{"id":233381,"date":"2007-05-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-05-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007"},"modified":"2016-12-29T06:14:57","modified_gmt":"2016-12-29T00:44:57","slug":"jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007","title":{"rendered":"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity &#8230; on 15 May, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Chattisgarh High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity &#8230; on 15 May, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n         IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR         \n\n        WP No 2507 of 2005\n\n        Jhadu  Ram\n\n                             ...Petitioner\n\n                                VERSUS\n\n        1 Chhattisgarh  State  Electricity Board\n\n        2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board\n\n                             ...Respondents\n\n\n!       Shri H B Agrawal Sr Advocate with Shri J K Gupta Advocate for the petitioner\n\n^       Shri P S Koshy Advocate for the respondents\n\n        Honble Justice Shri Satish K Agnihotri\n\n        Dated: 15\/05\/2007\n\n:       Order\n\n\n        WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF         \n                           INDIA.\n\n\n                            ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>             (Passed on 15th  day of May, 2007)<\/p>\n<p>  1.   By  this petition, the petitioner seeks a relief that<br \/>\n        the petitioner be granted pension after his taking services<br \/>\n        as daily wager into account for calculating the minimum<br \/>\n        qualifying 10 years in service to entitle the petitioner for<br \/>\n        grant of pension and gratuity also.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   The indisputable facts, in nutshell, are that the<br \/>\npetitioner was engaged in the service as daily wager from<br \/>\n24.9.1974. The petitioner was regularised w.e.f 24.12.1986.<br \/>\nThereafter, vide order dated 27.10.1990 (Annexure P\/1), the<br \/>\npetitioner was appointed as work charged driver temporarily<br \/>\non time scale of pay of Rs. 1090-1950. The petitioner<br \/>\nretired from service w.e.f 25.03.1995 on attaining the age<br \/>\nof superannuation. The petitioner was communicated letter<br \/>\ndated 29.11.1995 (Annexure P\/3) that the petitioner was not<br \/>\nentitled to grant of pension as the petitioner has not<br \/>\ncompleted the minimum required 10 years for entitlement of<br \/>\npension.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.   Shri H.B.Agrawal, learned senior counsel appearing with<br \/>\nShri Pankaj Agrawal, would submit that the petitioner was<br \/>\nengaged as daily wager w.e.f 24.09.1974. Admittedly,<br \/>\nthereafter, the services of the petitioner was regularised<br \/>\nw.e.f. 24.12.1986. Learned counsel further relied on an<br \/>\norder dated 17.12.1984 passed by the Labour Court, wherein<br \/>\nthe Labour Court directed to reinstate  the applicant with<br \/>\ncontinuity of service on his former post. Thus, the<br \/>\npetitioner is entitled to pension on counting his service as<br \/>\ndaily wager for the purpose of pension.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.   Per contra, Shri Koshy, learned counsel appearing for<br \/>\nthe respondents would submit that the respondent Board has<br \/>\nadopted M.P.\/C.G. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976<br \/>\n(hereinafter referred to as &#8220;the Rules, 1976&#8221;). As per the<br \/>\nrule, the period spent by the petitioner as daily wager<br \/>\ncannot be counted for his entitlement to pensionery<br \/>\nbenefits. The petitioner was regularised as Work Charged<br \/>\ncleaner w.e.f 24.12.1986 and the petitioner retired on<br \/>\n25.03.1995. Thus the petitioner has not completed the<br \/>\nminimum 10 years qualifying service as entitlement to<br \/>\npension.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the<br \/>\nparties, perused the pleadings and documents appended<br \/>\nthereto. It is evident that the petitioner was not born in<br \/>\nservice till 24.12.1986 when he was regularised. Engagement<br \/>\nof the petitioner on daily wages cannot be counted as<br \/>\nservice in the department. It is well settled principle of<br \/>\nlaw that any appointment dehors the constitutional scheme of<br \/>\nthe employment and not in consonance with the provisions of<br \/>\nlaw on daily wages, contract or temporary, is not legal and<br \/>\nthe employee does not acquire any right to continue in<br \/>\nservice and other benefits of the regular service.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.   With regard to the contention of the learned counsel<br \/>\nappearing for the petitioner that the Labour Court, vide<br \/>\norder dated 17.12.1984 directed the reinstatement of the<br \/>\npetitioner with continuity of service on the former post. It<br \/>\nis clear that the Labour Court has directed to reinstate the<br \/>\nservices of the petitioner on daily wages on his former post<br \/>\nand the said service cannot be counted as regular service.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.   Sub Rule (2) of Rule 12:- Commencement of qualifying<br \/>\nservice, read with Sub Rule (2) of Rule 43:- Amount of<br \/>\nPension, of the M.P. Civil Services  (Pension) Rules, 1976,<br \/>\nreads as under:\n<\/p>\n<pre>        \"Rule    12    (1)        xxx             xxx\n        xxx                    xxx\n                (2)  Subject  to  the  provisions  of\n<\/pre>\n<p>                these rules, qualifying service of  a<br \/>\n                Government  servant  shall   commence<br \/>\n                from the date he takes charge of  the<br \/>\n                post  to  which he is first appointed<br \/>\n                either   substantively   or   in   an<br \/>\n                officiating or temporary capacity.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<pre>          Rule    43    (1)       xxx             xxx\n          xxx                    xxx\n                  (2)  In  the  case of a  Government\n<\/pre>\n<p>                servant  retiring in accordance  with<br \/>\n                the  provisions of these rules  after<br \/>\n                completing qualifying service of  not<br \/>\n                less  than  10 years, the  amount  of<br \/>\n                pension  shall be appropriate  amount<br \/>\n                as set out below, namely:-&#8230;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>  8.   