filingthe appeal.\n<\/p>\n
  Vghdlsurance Co. is directed to deposit the<\/p>\n
enhalnceld compensation amount with interest within<\/p>\n
  months from the date of receipt of a copy of this<\/p>\n
 judgment, excluding interest for the delayed period of<\/p>\n
108 days in filing the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
18. Out of the enhanced compensation 80%”-.._with<\/p>\n
proportionate interest is ordered to be investe_d:Vi11u:<\/p>\n
in any nationalized or scheduled Bank in””t_i:ie jV’na”m’e’  V’ <\/p>\n
the claimant for a period of  <\/p>\n
option to withdraw interest ‘periodically;  ” <\/p>\n
remaining amount with “‘p_roportion_ate-7 interest is<\/p>\n
ordered to be re1eas’e:d”‘in his <\/p>\n
No order as_ to ;_ciost’s~.;\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda IN THE HIGH comm or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9% my or NovEMBr;:\u00a7<t;f , BEFORE k V' ' THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Miscellaneous First Appeal 1V"o__. \u00a32909 BETWEEN Dayananda Salian V S\/o. Late Krishna Salian Aged […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-232839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-27T19:16:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-27T19:16:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":841,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-27T19:16:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-27T19:16:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-27T19:16:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010"},"wordCount":841,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010","name":"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-27T19:16:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dayananda-salian-vs-vijaya-s-hegede-38-years-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dayananda Salian vs Vijaya .S.Hegede, 38 Years on 9 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232839"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232839\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}