On perusal of the relevant provisions of Pension Rules,<br \/>\n        1976, the qualifying service for grant of pension and other<br \/>\n        retiral benefits is 10 years. Admittedly, the petitioner was<br \/>\n        regularised on his service w.e.f 24.12.1986 and  the<br \/>\n        petitioner retired on 25.3.1995. The petitioner is thus not<br \/>\n        entitled to pension under the provisions of Pension Rules,<br \/>\n        1976.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.   The petitioner has approached this Court not<br \/>\nimmediately after retirement from service i.e. 25.03.1995.<br \/>\nThe petitioner has slept over his right and approached this<br \/>\nCourt after a period of about 10 years with unexplained,<br \/>\ninordinate delay.\n<\/p>\n<p>10.  The Supreme Court, in Burn Standard Co. Ltd. &amp; Others<br \/>\nVs. Dinabandhu Majumdar &amp; another1 observed as under:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                &#8220;The  very conduct of non-raising  of<br \/>\n                an  objection  in the matter  by  the<br \/>\n                employee,  in  our  view,  should  be<br \/>\n                sufficient reason for the High Court,<br \/>\n                not to entertain such applications on<br \/>\n                grounds of acquiescence, undue  delay<br \/>\n                and laches.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>  11.  The Supreme Court, in Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd.\n<\/p>\n<p>        through its Chairman &amp; Managing Director &amp; another Vs.<br \/>\n        K.Thangappan &amp; another2 observed as under:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               &#8220;Delay or laches is one of the factors<br \/>\n               which  is to be borne in mind  by  the<br \/>\n               High  Court  when they exercise  their<br \/>\n               discretionary powers under Article 226<br \/>\n               of the Constitution. In an appropriate<br \/>\n               case  the  High  Court may  refuse  to<br \/>\n               invoke  its  extraordinary  powers  if<br \/>\n               there  is  such negligence or omission<br \/>\n               on the part of the applicant to assert<br \/>\n               his right as taken in conjunction with<br \/>\n               the    lapse   of   time   and   other<br \/>\n               circumstances, cause prejudice to  the<br \/>\n               opposite party. Even where fundamental<br \/>\n               right  is involved the matter is still<br \/>\n               within the discretion of the Court  as<br \/>\n               pointed  out  in  the Durg  Prasad  V.<br \/>\n               Chief   Controller  of   Imports   and<br \/>\n               exports. Of course, the discretion has<br \/>\n               to   be   exercised   judicially   and<br \/>\n               reasonably.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>  12.  The High Court, in exercise of its discretion, does not<br \/>\n        ordinarily assist the tardy and the indolent and the<br \/>\n        acquiescent and the lethargic as the belated approach may<br \/>\n        certainly breach the rights of others.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.  Looking from all angles, this petition has no merit and<br \/>\nis accordingly dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chattisgarh High Court Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity &#8230; on 15 May, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP No 2507 of 2005 Jhadu Ram &#8230;Petitioner VERSUS 1 Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board &#8230;Respondents ! Shri H B Agrawal Sr Advocate with Shri J K Gupta [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-233381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chattisgarh-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity ... on 15 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity ... on 15 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-05-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-29T00:44:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity &#8230; on 15 May, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-05-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-29T00:44:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007\"},\"wordCount\":933,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Chattisgarh High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007\",\"name\":\"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity ... on 15 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-05-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-29T00:44:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity &#8230; on 15 May, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity ... on 15 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity ... on 15 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-05-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-29T00:44:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity &#8230; on 15 May, 2007","datePublished":"2007-05-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-29T00:44:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007"},"wordCount":933,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Chattisgarh High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007","name":"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity ... on 15 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-05-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-29T00:44:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jhadu-ram-vs-2-chhattisgarh-state-electricity-on-15-may-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhadu Ram vs 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity &#8230; on 15 May, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=233381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/233381\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=233381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=233381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=233381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}